Short-Term Outcome of Cataract Surgery Using Torsional-Mode Phacoemulsification for Patients with Low Endothelial Cell Counts

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Kyoung Lee ◽  
Mee Kum Kim ◽  
Won Ryang Wee ◽  
Jin Hak Lee
2020 ◽  
pp. 014556132095250
Author(s):  
Diyan Chen ◽  
Zhujian Wang ◽  
Gaogan Jia ◽  
Huanyu Mao ◽  
Yusu Ni

Objective: Immunity is associated with acute low tone hearing loss. However, the exact pathophysiology of immunity-mediated acute low tone hearing loss remains unknown. In this study, we evaluated the presence, therapeutic effectiveness, and immunopathological mechanisms of anti-endothelial cell autoantibodies (AECEs) in patients with acute low-frequency hearing loss. Material and Methods: Forty-nine patients who were treated as inpatients having acute low-frequency hearing loss and additional symptoms, such as ear fullness, tinnitus, dizziness, or hyperacusis, were enrolled in this study. Serum samples from these patients were collected for laboratory serum autoimmunity detection, including AECAs, antinuclear antibodies, immunoglobulin, and circular immune complex. Therapeutic responses to combination therapy in short-term outcome and serum cytokine levels were compared between AECA-positive and AECA-negative patients. Results: Anti-endothelial cell autoantibodies–positive patients tended to show significantly less response to standard therapy compared with AECAs controls ( P < .05). Moreover, some serum cytokine levels elevated in both AECAs− and AECAs+ groups. Positive ratio of interleukin-8 and concentrations of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α were found higher in AECAs+ groups ( P < .05). Conclusion: The results supported that AECAs might wield influence on the short-term outcome of acute low-tone hearing loss (ALHL) treatment. Furthermore, AECA-mediated acute low-frequency hearing loss possibly involved dysregulation of inflammation process and release of cytokines.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-134
Author(s):  
Rahul Bhargava ◽  
Shiv Kumar Sharma ◽  
Mini Chandra ◽  
Prachi Kumar ◽  
Yogesh Arora

Introduction: Endothelial cell loss and complications after cataract surgery may be higher when cataract is complicated by uveitis.Objective: To compare endothelial cell damage and complication rates after phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery (SICS) in patients with uveitis.Materials and methods: Patients with uveitic cataract were randomly allocated for phacoemulsification (n=75) or manual SICS (n=80) in a double blind prospective study. In the bag implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens was aimed in all cases. Patients with follow up of less than six months were excluded. Main outcome measures were alteration in endothelial cell counts (ECC) and morphology, improvement in vision and complication rates. ECC was measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 3 months and six months, postoperatively.Results: Six patients were lost to follow up and another three due inability to implant IOL. There were no significant difference in endothelial cell counts (P= 0.032), the variance of endothelial cell size (CV) and percentage of hexagonal cells between both the groups at six months (Mann-Whitney test, P=0.283). Endothelial cell density was significantly less in the group in which vitrectomy and/or pupil dilatation procedures were performed (2290±31.5 cells/mm2) versus (2385±50.3 cells/mm2), respectively (t test, P<0.001). Incidence of postoperative complications that were observed like persistent uveitis (P=0.591), macular edema (P=0.671) and PCO (P=0.678) and visual outcome (P=0.974) were comparable between the two groups.Conclusions: Manual SICS and phacoemulsification do not differ significantly in endothelial cell loss and complication rates in uveitic eyes. However, increased anterior chamber manoeuvring due to additional procedures may lead to significantly higher endothelial cell loss.


Thorax ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 732-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
N M Foley ◽  
A P Coral ◽  
K Tung ◽  
B N Hudspith ◽  
D G James ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-104
Author(s):  
Kourosh Shahraki ◽  
Mohammad Naeim Amini Fard ◽  
Farkhondeh Shahri ◽  
Rama Pourmatin ◽  
Tafgeh Mohammadi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document