scholarly journals Robsons Ten Group Classification of Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Center in Nepal

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
Gehanath Baral ◽  
Alish Shrestha ◽  
Arati Sah ◽  
Aswani Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Quality Of Data ◽  
Cesarean Birth ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Preterm Group ◽  
Obstetric Population

Background: Increasing trend in Ceasarean birth is the issue of both demand and supply side. One of the recommended tools to characterize every pregnancy admitted for childbirth is Robson ten-group classification system that may evaluate obstetric practice. The aim of the study was to assess the cesarean section pattern based on Robson’s classification in a central referral hospital.Methods: A retrospective census of childbirths at Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital in Kathmandu performed from September 2018 to February 2019 based on obstetric record. Robson ten-group classification system was the research tool to collect data and Robson Classification Report Table was used to evaluate the data.Results: There were 10500 births with 34% (32-35%) overall cesarean section rate. Excluding spontaneous and induced labor the supposedly total prelabor CS is 14.5%. Group 1+2+3 size is 81% and 21% CS; 5+10 had 11.3% and 23.3% respectively. Prelabor CS (2b+4b) is 3.54% and additional 11% from malpresentation and preterm. Group CS rate from Class 5 onwards, and ratio of 1 and 2 are as recommended by Robson; 67% of CS were not picked up by Robson class due to indications evolved as the labor progresses and the attributes not pre-classified.Conclusions: The assessed quality of data and the type of obstetric population by Robson reference values prove this study as a representative research. But the indications of cesarean sections can be predicted for only one-third of pregnancy attributes classified by Robson class. To supplement this tool to reduce rising cesarean birth requires audit of indications at decision making level.Keywords: Cesarean section; indication; prediction; robson classification

Analysis of Cesarean Delivery at Ain Shams Maternity Hospital Using the Ten Group Classification System

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazem Amin Elzenini ◽  
Radwa Mansour ◽  
Ismail Mohamed Ismail Elnagar
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Maternity Hospital ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Medical Complication ◽  
Quality Of Data ◽  
Robson Classification

Abstract Background Cesarean section is an invasive surgical procedure in which a baby is delivered through an abdominal and uterine incision & carries with it many immediate and delayed morbidity and mortality risks. Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery indications at Ain Shams Maternity hospital. Methods This is a retrospective study on women who delivered by cesarean delivery at Ain Shams Maternity hospital between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2018. All patient files have been revised and data has been collected then categorized. The indications for this mode of delivery: suspected fetal growth impairment, fetal distress, preeclampsia/eclampsia, pregnancy duration in weeks or more pre-partum hemorrhage, cephalopelvic disproportion, dystocia, failure of progress, multiple pregnancy, suspected/imminent uterine rupture, breech or other malpresentations, previous cesarean delivery, failed induction of labor, tubal ligation, sterilization, maternal request genital herpes, extensive condyloma, any other obstetric complication, any other fetal indication or any other maternal medical complication. Results 15808 women delivered in the hospital during the study period, The CS rate was 58.04%. According to the Robson classification, Group5 and Group 10 were the most represented groups (31.72% and 29.91% of population, respectively). The major contributors to the CS rate were group 5 (27.10%), group10 (14.02%).The most commonly reported indications for CS included past CS, suspected fetal distress, preeclampsia, eclampsia.These suggested the need for further discussion on CS practices Conclusion This study provides an example on how the WHO manual for Robson classification can be used in an action-oriented manner for developing recommendations for improving the QoC, and the quality of data collected.

scholarly journals Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal According to Robson Ten Group Classification System

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (06) ◽  
pp. 310-315
Author(s):  
Sara Vargas ◽  
Susana Rego ◽  
Nuno Clode
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
Rate Analysis ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
The World ◽  
Obstetric Population ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract Objective The Robson 10 group classification system (RTGCS) is a reproducible, clinically relevant and prospective classification system proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing cesarean section (CS) rates. The purpose of the present study is to analyze CS rates according to the RTGCS over a 3-year period and to identify the main contributors to this rate. Methods We reviewed data regarding deliveries performed from 2014 up to 2016 in a tertiary hospital in Portugal, and classified all women according to the RTGCS. We analyzed the CS rate in each group. Results We included data from 6,369 deliveries. Groups 1 (n = 1,703), 2 (n = 1,229) and 3 (n = 1,382) represented 67.7% of the obstetric population. The global CS rate was 25% (n = 1,594). Groups 1, 2, 5 and 10 were responsible for 74.2% of global CS deliveries. Conclusion As expected, Groups 1, 2, 5 and 10 were the greatest contributors to the overall CS rate. An attempt to increase the number of vaginal deliveries in these groups, especially in Groups 2 and 5, might contribute to the reduction of the CS rate.

