scholarly journals Optogenetic Activation of Arcuate Kisspeptin Neurons Generates a Luteinizing Hormone Surge-Like Secretion in an Estradiol-Dependent Manner

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian-Hua Lin ◽  
Geffen Lass ◽  
Ling-Si Kong ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Xiao-Feng Li ◽  
...  

Traditionally, the anteroventral periventricular (AVPV) nucleus has been the brain area associated with luteinizing hormone (LH) surge secretion in rodents. However, the role of the other population of hypothalamic kisspeptin neurons, in the arcuate nucleus (ARC), has been less well characterized with respect to surge generation. Previous experiments have demonstrated ARC kisspeptin knockdown reduced the amplitude of LH surges, indicating that they have a role in surge amplification. The present study used an optogenetic approach to selectively stimulate ARC kisspeptin neurons and examine the effect on LH surges in mice with different hormonal administrations. LH level was monitored from 13:00 to 21:00 h, at 30-minute intervals. Intact Kiss-Cre female mice showed increased LH secretion during the stimulation period in addition to displaying a spontaneous LH surge around the time of lights off. In ovariectomized Kiss-Cre mice, optogenetic stimulation was followed by a surge-like secretion of LH immediately after the stimulation period. Ovariectomized Kiss-Cre mice with a low dose of 17β-estradiol (OVX+E) replacement displayed a surge-like increase in LH release during period of optic stimulation. No LH response to the optic stimulation was observed in OVX+E mice on the day of estradiol benzoate (EB) treatment (day 1). However, after administration of progesterone (day 2), all OVX+E+EB+P mice exhibited an LH surge during optic stimulation. A spontaneous LH surge also occurred in these mice at the expected time. Taken together, these results help to affirm the fact that ARC kisspeptin may have a novel amplificatory role in LH surge production, which is dependent on the gonadal steroid milieu.

2017 ◽  
Vol 233 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinuyo Iwata ◽  
Yuyu Kunimura ◽  
Keisuke Matsumoto ◽  
Hitoshi Ozawa

Hyperandrogenic women have various grades of ovulatory dysfunction, which lead to infertility. The purpose of this study was to determine whether chronic exposure to androgen affects the expression of kisspeptin (ovulation and follicle development regulator) or release of luteinizing hormone (LH) in female rats. Weaned females were subcutaneously implanted with 90-day continuous-release pellets of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and studied after 10 weeks of age. Number of Kiss1-expressing cells in both the anteroventral periventricular nucleus (AVPV) and arcuate nucleus (ARC) was significantly decreased in ovary-intact DHT rats. Further, an estradiol-induced LH surge was not detected in DHT rats, even though significant differences were not observed between DHT and non-DHT rats with regard to number of AVPV Kiss1-expressing cells or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-immunoreactive (ir) cells in the presence of high estradiol. Kiss1-expressing and neurokinin B-ir cells were significantly decreased in the ARC of ovariectomized (OVX) DHT rats compared with OVX non-DHT rats; pulsatile LH secretion was also suppressed in these animals. Central injection of kisspeptin-10 or intravenous injection of a GnRH agonist did not affect the LH release in DHT rats. Notably, ARC Kiss1-expressing cells expressed androgen receptors (ARs) in female rats, whereas only a few Kiss1-expressing cells expressed ARs in the AVPV. Collectively, our results suggest excessive androgen suppresses LH surge and pulsatile LH secretion by inhibiting kisspeptin expression in the ARC and disruption at the pituitary level, whereas AVPV kisspeptin neurons appear to be directly unaffected by androgen. Hence, hyperandrogenemia may adversely affect ARC kisspeptin neurons, resulting in anovulation and menstrual irregularities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A536-A537
Author(s):  
Patricia Costa Henriques ◽  
Nayara Soares Sena Aquino ◽  
Roberta Araújo-Lopes ◽  
Juneo Freitas Silva ◽  
Candido Celso Coimbra ◽  
...  

