Carboplatin (C) plus paclitaxel (P) versus carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC): Final analysis of the MITO-2 randomized multicenter trial.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5033-LBA5033 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pignata ◽  
G. Scambia ◽  
A. Savarese ◽  
R. Sorio ◽  
E. Breda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

LBA5033 Background: CP is standard first-line chemotherapy for AOC. MITO-2 (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer) is an academic multicenter randomized phase III study, testing whether C-PLD is more effective than CP. Methods: AOC chemo-naïve patients (pts), stage IC-IV, aged≤75, ECOG PS≤2, were randomized to CP (C AUC5 + P 175 mg/m2,d1q3w) or to C-PLD (C AUC5 + PLD 30 mg/m2,d1q3w), both for 6 cycles. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate, toxicity and quality of life (QoL). To have 80% power in detecting a 0.80 HR in PFS, with 2-sided α error 0.05, 632 events were needed and 820 pts were planned. Response rate and toxicity have been reported at ASCO 2009 (abs #LBA5508). All analyses are based on intention to treat. Results: From Jan ’03 to Nov ’07, 820 pts were randomized, 410 to each arm. Median age was 57 yrs (range 21-77). Stage III (60%) and IV (21%) were prevalent. A plateau in PFS events was reached before obtaining the planned number. Thus, following an IDMC recommendation, the final analysis was done with 556 events occurred as of December 31, 2009. This size is consistent with HR to be detected equal to 0.79, with 80% power. With a median follow-up of 40.2 months, median PFS was 19.0 and 16.8 months with C-PLD and CP, respectively (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.81-1.13, log-rank p value=0.58). Lack of significant difference was confirmed (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.81-1.14) at multivariable analysis adjusted by stage, PS, residual disease, age and size of the institution. There was no heterogeneity of treatment effect among major subgroups. With 313 deaths recorded, median OS was 61.6 and 53.2 months with C-PLD and CP, respectively (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.72-1.12, log-rank p value=0.32). QoL data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In the MITO-2 trial, C-PLD was not found to be superior to CP, which remains the standard first-line chemotherapy for AOC.However, given the observed confidence interval and the different toxicity profile, C-PLD could be considered an alternative to standard therapy. Study was partially supported by Schering-Plough. [Table: see text]

First-Line Chemotherapy With Epirubicin, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Phase I/II Study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. du Bois ◽  
H. J. Lück ◽  
T. Bauknecht ◽  
W. Meier ◽  
B. Richter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gynäkologische Onkologie ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: Despite the progress that has been achieved over the years, survival rates in patients with advanced ovarian cancer are still disappointing. New methods to improve the efficiency of first-line chemotherapy are warranted. One method to improve results is to add more non–cross-resistant drugs to platinum-paclitaxel combination regimens. Anthracyclines are among the candidates for incorporation as the “third drug” into first-line regimens for advanced ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a phase I/II trial with escalating doses of epirubicin (60, 75, and 90 mg/m2) combined with fixed doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin in 27 previously untreated patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at dose level 2 (75 mg/m2 epirubicin) and consisted of myelosuppression (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia). No dose-limiting, nonhematologic toxicities were observed. The maximum tolerable dose was epirubicin 60 mg/m2 (E) combined with a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (T) and carboplatin AUC 5 (Carbo). Preliminary analysis indicated promising activity against ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: The three-drug combination ET-Carbo, given according to the outlined dose and schedule, should be considered for further phase III evaluation. A randomized German-French intergroup trial comparing ET-Carbo with carboplatin-paclitaxel has already been initiated.

Prognostic impact of the time interval between primary surgery and start of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Analysis of prospective randomized phase III trials

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5514-5514
Author(s):  
S. Mahner ◽  
A. Staehle ◽  
C. zu Eulenburg ◽  
K. Wegscheider ◽  
A. Reuss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

