scholarly journals Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashida Parveen ◽  
Mehnaz Khakwani ◽  
Anum Naz ◽  
Rabia Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Group 10 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Objective: To analyze trends of CSs and evaluating them according to Robson’s Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) at a leading government tertiary care hospital of South Punjab, Pakistan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University Hospital, Multan Pakistan, from October 2019 to March 2020.The study population included a total of 167 women who underwent CS in the hospital during the specified study period. For each case, we collected data regarding maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related information. The dependent variable was Robson classification group. Results: Overall, mean age was 26.53+5.1 years. Majority of the women, 116 (69.5%) belonged to urban areas of residence, 74 (44.3%) gestational aged between 37-42 years while 108 (64.7%) had history of cesarean section. Most of the patients, 85 (50.9%) turned out to be from TGCS Group-10. Group-5 and Group-1 were the 2nd and 3rd most common group, accounted for 24 (14.4%) and 19 (11.4%) cases respectively. Previous cesarean section (20.4%) and fetal distress (19.8%) were found to be most common indications leading to cesarean section. Conclusion: As per Robson’s Ten-Group Classification, Group-10 and Group-5 were found to be the most contributing among deliveries done. Previous cesarean section and fetal distress were the most common indications of cesarean section. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 How to cite this:Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A, Bhatti R. Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Cesarean Section and Its Indications in A Tertiary Care Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (216) ◽  
Author(s):  
Smrity Maskey ◽  
Manisha Bajracharya ◽  
Sunita Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Hypertensive Disorder ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Common Indication ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Introduction: Cesarean section is a surgical procedure performed to deliver fetus through abdominal route. Increasing rate of cesarean section worldwide is an alarming concern for public health and obstetricians due to increase in financial burden and risk to health of the mother in comparison to vaginal delivery. The aim of the study was to find the prevalence of cesarean section and its most common indication in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was done in a tertiary care hospital, from July 2016 to June 2018 after taking ethical clearance from institutional review board. Convenience sampling was done to reach the sample size. Data was collected and entry was done in microsoft excel, point estimate at 95% CI was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data and analysis was done. Results: Out of total deliveries conducted, 862 (36.8%) were CS deliveries, 1477 (63.1%) were vaginal deliveries, and 12 (0.51%) were instrumental deliveries. Prevalence of CS is 862 (36.8%) at 95% CI (34.82%-38.78%). Mean age±S.D of delivering mother was found to be 26.1±0.25 years. Primi cesarean section was more than repeat cesarean section. Most common indication of cesarean section was fetal distress 243 (28%) followed by previous cesarean section 165 (18%), non-progress of labour 106 (12%), oligohydramnios 59 (7%), malpresentation 59 (7%), cephalo pelvic disorders 52 (6.5%), and hypertensive disorder in pregnancy 33 (4%). Conclusions: Prevalence of cesarean section in a tertiary care hospital is high compared to WHO data. The most common indication of cesarean section are fetal distress and previous cesarean section.

scholarly journals Auditing the cesarean section rate by Robson’s ten group classification system at Tertiary Care Hospital.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (04) ◽  
pp. 700-706
Author(s):  
Mehak Asim Khan ◽  
Irum Sohail ◽  
Maria Habib
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Group 5

Objectives: To analyze the trends of cesarean sections, categorize them into Robson’s Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS), to identify the groups contributing the most to overall lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) rate and to formulate strategies for reducing these rates. Study Design: Cross sectional population based study. Setting: Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of Kahuta Research Laboratories (KRL) hospital, Islamabad. Period: From 1st Nov, 2017 to 30th April, 2018. Material & Methods: The births during this period were distributed into the RTGCS on the basis of past obstetric history and fetal characteristics along with mode of onset of labour. Overall LSCS rate was calculated and contribution of each group was analyzed separately by SPSS version 23. Results: Our study showed 617 LSCS out of 964 deliveries making a high LSCS rate of 64%. Group 5, 2 and 10 of RTGCS contributed to the majority of LSCS performed with the percentages of 47.5%, 18.5% and 12.8% respectively. Group 5 of RTGCS which contributed to the highest LSCS rate had 354 subjects which were previous scars out of which 199 had previous 1 scar making the percentage 56.21%. It contributed 32.3% to the overall LSCS rate. Conclusion: RTGCS is a very useful tool for auditing the LSCS rate at local, national and international levels. Once the LSCS are classified into specific RTGCS, analysis can be done about the reasons for the increasing rates of LSCS and then strategies can be devised to reduce them.

