scholarly journals Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (Smart) Decision Making for Technology Selection of Real-Time Well Monitoring Project

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 24-43
Author(s):  
Deni Eka Prasetya
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Technology Selection ◽  
Selection Of

The application of Delphi and AHP method in environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Govind Kharat ◽  
Rakesh D Raut ◽  
Sachin S Kamble ◽  
Sheetal Jaisingh Kamble
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Waste Treatment ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Technology Selection ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Environmentally Sustainable ◽  
Complex Models ◽  
Treatment And Disposal ◽  
Selection Of

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe an application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique for the selection of waste treatment and disposal technology for municipal solid waste (MSW). Design/methodology/approach – The proposed approach is based on the integration of Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) techniques. A model has been proposed to evaluate the best treatment and disposal technology. Expert opinions have been incorporated in the selection of criteria. AHP has been used to determine the weights of criteria, followed by ranking of the available technologies. Findings – Delphi method was used to derive appropriate evaluation criteria to assess the potential alternative technologies. A set of identified holistic criteria was used, representing the environmental, social, and economic aspects, as compared to the sub-criteria concept generally found in existing literature. Quantitative weightings from the AHP model were calculated to identify the priorities of alternatives. The study provides a simple framework for technology selection as compared to the complex models present in the literature, reducing the uncertainty, cost and time consumed in the decision-making process. Practical implications – The model identifies the optimal technologies for the handling, treatment and disposal of MSW in a better economic and more environmentally sustainable way. The study provides a simple framework for selection as compared to the complex models present in the literature, reducing the uncertainty, cost and time taken by the decision-making process. Originality/value – The paper highlights a new insight into MCDM techniques to select an optimum treatment and disposal technology suitable for MSW management in India. The study identifies a minimal relevant set of evaluation criteria, and appropriate technologies for the handling, treatment, and disposal of MSW in a more economic and environmentally sustainable way.

scholarly journals Evaluating the feasibility of hydraulic and physical barriers at contaminated sites by means of multicriteria analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Gigliuto ◽  
Rudy Rossetto
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multicriteria Analysis ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Technology Selection ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Contaminant Plumes ◽  
Analysis Methodology ◽  
Physical Barriers ◽  
Multi Criteria Analysis ◽  
Selection Of

Controlling contaminant plumes in groundwater using pump and treat or hydraulic and physical barriers is a common practice to contain and reduce solute contaminants in remediation activities. Recent evolution in engineering techniques also allowed to extend the number of solutions that can be designed and set in practice. As such, the decision-making process assumes great importance in leading the selection of the best suitable technology for a certain case study. This process has to take into account technical, environmental and socioeconomic factors. This paper presents the results of a research project aimed at defining a multi-criteria procedure analysis to support the decision-making process in the barrier technology selection, taking into account technical, economic, social and environmental factors. A multi-criteria analysis methodology has been defined to provide a quantitative tool to guide the selection of the best suitable technology concerning a specific case. The methodology was applied to a real case, selected from many case studies based on data availability and quality, in order to verify the effectiveness of the procedure in evaluating the alternative selections and to highlight the differences between the results of the multi-criteria analysis and the real engineers choices. A sensitivity analysis was performed to analyze the influence of each criterion on the final result of the study. With this paper we aim to start a discussion to deepen the decision making process, in order to develop methodologies allowing to chose the best solution without subjective evaluations.

scholarly journals A SIAD achievement based on the collection of the industry costs

10.26458/1435 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Cezarina Adina TOFAN
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Market Economy ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Economic Environment ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Qualitative Information ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Selection Of

In modern market economy, organizations have to take decisions in a flexible, dynamic manner. In the economic environment, the relationship between product - market and competition is becoming more and more complex, as the socio-economic environment itself becomes more diversified and complex. Thereby, in order to be efficient, the management has to rely not only on chance and inspiration but especially on scientific methods designed to resolve dilemmas and multiple choice situations. The decision-making process represents an complex sum of activities regarding the collection, processing and selection of information. The information becomes a valuable asset for the organization if it is obtained and used in real-time, therefore the decision making process is highly dependent on complex, operational and qualitative information.  

