scholarly journals Identification of Cortical and Subcortical Correlates of Cognitive Performance in Multiple Sclerosis Using Voxel-Based Morphometry

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi A. Matías-Guiu ◽  
Ana Cortés-Martínez ◽  
Paloma Montero ◽  
Vanesa Pytel ◽  
Teresa Moreno-Ramos ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Ceccarelli ◽  
Jonathan S. Jackson ◽  
Ashish Arora ◽  
Shahamat S. Tauhid ◽  
Christian Chavarro-Nieto ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1635-1644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Zimmer ◽  
Wilhelm Bloch ◽  
Alexander Schenk ◽  
Max Oberste ◽  
Stefan Riedel ◽  
...  

Background: Aerobic exercise can improve cognitive performance in healthy elderly people. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a 3-week high-intensity aerobic exercise programme (high-intensity training group (HIT)) on cognitive performance in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) compared with a standard exercise programme (control training (CT)). Methods: A total of 60 persons with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS): 1.0–6.5) were randomized to a HIT group (3×/week for 20 minutes, including five 3-minute exercise intervals at 80% of peak oxygen uptake (VO2-peak)) or a CT group (continuously 5×/week for 30 minutes/session at 65% of VO2-peak). Cognitive performance was assessed using the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS at entry ( t0) and discharge ( t1). Furthermore, VO2-peak, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, serotonin and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and -9 were measured. Results: Compared to CT, HIT significantly improved verbal memory. Significant improvements over time in executive functions were found in both groups. Secondary outcomes indicated significant improvements in VO2-peak and a significant reduction in MMP-2 in the HIT group only. Conclusion: HIT represents a promising strategy to improve verbal memory and physical fitness in persons with MS. Further research is needed to determine the impact of exercise on biomarkers in MS.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. E79-E85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Sander ◽  
Hans-Ulrich Voelter ◽  
Hans-Peter Schlake ◽  
Paul Eling ◽  
Helmut Hildebrandt

AbstractOne of the most frequent symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) is fatigue. It has a major impact on quality of life as well as on professional activity. Even nowadays it is still unclear what constitutes an adequate assessment of the perceived fatigue.The following overview will discuss different possibilities to assess fatigue with the help of questionnaires, clinical interviews or the objective measurement of cognitive performance. Furthermore, a structured guideline for the assessment of fatigue will be proposed. Clinical criteria for MS related fatigue include the main symptoms, their everyday relevance, the possible causal relation with the cause of disease (the underlying MS), as well as an exclusion of other possible somatic or psychological reasons. It is recommended to use the “Würzburger Erschöpfungs-Inventar bei Multipler Sklerose (WEIMUS)” (English: Würzburg Fatigue Inventory for Multiple Sclerosis) and especially the “Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions” (FSMC), as these questionnaires distinguish between motor and cognitive fatigue and due to the larger number of research studies using the FSMC. Moreover, the presence of depression, quality of sleep and daytime sleepiness should be assessed. In addition, general cognitive performance as well as performance during monotonous stimulation (vigilance) should be assessed. This may be relevant for the evaluation of a patient’s capacity to work, and for determining prognosis, as there are indications for a relation to relapse frequency, a change from a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to an MS diagnosis with an increase of brain atrophy.All in all, it can be said, that despite the growing convergence of diagnostic criteria, the available studies of the objective as well as the subjective assessment of fatigue are still not sufficient and further research is needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 102136
Author(s):  
C. Danielle Jones ◽  
Katie L. Cederberg ◽  
E. Morghen Sikes ◽  
Glenn R. Wylie ◽  
Robert W. Motl ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document