scholarly journals Acquisitions of Financially Constrained Targets

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Maslinawati Mohamad ◽  
Surendranath Rakesh Jory ◽  
Nnamdi Madichie
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
The United States ◽  
Target Firm ◽  
Wealth Transfer ◽  
Stock Market Reaction ◽  
Cumulative Abnormal Returns ◽  
Acquisition Announcements

We examine the extent to which bidders’ stock returns at acquisition announcements reflect the financing needs of the target firm. Using a sample of the United States mergers and acquisitions of a period starts in 1985 and ends in 2012, we find that bidders of financially constrained targets pay lower acquisition premiums and earn higher announcement period cumulative abnormal returns than bidders of unconstrained targets. The lower premium and positive stock market reaction are both sources of value for bidders’ shareholders. Our results contrast the findings of the literature that document an insignificant wealth transfer to bidder shareholders.

scholarly journals Acquisitions of Financially Constrained Targets.

2018 ◽  
pp. 868-877
Author(s):  
Maslinawati Mohamad ◽  
Surendranath Rakesh Jory ◽  
Nnamdi Madichie
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
The United States ◽  
Target Firm ◽  
Wealth Transfer ◽  
Stock Market Reaction ◽  
Cumulative Abnormal Returns ◽  
Acquisition Announcements

We examine the extent to which bidders’ stock returns at acquisition announcements reflect the financing needs of the target firm. Using a sample of the United States mergers and acquisitions of a period starts in 1985 and ends in 2012, we find that bidders of financially constrained targets pay lower acquisition premiums and earn higher announcement period cumulative abnormal returns than bidders of unconstrained targets. The lower premium and positive stock market reaction are both sources of value for bidders’ shareholders. Our results contrast the findings of the literature that document an insignificant wealth transfer to bidder shareholders.

scholarly journals Pokémon Go!: Stock valuation and disruptive innovation in entertainment industry

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (46) ◽  
pp. 47-63
Author(s):  
Claudio Marcelo Edwards Barros ◽  
Iago França Lopes ◽  
Itzhak David Simão Kaveski
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
The United States ◽  
Disruptive Innovation ◽  
Stock Valuation ◽  
Stock Market Reaction ◽  
Cumulative Abnormal Returns ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Pokémon Go ◽  
The Impact

This research aims to analyze the impact of the announcement of the launch of the game Pokémon Go! on Nintendo's stocks. The study anchors itself on conceptual foundations of disruptive innovation and previous research that examined the stock market reaction to the announcement of innovations. This is an empirical research whose sample is made up of 4 Nintendo company assets traded in the United States, Germany, Switzerland and Japan, as well as the assets of companies comparable to Nintendo that made up the Detailed Stock Report available in the Refiniv® system (Thomson Reuters), at the time of the launch of the game. Through conducting a series of event studies, Nintendo's stocks traded in the United States, Germany, Switzerland and Japan presented abnormal returns after one day of the game's launch. These findings proved to be specific of Nintendo corporation's assets, with no similar reactions observed in peer valuation analysis. Based on five variables of cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) for all entertainment companies listed in Japan and controlled by factors such as profitability, debt, size and market value, it was found that on average the cumulative abnormal returns of Nintendo were significantly higher than the other companies in all 5 models tested. In response, we hope to broaden the discussions listed in this survey to recognize the launch of Pokémon Go! as an innovation with typical traits of Disruptive innovation, which were not ignored by capital market when the game was launched in July 06th, 2016.

scholarly journals Stock Market Reactions to Financing and Payment Decisions for European Mergers and Acquisitions

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-89
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Bessler ◽  
David Kruizenga ◽  
Wim Westerman
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Market Reactions ◽  
Valuation Effects ◽  
Payment Methods ◽  
Cumulative Abnormal Returns ◽  
Study Methodology ◽  
Acquisition Announcements ◽  
Stock Market Reactions