scholarly journals The evaluation of cesarean section rates in accordance with Robson Ten-Group Classification System and the data of perinatology (tertiary center)

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-100
Author(s):  
Hüseyin Kıyak ◽  
Gökhan Bolluk ◽  
Emel Canaz ◽  
Semra Yüksel ◽  
Ali Gedikbaşı
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Tertiary Center

Comparing the Experiences of Parturient Women With Remifentanil Analgesia and Elective Cesarean Section and Providing Improver Strategies: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Method Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
rana dousti ◽  
Sevil Hakimi ◽  
Hojjat Pourfathi ◽  
Roghayeh Nourizadeh ◽  
Niloufar sattarzadeh jahdi
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Mixed Method Study ◽  
Quality Of Data ◽  
Sequential Approach ◽  
Private Hospitals ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
The City

Abstract Background Identifying methods that can effectively and safely improve the childbirth experience and are tailored to mothers' needs are of crucial importance. The current study aimed to compare experiences of parturient women with remifentanil analgesia and elective cesarean section and providing improver strategies for women living in the city of Tabriz, Iran.MethodsThis is a mixed-method study with an explanatory sequential approach. The first stage is quantitative and longitudinal. The study population is all parturient women who will give birth by elective C-section or vaginal painless delivery using remifentanil in private hospitals of the city of Tabriz in 2020-2021. All mothers are free to choose either method. Participants will be selected from all private hospitals using the convenience sampling technique proportioned to the number of eligible women in each hospital. Participants will be followed up to 30 days after delivery to complete the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression questionnaire. The second stage is a qualitative study aimed at exploring the perceptions of parturient women who had either elective C-section or painless delivery (using remifentanil), including factors related to labor experiences. Data will be collected by semi structured interviews with new mothers and important others (if needed).In the third stage, a mixed study will be performed to provide strategies for improving labor experiences. we will use an explanatory Sequential approach in order to increase the accuracy and quality of data and to use the findings to evaluate different methods of delivery.DiscussionBy comparing the experience of parturient women receiving Remifentanil analgesia and elective C-section, evidence-based improving strategies using a culturally sensitive approach can be provided. Presentation of the results obtained from this study using the mixed method may help in better understanding the issue. Also, the obtained results can be used to enhance the quality of midwifery care to be examined by health policymakers and planners.Trial registrationThis study is approved by the ethics committee of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399. 521). Besides, it's evaluated by relevant refers.

scholarly journals Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashida Parveen ◽  
Mehnaz Khakwani ◽  
Anum Naz ◽  
Rabia Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Group 10 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Objective: To analyze trends of CSs and evaluating them according to Robson’s Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) at a leading government tertiary care hospital of South Punjab, Pakistan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University Hospital, Multan Pakistan, from October 2019 to March 2020.The study population included a total of 167 women who underwent CS in the hospital during the specified study period. For each case, we collected data regarding maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related information. The dependent variable was Robson classification group. Results: Overall, mean age was 26.53+5.1 years. Majority of the women, 116 (69.5%) belonged to urban areas of residence, 74 (44.3%) gestational aged between 37-42 years while 108 (64.7%) had history of cesarean section. Most of the patients, 85 (50.9%) turned out to be from TGCS Group-10. Group-5 and Group-1 were the 2nd and 3rd most common group, accounted for 24 (14.4%) and 19 (11.4%) cases respectively. Previous cesarean section (20.4%) and fetal distress (19.8%) were found to be most common indications leading to cesarean section. Conclusion: As per Robson’s Ten-Group Classification, Group-10 and Group-5 were found to be the most contributing among deliveries done. Previous cesarean section and fetal distress were the most common indications of cesarean section. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 How to cite this:Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A, Bhatti R. Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Using the Robson 10‐Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Colter Smith ◽  
Julia C. Phillippi ◽  
Nancy K Lowe ◽  
Rachel Blankstein Breman ◽  
Nicole S. Carlson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Cesarean Birth

scholarly journals Analysis of Cesarean Section at a Tertiary care centre in Eastern Nepal according to Robson's Ten Group classification System (TGCS): A hospital based cross sectional study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1171-1175
Author(s):  
Anamika Das ◽  
Ajay Agrawal ◽  
Sangeeta Bhandari ◽  
Sanyukta Rajbhandari ◽  
Surya Prasad Rimal
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Cesarean Section Rate ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
The Absolute

