scholarly journals Radiomic Analysis to Predict Outcome in Recurrent Glioblastoma Based on Multi-Center MR Imaging From the Prospective DIRECTOR Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Vils ◽  
Marta Bogowicz ◽  
Stephanie Tanadini-Lang ◽  
Diem Vuong ◽  
Natalia Saltybaeva ◽  
...  

BackgroundBased on promising results from radiomic approaches to predict O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status (MGMT status) and clinical outcome in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the current study aimed to evaluate radiomics in recurrent glioblastoma patients.MethodsPre-treatment MR-imaging data of 69 patients enrolled into the DIRECTOR trial in recurrent glioblastoma served as a training cohort, and 49 independent patients formed an external validation cohort. Contrast-enhancing tumor and peritumoral volumes were segmented on MR images. 180 radiomic features were extracted after application of two MR intensity normalization techniques: fixed number of bins and linear rescaling. Radiomic feature selection was performed via principal component analysis, and multivariable models were trained to predict MGMT status, progression-free survival from first salvage therapy, referred to herein as PFS2, and overall survival (OS). The prognostic power of models was quantified with concordance index (CI) for survival data and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the MGMT status.ResultsWe established and validated a radiomic model to predict MGMT status using linear intensity interpolation and considering features extracted from gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (training AUC = 0.670, validation AUC = 0.673). Additionally, models predicting PFS2 and OS were found for the training cohort but were not confirmed in our validation cohort.ConclusionsA radiomic model for prediction of MGMT promoter methylation status from tumor texture features in patients with recurrent glioblastoma was successfully established, providing a non-invasive approach to anticipate patient’s response to chemotherapy if biopsy cannot be performed. The radiomic approach to predict PFS2 and OS failed.

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi149-vi149
Author(s):  
Thomas Urup ◽  
Linn Gillberg ◽  
Katja Kaastrup ◽  
Maja Schuang Lü ◽  
Signe Regner Michaelsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Recurrent glioblastoma patients achieving response to bevacizumab combination therapy have clinical improvement and prolonged survival. High gene-expression of angiotensinogen (AGT) is associated with a poor response to bevacizumab combination therapy. Because AGT gene-expression is epigenetically regulated, we investigate if lower AGT promoter methylation in tumor tissue predicts a poor response to bevacizumab combination therapy in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Methods: Patients were assessed for eligibility using our clinical database comprising all recurrent glioblastoma patients consecutively treated with bevacizumab combination therapy at our center. The study included 159 response and biomarker evaluable patients: A training cohort of 77 patients and a validation cohort of 82 patients treated in the period between year 2005–2011 and 2012–2015. DNA methylation of 4 CpG sites in the AGT promoter was measured using pyrosequencing. Using logistic regression analysis, a predictive model for non-response was established. Results: In the training cohort, lower methylation of each of the four CpG sites was significantly associated with non-response (p < 0.05). Lower mean methylation of the AGT promoter was significantly associated with non-response (2-fold decrease: OR &eq; 3.01; 95% CI:1.41–6.44; p &eq; 0.004). A predictive model able to predict bevacizumab non-response in clinical practice was established. This predictor was significantly associated with non-response in the validation cohort (p &eq; 0.037). Conclusion: AGT promoter methylation is lower in tumor tissue from non-responsive recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab combination therapy. A predictive model for non-response was established and successfully validated. This model can be used to identify patients who will not benefit from bevacizumab combination therapy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 3449-3457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomomitsu Tahara ◽  
Tomoyuki Shibata ◽  
Masakatsu Nakamura ◽  
Hiromi Yamashita ◽  
Daisuke Yoshioka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document