scholarly journals Evaluation and management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajit Jada ◽  
Charles E. Mackel ◽  
Steven W. Hwang ◽  
Amer F. Samdani ◽  
James H. Stephen ◽  
...  

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a 3D spinal deformity affecting children between the ages of 11 and 18, without an identifiable etiology. The authors here reviewed the available literature to provide spine surgeons with a summary and update on current management options.Smaller thoracic and thoracolumbar curves can be managed conservatively with observation or bracing, but corrective surgery may be indicated for rapidly growing or larger curves. The authors summarize the atypical features to look for in patients who may warrant further investigation with MRI during diagnosis and review the fundamental principles of the surgical management of AIS.Patients with AIS can be managed very well with a combination of conservative and surgical options. Outcomes for these children are excellent with sustained longer-term results.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina Nada ◽  
Cédric Julien ◽  
Pierre H. Rompré ◽  
Marie-Yvonne Akoume ◽  
Kristen F. Gorman ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baron S. Lonner ◽  
Courtney S. Toombs ◽  
Qasim M. Husain ◽  
Paul Sponseller ◽  
Harry Shufflebarger ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2002-2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Godzik ◽  
Terrence F. Holekamp ◽  
David D. Limbrick ◽  
Lawrence G. Lenke ◽  
T.S. Park ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo C Beauchamp ◽  
Richard C E Anderson ◽  
Michael G Vitale

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Xu ◽  
Zhonghui Chen ◽  
Yong Qiu ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Song Li ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEAs scoliosis in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is unusual and the number of cases reviewed in previous studies is also relatively small, no previous study exists that has directly compared the results of spinal deformity correction between AMC and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of surgical correction of spinal deformity associated with AMC versus AIS.METHODSTwenty-four adolescents with AMC were matched with 48 AIS patients in terms of Cobb angle of main curve, curve pattern, sex, age at surgery, Risser grade, and length of follow-up. Patients in both groups underwent posterior-only spinal correction and fusion procedures. The surgical outcomes and complications were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups.RESULTSIn comparison to the AIS group, the AMC group had a significantly longer mean operation time (5.6 vs 4.4 hours, p = 0.002), more blood loss (1620 ± 250 ml vs 840 ± 260 ml, p < 0.001), and more fusion levels (14.1 ± 2.3 levels vs 12.4 ± 2.5 levels, p = 0.007) as well as a lower correction rate (44.3% ± 11.1% vs 70.8% ± 12.4%, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of loss of correction (5.0% ± 3.1% vs 2.1% ± 1.9%, p < 0.001). Nine patients in the AMC group had preoperative pelvic obliquity, which was corrected from a mean of 14.2° ± 8.4° to a mean of 4.3° ± 3.2° (p < 0.001) after the surgery. The thoracic lordosis and sagittal vertical axis were significantly improved in the AMC group. Notably, however, the AMC group was found to have higher rates of screw malpositioning (15.9% vs 9.5%, p = 0.002) and complications (8/24 [33.3%] vs 4/48 [8.3%], p = 0.016) as compared to the AIS group.CONCLUSIONSCorrection of AMC-associated scoliosis tends to require a longer operating time and involve more fusion levels but results in less correction, more blood loss, and more complications, in comparison with AIS. In addition, more attention should be paid to pelvic obliquity and sagittal hyperlordosis in AMC patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalin Cirstoiu ◽  
Bogdan Cretu ◽  
Bogdan Serban ◽  
Zsombor Panti ◽  
Mihai Nica

Modern surgical management of extremity bone sarcomas is governed by limb-sparing surgery combined with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All the resection and reconstruction techniques have to achieve oncologic excision margins, with survival rates and functional results superior to amputation. The main reconstruction techniques of bone defects resulted after resection are: modular endoprosthetic reconstruction; bone graft reconstruction; bone transport; resection arthrodesis; and rotationplasty. Oncologic resection and modular endoprosthetic reconstruction are the generally approved surgical options adopted for the majority of cases in major specialized bone sarcoma centres. Good basic principles, efficient multidisciplinary approach and sustained research in the field can provide a better future for the challenge posed by extremity bone sarcoma treatment. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:174-182. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180048


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document