Introduction: Cesarean sectionis on the rising trend,so WHO proposes that health care facilities uses the Robson's 10 group classification system to audit their Cesarean section rates. This classification will helpto developstrategies to reduce these rates. Objective: The objective of this study was to classify the women coming for delivery into the 10 Robson’s group,to interpret the 10 group classification and to know the highest rate of cesarean section in the group. Methodology: This was a hospital basedcross sectional study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, for a period of 6months. All women undergoing deliverywere recruited for study .Based onthe  patient’s obstetric parameters, women were assigned to one of 10 groups as per Robson’s 10-group classification system.The relative size of each group, the cesarean section rate in each group, and the absolute and relative contributions to the overall cesarean section rate was then reported. Results: During the study period, the overall Cesarean Section rate was 33.40%.Highest contribution was by Robson's Group 2(Nulliparous, single cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, induced or CS before labor(9.84%) followed by Group 1(Nulliparous, single cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, in spontaneous labor)(7.73%) and Group 5(Previous CS, single cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks)  (5.75%). Least contribution was by Groups 8(All multiple pregnancies (including previous CS)and 9[All abnormal lies (including previous CS)]0.20% and 0.27% respectively. All women in group 9(all abnormal lies including previous CS)had 100% Cesarean rate. Conclusions: With reductions in the primary cesarean section rates and encouragingpatients forVBACcould reduce the contribution of Robson's groups towards the absolute Cesarean Section rates.

scholarly journals Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System

Medicina ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 280-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eglė Barčaitė ◽  
Gintarė Kemeklienė ◽  
Dalia Regina Railaitė ◽  
Arnoldas Bartusevičius ◽  
Laima Maleckienė ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification

scholarly journals Implementation of the WHO manual for Robson classification: an example from Sri Lanka using a local database for developing quality improvement recommendations

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e027317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hemantha Senanayake ◽  
Monica Piccoli ◽  
Emanuelle Pessa Valente ◽  
Caterina Businelli ◽  
Rishard Mohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Pathological Condition ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Quality Of Data ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Failed Induction ◽  
Group 1

ObjectivesThis study aimed at describing the use of a prospective database on hospital deliveries for analysing caesarean section (CS) practices according to the WHO manual for Robson classification, and for developing recommendations for improving the quality of care (QoC).DesignObservational study.SettingUniversity Obstetric Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women, the largest maternity unit in Sri Lanka.Data collection and analysisFor each childbirth, 150 variables were routinely collected in a standardised form and entered into a database. Data were routinely monitored for ensuring quality. Information on deliveries occurring from July 2015 to June 2017 were analysed according the WHO Robson classification manual. Findings were discussed internally to develop quality improvement recommendations.Results7504 women delivered in the hospital during the study period and at least one maternal or fetal pathological condition was reported in 2845 (37.9%). The CS rate was 30.0%, with 11.9% CS being performed prelabour. According to the Robson classification, Group 3 and Group 1 were the most represented groups (27.0% and 23.1% of population, respectively). The major contributors to the CS rate were group 5 (29.6%), group 1 (14.0%), group 2a (13.3%) and group 10 (11.5%). The most commonly reported indications for CS included abnormal cardiotocography/suspected fetal distress, past CS and failed progress of labour or failed induction. These suggested the need for further discussion on CS practices. Overall, 18 recommendations were agreed on. Besides updating protocols and hands-on training, activities agreed on included monitoring and supervision, criterion-based audits, risk management meetings and appropriate information for patients, and recommendations to further improve the quality of data.ConclusionsThis study provides an example on how the WHO manual for Robson classification can be used in an action-oriented manner for developing recommendations for improving the QoC, and the quality of data collected.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document