Taking the Time to Assess Cognition in Parkinson’s Disease: The Clock Drawing Test

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hemant Srivastava ◽  
Allen Joop ◽  
Raima A. Memon ◽  
Jennifer Pilkington ◽  
Kimberly H. Wood ◽  
...  

Background: Cognitive impairment is common and disabling in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Cognitive testing can be time consuming in the clinical setting. One rapid test to detect cognitive impairment in non-PD populations is the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), which calls upon the brain’s executive and visuospatial abilities to draw a clock designating a certain time. Objective: Test the hypothesis that PD participants would perform worse on CDT compared to controls and that CDT would correlate with other measures of cognition. Methods: This study evaluated two independent CDT scoring systems and differences in CDT performance between PD (N = 97) and control (N = 54) participants using a two-sample t-test. Pearson’s correlations were conducted between the CDT and tests of sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and vigilance (Psychomotor Vigilance Test); executive function (Trails B-A); and global cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine cut points on the CDT that identify individuals who need additional cognitive testing. Results: PD participants had worse performance on CDT compared to controls. The CDT was correlated with executive function (Trails B-A) and global cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment). The CDT correlated with vigilance (Psychomotor Vigilance Task) only in healthy controls. However, the CDT was not correlated with measures of sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) in either group. A cut point of 9 on the Rouleau scale and 18 on the Mendez scale identified PD participants with cognitive impairment. Conclusion: The CDT is a rapid clinical cognitive assessment that is feasible in PD and correlates with other measures of cognition.

Author(s):  
Ilaria Cova ◽  
Francesco Mele ◽  
Federica Zerini ◽  
Laura Maggiore ◽  
Silvia Rosa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The early detection of patients at risk of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) may help planning subacute and long-term care. We aimed to determine the predictivity of two screening cognitive tests on the occurrence of mild cognitive impairment or dementia in acute stroke patients. Methods A cognitive assessment within a few days of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke was performed in patients consecutively admitted to a stroke unit over 14 months by means of the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B). Results Out of 191 stroke survivors who were non-demented at baseline, 168 attended at least one follow-up visit. At follow-up (mean duration ± SD 12.8 ± 8.7 months), 28 (18.9%) incident cases of MCI and 27 (18%) cases of dementia were recorded. In comparison with patients who remained cognitively stable at follow-up, these patients were older, less educated, had more comorbidities, a higher score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, more severe cerebral atrophy, and lower MoCA-B and CDT scores at baseline. In multi-adjusted (for age, education, comorbidities score, NIHSS at admission and atrophy score) model, a pathological score on baseline CDT (< 6.55) was associated with a higher risk of PSCI at follow-up (HR 2.022; 95% CI 1.025–3.989, p < 0.05) with respect to non-pathological scores. A pathological baseline score on MoCA-B (< 24) did not predict increased risk of cognitive decline at follow-up nor increased predictivity of stand-alone CDT. Conclusion A bedside cognitive screening with the CDT helps identifying patients at higher risk of PSCI.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bárbara Costa Beber ◽  
Renata Kochhann ◽  
Bruna Matias ◽  
Márcia Lorena Fagundes Chaves

ABSTRACT Background: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia. Several different presentation formats and scoring methods for the CDT are available in the literature. Objective: In this study we aimed to compare performance on the free-drawn and "incomplete-copy" versions of the CDT using the same short scoring method in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia patients, and healthy elderly participants. Methods: 90 participants (controlled for age, sex and education) subdivided into control group (n=20), MCI group (n=30) and dementia group (n=40) (Alzheimer's disease - AD=20; Vascular Dementia - VD=20) were recruited for this study. The participants performed the two CDT versions at different times and a blinded neuropsychologist scored the CDTs using the same scoring system. Results: The scores on the free-drawn version were significantly lower than the incomplete-copy version for all groups. The dementia group had significantly lower scores on the incomplete-copy version of the CDT than the control group. MCI patients did not differ significantly from the dementia or control groups. Performance on the free-drawn copy differed significantly among all groups. Conclusion: The free-drawn CDT version is more cognitively demanding and sensitive for detecting mild/early cognitive impairment. Further evaluation of the diagnostic value (accuracy) of the free-drawn CDT in Brazilian MCI patients is needed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Ehreke ◽  
Melanie Luppa ◽  
Hans-Helmut König ◽  
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller

ABSTRACTBackground:The clock drawing test (CDT) is a common and widely used cognitive screening instrument for the diagnosis of dementia. However, it has remained unclear whether it is a suitable method to identify mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The aim of this paper is to review systematically the studies concerning the utility of the CDT in diagnosing MCI.Method:A systematic literature search was conducted. All studies dealing with utility of CDT in diagnosing MCI regardless of the applied CDT scoring system and MCI concept were selected.Results:Nine relevant studies were identified. The majority of the studies compared average CDT scores of cognitively healthy and mildly impaired subjects, and four of them identified significant mean differences. If reported, sensitivity and specificity have been mostly unsatisfactory.Conclusion:CDT should not be used for MCI-screening.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 889-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Cacho ◽  
Julián Benito-León ◽  
Ricardo García-García ◽  
Bernardino Fernández-Calvo ◽  
José Luis Vicente-Villardón ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. e4.82-e4
Author(s):  
Jeremy Cosgrove ◽  
Stuart Jamieson ◽  
Stephen Smith ◽  
Jane Alty

IntroductionClock drawing (CD) requires executive function, attention and visuospatial ability. Our objective was to investigate CD in Parkinson's subjects with and without cognitive impairment.Methods107 subjects completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), classifying into normal cognition (PD-NC – MoCA ≥26) and cognitive impairment (PD-CI–MoCA <26). CD was scored using MoCA criteria; a maximum of 3 points, one each for correct contour, clock face and clock hands.ResultsPD-CI (n=57) and PD-NC were matched for all demographics except age (PD-CI were older, P 0.032). 35% of PD-CI scored full marks compared to 90% of PD-NC (sensitivity 0.64, specificity 0.9, age adjusted-odds ratio for predicting PD-CI 15.63, 95% CI 5.18 – 47.62, P<0.001). 88% of PD-CI scored points for contour and 60% scored points for clock face. In contrast, all PD-NC scored points for contour and clock face (P <0.001). 42% of PD-CI and 90% of PD-NC correctly drew clock hands (P<0.001).ConclusionsIn this cohort, inability to score maximum points for CD was associated with PD-CI. Correctly drawing clock hands was the hardest component for both groups. Incorrect contour or clock face was highly specific for PD-CI.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_15) ◽  
pp. P841-P842
Author(s):  
Natasha A. Talwar ◽  
Nathan W. Churchill ◽  
Megan A. Hird ◽  
Tahira Tasneem ◽  
Iryna Pshonyak ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document