Abstract Low 17β-estradiol (E2) levels suppress luteinizing hormone (LH) release, while high E2 stimulates an LH surge in the positive-feedback required for ovulation. Kisspeptin (Kp) neurons in the anteroventral periventricular (AVPV) and arcuate (ARC) nuclei of hypothalamus have been implicated in E2 positive- and negative-feedback effects, respectively. However, how E2 differentially regulates these two neuronal populations remains unknown. We investigated whether neurons in the AVPV and ARC are differently responsive to changes in E2 levels and the regulatory role of estrogen receptors (ERs). Ovariectomized (OV) rats received oil or E2 at doses of 4 (OVE-4), 40 (OVE-40), or 80 (OVE-80) µg/kg. Rats on diestrus (DI) and proestrus (PRO) were used as physiological controls. OV rats were also treated with 0.02, 0.2 or 2.0 mg/kg of propyl pyrazole triol (PPT), or 6 mg/kg of diarylpropionitrile (DPN). Serial blood samples were collected for hormonal measurements. Brains were processed for immunohistochemistry and qPCR analyses in the AVPV and ARC. The E2 doses gradually increased plasma E2, with PRO levels being attained in OVE-80 rats. OVE-80 rats displayed a PRO-like LH surge, while LH levels were constantly suppressed in OVE-4 rats. Progesterone receptor (PR) was used as an index of E2 responsiveness. PR expression was increased in the AVPV of PRO and OVE-80 rats, associated with c-Fos expression and occurrence of LH surge. In the ARC, both low and high E2 induced PR expression and reduced the number of Kp-immunoreactive (ir) neurons, consistent with the negative feedback effects on LH. E2 at 4 or 80 µg/kg equally induced PR expression in 90% of ARC Kp-ir neurons. Despite the higher sensitivity to E2 in the ARC, the percentage of neurons expressing ERα was lower in the ARC compared with AVPV. However, Esr1 expression was 2-fold higher in the ARC than in AVPV for low E2 levels, whereas both Esr1 and Esr2 were more expressed in the AVPV under high E2 status. Notably, Esr1/Esr2 ratio was twice as high in the ARC as in the AVPV regardless of E2 levels, suggesting a stronger ERβ inhibition over ERα in the AVPV. Accordingly, ERα selective activation with PPT increased PR in the ARC at the doses of 0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg, reducing plasma LH, while only the highest dose was able to stimulate PR expression in the AVPV. ERβ activation with DPN, in turn, had no effect in OV rats but amplified the induction of AVPV PR and the size of the LH surge in OVE-80 rats. Thus, we provide evidence that ARC and AVPV neurons are responsive to low and high E2 levels, respectively. ARC is 10 times more sensitive to ERα activation than AVPV, whereas ERβ positively modulates AVPV responsiveness to high E2. These differential responses to E2 seem to be related to differences in the relative Esr1 and Esr2 expression in the ARC and AVPV. Our findings suggest that hypothalamic differences in the relative expression of ERs play a key role in the bimodal regulation of LH release by E2.


1983 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. D'Occhio ◽  
B. D. Schanbacher ◽  
J. E. Kinder

Abstract. The acute castrate ram (wether) was used as an experimental model to investigate the site(s) of feedback on luteinizing hormone (LH) by testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and oestradiol. At the time of castration, wethers were implanted subdermally with Silastic capsules containing either crystalline testosterone (three 30 cm capsules), dihydrotestosterone (five 30 cm capsules) or oestradiol (one 6.5 cm capsule). Blood samples were taken at 10 min intervals for 6 h 2 weeks after implantation to determine serum steroid concentrations and to characterize the patterns of LH secretion. Pituitary LH response to exogenous LRH (5 ng/kg body weight) were also determined at the same time. The steroid implants produced serum concentrations of the respective hormones which were either one-third (testosterone) or two-to-four times (dihydrotestosterone, oestradiol) the levels measured in rams at the time of castration. Non-implanted wethers showed rhythmic pulses of LH (pulse interval 40–60 min) and had elevated LH levels (16.1 ± 1.6 ng/ml; mean ± se) 2 weeks after castration. All three steroids suppressed pulsatile LH release and reduced mean LH levels (to below 3 ng/ml) and pituitary LH responses to LRH. Inhibition of pulsatile LH secretion by all three steroids indicated that testosterone as well as its androgenic and oestrogenic metabolites can inhibit the LRH pulse generator in the hypothalamus. Additional feedback on the pituitary was indicated by the dampened LH responses to exogenous LRH.


