PENGARUH KEJELASAN LABELISASI HALAL DAN PERILAKU-BERAGAMA TERHADAP MINAT BELI KONSUMEN: ANALISIS  DUA  MODEL ALTERNATIF

Abstract. The Influence of Halal Labelization and Religious Behavior of Consumer Buying Interest: Analysis of Two Alternative Models. This research was conducted to determine the effect of clarity on halal labels, and religious attitudes and behavior on consumer buying interest. The attitude and behavior of Muslims in buying a product is influenced by the presence or absence of halal labels and religious attitudes and behavior. But at this time no one has examined the impact of the clarity / clarity of the halal label on a product in influencing the desires of Muslim consumers. In this study two models were developed, in which the first model wanted to see the impact of the clarity of halal labeling together with religious behavior as a purely independent variable effect on buying interest. Whereas alternative models or moderation models, want to see the possibility of halal label clarity as a moderating relationship between religious behavior and buying interest. This study shows that the clarity of the halal label is not a moderating variable on the relationship between religious behavior and buying interest, but it is a purely independent variable that together religious behavior encourages buying interest. The results showed that the clarity of the halal label is a major factor that can encourage buying interest in Muslim consumers. Then furthermore, the level of observance of Muslims in implementing religion/ religious observance also encourages interest in buying halal products. Abstrak: Pengaruh Kejelasan Labelisasi Halal dan Perilaku Beragama Terhadap Minat Beli Konsumen: Analisis Dua Model Alternatif. Penelitian ini melihat pengaruh kejelasan label halal, dan sikap serta perilaku beragama terhadap minat beli konsumen. Sikap dan perilaku umat muslim dalam membeli suatu produk dipengaruhi oleh ada tidaknya label halal serta sikap dan perilaku beragama. Tetapi saat ini belum ada yang meneliti dampak jelasannya / kejelasan label halal dalam suatu produk dalam mempengaruhi keinginan konsumen muslim. Dalam penelitian ini dikembangkan dua model, dimana model pertama ingin melihat dampak kejelasan labelisasi halal bersama-sama dengan perilaku beragama sebagai variabel independen murni pengaruhnya terhadap minat beli. Sedangkan model alternatif atau model moderasi, ingin melihat kemungkinan kejelasan label-halal sebagai moderasi hubungan antara perilaku beragama terhadap minat beli. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kejelasan label halal bukan merupakan variabel moderasi terhadap hubungan antara perilaku beragama dengan minat beli, tetapi merupakan variable independen murni yang bersama-sama perilaku beragama mendorong minat beli. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kejelasan label halal merupakan faktor utama yang dapat mendorong minat beli konsumen muslim. Kemudian selanjutnya, tingkat ketaatan muslim dalam melaksanakan agama/ taat dalam beragama juga mendorong minat beli produk halal.

Download Full-text

The Influence Of Media On Attitudinal And Behavioral Changes: Acceptance Of Culture And Products

International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER) ◽

10.19030/iber.v11i12.7617 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 11 (12) ◽

pp. 1433

Author(s):

Rahmiati Lita ◽

Yoon C. Cho

Keyword(s):

Cultural Awareness ◽

Behavioral Changes ◽

Statistical Analyses ◽

The Media ◽

And Behavior ◽

Attitudes And Behavior ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship ◽

The Way

Culture affects every part of our lives, every day, from birth to death, and everything in between (Cateora, Gilly, and Graham 2011). This study discusses the way in which customers acceptance of cultures and products has been greatly affected by the media. This study also investigates how customers acceptance leads to attitudinal and behavioral changes. In particular, this study measures the impact of a cultural wave to examine the attitudinal and behavioral changes it causes. This study explores the causes that affect the willingness of people to change their behavior after exposure to the media. In particular, this study investigates 1) how a cultural wave influences product and cultural awareness, 2) the relationship between perceptions of a cultural wave and peoples attitudes and behavior, and 3) the relationship between the strength of peoples attitudes toward acculturation and changes in attitude and behavior. By applying various statistical analyses, this study identifies managerial and theoretical implications.

