The efficacy of physiotherapy interventions in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis: A systematic review

Author(s):  
Piumi Nakandala ◽  
Indumathie Nanayakkara ◽  
Surangika Wadugodapitiya ◽  
Indika Gawarammana

BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis is a debilitating condition which causes the capsule of the gleno-humeral joint to thicken and contract progressively. The effectiveness of various non-operative methods has been demonstrated to improve the pain, range of motion (ROM) and functional status of patients with adhesive capsulitis. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review recent evidence on the efficacy of physiotherapy interventions in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Science Direct and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published since 2013. The search terms included: Frozen shoulder, adhesive capsulitis, physical therapy, rehabilitation, manual therapy, mobilization, exercise, education, and electrotherapy. The search was limited to studies published in English and studies that used human subjects. RESULTS: Quality scores of 33 articles were reviewed according to the Sackett’s critical appraisal criteria and the grades of recommendation were determined for physiotherapy interventions used in the studies. CONCLUSION: The empirical evidence suggests that certain physical therapy techniques and modalities are strongly recommended for pain relief, improvement of ROM, and functional status in patients with adhesive capsulitis, while others are either moderately or mildly recommended. However, the efficacy of one treatment modality over another is uncertain. The poor methodological rigors demonstrated in most of the reviewed studies emphasize the urgent need of properly conducted, adequately sampled randomized controlled trials with adequate follow up to determine the superior combination of treatment.

2021 ◽  
pp. 46-48
Author(s):  
Nilabh Kumar ◽  
Laljee Chaudhary ◽  
Debarshi Jana

Background: Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis is a condition where the patient experience stiffness and pain in joint of the shoulder. It is an enigma as till now its etiology is unknown. It affects both the genders of the middle and elderly age. A retrospective, comparative study was to evaluate the effects of physical therapy versus intra-articular steroid injection in periarthritis of shoulder. Methods: 30 patients each with frozen shoulder who were treated either using physical therapy (Group 1) and intra-articular steroid injection (Group 2). The data was collected at baseline and at different follow-up periods and analyzed. Results: There were 3 lost to follow-up in physiotherapy group and 4 in intra-articular injection group. Slight male preponderance (51.9% vs. 48.1%) was seen in physiotherapy group. Left side more affected in both the groups. Literacy (p=0.064), socioeconomic status (p=0.22), occupation (p=0.866), comorbidities (p=0.974), abnormal x-ray (p=0.34) were all comparable between the two groups. Mean duration of shoulder pain and restriction of shoulder motion were also comparable (p>0.05). Side effects– 46.2% were higher in intra-articular injection group. Response to treatment, disability score and SPADI index showed signicant reduction in both the groups, but signicantly more reduction in intra-articular injection was seen in comparison to the physiotherapy group. Conclusions: The overall treatment outcome in intra-articular injection group is much better in comparison to the physiotherapy group, but with higher side effects. Intra-articular injection of steroid will prove to be a boon after effective management of side effects.


Author(s):  
Ravi Kant Jain ◽  
Jagdish Nagar ◽  
Abhijeet Jayaswal

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis is a condition where the patient experience stiffness and pain in joint of the shoulder. It is an enigma as till now its etiology is unknown. It affects both the genders of the middle and elderly age. A retrospective, comparative study was to evaluate the effects of physical therapy versus intra-articular steroid injection in periarthritis of shoulder.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 30 patients each with frozen shoulder who were treated either using physical therapy (Group 1) and intra-articular steroid injection (Group 2). The data was collected at baseline and at different follow-up periods and analyzed.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> There were 3 lost to follow-up in physiotherapy group and 4 in intra-articular injection group. Slight male preponderance (51.9% vs. 48.1%) was seen in physiotherapy group. Left side more affected in both the groups. Literacy (p=0.064), socioeconomic status (p=0.22), occupation (p=0.866), comorbidities (p=0.974), abnormal x-ray (p=0.34) were all comparable between the two groups. Mean duration of shoulder pain and restriction of shoulder motion were also comparable (p&gt;0.05). Side effects– 46.2% were higher in intra-articular injection group. Response to treatment, disability score and SPADI index showed significant reduction in both the groups, but significantly more reduction in intra-articular injection was seen in comparison to the physiotherapy group.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The overall treatment outcome in intra-articular injection group is much better in comparison to the physiotherapy group, but with higher side effects. Intra-articular injection of steroid will prove to be a boon after effective management of side effects.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Mi Yeo ◽  
Ji Young Lim ◽  
Jong Geol Do ◽  
Jae-Young Lim ◽  
Jong In Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background As the primary treatment for adhesive capsulitis, intensive and accurate home exercise is as important as physical therapy in hospitals. Augmented reality (AR)-based telerehabilitation has been implemented recently in various musculoskeletal conditions to increase patient compliance and enable patients to exercise with the correct posture. The objective of this study is to present a protocol for investigating the additive effect of interactive AR-based telerehabilitation in comparison with the usual care for patients with adhesive capsulitis. Methods This study presents the protocol of a prospective, multi-center, single-blinded, two-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT). One hundred patients with stage I or II adhesive capsulitis will be recruited at the physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups with 1:1 allocation. The intervention group will receive 3 months of hospital-based physical therapy in conjunction with home-based telerehabilitation. The control group will receive 3 months of hospital-based physical therapy in conjunction with a home-based exercise described in a brochure provided by the hospital. The primary outcome will be the change in passive range of motion (ROM) of the affected shoulder joint from baseline to 12 weeks after baseline assessment. The secondary outcomes will be active ROM, pain measured with the numeric rating scale, shoulder pain and disability index, 36-Item Short Form Survey, EuroQoL-5D-5L, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Discussion This will be the first RCT study protocol to investigate the effect of telerehabilitation in patients with adhesive capsulitis. The result of this RCT will determine whether AR-based telerehabilitation is more effective than a brochure-based home exercise program and will provide evidence of the usefulness of “telerehabilitation” using hardware (IoT) and software (monitoring platform) technologies to develop “digital therapeutics” for the future. Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered at the Clinicaltrials.gov website on 20 March 2020, with the identifier NCT04316130.