1977 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Clemens ◽  
Frank C. Tinsley ◽  
Ray W. Fuller

ABSTRACT The possible participation of dopamine in the neural events that lead to the pro-oestrous surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) was investigated utilizing a dopaminergic ergoline derivative (lergotrile mesylate). Administration of reserpine (2.0 mg/kg, ip) to rats on the day of pro-oestrus depicted brain dopamine and norepinephrine and prevented the LH surge and ovulation. Administration of lergotrile mesylate prior to or at the same time as reserpine prevented the inhibitory effects of reserpine on LH release and on ovulation in about half of the animals. When lergotrile mesylate was given on the morning of pro-oestrus, the LH surge was advanced. The results indicate that there is a dopaminergic component in the series of neural events that precede the surge of LH on prooestrus, and that the dopaminergic stimulus precedes the LH surge by about 4–5 h.


1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Benjamin Adler

These studies tested the interrelated hypotheses that the ovarian hormones produce their positive feedback effects on luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion through activation of noradrenergic and adrenergic systems in specific hypothalamic regions. Furthermore, the ovarian hormones may alter the activity of opioid neuropeptide and Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) systems to produce these alterations in catecholamine transmission and gonadotropin secretion. Radioimmunoassays were utilized to determine plasma LH and median eminence LHRH, and hypothalamic catecholamine concentrations were measured by radioenzymatic assay. The first two studies tested whether epinephrine (EPI) synthesis inhibition blocks the accumulation of median eminence LHRH that precedes the ovarian hormone-induced LH surge and also to test whether the stimulatory ovarian hormone regimen enhances the activity of hypothalamic EPI systems. Ovariectomized rats were primed with estradiol (EB), followed 2 days later by progesterone (Prog.). Animals were treated before Prog, administration with saline, one of the EPI synthesis inhibitors SKF 64139 or LY 78335, or the norepinephrine (NE) synthesis inhibitor, FLA-63. The catecholamine synthesis inhibitors blocked or delayed the LH surge. FLA-63 completely prevented the accumulation of LHRH in the median eminence that preceded the rise in LH release. However, selective reduction in EPI levels with SKF 64139 only partially prevented this increase in LHRH. A second EPI synthesis inhibitor, LY 78335, delayed both the LH surge and the rise in LHRH. In a second experiment, the administration of EB plus Prog, to ovariectomized rats increased the alpha-methyltyrosine (aMT) induced depletion of EPI in the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH). The depletion of NE after synthesis inhibition was enhanced in both the MBH and preoptic-anterior hypothalamus (POA). Experiments 3 and 4 examined a possible mechanism underlying these ovarian hormone effects on LH release and catecholamine activity. These studies tested whether the opiate antagonist, naloxone, which increases LH release, enhances the activity of NE and EPI neurons in the hypothalamus, and also tested whether morphine, an opiate agonist which decreases LH release, depresses the activity of hypothalamic NE and EPI activity. Administration of naloxone to EB-primed rats increased LH release and potentiated the depletion of NE in the POA and MBH, and enhanced the decline of EPI and dopamine (DA) in the MBH, suggesting increased catecholamine activity in these regions. Administration of the opiate agonist, morphine, to rats pretreated with EB and Prog., decreased LH and decreased the depletion of the catecholamines in the POA and MBH, suggesting reduced activity. In most cases, naloxone antagonized the inhibitory effect of morphine. Experiments 3, 6, and 7 examined the involvement of (GABA) systems in the positive feedback effects of EB and Prog, on LHRH and LH release. These studies tested 1) the effects of GABAergic drugs on the LH surge induced by EB and Prog., 2) whether GABA agonists reduce NE and EPI activity in the hypothalamus, and 3) whether a GABA agonist prevents the accumulation of median eminence LHRH induced by EB and Prog. Ovariectomized rats received the stimulatory EB plus Prog, treatment. Simultaneously with Prog., rats received either saline, the barbiturate, phenobarbital, the GABAg agonist, baclofen, the GABA^ agonist, muscimol, or either the GABA^ antagonist, bicuculline, or the putative GABAg antagonist, 5-aminovalerate. Additional experiments tested the effects of the GABA drugs on LH release in ovariectomized, hormonally untreated rats and in response to exogenous LHRH. The LH surge induced by EB+Prog. was blocked by treatment with either baclofen, muscimol, or phenobarbital. Bicuculline was ineffective in preventing the effect of baclofen and phonobarbital but partially prevented the effect of muscimol. Neither baclofen nor muscimol significantly affected LH release in hormonally untreated, ovariectomized rats or in rats receiving LHRH administration. In the results of Experiment 6, in EB plus Prog.-treated rats, baclofen and muscimol significantly reduced the concentrations of EPI and NE in the POA and MBH and prevented their decline after administration of otMT, suggesting decreased catecholamine transmission. In Experiment 7, rats were primed with the ovarian hormones and received, concurrently with Prog., either saline, or baclofen. The GABAg agonist, baclofen, blocked the LH surge and selectively increased LHRH concentrations. Experiment 8 tested 1) whether baclofen reverses the enhancement of LH release and catecholamine activity produced by naloxone, and 2) whether the opiate antagonist, nalmefene, prevents the blockade of the LH surge produced by baclofen. In the first study of Experiment 8, naloxone increased LH release and enhanced catecholamine activity in EB-primed rats. Baclofen was unable to reverse these effects. In the second study, baclofen administration to EB plus P treated rats blocked the LH surge and concomitant administration of nalmefene was unable to prevent this effect of baclofen. These results suggest that: 1) the ovarian hormones activate both NE and EPI systems to stimulate the early afternoon rise of LHRH in the median eminence and to induce the subsequent LH surge, 2) the ovarian hormones may produce their positive feedback effects on LH secretion by removing an inhibitory GABA or opioid neuropeptide influence on catecholamine transmission, allowing NE and EPI to stimulate LHRH, and subsequently, LH release, and 3) these modulatory actions of GABA and opiates may represent effects of two parallel, yet independent hypothalamic systems which regulate catecholamine neurotransmission and subsequently LH secretion.


