scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Combined With PD-1 Antibody for Third-Line or Further-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chongya Zhai ◽  
Xiaoling Zhang ◽  
Lulu Ren ◽  
Liangkun You ◽  
Qin Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Common ◽  
Third Line

BackgroundBoth anlotinib and programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) have been approved for the third line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the combination of these two standard therapies has not been investigated in third-line or further-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.MethodsWe reviewed 22 patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib combined with PD-1 mAb therapy from July 2018 to October 2019 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Based on the baseline characteristics, PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation status, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy by RESIST 1.1 and CTCAE 5.0.ResultsThe combination treatment of anlotinib and PD-1 mAb in 22 NSCLC patients gained a median PFS of 6.8 months and a median OS of 17.3 months. The disease control rate (DCR) was 90.9%, and the objective response rate (ORR) was 36.4%, where 1 (4.6%) patient achieved complete response (CR) and 7 (31.8%) patients achieved partial response (PR). The median time to response was 3.9 months, and the median duration of the response was 6.8 months. The common grades 1–2 adverse events were fatigue 10/22 (45.5%), decreased appetite 9/22 (40.9%), hypertension 10/22 (45.5%); the common grades 3–4 adverse events were hypertension 2/22 (9.1%) and mouth ulceration 2/22 (9.1%).ConclusionAnlotinib combined with PD-1 mAb showed promising efficacy in third-line or further-line treatment of NSCLC, and its adverse effects is tolerable.

Efficacy and Safety of Antigen-specific Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing-Di Yan ◽  
Xiao-Feng Cong ◽  
Sha-Sha Zhao ◽  
Meng Ren ◽  
Zi-Ling Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Specific Immunotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Background and Objective: We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of antigen-specific immunotherapy (Belagenpumatucel-L, MAGE-A3, L-BLP25, and TG4010) in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). </P><P> Methods: A comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted. Eligible studies were clinical trials of patients with NSCLC who received the antigenspecific immunotherapy. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for overall response rate (ORR) and the incidence of adverse events. </P><P> Results: In total, six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 4,806 patients were included. Pooled results showed that, antigen-specific immunotherapy did not significantly prolong OS (HR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.83, 1.01; P=0.087) and PFS (HR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.85, 1.01; P=0.088), but improved ORR (RR=1.72, 95%CI: 1.11, 2.68; P=0.016). Subgroup analysis based on treatment agents showed that, tecemotide was associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.74, 0.99; P=0.03) and PFS (HR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.49, 0.99, P=0.044); TG4010 was associated with an improvement in PFS (HR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.75, 1.00, P=0.058). In addition, NSCLC patients who were treated with antigen-specific immunotherapy exhibited a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than those treated with other treatments (RR=1.11, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.24; P=0.046). </P><P> Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the clinical survival benefits of tecemotide and TG4010 in the treatment of NSCLC. However, these evidence might be limited by potential biases. Therefore, further well-conducted, large-scale RCTs are needed to verify our findings.

scholarly journals Combination of bevacizumab and dual immunotherapy for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: a case report

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Song ◽  
Rengui Zhou ◽  
Xiangyong Li ◽  
Dejian Pan
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Extensive Disease ◽  
The Third ◽  
Third Line

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is sensitive to chemoradiotherapy but remains to have a poor prognosis. In the immunotherapy era, chemotherapy combined with PD-L1 inhibitors has become a new first-line treatment option for advanced SCLC. The CheckMate 032 study combined a PD-1 blockade and a CTLA-4 inhibitor and found that this dual immunotherapy might be a positive treatment choice for SCLC. In our case, the patient with advanced SCLC received bevacizumab combined with dual immunotherapy over the third line with more than 12 months survival time. The overall survival time was 21.5 months from the start of the third-line treatment and 39 months from the time of extensive-disease SCLC diagnosis. The combination of a VEGF blockade and a dual immunotherapy in SCLC resulted in synergistic treatment effects. Therefore, bevacizumab might be a better adjuvant, either combined with chemotherapy or dual immunotherapy, for patients with persistent disease progression after undergoing immunotherapy.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-chuan Ma ◽  
Yi-hong Liu ◽  
Kai-lin Ding ◽  
Yu-feng Liu ◽  
Wen-jie Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Whereas there are many pharmacological interventions prescribed for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparative data between novel generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain scant. Here, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapeutic options used for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Methods We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two or three treatment options. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), or adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Results A total of 9 RCTs consisting of 2484 patients with 8 treatment options were included in the systematic review. Our analysis showed that alectinib (300 mg and 600 mg), brigatinib, lorlatinib and ensartinib yielded the most favorable PFS. Whereas there was no significant OS or ORR difference among the ALK-TKIs. According to Bayesian ranking profiles, lorlatinib, alectinib 600 mg and alectinib 300 mg had the best PFS (63.7%), OS (35.9%) and ORR (37%), respectively. On the other hand, ceritinib showed the highest rate of severe adverse events (60%). Conclusion Our analysis indicated that alectinib and lorlatinib might be associated with the best therapeutic efficacy in first-line treatment for major population of advanced NSCLC patients with ALK-rearrangement. However, since there is little comparative evidence on the treatment options, there is need for relative trials to fully determine the best treatment options as well as the rapidly evolving treatment landscape.

Second and third line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Favaretto ◽  
Giulia Pasello ◽  
Cristina Magro ◽  
Clorinda Schettino ◽  
Cesare Gridelli
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Third Line Treatment

scholarly journals Erlotinib (ERL) versus Pemetrexed (MTA) as Second-Line Treatment for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSNSCLC): Efficacy and Safety Data

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix438-ix439
Author(s):  
J. Zugazagoitia ◽  
J. Puente ◽  
S. Hernandez ◽  
J.L. Gonzalez-Larriba ◽  
J. Sanz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document