scholarly journals Increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated without intracranial pressure monitoring

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 729-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Farahvar ◽  
Linda M. Gerber ◽  
Ya-Lin Chiu ◽  
Nancy Carney ◽  
Roger Härtl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
Gcs Score

Object Evidence-based guidelines recommend intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but there is limited evidence that monitoring and treating intracranial hypertension reduces mortality. This study uses a large, prospectively collected database to examine the effect on 2-week mortality of ICP reduction therapies administered to patients with severe TBI treated either with or without an ICP monitor. Methods From a population of 2134 patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] Score <9), 1446 patients were treated with ICP-lowering therapies. Of those, 1202 had an ICP monitor inserted and 244 were treated without monitoring. Patients were admitted to one of 20 Level I and two Level II trauma centers, part of a New York State quality improvement program administered by the Brain Trauma Foundation between 2000 and 2009. This database also contains information on known independent early prognostic indicators of mortality, including age, admission GCS score, pupillary status, CT scanning findings, and hypotension. Results Age, initial GCS score, hypotension, and CT scan findings were associated with 2-week mortality. In addition, patients of all ages treated with an ICP monitor in place had lower mortality at 2 weeks (p = 0.02) than those treated without an ICP monitor, after adjusting for parameters that independently affect mortality. Conclusions In patients with severe TBI treated for intracranial hypertension, the use of an ICP monitor is associated with significantly lower mortality when compared with patients treated without an ICP monitor. Based on these findings, the authors conclude that ICP-directed therapy in patients with severe TBI should be guided by ICP monitoring.

scholarly journals A clinical decision rule to predict intracranial hypertension in severe traumatic brain injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 612-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziz S. Alali ◽  
Nancy Temkin ◽  
Jason Barber ◽  
Jim Pridgeon ◽  
Kelley Chaddock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Decision Rule ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Clinical Decision Rule ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
Minor Criteria

OBJECTIVEWhile existing guidelines support the treatment of intracranial hypertension in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), it is unclear when to suspect and initiate treatment for high intracranial pressure (ICP). The objective of this study was to derive a clinical decision rule that accurately predicts intracranial hypertension.METHODSUsing Delphi methods, the authors identified a set of potential predictors of intracranial hypertension and a clinical decision rule a priori by consensus among a group of 43 neurosurgeons and intensivists who have extensive experience managing severe TBI without ICP monitoring. To validate these predictors, the authors used data from a Latin American trial (n = 150; BEST TRIP). To report on the performance of the rule, they calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with 95% confidence intervals. In a secondary analysis, the rule was validated using data from a North American trial (n = 131; COBRIT).RESULTSThe final predictors and the clinical decision rule were approved by 97% of participants in the consensus working group. The predictors are divided into major and minor criteria. High ICP would be considered suspected in the presence of 1 major or ≥ 2 minor criteria. Major criteria are: compressed cisterns (CT classification of Marshall diffuse injury [DI] III), midline shift > 5 mm (Marshall DI IV), or nonevacuated mass lesion. Minor criteria are: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score ≤ 4, pupillary asymmetry, abnormal pupillary reactivity, or Marshall DI II. The area under the curve for the logistic regression model that contains all the predictors was 0.86. When high ICP was defined as > 22 mm Hg, the decision rule performed with a sensitivity of 93.9% (95% CI 85.0%–98.3%), a specificity of 42.3% (95% CI 31.7%–53.6%), a positive predictive value of 55.5% (95% CI 50.7%–60.2%), and a negative predictive value of 90% (95% CI 77.1%–96.0%). The sensitivity of the clinical decision rule improved with higher ICP cutoffs up to a sensitivity of 100% when intracranial hypertension was defined as ICP > 30 mm Hg. Similar results were found in the North American cohort.CONCLUSIONSA simple clinical decision rule based on a combination of clinical and imaging findings was found to be highly sensitive in distinguishing patients with severe TBI who would suffer intracranial hypertension. It could be used to identify patients who require ICP monitoring in high-resource settings or start ICP-lowering treatment in environments where resource limitations preclude invasive monitoring.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02059941 (clinicaltrials.gov).

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (04) ◽  
pp. 291-296
Author(s):  
Bárbara Borchardt ◽  
Luanna Freitas ◽  
Ademar Filho ◽  
Áurea da Rosa ◽  
Milena Gabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Common Finding ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
Improvement In Survival

Objectives The aim of the present study was to analyze the prognostic impact of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods An observational, retrospective and quantitative study was performed. The sample consisted of 246 patients diagnosed with severe TBI, from January 2009 to August 2017. Results Out of the total sample, 43.56% of the patients were submitted to ICP monitoring. The mean time of use of the catheter was 1.7 days. In both groups, males were the most affected, and the majority of the patients were < 50 years old. Automobile accident was the main etiology of TBI. In the initial clinical evaluation, mydriatic pupils were related to death and normal pupil reaction at hospital discharge. The monitored group performed a larger number of computed tomography (CT) scans, with a mean of 2.6 examinations, with cerebral edema being the most common finding. Regarding the prognosis, those who used a catheter for ICP monitoring had a 47% reduction in the chance of death when compared with those who did not use the catheter. The stay duration both in the hospital and in the intensive care units was higher in patients who underwent ICP monitoring; periods > 30 days were related to meningitis, especially in those who used the catheter. Conclusion Patients who used a catheter for ICP monitoring had a significant improvement in survival.

