Reversed cyclic loading tests of precast concrete columns

1991 ◽  
pp. 615-622
Author(s):  
Claude F. Pilette ◽  
Denis Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Precast Concrete ◽  
Concrete Columns ◽  
Reversed Cyclic Loading ◽  
Loading Tests ◽  
Cyclic Loading Tests ◽  
Reversed Cyclic

scholarly journals Low reversed cyclic loading tests for integrated precast structure of lightweight wall with single-row reinforcement under a lightweight steel frame

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 180321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Suizi ◽  
Cao Wanlin ◽  
Zhang Yuchen
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Steel Frame ◽  
Recycled Concrete ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Reversed Cyclic Loading ◽  
Lightweight Steel ◽  
Loading Tests ◽  
Precast Structures ◽  
Cyclic Loading Tests ◽  
Reversed Cyclic

Given the development of precast structures for low-rise residential buildings, this study explores a new structure—namely, an integrated precast structure of lightweight recycled concrete wall with single-row reinforcement—under a lightweight steel frame filled with recycled concrete (integrated precast structure for short). The lightweight steel frame and lightweight wall cooperate to bear the forces. The applied concealed bracing, either a rebar bracing or a steel plate bracing, increases the shear resistance of the wall. The lightweight steel frame is designed to bear the vertical loading, whereas the seismic load in the horizontal direction is jointly borne by the frame and wall. This study presents the results of low reversed cyclic loading tests on nine specimens of integrated precast structures. An analysis is then carried out to investigate the mechanical properties of the specimens; based on these results, a formula for the force-bearing performance of the inclined section is developed. The results show satisfactory performance as an integrated piece; the proposed structure has two seismic lines of defence, with the lightweight wall restraint by the side frame being the first line and the steel frame being the second line. Because the failure of the wall can be categorized as shear failure, the restraint of the lightweight steel frame significantly reduces the potential damage of the wall. As the beams and columns of the steel frame tend to bend against failure, the wall filling helps resist sliding. Therefore, the reinforced joints of the connecting beams and columns show no visible signs of damage, indicating that the connection between the beams and columns is reliable. The narrow spacing of rebars and the setting of concealed bracing contribute to the increase in ductility and energy efficiency of the integrated structure and the evident reduction in the failure process. Furthermore, the recycled concrete increases the seismic resistance of the structure.

Behavior of HPFRC Connections for Precast Concrete Frames Under Reversed Cyclic Loading

PCI Journal ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 58-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa M. Vasconez ◽  
Antoine E. Naaman ◽  
James K. Wight
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Precast Concrete ◽  
Concrete Frames ◽  
Reversed Cyclic Loading ◽  
Reversed Cyclic

Experimental study of precast beam-to-column joints with steel connectors under cyclic loading

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 2822-2834
Author(s):  
Xian Rong ◽  
Hongwei Yang ◽  
Jianxin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Energy Dissipation ◽  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Precast Concrete ◽  
Displacement Ductility ◽  
Reversed Cyclic Loading ◽  
Column Joint ◽  
Energy Dissipation Capacity ◽  
Reversed Cyclic ◽  
The Web

This article investigated the seismic performance of a new type of precast concrete beam-to-column joint with a steel connector for easy construction. Five interior beam-to-column joints, four precast concrete specimens, and one monolithic joint were tested under reversed cyclic loading. The main variables were the embedded H-beam length, web plate or stiffening rib usage, and concrete usage in the connection part. The load–displacement hysteresis curves were recorded during the test, and the behavior was investigated based on displacement ductility, deformability, skeleton curves, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation capacity. The results showed that the proposed beam-to-column joint with the web plate in the steel connector exhibited satisfactory behavior in terms of ductility, load capacity, and energy dissipation capacity under reversed cyclic loading, and the performance was ductile because of the yielding of the web plate. Therefore, the proposed joint with the web plate could be used in high seismic regions. The proposed joint without the web plate exhibited similar behavior to the monolithic specimen, indicating that this joint could be used in low or moderate seismic zones. Furthermore, the utilization of the web plate was vital to the performance of this system.

SEISMIC ENHANCEMENT OF REINFORCED-CONCRETE COLUMNS BY REBAR-RESTRAINING COLLARS

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 1250015 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANAT RUANGRASSAMEE ◽  
ARCHAWIN SAWAROJ
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Concrete Columns ◽  
Bridge Columns ◽  
Concrete Bridge ◽  
Reinforcing Bars ◽  
Plastic Hinges ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Bridge ◽  
Loading Tests ◽  
Cyclic Loading Tests

When reinforced-concrete columns are subjected to lateral cyclic loading, columns usually suffer failures at plastic hinges. If the buckling of longitudinal reinforcements at plastic hinges can be prevented or delayed, columns are expected to carry gravity loads at a higher ductility level. In this study, the rebar-restraining collar (RRC) was developed to improve the post-buckling behavior of longitudinal reinforcements. The behavior was investigated under monotonic loading tests of reinforcing bars with the RRCs and the cyclic loading tests of two reinforced-concrete bridge columns with and without RRCs. From the monotonic loading test, it was found that the RRCs significantly improved the post-yielding behavior of longitudinal reinforcing bars. The ductility and energy dissipation of longitudinal reinforcing bars with RRCs was significantly higher than that of the bare bar. Then, cyclic loading tests of two reinforced-concrete bridge columns were conducted. The cross section of columns was 0.4 m × 0.4 m, and the effective height was 2.15 m. The ratio of longitudinal reinforcing bars was 0.0123, and the volumetric ratio of transverse reinforcement was 0.00424. The column with RRCs did not have buckling of longitudinal reinforcements and had the ductility enhancement of about 17%, comparing to the column without RRCs. One evident benefit of using the RRCs is to control damage at plastic hinges of columns. Hence, the repair cost of columns after an earthquake can be reduced.

Experimental Research on the Influence of the Pile Type and Stirrup on the Seismic Performance of PHC Piles

2012 ◽  
Vol 256-259 ◽  
pp. 2079-2084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tie Cheng Wang ◽  
An Gao ◽  
Hai Long Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Energy Dissipation ◽  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
High Strength Concrete ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Loading Tests ◽  
Energy Dissipation Capacity ◽  
Pile Type ◽  
Cyclic Loading Tests ◽  
Reversed Cyclic

The influence of the pile type and the stirrup on the seismic performance was evaluated based on the results of reversed cyclic loading tests on the four prestressed high strength concrete (PHC) piles. It is indicated that the AB-type pile has the better seismic performance than the A-type pile from the results. The bearing capacity does not increase obviously with decreasing of the stirrup spacing and increasing of the stirrup diameter. The degradation of stiffness does not decrease significantly with decreasing of the stirrup spacing and increasing of the stirrup diameter. The energy dissipation capacity is improved with increasing of the stirrup diameter and decreasing of the stirrup spacing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document