scholarly journals China and the Future of AI

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shafiullah Farzayee
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Developing Country ◽  
Artificial Intelligent ◽  
Fifth Generation ◽  
Development Agenda ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Future

The progress of technology is currently remarkable and very fast, especially Artificial Intelligent or AI. China, as the largest emerging and biggest developing country, has significant AI growth. It is near that China will probably become the pioneer in the fifth generation of technologies, making the US worry. Along with its remarkable economic growth, China makes research and development agenda as the top priority. In this regard, this paper seeks to explain China and the future of AI, including its current progress.

The World Bank and the politics of productivity: the debate on economic growth, poverty, and living standards in the 1950s

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Alacevich
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Living Standards ◽  
Bretton Woods ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
Development Agenda ◽  
The Us ◽  
Multilateral Organizations ◽  
Post War

AbstractAccording to most reconstructions of development debates, poverty and social issues were not part of the development agenda until the late 1960s. In contrast, this article shows that development practitioners and institutions were already addressing poverty and social issues in the late 1940s and early 1950s. However, economic multilateral organizations soon marginalized those inclusive views and focused exclusively on economic growth. This article discusses those early policy options and why they were marginalized. It argues that this happened for ideological reasons, specifically because of the ideological anti-New Deal post-war backlash and the adhesion of Western countries and multilateral organizations to what Charles Maier defined as the politics of productivity. This ideological backlash explains the rise and early demise of Keynesian ideas in international organizations, and, conversely, their stronger influence in developing countries, where the direct influence of the US and Bretton Woods organizations was somewhat mitigated.

The Power of ERDC : ERDC 2020–2030 Strategy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Pittman ◽  
J. Buchanan ◽  
Deborah Quimby
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Operational Environment ◽  
Holistic View ◽  
Us Army ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Future ◽  
World Class ◽  
Class Status ◽  
Future Direction ◽  
Development Center

The ERDC 2020–2030 Strategy outlines the origination of the organization, future direction, and the methods used to accomplish its research and development mission. The Strategy details the Ends (where we are going and why), the Ways (how we will get there), and the Means (the resources needed to get there) by which we will achieve the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) strategy. To realize its vision and maintain its world-class status, ERDC strives to be the go-to organization for the Warfighter and the nation to solve large complex problems in its mission space. To strengthen the outcomes from the Ends, Ways, and Means, ERDC has adopted the philosophy of the Understand-Predict-Shape (UPS) paradigm. The UPS paradigm maximizes the potential of ERDC’s current research programs and helps contemplate, develop, and define the organization’s future portfolio. UPS represents a holistic view of the operational environment: How to better Understand the Present, Predict the Future, and Shape the Outcome. The ERDC leadership team has looked toward the future and defined major strategic Science and Technology campaigns that offer challenges that ERDC can, and should, effectively address.

scholarly journals R&D Management Trends in the United States, India and China

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-46
Author(s):  
Tugrul U. Daim ◽  
Ashok Bhatla ◽  
Mohammad Mansour ◽  
Robert DeLay ◽  
Paul Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Emerging Economies ◽  
Historical Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Future Performance ◽  
Industry Standard ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Future ◽  
India And China

This study researches the Management of Research and Development (R&D) in the emerging economies of India and China and compares theirs with R&D in the United States (US). The purpose of this research is to forecast the future of R&D in these three countries. Because R&D is changing rapidly, particularly in China, understanding where they will be in the future is of interest to the scientific, academic, government and business segments of each country. Our research consisted of gathering industry standard measures of R&D from 1996 through 2009. These measures are as follows: R&D spending as a percentage of GDP (total government, industry and universities), researchers per million inhabitants, number of patents granted each year, number publications each year and total number of graduates in all programs in thousands. We gathered and logged the metrics for each year from 1996 through 2009 and used the historical data to forecast future positioning of R&D in these countries. An overview of each country is provided in the introductory portion of this paper. This provides the context for the historical performance of R&D and for expected future performance of R&D in the US, India and China.

Conclusion

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Grare
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Political ◽  
Slow Pace ◽  
Centre Of Gravity ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Future ◽  
Economic Interaction ◽  
The Asymmetry ◽  
The Relationship

India’s relationship with the United States remains crucial to its own objectives, but is also ambiguous. The asymmetry of power between the two countries is such that the relationship, if potentially useful, is not necessary for the United States while potentially risky for India. Moreover, the shift of the political centre of gravity of Asia — resulting from the growing rivalry between China and the US — is eroding the foundations of India’s policy in Asia, while prospects for greater economic interaction is limited by India’s slow pace of reforms. The future of India-US relations lies in their capacity to evolve a new quid pro quo in which the US will formulate its expectations in more realistic terms while India would assume a larger share of the burden of Asia’ security.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document