Selection of Contractor Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Tools

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 139-142
Author(s):  
S.PUSHPARANI S.PUSHPARANI ◽  
◽  
Dr.S.SENTHAMILKUMAR Dr.S.SENTHAMILKUMAR
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Selection Of

A Highly Efficient and Optimised Simulation Based Multi objective Decision-Making for FMS Control

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Shreyanshu Parhi ◽  
S. C. Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Manufacturing Industry ◽  
Simulation Software ◽  
Shop Floor ◽  
Simulation Tool ◽  
Routing Flexibility ◽  
Decision System ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Arena Simulation

Optimized and efficient decision-making systems is the burning topic of research in modern manufacturing industry. The aforesaid statement is validated by the fact that the limitations of traditional decision-making system compresses the length and breadth of multi-objective decision-system application in FMS.  The bright area of FMS with more complexity in control and reduced simpler configuration plays a vital role in decision-making domain. The decision-making process consists of various activities such as collection of data from shop floor; appealing the decision-making activity; evaluation of alternatives and finally execution of best decisions. While studying and identifying a suitable decision-making approach the key critical factors such as decision automation levels, routing flexibility levels and control strategies are also considered. This paper investigates the cordial relation between the system ideality and process response time with various prospective of decision-making approaches responsible for shop-floor control of FMS. These cases are implemented to a real-time FMS problem and it is solved using ARENA simulation tool. ARENA is a simulation software that is used to calculate the industrial problems by creating a virtual shop floor environment. This proposed topology is being validated in real time solution of FMS problems with and without implementation of decision system in ARENA simulation tool. The real-time FMS problem is considered under the case of full routing flexibility. Finally, the comparative analysis of the results is done graphically and conclusion is drawn.

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan SNMPTN Jalur Undangan Dengan Metode Electre

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Lidia K Simanjuntak ◽  
Tessa Y M Sihite ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Nuning Kurniasih ◽  
Yuhandri Yuhandri
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Action Selection ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Prospective Students ◽  
College Entrance ◽  
Electre Method ◽  
Selection Of

All colleges each year organize the selection of new admissions. Acceptance of prospective students in universities as education providers is done by selecting prospective students based on achievement in school and college entrance selection. To select the best student candidates based on predetermined criteria, then use Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) or commonly called decision support system. One method in MCDM is the Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Reality (ELECTRE). The ELECTRE method is the best method of action selection. The ELECTRE method to obtain the best alternative by eliminating alternative that do not fit the criteria and can be applied to the decision SNMPTN invitation path.

PEMILIHAN KEPLING TELADAN MENERAPKAN METODE RANK ORDER CENTROID (ROC) DAN METODE ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT (ARAS) DI KECAMATAN MEDAN AREA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza Handayani ◽  
Muhammad Syahrizal ◽  
Kennedi Tampubolon
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Priority Level ◽  
The Village ◽  
Field Area ◽  
Selection Of

The head of the environment is an extension of the head of the village head in assisting or providing services to the community both in the administration of administration in the village and to other problems. It is natural for a kepling to be appreciated for their performance during their special tenure in the kecamatan field area. Previously, the selection of a dipling in a sub-district was very inefficient and seemed unfair for this exemplary selection to use a system to produce an accurate value, and no intentional element. To overcome the process of selecting an exemplary kepling that experiences these obstacles by using an application called a Decision Support System. Decision Support System (SPK) is a system that can solve a problem, and this system is also assisted with several methods, namely the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) method that can assign weight values to each of the criteria based on their priority level. And to do the ranking or determine an exemplary set using the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method, this method provides decision making that takes decisions based on ranking or the highest value.Keywords: Head of Medan Area Subdistrict, SPK, Centroid Rank Order, Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document