2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 787-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Høyrup Christiansen ◽  
Poul Frost ◽  
Deborah Falla ◽  
Jens Peder Haahr ◽  
Lars Henrik Frich ◽  
...  

Background Little is known about the effectiveness of exercise programs after decompression surgery for subacromial impingement syndrome. For patients with difficulty returning to usual activities, special efforts may be needed to improve shoulder function. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness at 3 and 12 months of a standardized physical therapy exercise intervention compared with usual care in patients with difficulty returning to usual activities after subacromial decompression surgery. Design A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted. Setting The study was conducted in 6 public departments of orthopedic surgery, 2 departments of occupational medicine, and 2 physical therapy training centers in Central Denmark Region. Patients One hundred twenty-six patients reporting difficulty returning to usual activities at the postoperative clinical follow-up 8 to 12 weeks after subacromial decompression surgery participated. Intervention A standardized exercise program consisting of physical therapist–supervised individual training sessions and home training was used. Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Shoulder Score. Secondary outcome measures were the Constant Score and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. Results At 3 and 12 months, follow-up data were obtained for 92% and 83% of the patients, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses suggested a between-group difference on the Oxford Shoulder Score favoring the exercise group at 3 months, with an adjusted mean difference of 2.0 (95% confidence interval=−0.5, 4.6), and at 12 months, with an adjusted mean difference of 5.8 (95% confidence interval=2.8, 8.9). Significantly larger improvements for the exercise group were observed for most secondary and supplementary outcome measures. Limitations The nature of the exercise intervention did not allow blinding of patients and care providers. Conclusion The standardized physical therapy exercise intervention resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in shoulder pain and function at 12 months compared with usual care.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Chen ◽  
◽  
Cimin Shen ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
...  

Review question / Objective: Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder prompting many patients to seek treatment. Thermotherapy is a common treatment for shoulder which has been widely used in hospitals. But its efficiency has not been scientifically and methodically evaluated. This protocol aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Thermotherapy for treating shoulder pain. Information sources: Eight databases will be searched from their inception to October 2021. They are as follows: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), Weipu Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and Wanfang Database. There will be no limitation to study publication status or language. The search terms include shoulder impingement syndrome, rotator cuff, bursitis, adhesive capsulitis, frozen shoulder, shoulder pain, thermotherapy, diathermy, heat therapy, Moxibustion, and RCTs. The equivalent search words will be used in the Chinese databases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H H Kuo ◽  
M E Liu ◽  
P L Lin ◽  
L.Y.-M Liu

Abstract Introduction Lorcaserin is a selective serotonin 2c receptor agonist approved as an anti-obesity agent. The additional cardiometabolic benefits associated with lorcaserin have not been conclusively established. Purpose To examine the effects of lorcaserin on blood pressure, heart rate and other metabolic parameters in overweight or obese patients from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Methods A literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central using search terms: “lorcaserin”, “Belviq”, and “randomized controlled trials” without language restrictions. RCTs with a follow-up period of at least 24 weeks were included for the meta-analysis. Results Five studies with 9349 patients in the lorcaserin group and 9370 patients in the placebo group were included. Compared with placebo, lorcaserin not only reduced weight (mean difference [MD] = −3.03 kg, 95% CI: −3.42, −2.63, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2 =68%), waist circumference (MD=−2.27 cm, 95% CI: −2.71, −1.83, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=57%) and BMI (MD=−1.11 kg/m2, 95% CI: −1.27, −0.96, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=68%), but also improved SBP (MD=−0.75 mmHg, 95% CI: −1.12, −0.38, P<0.0001, I2=0%), DBP (MD=−0.70 mmHg, 95% CI: −0.93, −0.48, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=0%), heart rate (MD=−0.94 bpm, 95% CI: −1.28, −0.60, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=0%), LDL (MD=−1.47 mg/dL, 95% CI: −2.21, −0.74, P<0.0001, I2=0%), HDL (MD=0.55 mg/dL, 95% CI: 0.08, 1.01, P=0.02, I2=18%), triglycerides (MD=−8.71 mg/dL, 95% CI: −12.14, −5.28, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=71%), and fasting plasma glucose (MD=−5.69 mg/L, 95% CI: −9.5, −1.87, P=0.003, I2=93%). Our findings support that lorcaserin has consistent and favourable effects on blood pressure, heart rate, and all criteria of metabolic syndrome. Summary of lorcaserin effects Conclusion Lorcaserin improved all cardiometabolic parameters modestly in addition to its weight loss effect in overweight or obese patients. More research is needed to determine its long-term cardiovascular benefits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document