scholarly journals Cytokine Hemoadsorption as Rescue Therapy for Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia With Severe Respiratory Failure and Hypercytokinemia

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez ◽  
Luis Chiscano-Camón ◽  
Adolf Ruiz-Sanmartin ◽  
Clara Palmada ◽  
Erika Paola Plata-Menchaca ◽  
...  

Introduction: A dysregulated inflammatory response, known as “cytokine storm”, plays an important role in the pathophysiology of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). Identifying patients with a dysregulated inflammatory response and at high risk for severe respiratory failure, organ dysfunction, and death is clinically relevant, as they could benefit from the specific therapies, such as cytokine removal by hemoadsorption. This study aimed to evaluate cytokine hemoadsorption as rescue therapy in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, severe respiratory failure refractory to prone positioning, and hypercytokinemia.Methods: In this single center, observational and retrospective study, critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, severe acute respiratory failure, and hypercytokinemia were analyzed. All the patients underwent cytokine hemoadsorption using CytoSorb® (Cytosorbents Europe, Berlin, Germany). The indication for treatment was acute respiratory failure, inadequate clinical response to the prone position, and hypercytokinemia.Results: Among a total of 343 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 3, 2020 and June 22, 2020, six patients received rescue therapy with cytokine hemoadsorption. All the patients needed invasive mechanical ventilation and prone positioning. A significant difference was found in the pre- and post-treatment D-dimer (17,868 mcg/ml [4,196–45,287] vs. 4,488 mcg/ml [3,166–17,076], p = 0.046), C-reactive protein (12.9 mg/dl [10.6] vs. 3.5 mg/dl [2.8], p = 0.028), ferritin (1,539 mcg/L [764–27,414] vs. 1,197 ng/ml [524–3,857], p = 0.04) and interleukin-6 (17,367 pg/ml [4,539–22,532] vs. 2,403 pg/ml [917–3,724], p = 0.043) levels. No significant differences in the pre- and post-treatment interleukin-10 levels (22.3 pg/ml [19.2–191] vs. 5.6 pg/ml [5.2–36.6], p = 0.068) were observed. Improvements in oxygenation (prehemoadsorption PaO2/FIO2 ratio 103 [18.4] vs. posthemoadsorption PaO2/FIO2 ratio 222 [20.9], p = 0.029) and in the organ dysfunction (prehemoadsorption SOFA score 9 [4.75] vs. posthemoadsorption SOFA score 7.7 [5.4], p = 0.046) were observed. ICU and in-hospital mortality was 33.7%.Conclusions: In this case series, critically ill patients with COVID-19 with severe acute respiratory failure refractory to prone positioning and hypercytokinemia who received adjuvant treatment with cytokine hemoadsorption showed a significant reduction in IL-6 plasma levels and other inflammatory biomarkers. Improvements in oxygenation and SOFA score were also observed.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez ◽  
Luis Chiscano-Camón ◽  
Adolf Ruiz-Sanmartin ◽  
Clara Palmada ◽  
Erika Paola Plata-Menchaca ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : A dysregulated inflammatory response, known as “cytokine storm”, plays an important role in the pathophysiology of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). There is a subgroup of patients who develop a hyperinflammatory response with severe respiratory failure and organ dysfunction with high mortality. Identifying these patients is outstanding as they could benefit from specific therapies, such as cytokine removal by hemoadsorption. Methods: Single-center, observational and prospective study of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, severe acute respiratory failure and hypercytokinemia. All patients received cytokine hemoadsorption using Cytosorb® (Cytosorbents Europe, Berlin, Germany). The indication for treatment was acute respiratory failure, inadequate prone response, and hypercytokinemia. Results : A total of 343 patients were admitted to the ICU due to SARS-Cov-2 infection between March 3, 2020, to June 22, 2020. Of these, six patients [5 (83.3%) men; mean age 57 (10.5) years; SOFA 5 (1.4); mean Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score 19.5 (6)] underwent hemoadsorption with Cytosorb®. All patients fulfilled the Berlin criteria for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), underwent prone positioning, and were on mechanical ventilation for 15.2 (7.2) days. One session of 16 (9.0) hours duration was performed. IL-6 levels were significantly reduced [(pre- hemoadsorption levels 17.367 (4.539– 22.532) pg/ml; post-hemoadsorption levels 2.403 (917 – 3.724) pg/ml, p = 0.043], and improvements in oxygenation were observed [pre-hemoadsorption PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio was 103 (18.4), post- hemoadsorption PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 222 (20.9), p = 0.029]. We documented the clinical improvement and rapid reversal of organ dysfunction [pre-hemoadsorption Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score 9 (4.7); post- hemoadsorption SOFA score 7.7 (5.4), p = 0.046]. Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and ferritin) also improved significantly. Mean ICU stay was 17.2 (8.0) days. ICU and in-hospital mortality was 33.7%. Conclusions : In our cohort, patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and severe acute respiratory failure and hypercytokinemia who received cytokine hemoadsorption, an important reduction in IL-6 levels and improvements in oxygenation and SOFA score were observed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Fralick ◽  
Michael Colacci ◽  
Laveena Munshi ◽  
Kevin Venus ◽  
Lee Fidler ◽  
...  