Download Full-text

Attitudinal Ambivalence

Psychology ◽

10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0254 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Nicoletta Cavazza ◽

Vincent Pillaud ◽

Fabrizio Butera

Keyword(s):

Interpersonal Relationships ◽

Individual Level ◽

Attitudinal Ambivalence ◽

The Individual ◽

And Behavior ◽

Attitudes And Behavior ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship ◽

Moderating Role

Research on attitudinal ambivalence started in the early 1970s, forty years after the first wave of research on attitudes. Ambivalent attitudes consist of both positive and negative evaluations of the same object. Early approaches proposed different measurement methods, and ambivalence can now be measured either directly (referred to as “felt ambivalence”) or indirectly (referred to as “potential ambivalence”). Because of its duality, ambivalence has been studied in comparison with univalent attitudes—which consist of either positive or negative evaluations of an object—to uncover their specific features, antecedents, and consequences. Relevant research has focused on identifying the prevalence of ambivalent attitudes, and on whether they could stem from particular personality traits or situations. Researchers have found that ambivalent attitudes seem to be widespread and can be held for a long period of time. Their relationship with behaviors has also been widely studied. At the individual level, ambivalence increases response latency when a choice has to be made, extends information processing, can affect attitude stability, and can even lead to discomfort. At the behavioral level, studies have highlighted the moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence on the relationship between attitudes and behavior. A different field of research focuses on its strength to question whether ambivalence leads to more resistance or susceptibility to persuasion and influence. It appears that ambivalent attitudes are pliable and, depending on the context, can either help individuals to be more adaptive or prevent them from arriving at a satisfying conclusion. The role of ambivalent attitudes in interpersonal relationships and self-presentation also highlight some benefits in holding an ambivalent attitude. This article opens by reviewing general overviews to provide a detailed picture of the current state of research. It then presents early approaches to attitudinal ambivalence, and reviews studies that highlight the moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence on the relationship between attitudes and behavior, as well as studies that question whether ambivalence might lead to more resistance or susceptibility to persuasion and influence. The article then focuses on the impact of ambivalence at the individual level. Antecedents of attitudinal ambivalence will be reviewed, as well as its consequences on the individual. The article concludes by presenting research questioning its functions as well as some applied work.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Victimization on Fear

Crime & Delinquency ◽

10.1177/0011128787033001008 ◽

1987 ◽

Vol 33 (1) ◽

pp. 135-154 ◽

Cited By ~ 186

Author(s):

Wesley G. Skogan

Keyword(s):

Fear Of Crime ◽

Past Research ◽

Special Treatment ◽

Criminal Victimization ◽

Consistent Manner ◽

And Behavior ◽

Attitudes And Behavior ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship

This report examines the relationship between criminal victimization and fear of crime. Past research has been surprisingly inconclusive about this issue, and some people's fears have been branded “irrational” because the two did not appear to be tightly linked. However, the data analyzed here indicate that victimization affects both fear-related attitudes and behavior in a clear and consistent manner. This report also suggests that the impact of victimization is relatively uniform. Some research has indicated that certain groups are especially affected by crime, a claim that might be used to justify special treatment for selected victims and has been used to support demands for special “treatment” of selected offenders. However, the strong effects of victimization registered in these data were not differentially distributed across subgroups. In sum, most people do learn from their experiences, although other kinds of learning are rational as well.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Social Constraints on the Relationship Between Attitudes and Behavior

Social Forces ◽

10.1093/sf/50.1.102 ◽

1971 ◽

Vol 50 (1) ◽

pp. 102-112 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

J. S. Frideres ◽

L. G. Warner ◽

S. L. Albrecht

Keyword(s):

Social Constraints ◽

And Behavior ◽

Attitudes And Behavior ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship

Download Full-text

The Impact of Social Constraints on the Relationship between Attitudes and Behavior

Social Forces ◽

10.2307/3006054 ◽

1971 ◽

Vol 50 (1) ◽

pp. 102 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

James S. Frideres ◽

Lyle G. Warner ◽

Stan L. Albrecht

Keyword(s):

Social Constraints ◽

And Behavior ◽

Attitudes And Behavior ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship

Download Full-text

Public Opinion Toward Artificial Intelligence

10.31219/osf.io/284sm ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Baobao Zhang

Keyword(s):