Aim: We analyze stock market reactions to merger and acquisition announcements for firms in Europe and contribute to the literature by providing empirical evidence how the decisions with respect to alternative financing sources (equity or debt) and the methods of payment (cash or stock) affect the magnitude of the valuation effects.   Research design: An event study methodology is applied to 717 M&A transactions. We analyze the size of the cumulative abnormal returns using the financing sources and payment methods and other variables as the relevant determinants.   Findings: The cumulative abnormal results suggest that target shareholders and bidder shareholders in private deals benefit from mergers and acquisitions. The effect found is centered around the announcement date, making our findings consistent with market efficiency. Debt financed deals outperform equity financed deals and cash paid M&A outperform stock paid M&As, due to information asymmetry, signaling and agency effects.   Originality: This study adds to our understanding of the relevance of the financing sources and the payment methods for mergers and acquisitions in Europe.   Implications: This study may help practitioners to better assess the valuation effects of alternative financing sources and payment methods when acquiring other firms.     JEL: G32, G34

scholarly journals WHAT DRIVES MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS WAVES OF LISTED COMPANIES OF THE CHINEXT MARKET? IPO OVER-FINANCING OR STOCK OVERVALUATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1499-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Xu ◽  
Yong-jin Liang ◽  
Shun-lin Song
Keyword(s):  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Market Reaction ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Market Value ◽  
The United States ◽  
Payment Method ◽  
Cumulative Abnormal Returns ◽  
Cash Payment ◽  
The Government ◽  
Corporate Mergers And Acquisitions

A wave of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) has been consistently rising among the China’s ChiNext companies over the past years, which has drawn great attention across academia and industry. Based on the neoclassical theory and the behavioral theory, this paper explores the driving factors of M&A among Chinese ChiNext companies. Two hypotheses were put forward: one based on IPO over-financing and the other based on the market value overvaluation. IPO over-financing is specific to the Chinese capital market while market value overestimation is driven by the continuous upsurge in the ChiNext Market. Our study found that both factors account for enterprises’ mergers and acquisitions. They have far-reaching influences on such fields as acquisition probability, the size of the transaction, transaction frequency, M&A payment method and market reaction. Due to IPO over-financing, enterprises tend to carry out M&A via cash payment or cash and stock mixed payment method. Heavier IPO over-financing will increase the chance of M&A and leads to larger transaction size and higher transaction frequency. Market value overvaluation will lead to more uses of stock or cash and stock mixed payment on M&A transactions. When the company’s stock is overvalued, the company will use the overvalued equity to acquire other companies. Greater overvaluation of the market value also increases the chance of M&A and leads to a larger transaction size and higher frequency of M&A. In China, IPO over-financing rather than market value over-valuation, is the major driving factor for China’s corporate mergers and acquisitions. Further study found that the market reaction to different payment methods in mergers and acquisitions varies: it has the minimum reaction on cash payment, a larger reaction on stock payment and the greatest reaction on mixed payment. Also, the mixed payment method has the largest cumulative abnormal returns. This is different from the empirical findings in the United States and Europe. This paper provides a theoretical basis and empirical evidence for an in-depth understanding of the wave of mergers and acquisitions of Chinese ChiNext companies, and provides a basis for decision-making and policy recommendations for the government regulators and investors.

scholarly journals Unknown Unknowns: Uncertainty About Risk and Stock Returns

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1615-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Baltussen ◽  
Sjoerd van Bekkum ◽  
Bart van der Grient
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Stock Prices ◽  
Stock Markets ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pricing Mechanism ◽  
European Stock Markets ◽  
Low Uncertainty ◽  
High Uncertainty

Stocks with high uncertainty about risk, as measured by the volatility of expected volatility (vol-of-vol), robustly underperform stocks with low uncertainty about risk by 8% per year. This vol-of-vol effect is distinct from (combinations of) at least 20 previously documented return predictors, survives many robustness checks, and holds in the United States and across European stock markets. We empirically explore the pricing mechanism behind the vol-of-vol effect. The evidence points toward preference-based explanations and away from alternative explanations. Collectively, our results show that uncertainty about risk is highly relevant for stock prices.