1999 ◽  
Vol 276 (1) ◽  
pp. R219-R225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Hoeger ◽  
Lisa A. Kolp ◽  
Frank J. Strobl ◽  
Johannes D. Veldhuis

The preovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surge results from the integration of complex interactions among gonadal steroids and hypothalamic and pituitary hormones. To evaluate changes in LH secretory dynamics that occur during the rat LH surge, we have 1) obtained frequently sampled serum LH concentration time series, 2) used both waveform-dependent and waveform-independent convolution analyses, and 3) independently assessed proestrous LH half-life and basal non-gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-dependent LH secretion during the LH surge. Waveform-independent pulse analysis revealed a 24-fold increase in the maximal pulsatile LH secretory rate attained during late proestrus compared with early proestrus. A 15-fold increase was quantified for the mean LH secretory rate. In complementary analyses, we applied a measured LH half-life of 17 ± 2.7 min and a median basal LH secretion rate of 0.0046 μg ⋅ l−1 ⋅ min−1 for convolution analysis, revealing a 16-fold increase in the mass of LH released/burst and more than sixfold rise in the amplitude of the secretory peaks. Evaluation of the approximate entropy of the LH surge profiles was performed, showing an increase in the orderliness of the LH release process during the surge. We conclude that both quantitative (mass/burst) and qualitative (approximate entropy) features of LH release are regulated during the proestrous LH surge.


