scholarly journals Avian Pigment Pattern Formation: Developmental Control of Macro- (Across the Body) and Micro- (Within a Feather) Level of Pigment Patterns

Author(s):  
Masafumi Inaba ◽  
Cheng-Ming Chuong
2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 505-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa B. Patterson ◽  
David M. Parichy

Vertebrate pigment patterns are diverse and fascinating adult traits that allow animals to recognize conspecifics, attract mates, and avoid predators. Pigment patterns in fish are among the most amenable traits for studying the cellular basis of adult form, as the cells that produce diverse patterns are readily visible in the skin during development. The genetic basis of pigment pattern development has been most studied in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Zebrafish adults have alternating dark and light horizontal stripes, resulting from the precise arrangement of three main classes of pigment cells: black melanophores, yellow xanthophores, and iridescent iridophores. The coordination of adult pigment cell lineage specification and differentiation with specific cellular interactions and morphogenetic behaviors is necessary for stripe development. Besides providing a nice example of pattern formation responsible for an adult trait of zebrafish, stripe-forming mechanisms also provide a conceptual framework for posing testable hypotheses about pattern diversification more broadly. Here, we summarize what is known about lineages and molecular interactions required for pattern formation in zebrafish, we review some of what is known about pattern diversification in Danio, and we speculate on how patterns in more distant teleosts may have evolved to produce a stunningly diverse array of patterns in nature.


Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.K. Richardson ◽  
A. Hornbruch ◽  
L. Wolpert

One hypothesis to account for pigment patterning in birds is that neural crest cells migrate into all feather papillae. Local cues then act upon the differentiation of crest cells into melanocytes. This hypothesis is derived from a study of the quail-chick chimaera (Richardson et al., Development 107, 805–818, 1989). Another idea, derived from work on larval fish and amphibia, is that pigment patterns arise from the differential migration of crest cells. We want to know which of these mechanisms can best account for pigment pattern formation in the embryonic plumage of the quail wing. Most of the feather papillae on the dorsal surface of the wing are pigmented, while many on the ventral surface are white. When ectoderm from unpigmented feather papillae is grown in culture, it gives rise to melanocytes. This indicates that neural crest cells are present in white feathers but that they fail to differentiate. If the wing tip is inverted experimentally then the pigment pattern is inverted also. This is difficult to explain in terms of a model based on migratory pathways, unless one assumes that the pathways became re-routed. When an extra polarizing region is grafted to the anterior margin of the wing bud, a duplication develops in: (1) the pattern of skeletal elements; (2) the pattern of feather papillae; (3) the feather pigment pattern. The pigment pattern was not a precise mirror image although some groups of papillae showed a high degree of symmetry in their pigmentation. Both the tip inversions and the duplications produce discontinuities in the feather and pigment patterns. No evidence of intercalation was found in these cases. We conclude that pigment patterning in birds is determined by local cues acting on melanocyte differentiation, rather than by the differential migration of crest cells. Positional values along the anteroposterior axis of the pigment pattern are determined by a gradient of positional information. Thus the pigment patterns, feather patterns and cartilage patterns of the wing may all be specified by a similar mechanism.


Development ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-289
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cooke

Morphological evidence is presented that definitive mesoderm formation in Xenopus is best understood as extending to the end of the neurula phase of development. A process of recruitment of cells from the deep neurectoderm layers into mesodermal position and behaviour, strictly comparable with that already agreed to occur around the internal blastoporal ‘lip’ during gastrula stages, can be shown to continue at the posterior end of the presumptive body pattern up to stage 20 (earliest tail bud). Spatial patterns of incidence of mitosis are described for the fifteen hours of development between the late gastrula and stage 20–22. These are related to the onset of new cell behaviours and overt cyto-differentiations characterizing the dorsal axial pattern,which occur in cranio-caudal and then medio-lateral spatial sequence as development proceeds. A relatively abrupt cessation of mitosis, among hitherto asynchronously cycling cells,precedes the other changes at each level in the presumptive axial pattern. The widespread incidence of cells still in DNA synthesis, anterior to the last mitoses in the posterior-to-anteriordevelopmental sequence of axial tissue, strongly suggests that cells of notochord and somites in their prolonged, non-cycling phase are G2-arrested, and thus tetraploid. This is discussed in relation to what is known of cell-cycle control in other situations. Best estimates for cell-cycle time in the still-dividing, posterior mesoderm of the neurula lie between 10 and 15 h. The supposition of continuing recruitment from neurectoderm can resolve an apparent discrepancy whereby total mesodermal cell number nevertheless contrives to double over a period of approximately 12 h during neurulation when most of the cells are leaving the cycle. Because of pre-existing evidence that cells maintain their relative positions (despite distortion)during the movements that form the mesodermal mantle, the patterns presented in this paper can be understood in two ways: as a temporal sequence of developmental events undergone by individual, posteriorly recruited cells as they achieve their final positions in the body pattern, or alternatively as a succession of wavefronts with respect to changes of cellstate, passing obliquely across the presumptive body pattern in antero-posterior direction. These concepts are discussed briefly in relation to recent ideas about pattern formation in growing systems.


Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Mayer ◽  
G. Buttner ◽  
G. Jurgens

gnom is one of several genes that make substantial contributions to pattern formation along the apical-basal axis of polarity in the Arabidopsis embryo as indicated by the mutant seedling phenotype. The apical and basal end regions of the body pattern, which include the meristems of the shoot and the root, fail to form, and a minority of mutant embryos lack morphological features of apical-basal polarity. We have investigated the developmental basis of the gnom mutant phenotype, taking advantage of a large number of EMS-induced mutant alleles. The seedling phenotype has been traced back to the early embryo in which the asymmetric division of the zygote is altered, now producing two nearly equal-sized cells. The apical daughter cell then undergoes abnormal divisions, resulting in an octant embryo with about twice the normal number of cells while the uppermost derivative of the basal cell fails to become the hypophysis, which normally contributes to root development. Consistent with this early effect, gnom appears to be epistatic to monopteros in doubly mutant embryos, suggesting that, without prior gnom activity, the monopteros gene cannot promote root and hypocotyl development. On the other hand, when root formation was induced in bisected seedlings, wild-type responded whereas gnom mutants failed to produce a root but formed callus instead. These results suggest that gnom activity promotes asymmetric cell division which we believe is necessary both for apical-basal pattern formation in the early embryo and for root formation in tissue culture.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1487-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Pezzulo ◽  
M. Levin

How do regenerating bodies know when to stop remodeling? Bioelectric signaling networks guide pattern formation and may implement a somatic memory system. Deep parallels may exist between information processing in the brain and morphogenetic control mechanisms.


Biology Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 736-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Georg Frohnhöfer ◽  
Silke Geiger-Rudolph ◽  
Martin Pattky ◽  
Martin Meixner ◽  
Carolin Huhn ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-437
Author(s):  
M. Yu ◽  
M. Medina ◽  
C.-M Chuong

Genetics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 194 (3) ◽  
pp. 631-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena A. Kottler ◽  
Andrey Fadeev ◽  
Detlef Weigel ◽  
Christine Dreyer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document