scholarly journals Modulated Neuroprotection in Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1044
Author(s):  
Cristina Daia ◽  
Cristian Scheau ◽  
Aura Spinu ◽  
Ioana Andone ◽  
Cristina Popescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Glasgow Coma Scale ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome ◽  
Coma Scale ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
Neuroprotective Treatment ◽  
Gcs Score

Background: We aimed to assess the effects of modulated neuroprotection with intermittent administration in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 60 patients divided into two groups, with and without neuroprotective treatment with Actovegin, Cerebrolysin, pyritinol, L-phosphothreonine, L-glutamine, hydroxocobalamin, alpha-lipoic acid, carotene, DL-α-tocopherol, ascorbic acid, thiamine, pyridoxine, cyanocobalamin, Q 10 coenzyme, and L-carnitine alongside standard treatment. Main outcome measures: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) after TBI, Extended Glasgow Coma Scale (GOS E), Disability Rankin Scale (DRS), Functional Independence Measurement (FIM), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), all assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after TBI. Results: Patients receiving neuroprotective treatment recovered more rapidly from UWS than controls (p = 0.007) passing through a state of minimal consciousness and gradually progressing until the final evaluation (p = 0.000), towards a high cognitive level MOCA = 22 ± 6 points, upper moderate disability GOS-E = 6 ± 1, DRS = 6 ± 4, and an assisted gait, FIM =101 ± 25. The improvement in cognitive and physical functioning was strongly correlated with lower UWS duration (−0.8532) and higher GCS score (0.9803). Conclusion: Modulated long-term neuroprotection may be the therapeutic key for patients to overcome UWS after severe TBI.

scholarly journals Experimental model of intracranial hypertension with continuous multiparametric monitoring in swine

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 802-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Almir Ferreira de Andrade ◽  
Matheus Schmidt Soares ◽  
Gustavo Cartaxo Patriota ◽  
Alessandro Rodrigo Belon ◽  
Wellingson Silva Paiva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Animal Model ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Transcranial Doppler ◽  
Porcine Model ◽  
Cerebral Oximetry ◽  
Suitable Animal Model

Objective Intracranial hypertension (IH) develops in approximately 50% of all patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Therefore, it is very important to identify a suitable animal model to study and understand the pathophysiology of refractory IH to develop effective treatments. Methods We describe a new experimental porcine model designed to simulate expansive brain hematoma causing IH. Under anesthesia, IH was simulated with a balloon insufflation. The IH variables were measured with intracranial pressure (ICP) parenchymal monitoring, epidural, cerebral oximetry, and transcranial Doppler (TCD). Results None of the animals died during the experiment. The ICP epidural showed a slower rise compared with parenchymal ICP. We found a correlation between ICP and cerebral oximetry. Conclusion The model described here seems useful to understand some of the pathophysiological characteristics of acute IH.

Predictors of intracranial hypertension in children undergoing ICP monitoring after severe traumatic brain injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1453-1460
Author(s):  
Darryl K. Miles ◽  
Maria R. Ponisio ◽  
Ryan Colvin ◽  
David Limbrick ◽  
Jacob K. Greenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Hypertension In Children

scholarly journals Noninvasive screening for intracranial hypertension in children with acute, severe traumatic brain injury

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole F. O’Brien ◽  
Tensing Maa ◽  
Karin Reuter-Rice
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Flow Velocity ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Scale 8

OBJECT The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between transcranial Doppler (TCD) derived pulsatility index (PI), end diastolic flow velocity (Vd), and intracranial pressure (ICP). The subjects in this study were 36 children admitted after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) (postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) undergoing invasive ICP monitoring. METHODS Subjects underwent a total of 148 TCD studies. TCD measurements of systolic flow velocity (Vs), Vd, and mean flow velocity (Vm) were performed on the middle cerebral artery (MCA) ipsilateral to the ICP monitor. The PI was calculated by the TCD software (Vs-Vd/Vm). ICP registrations were made in parallel with TCD measurements. RESULTS Using a PI threshold of 1.3, postinjury Day 0–1 PI had 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity at predicting an ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg (n = 8). During this time frame, a moderately strong relationship was observed between the MCA PI and actual ICP (r = 0.611, p = 0.01). When using a threshold of < 25 cm/sec, postinjury Day 0-1 Vd had a 56% sensitivity to predict an ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg. Beyond the initial 24 hours from injury, the sensitivity of an MCA PI of 1.3 to detect an ICP ≥20 mm Hg was 47%, and a weak relationship between actual ICP values and MCA PI (r = 0.376, p = 0.01) and MCA Vd (r = -0.284, p = 0.01) was found. CONCLUSIONS Postinjury Day 0-1 MCA PI > 1.3 has good sensitivity and specificity at predicting an ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg. In those children with TBI who initially do not meet clear criteria for invasive ICP monitoring but who are at risk for development of intracranial hypertension, TCD may be used as a noninvasive tool to screen for the development of elevated ICP in the first 24 hours following injury.

