scholarly journals Simultaneous EEG-NIRS Measurement of the Inferior Parietal Lobule During a Reaching Task With Delayed Visual Feedback

Author(s):  
Takuro Zama ◽  
Yoshiyuki Takahashi ◽  
Sotaro Shimada
2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 560-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazutaka Maeda ◽  
Hiroaki Ishida ◽  
Katsumi Nakajima ◽  
Masahiko Inase ◽  
Akira Murata

Parietofrontal pathways play an important role in visually guided motor control. In this pathway, hand manipulation-related neurons in the inferior parietal lobule represent 3-D properties of an object and motor patterns to grasp it. Furthermore, mirror neurons show visual responses that are concerned with the actions of others and motor-related activity during execution of the same grasping action. Because both of these categories of neurons integrate visual and motor signals, these neurons may play a role in motor control based on visual feedback signals. The aim of this study was to investigate whether these neurons in inferior parietal lobule including the anterior intraparietal area and PFG of macaques represent visual images of the monkey's own hand during a self-generated grasping action. We recorded 235 neurons related to hand manipulation tasks. Of these, 54 responded to video clips of the monkey's own hand action, the same as visual feedback during that action or clips of the experimenter's hand action in a lateral view. Of these 54 neurons, 25 responded to video clips of the monkey's own hand, even without an image of the target object. We designated these 25 neurons as “hand-type.” Thirty-three of 54 neurons that were defined as mirror neurons showed visual responses to the experimenter's action and motor responses. Thirteen of these mirror neurons were classified as hand-type. These results suggest that activity of hand manipulation-related and mirror neurons in anterior intraparietal/PFG plays a fundamental role in monitoring one's own body state based on visual feedback.


NeuroImage ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 231 ◽  
pp. 117843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiqi Niu ◽  
Lucija Rapan ◽  
Thomas Funck ◽  
Seán Froudist-Walsh ◽  
Ling Zhao ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S409-S409
Author(s):  
A. Gadad ◽  
D.Y.C.J. Reddy ◽  
D.G. Venkatasubramanian ◽  
D.J. C.N

Aim of the studyTo study the neural substrates of insight in OCD by comparing patients with good insight, patients with poor insight and matched healthy controls using functional MRI.MethodologySubjects were recruited from among patients attending OCD clinic, adult psychiatry services and psychiatry ward inpatients of National Institute of Mental Health And Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore. They were further divided into ‘good insight’ (n = 30) and ‘poor insight’ (n = 14) using Brown's assessment of belief's scale. Control subjects (n = 30) were recruited from consenting volunteers. 3 T MRI was used mental rotation task was paradigm used for fMRI and analysis was done by SPM 8.ResultsPoor insight patients and good insight patients comparison revealed differential activation in left superior/medial frontal gyrus (corresponding to the DLPFC). A negative correlation between BABS score and activation of right inferior parietal lobule. Mental rotation task behavioural data results: OCD patients as a group had significantly lower accuracy compared to healthy controls. Poor insight group had significantly decreased accuracy ratio compared to good insight group and healthy controls. A negative correlation was noted between BABS score and accuracy ratio, indicating that poorer the insight, greater the errors during the active task.ConclusionInsight has been important prognostic factor in OCD. Poor insight patients had specific deficits in left medial frontal gyrus and right inferior parietal lobule as compared to good insight patients and healthy controls. Together, these indicate that insight has a strong neurobiological underpinning in OCD.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


1996 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Carnahan ◽  
Craig Hall ◽  
Timothy D. Lee

2010 ◽  
Vol 481 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Ting Yeh ◽  
Jason Boulet ◽  
Tyler Cluff ◽  
Ramesh Balasubramaniam

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document