scholarly journals 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia in People with Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Updated Systematic Review of Test Accuracy

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1175-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja Smailagic ◽  
Louise Lafortune ◽  
Sarah Kelly ◽  
Chris Hyde ◽  
Carol Brayne
2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_12) ◽  
pp. P674-P675
Author(s):  
Maria Sagrario Manzano Palomo ◽  
Belen Anaya Caravaca ◽  
Maria Angeles Balsa Breton ◽  
Sergio Muñiz Castrillo ◽  
Maria Asuncion De La Morena Vicente ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Sagrario Manzano Palomo ◽  
Belen Anaya Caravaca ◽  
Maria Angeles Balsa Bretón ◽  
Sergio Muñiz Castrillo ◽  
Asuncion de la Morena Vicente ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Grueso ◽  
Raquel Viejo-Sobera

Abstract Background An increase in lifespan in our society is a double-edged sword that entails a growing number of patients with neurocognitive disorders, Alzheimer’s disease being the most prevalent. Advances in medical imaging and computational power enable new methods for the early detection of neurocognitive disorders with the goal of preventing or reducing cognitive decline. Computer-aided image analysis and early detection of changes in cognition is a promising approach for patients with mild cognitive impairment, sometimes a prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Methods We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines of studies where machine learning was applied to neuroimaging data in order to predict whether patients with mild cognitive impairment might develop Alzheimer’s disease dementia or remain stable. After removing duplicates, we screened 452 studies and selected 116 for qualitative analysis. Results Most studies used magnetic resonance image (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) data but also magnetoencephalography. The datasets were mainly extracted from the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) database with some exceptions. Regarding the algorithms used, the most common was support vector machine with a mean accuracy of 75.4%, but convolutional neural networks achieved a higher mean accuracy of 78.5%. Studies combining MRI and PET achieved overall better classification accuracy than studies that only used one neuroimaging technique. In general, the more complex models such as those based on deep learning, combined with multimodal and multidimensional data (neuroimaging, clinical, cognitive, genetic, and behavioral) achieved the best performance. Conclusions Although the performance of the different methods still has room for improvement, the results are promising and this methodology has a great potential as a support tool for clinicians and healthcare professionals.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur M.N. Coutinho ◽  
Fábio H.G. Porto ◽  
Poliana F. Zampieri ◽  
Maria C. Otaduy ◽  
Tíbor R. Perroco ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Reduction of regional brain glucose metabolism (rBGM) measured by [18F]FDG-PET in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) has been associated with a higher conversion rate from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is a potential biomarker that has disclosed Naa/mI reductions within the PCC in both MCI and AD. Studies investigating the relationships between the two modalities are scarce. OBJECTIVE To evaluate differences and possible correlations between the findings of rBGM and NAA/mI in the PCC of individuals with AD, MCI and of cognitively normal volunteers. METHODS Patients diagnosed with AD (N=32) or MCI (N=27) and cognitively normal older adults (CG, N=28), were submitted to [18F]FDG-PET and MRS to analyze the PCC. The two methods were compared and possible correlations between the modalities were investigated. RESULTS The AD group exhibited rBGM reduction in the PCC when compared to the CG but not in the MCI group. MRS revealed lower NAA/mI values in the AD group compared to the CG but not in the MCI group. A positive correlation between rBGM and NAA/mI in the PCC was found. NAA/mI reduction in the PCC differentiated AD patients from control subjects with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70, while [18F]FDG-PET yielded a value of 0.93. CONCLUSION rBGM and Naa/mI in the PCC were positively correlated in patients with MCI and AD. [18F]FDG-PET had greater accuracy than MRS for discriminating AD patients from controls.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Weihua Li ◽  
Zhilian Zhao ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
Shaozhen Yan ◽  
Yanhong An ◽  
...  

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by cognitive decline and memory impairment. Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is the intermediate stage between normal cognitive aging and early dementia caused by AD. It can be challenging to differentiate aMCI patients from healthy controls (HC) and mild AD patients. Objective: To validate whether the combination of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) will improve classification performance compared with that based on a single modality. Methods: A total of thirty patients with AD, sixty patients with aMCI, and fifty healthy controls were included. AD was diagnosed according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for probable. aMCI diagnosis was based on Petersen’s criteria. The 18F-FDG PET and DTI measures were each used separately or in combination to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating HC, aMCI, and AD using receiver operating characteristic analysis together with binary logistic regression. The rate of accuracy was based on the area under the curve (AUC). Results: For classifying AD from HC, we achieve an AUC of 0.96 when combining two modalities of biomarkers and 0.93 when using 18F-FDG PET individually. For classifying aMCI from HC, we achieve an AUC of 0.79 and 0.76 using the best individual modality of biomarkers. Conclusion: Our results show that the combination of two modalities improves classification performance, compared with that using any individual modality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document