scholarly journals Decompressive Craniectomy for Elevated Intracranial Pressure and Its Effect on the Cumulative Ischemic Burden and Therapeutic Intensity Levels After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1111-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Weiner ◽  
Michelle R. Lacey ◽  
Larami Mackenzie ◽  
Darshak P. Shah ◽  
Suzanne G. Frangos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Decompressive Craniectomy ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Intensity Level ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
Therapeutic Intensity ◽  
The Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) can cause brain ischemia and compromised brain oxygen (PbtO2 ≤ 20 mm Hg) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). OBJECTIVE We examined whether decompressive craniectomy (DC) to treat elevated ICP reduces the cumulative ischemic burden (CIB) of the brain and therapeutic intensity level (TIL). METHODS Ten severe TBI patients (mean age, 31.4 ± 14.2 years) who had continuous PbtO2 monitoring before and after delayed DC were retrospectively identified. Patients were managed according to the guidelines for the management of severe TBI. The CIB was measured as the total time spent between a PbtO2 of 15 to 20, 10 to 15, and 0 to 10 mm Hg. The TIL was calculated every 12 hours. Mixed-effects models were used to estimate changes associated with DC. RESULTS DC was performed on average 2.8 days after admission. DC was found to immediately reduce ICP (mean [SEM] decrease was 7.86 mm Hg [2.4 mm Hg]; P = .005). TIL, which was positively correlated with ICP (r = 0.46, P ≤ .001), was reduced within 12 hours after surgery and continued to improve within the postsurgical monitoring period (P ≤ .001). The duration and severity of CIB were significantly reduced as an effect of DC in this group. The overall mortality rate in the group of 10 patients was lower than predicted at the time of admission (P = .015). CONCLUSION These results suggest that a DC for increased ICP can reduce the CIB of the brain after severe TBI. We suggest that DC be considered early in a patient's clinical course, particularly when the TIL and ICP are increased.

scholarly journals Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury – Results of a Canadian Survey

2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh Sahjpaul ◽  
Murray Girotti
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Level Of Confidence ◽  
Routine Monitoring ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
High Level

ABSTRACT:Objective:The purpose of this study was to obtain information from Canadian neurosurgeons regarding their opinions on, and utilization of, intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).Methods:A brief survey was sent to practicing Canadian neurosurgeons questioning them about their utilization of, and confidence in, intracranial pressure monitoring in the management of patients with severe TBI.Results:One hundred and ninety-six surveys were mailed. There were 103 responses for a response rate of 52.6%. The vast majority of responding neurosurgeons (98.1%) utilized ICP monitoring in the management of patients with severe TBI, with most (63.4%) using it in more than 75% of their patients, 14.9% using it in 50-75% of patients, 14.9% in 25-50% of patients, and 6.9% using it in less than 25% of patients. The level of confidence that routine monitoring improves outcome from severe TBI ranged from 23.3% having a low level of confidence, 56.3% having an intermediate level of confidence, to 20.4% having a high level of confidence. Most respondents (78.6%) felt that some form of prospective trial evaluating the role of ICP monitoring in improving outcome from severe TBI was warranted; 17.4% felt such a trial was not warranted and 3.9% were uncertain.Conclusions:While ICP monitoring has gained almost universal acceptance among responding Canadian neurosurgeons, their level of confidence that routine monitoring improves outcome from severe TBI was quite variable, with only 20.4% of respondents having a high level of confidence. Over 75% of respondents felt that some form of prospective trial evaluating the utility of ICP monitoring is warranted. This information is being used in consideration of a prospective trial addressing this issue.

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2018 ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Thomas Peponis ◽  
David R. King
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Neuropsychological Status

The study “A Trial of Intracranial-Pressure Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury” published by Chesnut et al. aimed to resolve the debatable issue of the benefit of intracranial-pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The authors designed a randomized controlled trial that was conducted in Latin America. A total of 324 patients admitted with severe TBI were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group (n = 157) was managed with ICP monitoring, using an intraparenchymal monitor. The goal was to keep the ICP below 20 mm Hg. Management of patients comprising the second group (n = 167) was based solely on serial clinical examinations and imaging tests. It was hypothesized that ICP-monitoring would result in increased survival rates, plus improved functional and neuropsychological status at 6-months after the injury. Additionally, the authors hypothesized that complication rates would be decreased and the ICU length of stay shorter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document