How Sports Sponsorship Influences a Sponsor’s Financial Performance: A Case Study from the Korea Baseball Organization

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Min Kim ◽  
Woon-Kyung Song ◽  
Sanghak Lee
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Cumulative Abnormal Returns ◽  
Abnormal Stock Returns ◽  
Korea Baseball Organization ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Insight Into

This study aims to examine the effects of sponsorship on the sponsor’s financial performance. Th is study investigates return on sponsorship (ROS) with a quantitative analysis. Nexen Tire’s title sponsorship agreement with the Heroes baseball club in the Korea Baseball Organization (KBO) in 2010 is studied. The positive effect of sponsorship on the sponsor’s Tobin’s q is confirmed by comparing the non-sponsorship period (2000‒2009) with the sponsorship period (2010‒2018). It is also shown from an event study that the sponsor experiences negative abnormal stock returns on the news of the sponsorship agreement, though this was not found to be statistically significant. Still, when the sponsee enters the postseason, positive cumulative abnormal returns are observed, particularly significant 10 days before the postseason games. Th is study confirms the positive influence of sponsorship on the sponsor’s financial performance and, with evidence from South Korea, provides insight into Asian markets in need of research. Th e results suggest that 10 days before a postseason game would be an ideal time to leverage marketing and activate a sponsorship strategy.

Bank Dependence and Bank Financing in Corporate M&A

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Huang ◽  
Ruichang Lu ◽  
Anand Srinivasan
Keyword(s):  
Mergers And Acquisitions ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Loan Pricing ◽  
Loan Contracts ◽  
Cumulative Abnormal Returns ◽  
Bank Financing ◽  
The Difference

We examine the valuation impact of bank-financed mergers and acquisitions (M&As) and the loan contracts used to finance M&A transactions, focusing on the difference between bank-dependent acquirers and other acquirers. We find that bank-financed deals have higher acquirer’s cumulative abnormal returns relative to other cash M&A deals, but this certification effect exists only for bank-dependent acquirers. Despite bank-dependent acquirers being more susceptible to hold-up, banks do not impose higher loan pricing or more stringent nonprice terms on them. After completion of the acquisition, bank-dependent acquirers retain the M&A financing banks for a much larger share of their borrowing needs, suggesting the importance of repeat business for lack of hold-up. Our findings highlight the positive aspects of bank dependence and the importance of implicit contracting for the lack of hold-up in lending markets. This paper was accepted by David Simchi-Levi, finance.

scholarly journals Macroeconomic News and Stock Returns in the United States and Germany

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Funke ◽  
Akimi Matsuda
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Interest Rates ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Stock Prices ◽  
The United States ◽  
Good News ◽  
Macroeconomic News ◽  
Hourly Data ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Using daily data for the January 1997 to June 2002 period, we analyze similarities and differences in the impact of macroeconomic news on stock returns in the United States and Germany. We consider 27 different types of news for the United States and 12 different types of news for Germany. For the United States, we present evidence for asymmetric reactions of stock prices to news. In a boom (recession) period, bad (good) news on GDP growth and unemployment or lower (higher) than expected interest rates may be good news for stock prices. In the period under consideration there is little evidence for asymmetric effects in Germany. However, in the case of Germany, international news appears at least as important as domestic news. There is no evidence that US stock prices are influenced by German news. The analysis of bi-hourly data for Germany confirms these results.

IMMEDIATE AND LONGER-TERM STOCK PRICE DYNAMICS FOLLOWING LARGE STOCK PRICE CHANGES

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050002
Author(s):  
ANDREY KUDRYAVTSEV
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Trading Volume ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Market Model ◽  
Conditional Volatility ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Price Increases ◽  
Cumulative Abnormal Returns ◽  
Price Reversal

The study explores the correlation between the immediate and the longer-term stock returns following large daily price moves. Following the previous literature, which documents a tendency for price reversals after initial large price moves, I suggest that if a large stock price move is immediately followed by a short-term price drift, then it may indicate that the company-specific shock is more completely incorporated in the stock price, significantly increasing the probability of subsequent longer-term price reversal. Analyzing a vast sample of large stock price moves, I document that negative (positive) longer-term stock price reversals after large price increases (decreases) are significantly more pronounced if the latter are immediately followed by relatively high (low) short-term cumulative abnormal returns, that is, by short-term price drifts. The effect remains significant after accounting for additional company-specific (size, market model beta, historical, or conditional volatility) and event-specific (stock’s return and trading volume on the event day) factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document