Reproduction ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
pp. 733-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Stormshak ◽  
C T Estill ◽  
J A Resko ◽  
C E Roselli

Two experiments were conducted to determine whether an estradiol challenge could cause a female-type LH surge in castrated male- and female-oriented rams (MORs and FORs). Administration of 17β-estradiol to castrated MORs and FORs and ovariectomized ewes caused an initial reduction in LH secretion followed for 12–20 h by a surge release of LH in the ewes. No surge release of LH occurred in the MORs and FORs. The pattern of changes in LH secretion within rams and ewes did not differ between the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Treatment failed to elicit female-typical receptive sexual behaviors in the rams but did stimulate increased sexual receptivity in the ewes as determined by the measures of responsiveness to the teaser ram. Overall, no differences were found in hypothalamic–hypophyseal function in response to exogenous estradiol between MORs and FORs. These data are interpreted to suggest that in contrast to sexual attraction, the neural mechanisms controlling the LH surge and female receptivity are defeminized in MORs.


1995 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Evans ◽  
S J Hurd ◽  
D R Mason

Abstract Although GnRH is believed to be the primary secretagogue for LH, oxytocin has also been shown to stimulate LH release from the anterior pituitary. We investigated the possibility that the two secretagogues interact in the modulation of LH release. Anterior pituitaries were removed from adult female rats at pro-oestrus, and tissue pieces were pre-incubated in oxytocin for 3 h prior to being stimulated with 15 min pulses of GnRH. LH output over the 1 h period from the beginning of the GnRH pulse was determined. Control incubations were carried out in the absence of oxytocin, and background secretory activities without GnRH stimulation were also determined. Tissue which was pre-exposed to oxytocin (0·012–1·25 μm) had an increased LH response to GnRH (1·25 nm). The increase was larger than the sum of the LH outputs obtained with oxytocin and GnRH separately, revealing that oxytocin synergistically enhanced LH secretion elicited by GnRH (P<0·05; ANOVA). If stimulation by GnRH was delayed for 2 h after incubation with oxytocin, an increase in LH secretion was still observed, indicating that oxytocin-induced modulation did not rapidly disappear. Oxytocin pre-incubation was observed to result in an increase of maximal GnRH-induced LH output (P<0·001; t-test), as well as an increase of intermediate responses. The LH response of the anterior pituitary to subsequent pulses of GnRH was modified by the self-priming process. The effect of oxytocin pretreatment on the response of primed tissue to GnRH was also investigated. It was found that pre-incubation in oxytocin also enhanced the LH response of primed tissue to GnRH. The study has revealed that oxytocin increases the LH output of anterior pituitary tissue in response to GnRH. The effect occurs on both GnRH-primed and unprimed tissues. The results suggest that oxytocin has the potential to regulate the dynamics of the pro-oestrous LH surge. Journal of Endocrinology (1995) 145, 113–119


1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-192
Author(s):  
Padmaja N. Kulkarni ◽  
Alan A. Simpson ◽  
William H. Moger

The effect of androgens on pituitary response to luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) and their ability to modify effects of 17β-estradiol (E2) on pituitary responsiveness to LHRH were tested in ovariectomized rats maintained on a daily dose of 0.25 μg estradiol benzoate per rat for 6 d before androgen administration.Testosterone propionate (TP) (4, 40, 400, or 4000 μg per rat), administered 24 h before LHRH (500 ng per rat), had no significant effect on luteinizing hormone (LH) or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) response. Similar doses of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) did not significantly alter the LH response but significantly suppressed the FSH response. Even the lowest dose completely blocked the FSH response to LHRH. TP in combination with 4 or 400 μg of E2 suppressed the stimulatory effect of E2 on both LH and FSH response to LHRH in a dose-related manner. DHT and E2 in combination affected LH response inconsistently, whereas their ratio determined FSH response; there was pronounced inhibition of FSH response in rats given high doses of DHT combined with low doses of E2; DHT inhibition of FSH response in animals receiving 4 μg of DHT with 400 μg E2 was partially overcome by the stimulatory effect of E2. Our results indicate that TP and DHT affect LH and FSH response to LHRH differently. The ratio of androgen to estrogen is important in determining the response to LHRH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document