scholarly journals Retrospective study of cesarean section by using the Robson’s ten group classification system

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1054
Author(s):  
Manoj Bhatt ◽  
Gunvant Kadikar ◽  
Dipti C. Parmar ◽  
Medha Kanani
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Cesarean Section Rate ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Study Institute ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Previous Cesarean ◽  
Group 1

Background: The present study was done to determine the relative contribution of each of ten groups of robson´s classification to overall cesarean section rate and identify modifiable group for intervention to reduce the cesarean rate.Methods: Retrospective review of record of cesarean section from the statistical Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology sir T. hospital, Bhavnagar from January 2017 to October 2017 and classify them in to Robson´s ten group classification system to find out total number of cesarean among total number of delivery in above 10 months duration.Results: Total number of delivery in my study institute in 10 months was 3804 out of them 1182 was cesarean section, so the overall cesarean section rate in Sir T. hospital, Bhavnagar was 31%. Group 1 (Nulliparous, single cephalic, >37 weeks in spontaneous labor), 2 (Nulliparous, single cephalic, >37 weeks, induced or CS before labor) and 5 (Previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) contributes for around 66% of total cesarean. Group 5 (Previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) was the major contributor among all. Least common cause of cesarean was group 8 (All multiple pregnancies (including previous CS)) and group 9 (All abnormal lies including previous CS).Conclusions: Incidence of cesarean was more common with patient having previous cesarean section. So, to decrease cesarean rate trial of labour should be given to the patient who was suitable for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Adequate assessment of pelvis and giving trial to patient having borderline pelvis also decrease the rate of cesarean in primi gravid (group 1).

scholarly journals A study of rate, indications and maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery in a tertiary care hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2810
Author(s):  
Asma Nigar ◽  
Ausaf Ahmad ◽  
Khashia Khan
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Background: Cesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in obstetrics worldwide. Over  the last three decades, a tremendous increase in cesarean section rates has been observed globally, which is a cause for concern as procedure is associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared to vaginal delivery. This study was done to analyze the rate and indications for cesarean section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a period of 6 months from 1st October 2017 to 31st March 2018 in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Lucknow, India. Data of patients who were admitted for delivery in department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in OPD or emergency were recorded. Statistical analysis of various parameters namely, the cesarean section rates, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done.Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 577, out of which 210 patients underwent cesarean sections. The overall cesarean section rate in our study was 36.39%. Previous cesarean section was the leading indication of cesarean section (31.9%) followed by arrest of labor (18.1%), CPD (14.2%), and fetal distress (12.9%). Breech presentation (5.2%), failed induction of labor (4.8%), pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) (3.8%), oligohydramnios (3.3%), obstructed labor (2.4%), APH (1.4%), multiple pregnancy and BOH accounted for 0.95% of cesarean sections. 9% patients had few complications mainly minor wound infection (2.4%) and postpartum hemorrhage (2%). There was no mortality during this period.Conclusions: Previous cesarean section has been found to be the main indication for cesarean section. So primary cesarean section should be reduced to decrease the overall cesarean rates. A comprehensive, evidence based approach needs to be introduced to monitor indication of all cesarean section.

scholarly journals Pregnancy complicated by previous cesarean section: a retrospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4470
Author(s):  
Poornima M.
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Perinatal Morbidity ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
History Of ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Background: Previous Cesarean section (CS) is one of the important causes of CS in subsequent pregnancies. Moreover, repeated cesarean sections increase maternal as well as perinatal morbidity and mortality. We conducted this study to find out outcome of pregnancies in women who had a history of previous CS.Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients of previous caesarean section for either maternal or fetal indications. The duration of study was 3 years. Total 215 patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The indications, maternal and neonatal outcome were studied from medical records of the patients. Statistical analysis was done using SSPE 22.0 software.Results: Out of 215 studied cases majority of the patients belonged to age group of 21-30 years (75.35%) and were 2nd gravida (61.86%). 164 (76.28%) patients attended ANC OPD at least for 3 times during pregnancy. 73 (33.95%) patients had Hb of less than 10 gms while blood transfusion was required to be given in 11 (5.12%) patients. cesarean section was required in 172 (80%) patients out of which 166 (77.21%) patients had undergone emergency LSCS while in 6 (2.79%) patients elective LSCS was done. Scar tenderness was the most common indication for repeat cesarean section. There was no maternal mortality in any patients while there was 1 still birth and 1 neonatal death.Conclusions: Previous cesarean section is one of the important causes of CS in subsequent pregnancies hence decision of doing CS, especially primigravida, must be taken in accordance with strict guidelines and the practice of “cesarean section on demand” should be discouraged.