Artificial Intelligence ◽

Public Opinion ◽

Lower Socioeconomic Status ◽

The Public ◽

Lower Socioeconomic ◽

Major Stakeholder ◽

And Behavior ◽

Attitudes And Behavior ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship

This chapter in the Oxford Handbook of AI Governance synthesizes and discusses research on public opinion toward artificial intelligence (AI). Understanding citizens' and consumers' attitudes toward AI is important from a normative standpoint because the public is a major stakeholder in shaping the future of the technology and should have a voice in policy discussions. Furthermore, the research could help us anticipate future political and consumer behavior. Survey data worldwide show that the public is increasingly aware of AI; however, they -- unlike AI researchers -- tend to anthropomorphize AI. Demographic differences correlate with trust in AI in the abstract: those living in East Asia have higher levels of trust in AI, while women and those of lower socioeconomic status across different regions have lower levels of trust. Surveys that focus on particular AI applications, including facial recognition technology, personalization algorithms, lethal autonomous weapons, and workplace automation, add complexity to this research topic. I conclude this chapter by recommending four new topics for future studies: 1) institutional trust in actors building and deploying AI systems, 2) the impact of knowledge and experience on attitudes toward AI, 3) heterogeneity in attitudes toward AI, and 4) the relationship between attitudes and behavior.

Download Full-text

A study on the relationship between skin care of attitudes and behavior

The Research Journal of the Costume Culture ◽

10.29049/rjcc.2013.21.5.629 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 21 (5) ◽

pp. 629-638

Author(s):

이지영 ◽

Kilsoon Park

Keyword(s):

Skin Care ◽

And Behavior ◽

Attitudes And Behavior ◽

The Relationship

Download Full-text

Enacting Accountability Under Populist Pressures: Theorizing the Relationship Between Anti-Elite Rhetoric and Public Accountability

Administration & Society ◽

10.1177/00953997211019387 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 009539972110193

Author(s):

Matthew Wood ◽

Felicity Matthews ◽

Sjors Overman ◽

Thomas Schillemans

Keyword(s):

Public Accountability ◽

Blame Attribution ◽

Three Stages ◽

Bureaucratic State ◽

And Behavior ◽

The Impact ◽

Accountability Practices ◽

The Relationship

While populism challenges the pluralism and technocratic expertise on which public bureaucracies are based, extant scholarship has overlooked its effects on accountability processes. In particular, it neglects the impact of anti-elite rhetoric, characterized by what can be regarded as “emotionalized blame attribution,” on the thinking and behavior of accountability actors. Responding to this gap, this article examines the impact of this distinctive form of populist rhetoric on accountability relationships within the bureaucratic state. It identifies three “stages” whereby these populist pressures challenge accountability relationships, threaten the reputation of accountability actors, and result in alternative accountability practices. In doing so, the article provides a roadmap for assessing the impact of anti-elite rhetoric on accountability actions.

Download Full-text

The Genetic Origins of the Relationship between Psychological Traits and Social Trust

Twin Research and Human Genetics ◽

10.1375/twin.15.1.21 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 21-33 ◽

Cited By ~ 38

Author(s):

Sven Oskarsson ◽

Christopher Dawes ◽

Magnus Johannesson ◽

Patrik K. E. Magnusson

Keyword(s):

Social Trust ◽

Personal Control ◽

Genetic Component ◽

Trust Game ◽

Psychological Traits ◽

Causal Pathways ◽

Survey Responses ◽

And Behavior ◽

Attitudes And Behavior ◽

The Relationship

Recent studies have shown that trusting attitudes and behavior are biologically influenced. Focusing on the classic trust game, it has been demonstrated that oxytocin increases trust and that humans are endowed with genetic variation that influences their behavior in the game. Moreover, several studies have shown that a large share of the variation in survey responses to trust items is accounted for by an additive genetic component. Against this backdrop, this article makes two important contributions. First, utilizing a unique sample of more than 2,000 complete Swedish twin pairs, we provide further evidence of the heritability of social trust. Our estimates of the additive genetic component in social trust were consistent across the sexes – .33 for males and .39 for females – and are similar to the results reported in earlier studies. Secondly, we show that social trust is phenotypically related to three psychological traits – extraversion, personal control, and intelligence – and that genetic factors account for most of these correlations. Jointly, these psychological factors share around 30% of the genetic influence on social trust both for males and females. Future studies should further explore the possible causal pathways between genes and trust using panel data on both psychological traits and social trust.

Download Full-text