scholarly journals Penyesuaian Lapisan dan Tarif PPh Orang Pribadi: Agresif atau Progresif?

Owner ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 709-721
Author(s):  
Kalyana Mitta Kristanti
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Tax Harmonization ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government

In 2022, Indonesia would apply changes in tax brackets and rates for personal income tax. This adjustment is based on the Article 17 Paragraph 1 Tax Harmonization Law Number 7 of 2021. The government tries to accommodate the needs of the community through formulating process of this regulation. In particular, it provides convenience to the lower-middle income community and encourages an even distribution of income. People belonging to the high wealth income will be subject to the highest tariffs that have just been set through this law. Through a qualitative descriptive method in which data collection is carried out by taking from literature review; law, articles, books, and website, the author tries to analyze changes in brackets and rates of personal income tax. This study presents illustrations of the calculation to explain the difference in the amount of income tax payable before and after the implementation of the Tax Harmonization Law. In addition, the analysis of the principles of equity and democracy on the adjustment of layers and tax rates is elaborated in this paper. The results obtained explain that with the application of the new tax rate, taxpayers get a tax burden relief because the tax expense is lower due to the broadening of income range. However, wealthy taxpayers will pay more taxes because of the higher tax rates. This condition proves that the new tax rate supports vertical fairness in the taxation system. In addition, the implementation of regulations related to tax rates adjustment provides evidence that the implementation of democracy has been implemented. The adjustment of tax brackets and rates has a positive impact on the community and the government so that the allocation of tax revenues can run optimally to support the welfare of the community.

scholarly journals Can Tax Incentives for Electronic Payments Curtail the Shadow Economy? Korea`s Attempt to Reduce Underreporting in Retail Businesses

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-134
Author(s):  
Sung Myung Jae ◽  
Awasthi Rajul ◽  
Lee Hyung Chul
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Shadow Economy ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Tax Incentives ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Gini Coefficients ◽  
Korean Economy ◽  
Business Income

Increasing tax revenues by curtailing the shadow economy has been a central goal of tax policy and administration in the Republic of Korea since the National Tax Service was established as an independent agency in 1966. This paper examines the Tax Incentives for Electronically Traceable Payments (TIETP) introduced by the Korean tax authorities in 1999 to promote payments made using credit cards, debit cards, and electronic cash receipts in business-to-consumer transactions. TIETP allows wage and salary earners to claim tax deductions for eligible purchases made using electronically traceable payments when they file their year-end income tax return. This tax incentive scheme has greatly contributed to transforming the Korean economy into a cashless economy over the last decade and a half. Card payments as a ratio of Korea`s GDP have ranked highest in the world since 2005, reaching 49% in 2014. TIETP has increased the percentage of business income earners who pay taxes from stagnant at around 30% up to the late 1990s to approximately 80% at present. The effective personal income tax rate for business income followed a continuous upward trend from 3.4% in 1998 to 6.3% in 2013. The total revenue increase driven by TIETP has been estimated as \3.4 trillion, with TIETP costs reaching \1.9 trillion. The net gain is an estimated \1.4 trillion (approximately US$1.3 billion), an increase of personal income tax revenue by 4.2%. TIETP also had a positive impact on income redistribution, decreasing Gini coefficients by 0.11 percentage points.

scholarly journals HARMONIZATION OF TAX LEGISLATION OF THE ASEAN COMMUNITY

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
TANAPONG DAMKERNGKHAJORNWONG
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Consumption Tax ◽  
Direct Taxation ◽  
Tax Legislation ◽  
Asean Member ◽  
Tax Harmonization ◽  
Asean Countries

Abstract This article indicates how tax legislations, both in direct and indirect fields, of ASEAN countries should be harmonized. With respect to direct taxation, the issue of direct tax rates harmonization - personal income tax and corporate income tax - will firstly be discussed. Further, I will look into how the personal income tax treatment on a resident exercising the free movement of skilled labour should be. In addition, how to enhance the network of tax treaties between ASEAN Member States and withholding tax levied on cross-border transaction will also be described. As regards indirect taxation, I will consider to what extent such the consumption tax systems as VAT and GST in each ASEAN countries could be in accordance with each other. Finally, what challenges over tax harmonization in ASEAN can be will be noted. The majority of the discussions above will be based upon the tax harmonization and coordination already conducted within the EU. 

scholarly journals HARMONIZATION OF TAX LEGISLATION OF THE ASEAN COMMUNITY

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
TANAPONG DAMKERNGKHAJORNWONG
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Consumption Tax ◽  
Direct Taxation ◽  
Tax Legislation ◽  
Asean Member ◽  
Tax Harmonization ◽  
Asean Countries

Abstract This article indicates how tax legislations, both in direct and indirect fields, of ASEAN countries should be harmonized. With respect to direct taxation, the issue of direct tax rates harmonization - personal income tax and corporate income tax - will firstly be discussed. Further, I will look into how the personal income tax treatment on a resident exercising the free movement of skilled labour should be. In addition, how to enhance the network of tax treaties between ASEAN Member States and withholding tax levied on cross-border transaction will also be described. As regards indirect taxation, I will consider to what extent such the consumption tax systems as VAT and GST in each ASEAN countries could be in accordance with each other. Finally, what challenges over tax harmonization in ASEAN can be will be noted. The majority of the discussions above will be based upon the tax harmonization and coordination already conducted within the EU. 