scholarly journals Analysis of caesarean section rate in tertiary care hospital according to Robson`s 10 groups classification

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1380
Author(s):  
Varija T. ◽  
Veerendra Kumar C. M. ◽  
Chandrasekhar Tarihalli
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Group 5

Background: The caesarean section (CS) delivery rate is steadily increasing worldwide, including India. Identifying the proportion of women in various categories as per Robson's ten group classification system and CS rate among them is important to bring down the increasing CS rate.Methods: This case series study was conducted at Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), a tertiary care teaching hospital in Ballari, Karnataka, India. All pregnant women who have been admitted for delivery were enrolled and the data was collected for the women delivered by CS during January 2016 to December 2016 and proportions in various groups as per Robson’s ten-group classification system were calculated.Results: Among a total of 6980 women delivered during study period, 2992 (42.8%) delivered by CS. The CS rates among various groups varied from 100% among women with abnormal lies and group 6-95% (all nulliparous breeches) group 5-94% (Previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) to 10 to 15% among multiparous women with spontaneous labour having single cephalic pregnancy (group 3). Among women with previous section, CS rate was very high (89.6%). Women with previous CS (group 5) contributed maximum (40.24%) to the total number of CS.Conclusions: In the present study, all women with breech presentation and abnormal lies delivered by CS and repeat CS was the highest contributor to all CS deliveries.

Safety of Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous One Cesarean Section

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
Shahnaz Kouser ◽  
Shaheen Kouser ◽  
Bushra Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Medical Disorders ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
One Year ◽  
Operative Findings ◽  
Previous Cesarean

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the safety and integrity of scar at repeat cesarean section, in patients with previous one cesarean section performed at different settings. Study design A reterospective study in a tertiary care obstetric unit over a period of one year (2006). Material and methods All patients with previous one cesarean section, undergoing emergency and elective cesarean sections were enrolled at our institution. The variables noted were age, parity, residential area, location of previous cesarean section and associated complaints, e.g uterine contractions, vaginal leaking/ bleeding and comorbid medical disorders. Outcome measures Operative findings in terms of thinning of scar, dehiscence or rupture were recorded. The effects of skill level of surgeon and set-up of previous cesarean section were analyzed. Results Two hundred and seventy cesarean sections were performed for different indications in patients with previous one cesarean section over a period of one year. Out of all patients, extreme thinning of scar was noted in 36 (13.3%) patients. Seven patients(2.6%) had scar dehiscence. Only 3 (42.8%) patients with scar dehiscence had associated complaint of scar tenderness, while 22 (61%)of 36 cases of scar thinning were having scar tenderness. All 7 cases of scar dehiscence had their previous cesarean sections at teaching hospitals. No patient underwent hysterectomy and all patients with scar dehiscence had successful repair. Conclusion The study concludes relatively inadequate scar thickness rate but at the same time relatively acceptable scar dehiscence rate. Thus it will still be safe to subject the patients to trial of labor after meticulous scrutinization and individualization. At the same time adequate surgical training of doctors (trainees and community doctors) through different formats is recommended.

Analysis of cesarean section rates in two German hospitals applying the 10-Group Classification System

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Pulvermacher ◽  
Patricia Van de Vondel ◽  
Lydia Gerzen ◽  
Ulrich Gembruch ◽  
Thomas Welchowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
National Data ◽  
Birth Registry ◽  
Aggregated Data ◽  
Levels Of Care ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Group 5

