The relationship between accountability mandates, school leadership, and school improvement : exploring the impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on one school's efforts to bring about and sustain reform

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramona Dobson
Keyword(s):  
No Child Left Behind ◽  
School Improvement ◽  
School Leadership ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

The Impact of Brown on EL Students: Addressing Linguistic and Educational Rights Through School Leadership Practice and Preparation

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Callahan ◽  
David DeMatthews ◽  
Pedro Reyes
Keyword(s):  
No Child Left Behind ◽  
School Leadership ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Historical Case ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Educational Rights ◽  
Brown Decision ◽  
Principal Preparation Program ◽  
Every Student Succeeds Act ◽  
The Impact

In 1974, the Supreme Court drew on the 1954 Brown decision in Lau v Nichols, placing English learner (EL) students’ right to a meaningful education at the forefront of educational policy. Subsequent federal decisions and legislation (i.e., Castañeda; Equal Educational Opportunities Act [EEOA], No Child Left Behind [NCLB], and Every Student Succeeds Act [ESSA]) have placed the responsibility for providing quality educational programming on districts, schools, and school leaders. In this article, we propose a framework for the integration of linguistic equity in leadership preparation and an historical case of a university-based principal preparation program that has integrated this framework into coursework and clinical experiences.

scholarly journals The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Students, Teachers, and Schools

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Dee ◽  
Brian A. Jacob
Keyword(s):  
No Child Left Behind ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
The Impact

National Certification: Evidence of a Professional School Counselor?

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 2156759X0701000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Milsom ◽  
Patrick Akos
Keyword(s):  
No Child Left Behind ◽  
School Counselors ◽  
School Counselor ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Professional School ◽  
Archival Data ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Professional School Counselor ◽  
National Certification ◽  
The Relationship

National certification and the professionalism of school counselors are becoming more salient, particularly as a result of the No Child Left Behind Act. Archival data were used to examine the relationship between preparation at programs accredited by the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) and national certification for school counselors. Significantly more individuals who obtained the National Certified Counselor credential were graduates of CACREP-accredited programs while the majority of school counselors who obtained the National Certified School Counselor credential were graduates of non-accredited programs. Implications for school counselors are examined.

The Impact of the Neoliberal Revolution on Society and Public Education

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
No Child Left Behind ◽  
Public Education ◽  
Educational System ◽  
Political Process ◽  
Public Support ◽  
Private Investment ◽  
Credit Recovery ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
American Society ◽  
The Impact

The neoliberal revolution negatively impacted the American society and educational system. Several major contributors to neoliberal thinking helped develop the theory. Two examples of utilizing neoliberal principles are the Sears corporation and the nation of Honduras, both teetering on the brink of collapse. The GINI Index can be used to provide insight into American economic inequality. Neoliberalism as a social movement and its impact on the American educational system are analyzed. Major conceptual components of neoliberalism, including competition, choice, privatization, standardization, accountability, marketing, and deregulation, are presented. Legislation using these principles include No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top and the Every Child Succeeds Act (ESSA). The testing, voucher, and charter movements are discussed. Three kinds of charter schools together with their academic and segregating results are analyzed. Charter and voucher supporters have become active in the political process to increase the charter component of public education. Corruption in charters and vouchers and neoliberalism’s undermining of public support for public education is treated. Online education’s positive support for small and rural schools, particularly for high schools, is noted, as is online education’s assistance for credit recovery. Another impact of neoliberalism on public education is noted, that is treating charters and vouchers as commodities which provide opportunities for private investment.

Administrative Perspectives on the No Child Left behind Act (NCLBA) for Students with Disabilities in Rural Settings

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luann L. Purcell ◽  
Bill East ◽  
Harvey A. Rude
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
No Child Left Behind ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
The State ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Education Leaders ◽  
State And Local ◽  
The Impact

The impact of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) has provided a significant challenge and opportunity for administrators of special education services at the state and local levels. Leaders representing prominent professional organizations at both the state (National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.) and local (Council of Administrators of Special Education, Inc.) education levels have identified advantages and barriers to successful implementation of the legal mandates. The most significant challenges for special education leaders and managers include: the requirements for adequate yearly progress for all learners, the provision of highly qualified special education service providers, and an adequate amount of attention devoted to all subgroups of learners. The unique difficulties for rural schools providing an appropriate education to all learners, including those with disabilities, are compounded by the effects of supplemental services, choice options, and the identification of adequate resources. The implications for the preparation of effective special education leaders and managers are identified within these parameters.

Ethnically Diverse Rural Special Educators who are Highly Qualified: Does NCLB Make this Impossible?

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Anne Prater
Keyword(s):  
No Child Left Behind ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
Ethnically Diverse ◽  
Highly Qualified Teachers ◽  
Highly Qualified ◽  
Short Supply ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Impact

Ethnically diverse special educators are in short supply not only in urban and suburban schools, but in rural areas as well. Finding teachers who meet the highly-qualified definition under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 worsen the shortage problem. This article addresses the impact of the definition of highly-qualified teachers on the recruitment and retention of ethnically diverse special educators and provides some suggested solutions for rural schools and districts to consider.

The Rhode to Turnaround: The Impact of Waivers to No Child Left Behind on School Performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun M. Dougherty ◽  
Jennie M. Weiner
Keyword(s):  
No Child Left Behind ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Student Mobility ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Fuzzy Regression ◽  
Continuous Performance ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Impact

Using data from Rhode Island, and deploying a fuzzy regression-discontinuity design, this study capitalizes on a natural experiment in which schools, in accordance with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) waivers, were sorted into performance categories based on a continuous performance measure. The lowest performing schools were then mandated to implement interventions. We find that schools implementing fewer interventions perform no differently than comparable schools without such requirements. Additionally, schools just required to implement more interventions performed worse than comparable schools implementing fewer. Finally, we find differences in the probability of student mobility from lower performing schools.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document