scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT OF CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS SCALE

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-359
Author(s):  
Fatma Alkan

Chemistry self-efficacy beliefs have been defined as someone’s beliefs about his or her own capability to perform a given chemistry task. These beliefs, one of the affective variables in the laboratory practices which are quite effective for learning science, affect individuals’ accomplishment, motivation and anxiety. Self-efficacy is task and domain specific. Therefore, self-efficacy beliefs gathered through chemistry self-efficacy scales cannot be accepted as a predictor of chemistry laboratory self-efficacy beliefs. In this research, an instrument, Chemistry Laboratory Self-Efficacy Beliefs Scale, was developed in order to determine students’ self-efficacy beliefs toward chemistry laboratory. Data were collected from 1095 high school students. Validity analysis was examined with Exploratory Factor Analysis, then Confirmatory Factor Analysis was made. The factor analysis revealed 2 factors: psychomotor self-efficacy and cognitive self-efficacy. The reliability analysis was computed with Cronbach alpha coefficient, for the whole instrument it was 0.885. The analyses resulted in the development of a two-factor scale of 14 items that was shown to be valid and reliable. At the same time, this instrument is also the first original instrument developed for determining the students’ self-efficacy beliefs toward chemistry laboratory. Key words: chemistry laboratory, high school students, self-efficacy beliefs.

Author(s):  
Mildin Jeminez Retutas ◽  
Marilyn Torela Rubio

Over the past few years, teaching and learning of statistics have been influenced by the emergence of the reform movement in education such as the K-12 basic education curriculum. Those of statistics concepts have changed both elementary and secondary level. Considering the educational reform in the Philippines, the study was conducted to determine whether there are significant differences of the determinants such as gender, type of school, parent’s educational level, family monthly income, family size and Senior High School track preference to students’ self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes towards Statistics, and performance in Statistics. The causal-comparative research design was used for comparing two or more groups to find the differences or determine whether the independent variable influences the dependent variable. The data were gathered from 570 senior high school students of both public and private schools in Mindanao, Region XI. The study adopted the questionnaires on self-efficacy beliefs and attitude towards Statistics while it utilized a researcher-made questionnaire for performance in Statistics. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was used to determine whether multiple levels of independent variables on their own or in combination with one another influence the dependent variables. The findings revealed that among the demographic factors, only type of school has a significant difference to the self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes towards Statistics, and performance of senior high students in Statistics. Implications from the findings of this study might suggest that improving of K-12 school facilities by the school public administrators and collaborative effort of teachers to enhance the students’ self-efficacy, attitudes towards statistics and teaching statistics reveals optimistic results.  Also, school administrators may provide opportunities for Statistics teachers to hone their pedagogical skills in promoting and building students’ self-confidence and interest in the subject.


2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Şenol Şen

This research examined the relations among students’ learning strategies (elaboration, organization, critical thinking and metacognitive learning strategies), self-efficacy beliefs, and effort regulation. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was used to measure students’ learning strategies, self-efficacy beliefs, and effort regulation. A total of 227 high school students participated in the research. Confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis were performed to examine the relations among the variables of the research. Results revealed that students’ metacognitive learning strategies and self-efficacy beliefs statistically and significantly predicted their effort regulation. In addition, the students’ self-efficacy beliefs directly affected deep cognitive learning strategies and effort regulation but indirectly affected metacognitive learning strategies. Furthermore, 88.6 % of the variance in effort regulation was explained by metacognitive learning strategies and self-efficacy beliefs. Key words: effort regulation, high school students, learning strategies, self-efficacy beliefs, structural equation modeling.


Author(s):  
Marcos Cupani ◽  
Ana Estefanía Azpilicueta ◽  
Victoria Sialle

RESUMENLa teoría social cognitiva de la carrera (SCCT; Lent, Brown & Hackett, 1994) se formuló originalmente con la finalidad de integrar diferentes modelos y constructos para lograr una comprensión más profunda de los mecanismos que regulan el desarrollo de los intereses vocacionales, la elección de la carrera y el rendimiento académico (Lent, et al., 1994, 2000). En la presente investigación se evalúa un modelo de intención de elección de carrera derivado de la SCCT. La muestra estuvo conformada por alumnos argentinos de la Escuela Secundaria, quienes respondieron a una serie de medidas sobre: fuentes de autoeficacia, creencias de autoeficacia, intereses e intención de elección de carrera. Estas medidas fueron analizadas en cada una de las seis tipologías planteadas por la teoría RIASEC (Realista, Investigador, Artista, Social, Emprendedor y Convencional) de Holland (1997). Los resultados indicaron un apoyo general a las hipótesis de la SCCT, las cuales proponen una influencia de las fuentes de autoeficacia sobre el origen de las creencias de autoeficacia y cómo estas, junto con los intereses, determinan las intenciones de elección de carrera, aunque no de forma homogénea en todas las tipologías planteadas por Holland. Se discuten los resultados para cada una de las tipologías y se consideran las limitaciones e implicaciones de estos hallazgos para futuras investigaciones.ABSTRACTSocial cognitive career theory (SCCT; Lent, Brown & Hackett, 1994) was originally formulated in order to integrate different models and constructs, to achieve a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that regulate the development of vocational interests, career choice and academic performance (Lent, et al., 1994, 2000). In this research, several hypotheses emanating from SCCT were tested. The sample was composed by Argentine high school students, who completed a series of measures, such as: sources of self-efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, interests and intentions of career choice. These measures were analyzed in each of the six types raised in the RIASEC model (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising and Conventional) of Holland. The results indicate general support for the hypothesis of SCCT, which suggest an influence of the sources of self-efficacy on the origin of self-efficacy beliefs and how they, together with interest, determine the intentions of career choice, but not evenly in all types raised by Holland. We consider the limitations and implications of these findings for further research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document