scholarly journals Personal Income Taxation in Poland

Ekonomika ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edyta Małecka-Zieńska
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Tax Exemptions ◽  
Tax Deductions ◽  
The One ◽  
Taxation System

The Polish taxation system has been undergoing substantial changes in recent years, aimed at creating a more transparent system and conforming to the taxation standards of market economy countries. The two most important changes were introduction of the personal income tax (PIT) in 1992 and replacement of the turnover tax with the value added tax (VAT) in 1993. The uniform personal income tax covered all incomes generated by natural persons irrespective of where the sources of income are located. The reform provided also a more equitable distribution of the tax burden by introducing a progressive system with three nominal tax rates (in 1992-20%, 30%, 40%).A comparative study of the effective PIT rate for pensioners and other groups of PIT payers is the main goal of this paper. The study refers to our own research on data received from The information of Polish Ministry of Finance about accounting of PIT in several subsequent years. Statistics cover a period from 1993 to 2003. However, numbers of taxpayers refer also to year 1992 when the PIT has been established and a period from 2004 to 2006.Concluding the situation in Poland, taxpayers with the highest income make exhaustive use of tax reductions. There are occurring situations when well-off people benefit more than people with relatively minor income (e. g. pensioners). It happens even if most of deductions were aimed generally at all taxpayers. Such a situation reduces the impression of the system fairness. Because tax deductions reduce budgetary revenues, the foregone revenues have to be compensated by other taxes or / and higher rates. Therefore, the system of deductions and relief, on the one hand, supports the special gains (e. g. house building), however, on the other it generates costs. It is possible that the reduction of tax rate for the I tax bracket and removal of some tax exemptions and deductions would make the Polish personal income tax more transparent, equal and simple.

scholarly journals Are Local Tax Rates Strategic Complements or Strategic Substitutes?

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphaël Parchet
Keyword(s):  
Public Good ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Strategic Substitutes ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
The Public

The identification of strategic interactions among local governments is typically plagued by endogeneity problems. I exploit the fact that local jurisdictions located close to a state border have some neighbors in another state and instrument the tax rate of neighbor jurisdictions with the state-level tax rate of the neighboring state. I use this instrument to identify strategic personal income tax setting by local jurisdictions in Switzerland and find that tax rates are strategic substitutes. I then develop a residence-based personal income tax competition model and show that tax rates are strategic substitutes if the elasticity of the marginal utility of the public good with respect to the tax rate is above one. This is notably the case in the presence of economies of scale in the public good provision. (JEL H24, H71, H73, H77)

Federal Personal Income Tax Policy in the 1920s

1995 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene Smiley ◽  
Richard H. Keehn
Keyword(s):  
World War I ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
World War ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Income Tax Policy ◽  
Tax Cuts

During the 1920s, federal personal income tax rates, which had been dramatically increased during World War I, were sharply reduced. These tax rate cuts have often been cited as an example of a successful supply-side policy, but they have also been criticized as policies designed primarily to benefit the wealthy. We argue that a primary motive for the tax cuts of the 1920s was the desire to reduce the tax avoidance by wealthier individuals that occurred as a result of the previous tax rate increases and that the tax cuts enacted did reduce tax avoidance.

INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX ON THE RICH

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
G. N. SEMENOVA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Annual Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Single Tax ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Rich

The article deals with the taxation of income of individuals with income tax. Income tax rates in different tax periods changed many times were progressive and depended on the size of the total annual income of individuals. Since 2001, with the adoption of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation, a single tax rate on personal income has been established in the amount of 13%. The coronavirus pandemic has impacted busi-ness activities as well as tax revenues. From January 01.01.2021, 15, an additional personal income tax rate of 5% has been established, which will affect the rich whose income will exceed 5 million rubles. The article exam-ines the foreign practice of taxing income of individuals.

scholarly journals What Explains the Redistribution Achieved by the Italian Personal Income Tax? Evidence from Administrative Data

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Paolo Barbetta ◽  
Simone Pellegrino ◽  
Gilberto Turati
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Data ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Credits ◽  
Tax Credit ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Tax Returns ◽  
The Government ◽  
Redistributive Effect

We analyze the Italian personal income tax (PIT) in the light of the different tools available to the government to achieve income redistribution. We focus in particular on three mechanisms: marginal tax rates, deductions, and tax credits. Exploiting an extended version of the standard Pfähler decomposition, we estimate the contribution of each of these three tools to the overall redistributive effect of the PIT using administrative data on more than 1.3 million individual tax returns. Our estimates suggest that more than half of the total PIT redistributive effect is due to the two most important tax credits (the tax credit for employment and the tax credit for retirement income), while the marginal rates schedule contribution is about 40 percent. On the contrary, most of the itemized expenditures do not show any sizable impact on redistribution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document