Dose-dense Chemotherapy Versus Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy as First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Author(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16509-e16509
Author(s):  
Alexandra Tjulandina ◽  
Marina Stenina ◽  
Ilya Pokataev ◽  
Mikhail Fedyanin ◽  
Alexey Tryakin ◽  
...  

e16509 Background: First line dose-dense (dd) regimens improve PFS in patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer, but also increase hematological toxicity, peripheral neuropathy and usage of G-CSF. Nowadays it is unknown which pts benefit from this treatment. Methods: The analysis included 156 pts with ovarian carcinoma stages Ic-IV, who received paclitaxel (Ptx) and platinum agents in first line chemotherapy (CT) from 1996 to 2010 in our center. Retrospective group contained 91 pts, who were administered standard regimens (Ptx 175 mg/m2 + Carboplatin (C) AUC5-6 /Cisplatin (DDP) 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). Prospective group included 65 pts. Forty of them received 9 cycles Ptx 150 mg/m2+DDP 50 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, 25 pts were given 6 cycles Ptx 80 mg/m21,8,15 days + C AUC6 every 3 weeks. Results: Median PFS in the dd (12.5 months) and the standard arms (13.3 months) were not statistically significantly different (p = 0.6, HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.61-1.37). Multivariate analysis revealed the optimality (p=0.006) and time (p = 0.008) of cytoreduction were found as the strongest factors exerted on PFS and could take effect on choice of CT regimen. Median PFS was longer in pts with primary optimal cytoreduction (26.3 months) than in group with primary non optimal, interval debulking or without any surgery treatment (10.9 months) (p < 0.0001, HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.23-0.55). The dd regimens prolonged PFS in comparison with the standard arm in pts with favorable prognosis (primary optimal cytoreduction): median was not reached vs 15.1 months respectively (p = 0.02, HR 0.36; 95%CI 0.13-1.2). Meanwhile, median PFS in unfavorable prognostic group was not different between 2 arms: 10.3 vs 11.5 months respectively (p = 0.4 HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.8-2.02). Conclusions: First-line dd statistically significantly prolong PFS in pts with primary optimal cytoreduction comparing with standard conventional CT. It is necessary to validate this predictive factor in prospective trial.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30) ◽  
pp. 3374-3382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Anne Floquet ◽  
Jae-Weon Kim ◽  
Joern Rau ◽  
Josep M. del Campo ◽  
...  

PurposePazopanib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1/-2/-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) -α/-β, and c-Kit. Preclinical and clinical studies support VEGFR and PDGFR as targets for advanced ovarian cancer treatment. This study evaluated the role of pazopanib maintenance therapy in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease did not progress during first-line chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsNine hundred forty patients with histologically confirmed cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, International Federation Gynecology Obstetrics (FIGO) stages II-IV, no evidence of progression after primary therapy consisting of surgery and at least five cycles of platinum-taxane chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg once per day or placebo for up to 24 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival by RECIST 1.0 assessed by the investigators.ResultsMaintenance pazopanib prolonged progression-free survival compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91; P = .0021; median, 17.9 v 12.3 months, respectively). Interim survival analysis based on events in 35.6% of the population did not show any significant difference. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of hypertension (30.8%), neutropenia (9.9%), liver-related toxicity (9.4%), diarrhea (8.2%), fatigue (2.7%), thrombocytopenia (2.5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (1.9%) were significantly higher in the pazopanib arm. Treatment discontinuation related to adverse events was higher among patients treated with pazopanib (33.3%) compared with placebo (5.6%).ConclusionPazopanib maintenance therapy provided a median improvement of 5.6 months (HR, 0.77) in progression-free survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have not progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Overall survival data to this point did not suggest any benefit. Additional analysis should help to identify subgroups of patients in whom improved efficacy may balance toxicity (NCT00866697).


Author(s):  
Dirk Olaf Bauerschlag ◽  
Felix Hilpert ◽  
Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein ◽  
Walter Jonat ◽  
Jacobus Pfisterer ◽  
...  


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5033-LBA5033 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pignata ◽  
G. Scambia ◽  
A. Savarese ◽  
R. Sorio ◽  
E. Breda ◽  
...  

LBA5033 Background: CP is standard first-line chemotherapy for AOC. MITO-2 (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer) is an academic multicenter randomized phase III study, testing whether C-PLD is more effective than CP. Methods: AOC chemo-naïve patients (pts), stage IC-IV, aged≤75, ECOG PS≤2, were randomized to CP (C AUC5 + P 175 mg/m2,d1q3w) or to C-PLD (C AUC5 + PLD 30 mg/m2,d1q3w), both for 6 cycles. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate, toxicity and quality of life (QoL). To have 80% power in detecting a 0.80 HR in PFS, with 2-sided α error 0.05, 632 events were needed and 820 pts were planned. Response rate and toxicity have been reported at ASCO 2009 (abs #LBA5508). All analyses are based on intention to treat. Results: From Jan ’03 to Nov ’07, 820 pts were randomized, 410 to each arm. Median age was 57 yrs (range 21-77). Stage III (60%) and IV (21%) were prevalent. A plateau in PFS events was reached before obtaining the planned number. Thus, following an IDMC recommendation, the final analysis was done with 556 events occurred as of December 31, 2009. This size is consistent with HR to be detected equal to 0.79, with 80% power. With a median follow-up of 40.2 months, median PFS was 19.0 and 16.8 months with C-PLD and CP, respectively (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.81-1.13, log-rank p value=0.58). Lack of significant difference was confirmed (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.81-1.14) at multivariable analysis adjusted by stage, PS, residual disease, age and size of the institution. There was no heterogeneity of treatment effect among major subgroups. With 313 deaths recorded, median OS was 61.6 and 53.2 months with C-PLD and CP, respectively (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.72-1.12, log-rank p value=0.32). QoL data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In the MITO-2 trial, C-PLD was not found to be superior to CP, which remains the standard first-line chemotherapy for AOC.However, given the observed confidence interval and the different toxicity profile, C-PLD could be considered an alternative to standard therapy. Study was partially supported by Schering-Plough. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document