scholarly journals Penerapan Multiple Criteria Decision Making untuk Pemilihan Dosen Prestasi

Techno Com ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-60
Author(s):  
Tri Widayanti
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Dengan adanya penyelenggaraan pemilihan dosen berprestasi di tingkat nasional, maka diharapkan setiap perguruan tinggi terdorong untuk memiliki sistem penghargaan yang terprogram bagi dosen yang memiliki prestasi tinggi dalam pelaksanaan tridarma perguruan tinggi. Dalam pemilihan dosen berprestasi tersebut sering muncul subyektifitas para pengambil keputusan.Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah dengan penunjang keputusan, pengambilan keputusan akan lebih objektif dalam memilih dosen berprestasi. Penelitian Multiple Criteria Decision Making dilakukan dengan menggunakan 2 metode yaitu Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Technique for Order by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). AHP digunakan untuk menentukan bobot kepentingan dari setiap kriteria dan sub kriteria penilaian dosen berprestasi, kemudian TOPSIS digunakan untuk memilih alternatif dosen berprestasi yang memerlukan pertimbangan. Hasil penelitian  menunjukkan bahwa AHP dan TOPSIS dapat digunakan sebagai pendukung pembuat keputusan yang multi kriteria dan memerlukan banyak pertimbangan dalam pemilihan dosen berprestasi di perguruan tinggi. Metode AHP dan TOPSIS dapat membedakan dengan jelas  berdasarkan nilai preferensi yang dihasilkan sehingga memberikan keputusan yang objektif.

Research on Evaluation of Group-Buying Website Based on FAHP

2011 ◽  
Vol 204-210 ◽  
pp. 1588-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shou Ming Chen ◽  
Ru Li
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Group Buying ◽  
Research On Evaluation ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The group-buying online, a boom of e-commerce phenomenon, expands rapidly in China. Hence, the evaluation of group-buying website is essential for CEO to improve their website performance and for consumers to select the platform to purchase. However, the evaluation of group-buying website is a multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem that is not easy to determine. For this reason, we propose analytical hierarchy process based approaches Fuzzy AHP, to evaluate the group-buying websites. In addition, a case study is presented to demonstrate how the approach can help in solving such problems in practice.

scholarly journals Evaluation of traffic congestion degree: An integrated approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 155014771772316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nannan Hao ◽  
Yixiong Feng ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Guangdong Tian ◽  
Lele Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Traffic Congestion ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Gray Correlation ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Correlation Techniques ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Intersection traffic congestion evaluation is essential for effective intelligent transportation system planning, and an objective and precise assessment of traffic congestion is vital to ensure the smooth circulation of traffic. Multiple criteria decision-making is a method for evaluating the degree of traffic congestion. A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution, and gray correlation techniques are presented in this work. The proposed method applied fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of the evaluation index; subsequently, gray correlation techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution were integrated to construct the hybrid decision-making method. A case study of traffic congestion at intersections with five evaluation indexes verified the effectiveness of the hybrid method. The evaluation results of the different methods show that the proposed method overcomes the one-sidedness of analytical hierarchy process–techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution and analytical hierarchy process–gray correlation. Thus, the proposed hybrid decision-making model provides a more accurate and reliable method for evaluating the degree of traffic congestion.

scholarly journals A Study of Multicriteria Decision Making for Supplier Selection in Automotive Industry

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Jamil ◽  
Rosli Besar ◽  
H. K. Sim
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Automotive Manufacturing ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Hierarchy Process

This paper is designed to present the effectiveness of group multicriteria decision making in automotive manufacturing company focusing on the selection of suppliers in Malaysia. The process of selecting suppliers is one of the most critical and challenging endeavor in any supply chain management. There are five decision making tools being analyzed in this study, namely, analytical hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS), and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated with fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FAHPiFTOPSIS). The scores of ranking among the suppliers in each MCDM tools (AHP, FAHP, TOPSIS, FTOPSIS, and FAHPiFTOPSIS) show significantly comparable variation. Scores of the best supplier is then compared to the lowest supplier for all MCDM tools whereby this reflects that the highest percentage goes to TOPSIS with scoring of 79.37%. On the contrary, FAHPiFTOPSIS demonstrated the lowest score variation of 22.42% which indicates that FAHPiFTOPSIS is able to eliminate biasness in supplier selection process.

Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 763-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu-Chen Liu ◽  
Jian-Xin You ◽  
Xue-Feng Ding ◽  
Qiang Su
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Effect Analysis ◽  
Maintenance Strategies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Safety And Reliability ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a new failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) framework for evaluation, prioritization and improvement of failure modes. Design/methodology/approach – A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method combining VIKOR, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to rank the risk of the failure modes identified in FMEA. The modified VIKOR method is employed to determine the effects of failure modes on together. Then the DEMATEL technique is used to construct the influential relation map among the failure modes and causes of failures. Finally, the AHP approach based on the DEMATEL is utilized to obtain the influential weights and give the prioritization levels for the failure modes. Findings – A case study of diesel engine’s turbocharger system is provided to illustrate the potential application and benefits of the proposed FMEA approach. Results show that the new risk priority model can be effective in helping analysts find the high risky failure modes and create suitable maintenance strategies. Practical implications – The proposed FMEA can overcome the shortcomings and improve the effectiveness of the traditional FMEA. Particularly, the dependence and interactions between different failure modes and effects have been addressed by the new failure analysis method. Originality/value – This paper presents a systemic analytical model for FMEA. It is able to capture the complex interrelationships among various failure modes and effects and provide guidance to analysts by setting the suitable maintenance strategies to improve the safety and reliability of complex systems.

scholarly journals Cognitive Multiple Criteria Decision Making and the Legacy of the Analytic Hierarchy Process

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
José María Moreno-Jiménez ◽  
Luis G. Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Sociedad Del Conocimiento ◽  
Toma De Decisiones ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Este trabajo recoge brevemente el concepto, la evolución histórica y las diferentes escuelas de una de las partes de la Investigación Operativa más fructífera y con mayor difusión de los últimos 45 años: la Decisión Multicriterio. Así mismo, analiza la evolución que el método científico ha seguido en este periodo de tiempo y cuáles son las nuevas orientaciones que presenta en el contexto de la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Finalmente, se incluyen una serie de ideas sobre cuáles pueden ser algunos de los retos futuros en el campo de la toma de decisiones multicriterio (TDMC), en particular en el contexto de una de las aproximaciones más populares: el Proceso Analítico Jerárquico (AHP). Tres problemas fundamentales, ya vislumbrados para esta escuela de pensamiento por su creador, necesitan ser abordados como futuros retos en el campo multicriterio. Este trabajo se ha dedicado a la memoria del profesor Thomas L. Saaty, el autor de AHP y uno de los matemáticos más brillantes e ingeniosos de los últimos 60 años, quien acaba de fallecer en agosto de 2017 a los 91 años de edad.

Study on Ship Form Technical and Economic Evaluation DS Based on Interactive MCDM

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Song ◽  
Li-Hua Jun
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Accurate Result ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Least Square Method ◽  
Least Square ◽  
New Method ◽  
Decision Systems ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Hierarchy Process

A new method of interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is presented. In order to settle the problem that in the cases for the ship designers sometimes it is difficult to make a decision when facing so complex ship form schemes. The conventional AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) is adopted, but it mostly depends on the designer’s subjective and leads to the systematic error. The new method can obtain the accurate result with the rigid least square method as a tool, making full use of the AHP and the objective information entropy, which reflects the inherent attribute. When applied in the practice, it is proved to be effective, practical and dependable for future ships’ complex Decision Systems (DS).

scholarly journals Aid application multicriteria the decision based on AHP Method and Fuzzy Logic in commercial land selection

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilson Brandalise ◽  
Amanda Sexto Alexandre Pereira ◽  
Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito Mello
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Engineering Problems ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Analytical Operation ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract The objective of this article is to select land for commercial buildings in Rio de Janeiro city using multiple criteria decision-making techniques. The techniques used were based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Logic methods. These methods were chosen because of functionality, flexibility and great application in engineering problems for decision making involving multiple criteria. Its application was made through an opinion survey with expert builders, where 6 (six) factors for evaluation were selected in 10 (ten) commercial land alternatives. For the analytical operation of the methods, the software used were: Super Decisions and MATLAB®, respectively for each method, presenting the factors classified, in order of priority, in the selection of land, and ranking of the alternatives according to the defined scenario, facilitating in this way the process of selection of land for buildings, establishing a scientific way for the decision process.

Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Selecting Automated Manufacturing Systems

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 45-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.P. Mohanty ◽  
Sitalakshmi Venkataraman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Manufacturing Systems ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Social Impacts ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Automated Manufacturing ◽  
Automated Manufacturing Systems ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Studies the justification problems of automated manufacturing systems (AMS) by using a multiple‐criteria decision making (MCDM) approach such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP). An example from Indian manufacturing has been studied. Strategic, technological and social impacts have been considered for justifying AMS and decomposing these factors into several possible attributes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document