Camouflage Treatment of a Skeletal Class III Adult Patient with Transverse Discrepancy Using a Microimplant-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-116
Author(s):  
Jinung Jang ◽  
Seung-Wook Oh ◽  
Kyung-A Kim
2018 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliano Maino ◽  
Ylenia Turci ◽  
Angela Arreghini ◽  
Emanuele Paoletto ◽  
Giuseppe Siciliani ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elona Kongo

SummaryBackground/Aim: Maxillary transverse deficiency often combines with retruded maxillary skeletal position causing a skeletal class III malocclusion. In these cases combination of rapid palatal expander and a facial mask to protract the maxilla is a very effective treatment protocol. When the maxilla is not deficient is it necessary to use palatal expansion before protracting? Should we use this combination because it has been proved to be effective? The aim of this paper is to show that maxillary protraction is also effective when applied without expanding the maxilla although there are some statistically significant changes.Material and Methods: Two groups of 20 patients each, were created for this study. The first group were treated with rapid palatal expansion and face mask. In the second group, patients were treated only with face mask.Results: Measurements made at T0 (prior to treatment) and those at T1 (after treatment) were statistically analyzed. At the end of the treatment patients of the 1st group showed significant difference for the values of SNA, SNB, ANB angles (p=0.000). Significant changes were observed also for the second group (SNA, SNB, ANB). The only differences between the two groups were observed regarding SNA angle (p=0.040) and maxillary incisor inclination (p=0.028).Conclusions: At the end of treatment, all patients showed skeletal class III correction and improved facial appearance. Significant changes of SNA angle were observed for each group. There were also significant changes in the position of the mandible. These changes contributed in skeletal class III correction but there was no significant difference between them.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hossein Behnia ◽  
Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi ◽  
Mohammad Behnaz

This case report presents the treatment of a 21-year-old male patient with class III skeletal malocclusion, an open bite, and vertical growth pattern. He was managed with surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) along with an orthopedic facemask. The duration of treatment was 16 months. Significant improvement and favourable outcome were observed concerning both facial appearance and paraclinical parameters after completion of treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2531
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Quinzi ◽  
Licia Coceani Paskay ◽  
Nicola D’Andrea ◽  
Arianna Albani ◽  
Annalisa Monaco ◽  
...  

Background: This study is a systematic literature review aiming at identifying the variation of the average nasolabial angle (NLA) in various orthodontic situations. The NLA is one of the key factors to be studied in an orthodontic diagnosis for the aesthetics of the nose and facial profile. Methods: Out of 3118 articles resulting from four search engines (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) and SciELO), the final study allowed the analysis and comparison of only 26 studies. These included studies have considered the NLA in the following cases: teeth extraction, class II malocclusion, class III malocclusion, rapid palatal expansion (RPE), orthognathic surgery, and non-surgical rhinoplasty with a hyaluronic acid filler. Results: The results indicate that teeth extraction and the use of hyaluronic acid fillers significantly affect the NLA. Conclusions: This systematic review shows that a statistically significant change in NLA values occurs in: extractive treatments of all four of the first or second premolars in class I patients; in class II patients with upper maxillary protrusion; in patients with maxillary biprotrusion, except for cases of severe crowding; and in patients undergoing non-surgical rhinoplasty with a hyaluronic acid filler. Trial registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020185166


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document