What is already known on this topic: Prone positioning is considered standard of care for mechanically ventilated patients who have severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Recent data suggest prone positioning is beneficial for patients with COVID-19 who are requiring high flow oxygen. It is unknown of prone positioning is beneficial for patients not on high flow oxygen. What this study adds: Prone positioning is generally not well tolerated and innovative approaches are needed to improve adherence. Clinical and physiologic outcomes were not improved with prone positioning among hypoxic but not critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of prone positioning to reduce the risk of death or respiratory failure in non-critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 Design: Pragmatic randomized clinical trial of prone positioning of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 across 15 hospitals in Canada and the United States from May 2020 until May 2021. Settings: Patients were eligible is they had a laboratory-confirmed or a clinically highly suspected diagnosis of COVID-19, required supplemental oxygen (up to 50% fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2]), and were able to independently prone with verbal instruction. (NCT04383613). Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, mechanical ventilation, or worsening respiratory failure defined as requiring at least 60% FiO2 for at least 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included the change in the ratio of oxygen saturation to FiO2 (S/F ratio). Results: A total of 248 patients were included. The trial was stopped early on the basis of futility for the pre-specified primary outcome. The median time from hospital admission until randomization was 1 day, the median age of patients was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR] 45,65), 36% were female, and 90% of patients were receiving oxygen via nasal prongs at the time of randomization. The median time spent prone in the first 72 hours was 6 hours total (IQR 1.5,12.8) for the prone arm compared to 0 hours (0,2) in the control arm. The risk of the primary outcome was similar between the prone group (18 [14.3%] events) and the standard care group (17 [13.9%] events), odds ratio 0.92 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.92). The change in the S/F ratio after 72 hours was similar for patients randomized to prone compared to standard of care. Conclusion: Among hypoxic but not critically patients with COVID-19 in hospital, a multifaceted intervention to increase prone positioning did not improve outcomes. Adherence to prone positioning was poor, despite multiple efforts. Subsequent trials of prone positioning should aim to develop strategies to improve adherence to awake prone positioning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-398
Author(s):  
Burçin Halaçlı ◽  
Pervin Hancı ◽  
Ebru Ortaç Ersoy ◽  
Serpil Öcal ◽  
Mine Durusu Tanrıöver ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Alhad Sathe ◽  
Pavan K. Bhatraju ◽  
Carmen Mikacenic ◽  
Eric D. Morrell ◽  
W. Conrad Liles ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. The triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) mediates fatal septic shock in murine models, but studies linking the soluble form of TREM-1 (sTREM-1) to mortality in clinical sepsis are inconclusive, and few have examined its relationship to organ dysfunction. We sought to identify associations between circulating sTREM-1 and both mortality and organ dysfunction among a broad cohort of critically ill medical, post-surgical and trauma patients. Methods. We enrolled a prospective cohort of patients who met two or more criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 24 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission at a large academic medical center. sTREM-1 concentrations were measured at study enrollment. We used relative risk regression, adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index, to determine associations between sTREM-1 and the primary outcome of 28-day mortality. We also examined secondary outcomes of prevalent organ dysfunction on enrollment, and composites of persistent organ dysfunction or death at day 7. Results. Among 231 critically ill patients, non-survivors (n=19, 8%) had a higher proportion of pre-existing comorbidities, mechanical ventilation (79% vs. 44%) and shock (58% vs. 28%) compared to survivors. At study enrollment, increasing sTREM-1 was associated with a higher risk of severe acute kidney injury (AKI), shock, and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. sTREM-1 was higher among non-survivors than survivors (885 vs 336 pg/mL); each doubling of sTREM-1 concentration was associated with a 2.41-fold higher risk of 28-day mortality (95% CI 1.57, 3.72). Among 92 patients with shock on enrollment, doubling of sTREM-1 was associated with a 3.89-fold higher risk of persistent shock or death by day 7 (95% CI 1.85, 8.17). Higher sTREM-1 was also associated with a higher risk of both persistent AKI and persistent hypoxemic respiratory failure or death. Conclusions. Elevated plasma sTREM-1 is highly associated with 28-day mortality and organ dysfunction across a diverse critically ill population. These data support that early activation of the innate immune system plays a role in the development of organ dysfunction and death. Further studies should address whether modulation of the TREM-1 pathway might be beneficial in critically ill patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document