Reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 329-338
Author(s):  
Ryuji Miyata ◽  
Shuji Matsumoto ◽  
Seiji Miura ◽  
Kentaro Kawamura ◽  
Tomohiro Uema ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Gait analysis, such as portable gait rhythmogram (PGR), provides objective information that helps in the quantitative evaluation of human locomotion. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of PGR in post-stroke patients. METHODS: Two raters (A and B) examined 48 post-stroke patients. To assess intra-rater reliability, rater A tested subjects on three separate occasions (Days 1, 2, and 3). To assess inter-rater reliability, raters A and B independently tested participants on the same occasion (Day 3). RESULTS: There was no significant systematic bias between test occasions or raters. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.93–0.97 for intra-rater reliability at both the comfortable speed and maximum speed, and 0.97–0.98 (comfortable speed) and 0.97–0.99 (maximum speed) for inter-rater reliability. The standard error was 1.25–1.49 (comfortable speed) and 1.62–1.77 (maximum speed) for intra-rater investigation, and 1.04–1.32 (comfortable speed) and 0.91–1.26 (maximum speed) for inter-rater investigation. At the 90% confidence level, the minimum detectable change ranged from 2.9–4.1%, and the error of an individual’s score at a given time point ranged from ±2.1–2.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this excellent reliability of the PGR in post-stroke patients, it can be recommended as a simple test of gait analysis in this population.

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 382-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Francini Devetak ◽  
Suzane Ketlyn Martello ◽  
Juliana Carla de Almeida ◽  
Katren Pedroso Correa ◽  
Dielise Debona Iucksch ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S10-S11
Author(s):  
S. Del Din ◽  
A. Bertoldo ◽  
Z. Sawacha ◽  
M. Rabuffetti ◽  
M. Laganà ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Haining Ou ◽  
Shijuan Lang ◽  
Yuxin Zheng ◽  
Dongqing Huang ◽  
Sheng Gao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tomas Gallego-Izquierdo ◽  
Enrique Arroba-Díaz ◽  
Gema García-Ascoz ◽  
María del Alba Val-Cano ◽  
Daniel Pecos-Martin ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the mobile application forward head posture in terms of validity, inter- and intra-rater reliability, minimum detectable change, sensitivity, and specificity to measure craniovertebral angle. In total, 44 subjects (mean age 23.30 ± 4.44 years) were evaluated in the standing position with markers on the tragus and cutaneous prominence of seventh cervical vertebra (C7). We had two experienced and trained physiotherapists assess cervical posture using the mobile application forward head posture and photogrammetry. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine validity and reliability. A contingency table was made to determine sensitivity and specificity. Intra-rater reliability of the mobile application forward head posture had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88. The inter-rater reliability generated an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 to 0.89. Criterion validity data were above 0.82. The minimum detectable change was 4.96° for intra-rater and 5.52° for inter-rater reliability. The smartphone application exhibited 94.4% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity. The smartphone application forward head posture is a valid and reliable tool to measure craniovertebral angle in a standing position and, therefore, could be a useful assessment tool in clinical practice.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Del Din ◽  
Alessandra Bertoldo ◽  
Zimi Sawacha ◽  
Johanna Jonsdottir ◽  
Marco Rabuffetti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 221049172096736
Author(s):  
Christina Dürregger ◽  
Klemens A Adamer ◽  
Michael Pirchl ◽  
Michael J Fischer

Background: Gait analysis constitutes an essential part of orthopedic rehabilitation assessment. Previous studies indicate that observational-based gait analysis lacks reliability and requires extensive clinical training. Therefore, gait analysis in the clinical practice heavily relies on technical aids. The aim of the present study is to develop a reliable gait analysis assessment tool that can accurately assess clinically relevant gait cycle parameters in daily clinical practice. Methods: In this pilot study, a new gait analysis and motion score (GAMS), comprising 10 observational and 5 technically measured (e.g. pressure plate) gait parameters, was developed. The parameters were dichotomously operationalized, reflecting pathological versus physiological manifestations of the parameters. The rating algorithm was administered by 12 raters using videotaped treadmill sessions of 10 orthopedic subjects ( n = 120 ratings). Inter-rater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the percentage of rating agreement. Results: The mean (standard deviation (SD)) GAMS ratings ranged from 10.0 (1.1) to 21.5 (1.3) points. The overall GAMS ICC was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96–1.00), whereas the ICC of observational parameters alone was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99). The mean (SD) percentage of rating agreement was 86.1% (3.3%). For the observational parameters, the mean (SD) rating agreement was 82.5% (4.5%). Conclusion: This new GAMS shows excellent overall inter-rater reliability for a continuum of functional gait statuses. The new score may be an appropriate clinical tool to objectively evaluate patients’ gait patterns. Furthermore, the GAMS may find application as a clinician-reported outcome measure in orthopedic rehabilitation. Further studies are required to verify the validity and accuracy of the new GAMS and its functionality in assessing clinical changes in gait patterns.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 5781
Author(s):  
Betsy D. M. Chaparro-Rico ◽  
Daniele Cafolla

