A Quality Rating Scale for Patients in Complex Situations

Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Frühauf ◽  
Reinhard Kopiez ◽  
Friedrich Platz
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Göllner ◽  
Wolfgang Wagner ◽  
Jacquelynne S. Eccles ◽  
Ulrich Trautwein

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Bucci ◽  
Samantha Hartley ◽  
Katherine Knott ◽  
Jessica Raphael ◽  
Katherine Berry
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 619-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn L Tate ◽  
Michael Perdices ◽  
Ulrike Rosenkoetter ◽  
Donna Wakim ◽  
Kali Godbee ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Kocsis ◽  
Andrew J. Gerber ◽  
Barbara Milrod ◽  
Steven P. Roose ◽  
Jacques Barber ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda S Phillips ◽  
Charles A Guarnaccia

Treatment of those with obesity, prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes often yields initial health improvements, but gains erode over time. A systematic search of self-determination theory and motivational interviewing papers for the above populations was conducted, yielding 54 publications and 42 independent samples. Interventions to treat overweight and obesity ( n = 15), prediabetes ( n = 4), and type 2 diabetes ( n = 23) are summarized and evaluated using the Quality Rating Scale. While the results of these studies are mixed, the majority of the interventions resulted in health benefits. Suggestions for future research are discussed.


2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murad Alam ◽  
Jean DesJardin ◽  
Kenneth A. Arndt ◽  
Jeffrey S. Dover ◽  
Robert M. Hodapp ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Q. Valenzuela ◽  
J. C. G. Reyes

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The General Image Quality Equation (GIQE) is an analytical tool derived by regression modelling that is routinely employed to gauge the interpretability of raw and processed images, computing the most popular quantitative metric to evaluate image quality; the National Image Interpretability Rating Scale (NIIRS). There are three known versions of this equation; GIQE&amp;nbsp;3, GIQE&amp;nbsp;4 and GIQE&amp;nbsp;5, but the last one is scarcely known. The variety of versions, their subtleties, discontinuities and incongruences, generate confusion and problems among users. The first objective of this paper is to identify typical sources of confusion in the use of the GIQE, suggesting novel solutions to the main problems found in its application and presenting the derivation of a continuous form of GIQE&amp;nbsp;4, denominated GIQE&amp;nbsp;4C, that provides better correlation with GIQE&amp;nbsp;3 and GIQE&amp;nbsp;5. The second objective of this paper is to compare the predictions of GIQE&amp;nbsp;4C and GIQE&amp;nbsp;5, regarding the maximum image quality rating that can be achieved by image processing techniques. It is concluded that the transition from GIQE&amp;nbsp;4 to GIQE&amp;nbsp;5 is a major paradigm shift in image quality metrics, because it reduces the benefit of image processing techniques and enhances the importance of the raw image and its signal to noise ratio.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document