5514 Background: Primary surgery followed by platinum-taxane chemotherapy is the standard therapy of advanced ovarian cancer. It is not clear, whether the time interval between surgery and start of first line chemotherapy (time to chemo - TTC) has an impact on the clinical outcome. Methods: Individual patient data meta-analysis of three prospective randomized AGO-OVAR/GINECO trials (AGO OVAR 3, 5, and 7) conducted between 1995 and 2002 to investigate platinum-taxane based chemotherapy regimens in advanced ovarian cancer. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to evaluate the prognostic impact of different variables on survival; TTC was introduced as a continuous variable. Results: A total of 3,326 patients were analyzed. Chemotherapy was started within 8 weeks after surgery. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.91 months (95% CI: 17.15–18.73 months) and median overall survival (OS) 37.83 months (95% CI: 36.57–38.90 months). The median TTC was 19 days (95% CI: 18–19 days, range 1–56 days). By multivariate analysis of the total cohort, there was no significant association between TTC and PFS (p = 0.131) or OS (p = 0.372). In the subgroup of patients with no residual tumor after debulking surgery (n = 1.101), a significant and independent correlation between early start of chemotherapy and improved overall survival was observed (p = 0.022). Conclusions: Our analysis represents the largest study investigating treatment delivery and outcome in ovarian cancer. The time interval between primary surgery and start of first line chemotherapy seems to have no general impact in all patients. However, it could be demonstrated for the first time that a delayed start of chemotherapy was independently associated with decreased overall survival in patients with complete surgical debulking. As previously shown for other biological factors in ovarian cancer, the presence of residual tumor after surgery seems to prevail over the prognostic impact of therapy initiation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin Plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin As First-Line Treatment for Patients With Ovarian Cancer: The MITO-2 Randomized Phase III Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27) ◽  
pp. 3628-3635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Pignata ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Gabriella Ferrandina ◽  
Antonella Savarese ◽  
Roberto Sorio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose Carboplatin/paclitaxel is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer-2 (MITO-2), an academic multicenter phase III trial, tested whether carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was more effective than standard chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IC to IV ovarian cancer (age ≤ 75 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2) were randomly assigned to carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 or to carboplatin AUC 5 plus PLD 30 mg/m2, every 3 weeks for six cycles. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). With 632 events in 820 enrolled patients, the study would have 80% power to detect a 0.80 hazard ratio (HR) of PFS. Results Eight hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned. Disease stages III and IV were prevalent. Occurrence of PFS events substantially slowed before obtaining the planned number. Therefore, in concert with the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, final analysis was performed with 556 events, after a median follow-up of 40 months. Median PFS times were 19.0 and 16.8 months with carboplatin/PLD and carboplatin/paclitaxel, respectively (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = .58). Median overall survival times were 61.6 and 53.2 months with carboplatin/PLD and carboplatin/paclitaxel, respectively (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.12; P = .32). Carboplatin/PLD produced a similar response rate but different toxicity (less neurotoxicity and alopecia but more hematologic adverse effects). There was no relevant difference in global quality of life after three and six cycles. Conclusion Carboplatin/PLD was not superior to carboplatin/paclitaxel, which remains the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. However, given the observed CIs and the different toxicity, carboplatin/PLD could be considered an alternative to standard therapy.

scholarly journals First-line PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: summary of an ESMO Open - Cancer Horizons round-table discussion

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e001110
Author(s):  
Susana Banerjee ◽  
Antonio Gonzalez-Martin ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Domenica Lorusso ◽  
Kathleen N Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is the latest breakthrough in the management of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. The results of the SOLO-1 trial in 2018 led to European Medicines Agency and Food and Drug Administration approval of olaparib as first-line maintenance therapy in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation, establishing a new standard of care. Subsequently, the results of three phase III trials (PRIMA, PAOLA-1, VELIA) evaluating the use of first-line PARP inhibitors beyond patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and as combination strategies were presented in 2019, leading to the recent approval of maintenance niraparib irrespective of biomarker status and olaparib in combination with bevacizumab in homologous recombination deficiency-positive-associated advanced ovarian cancer. An ESMO Open - Cancer Horizons round-table expert panel discussed the four phase III trials of first-line PARP inhibitor therapy and how they are changing the clinical management of advanced ovarian cancer.

Incorporation of Pazopanib in Maintenance Therapy of Ovarian Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30) ◽  
pp. 3374-3382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Anne Floquet ◽  
Jae-Weon Kim ◽  
Joern Rau ◽  
Josep M. del Campo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PurposePazopanib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1/-2/-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) -α/-β, and c-Kit. Preclinical and clinical studies support VEGFR and PDGFR as targets for advanced ovarian cancer treatment. This study evaluated the role of pazopanib maintenance therapy in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease did not progress during first-line chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsNine hundred forty patients with histologically confirmed cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, International Federation Gynecology Obstetrics (FIGO) stages II-IV, no evidence of progression after primary therapy consisting of surgery and at least five cycles of platinum-taxane chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg once per day or placebo for up to 24 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival by RECIST 1.0 assessed by the investigators.ResultsMaintenance pazopanib prolonged progression-free survival compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91; P = .0021; median, 17.9 v 12.3 months, respectively). Interim survival analysis based on events in 35.6% of the population did not show any significant difference. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of hypertension (30.8%), neutropenia (9.9%), liver-related toxicity (9.4%), diarrhea (8.2%), fatigue (2.7%), thrombocytopenia (2.5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (1.9%) were significantly higher in the pazopanib arm. Treatment discontinuation related to adverse events was higher among patients treated with pazopanib (33.3%) compared with placebo (5.6%).ConclusionPazopanib maintenance therapy provided a median improvement of 5.6 months (HR, 0.77) in progression-free survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have not progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Overall survival data to this point did not suggest any benefit. Additional analysis should help to identify subgroups of patients in whom improved efficacy may balance toxicity (NCT00866697).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document