Studies have demonstrated the validity of Kinect-based systems to measure spatiotemporal parameters of gait. However, few studies have addressed test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for spatiotemporal gait parameters. This study aims to assess test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of SANE (eaSy gAit aNalysis system) as a measuring instrument for spatiotemporal gait parameters. SANE comprises a depth sensor and a software that automatically estimates spatiotemporal gait parameters using distances between ankles without the need to manually indicate where each gait cycle begins and ends. Gait analysis was conducted by 2 evaluators for 12 healthy subjects during 4 sessions. The reliability was evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). In addition, the Standard Error of the Measurement (SEM), and Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) was calculated. SANE showed from an acceptable to an excellent test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability; test-retest reliability ranged from 0.62 to 0.81, inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.70 to 0.95 and intra-rater ranged from 0.74 to 0.92. The subject behavior had a greater effect on the reliability of SANE than the evaluator performance. The reliability values of SANE were comparable with other similar studies. SANE, as a feasible and markerless system, has large potential for assessing spatiotemporal gait parameters.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daiane Marques Ferreira ◽  
Leonardo César Carvalho ◽  
Carolina Kosour ◽  
Adriana Teresa Silva Santos ◽  
Lucas Fechio Marin ◽  
...  

Changes in balance are observed in some hemiparetics following a stroke, generating significant physical, social, and economic impacts; thus, an assessment was developed to facilitate treatment plans for patients. Goniometry is currently used as an evaluation tool for range of motion (ROM); however, the development of exergames has brought a new perspective to the assessment, which uses a dynamic mechanism and has little subjectivity. Objective: This study evaluates the inter-and intra-rater reliability of ROM measurement of the shoulder abduction in post-stroke patients using the exergame PhysioPlay™. Method: Thirteen volunteer chronic stroke survivors, aged 58.23 ± 9.96 years (men and women), participated in this study. Two physiotherapists evaluated the abduction of the shoulder using goniometry and the exergame PhysioPlay™. A retest was performed one week later. Clinical trial registry number – RBR-55smwr. Results: The results of the analyses using intraclass correlation coeficient (ICC) showed an excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability level (r > 0.90; p < .05). The Pearson correlation between the maximum measures obtained in the goniometry and the software PhysioPlay™ showed a high correlation (r > 0.90, p= .001). Conclusion: The Kinect associated with the exergame PhysioPlay™ presented excellent reliability in capturing the ROM measure compared to the conventional goniometry.


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 3154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Fernández-González ◽  
Aikaterini Koutsou ◽  
Alicia Cuesta-Gómez ◽  
María Carratalá-Tejada ◽  
Juan Carlos Miangolarra-Page ◽  
...  

Gait analysis is necessary to diagnose movement disorders. In order to reduce the costs of three-dimensional motion capture systems, new low-cost methods of motion analysis have been developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of Kinovea® and the agreement with a three-dimensional motion system for detecting the joint angles of the hip, knee and ankle during the initial contact phase of walking. Fifty healthy subjects participated in this study. All participants were examined twice with a one-week interval between the two appointments. The motion data were recorded using the VICON Motion System® and digital video cameras. The intra-rater reliability showed a good correlation for the hip, the knee and the ankle joints (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC > 0.85) for both observers. The ICC for the inter-rater reliability was >0.90 for the hip, the knee and the ankle joints. The Bland–Altman plots showed that the magnitude of disagreement was approximately ±5° for intra-rater reliability, ±2.5° for inter-rater reliability and around ±2.5° to ±5° for Kinovea® versus Vicon®. The ICC was good for the hip, knee and ankle angles registered with Kinovea® during the initial contact of walking for both observers (intra-rater reliability) and higher for the agreement between observers (inter-rater reliability). However, the Bland–Altman plots showed disagreement between observers, measurements and systems (Kinovea® vs. three-dimensional motion system) that should be considered in the interpretation of clinical evaluations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document