Abstract Objectives In Germany, cesarean section (CS) rates more than doubled within the past two decades. For analysis, auditing and inter-hospital comparison, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) is recommended. We used the TGCS to analyze CS rates in two German hospitals of different levels of care. Methods From October 2017 to September 2018, data were prospectively collected. Unit A is a level three university hospital, unit B a level one district hospital. The German birth registry was used for comparison with national data. We performed two-sample Z tests and bootstrapping to compare aggregated (unit A + B) with national data and unit A with unit B. Results In both datasets (national data and aggregated data unit A + B), Robson group (RG) 5 was the largest contributor to the overall CS rate. Compared to national data, group sizes in RG 1 and 3 were significantly smaller in the units under investigation, RG 8 and 10 significantly larger. Total CS rates between the two units differed (40.7 vs. 28.4%, p<0.001). The CS rate in RG 5 and RG 10 was different (p<0.01 for both). The most relative frequent RG in both units consisted of group 5, followed by group 10 and 2a. Conclusions The analysis allowed us to explain different CS rates with differences in the study population and with differences in the clinical practice. These results serve as a starting point for audits, inter-hospital comparisons and for interventions aiming to reduce CS rates.

scholarly journals Vaginal repaired cesarean section diverticulum is beneficial in women with two prior cesarean sections

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yizhi Wang ◽  
Jiarui Li ◽  
Xipeng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Average Duration ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Repair ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Average Size ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the effect of vaginal repair in patients with cesarean section diverticulum (CSD) who had one or two previous cesarean sections (CSs). Design Observational cohort study. Setting Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. Patients A total of 248 patients with CSD who underwent vaginal repair between January 2012 and December 2014. Interventions Vaginal excision and suture of CSD. Measurements and Main Results From January 2012 to December 2014, 248 women with CSD underwent vaginal repair surgery in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. These included 193 women with one previous cesarean section and 55 women with two previous cesarean sections. A total of 221 (89.11%) women were followed-up for more than 3 months, and 168 (67.74%) women were followed-up for more than 6 months. Excision and suture of CSD was performed through a vaginal approach. The duration of menstruation, the size of the CSD and the thickness of the remaining muscular layer (TRM) were evaluated before and after surgery. Of the women who had one previous cesarean section, before surgery, the average duration of menstruation was 13.99±3.71 days, the average size of CSD was 7.99*12.43*6.62 mm, and the TRM was 2.51±1.02 mm. At 3 and 6 months after vaginal repair, the average duration of menstruation was 7.77±2.05 and 8.02±2.06 days; the average size of the CSD was 5.54*9.19*5.60 and 5.75*9.04*6.18 mm; and the mean TRM was 7.61±2.52 and 7.60±3.00 mm. Of the women who had two previous cesarean sections, before and at 3 and 6 months after surgery, the average duration of menstruation was 15.05±2.86, 8.06±2.11, and 7.89±2.32 days; and the size of CSD was 7.76*11.71*6.20, 6.22*10.17*5.89, and 5.42*11.58*5.08 mm; and the TRM was 3.17±1.55, 8.04±2.57, and 8.22±2.42 mm. The results of this study reveal that vaginal repair could shorten the duration of menstruation and improve anatomical defects (P< 0.05); moreover, there was no significant difference in the effect of clinical repair between women with one or two previous cesarean sections (P> 0.05). Conclusion In CSD patients, the clinical effectiveness of vaginal repair was equivalent between women with one or two previous cesarean sections.

scholarly journals Obstetric practices in planned home births assisted in Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Green Koettker ◽  
Odaléa Maria Bruggemann ◽  
Paulo Fontoura Freita ◽  
Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco ◽  
Roberta Costa
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Home Birth ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Place Of Birth ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Home Births ◽  
Previous Cesarean ◽  
At Home

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe obstetric practices in planned home births, assisted by qualified professionals in Brazil. Method: This is a descriptive study, with data collected in an online bank maintained by 49 professionals from December 2014 to November 2015, in which the target population was women and newborns assisted in home births. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 667 women and 665 newborns were included. Most of the women gave birth at home (84.4%), in a nonlithotomic position (99.1%); none underwent episiotomy; 32.3% had intact perineum; and 37.8% had first-degree lacerations, some underwent amniotomy (5.4%), oxytocin administration (0.4%), and Kristeller’s maneuver (0.2%); 80.8% of the women with a previous cesarean section had home birth. The rate of transfer of parturients was 15.6%, of puerperal women was 1.9%, and of neonates 1.6%. The rate of cesarean section in the parturients that started labor at home was 9.0%. Conclusion: The obstetric practices taken are consistent with the scientific evidence; however, unnecessary interventions are still performed. The rates of cesarean sections and maternal and neonatal transfers are low. Home can be a place of birth option for women seeking a physiological delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document