scholarly journals A Randomized Controlled Trial on Mutual Support Group Intervention for Families of People With Recent-Onset Psychosis: A Four-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wai Tong Chien ◽  
Daniel Bressington ◽  
Sally W. C. Chan
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Support Group ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Mutual Support ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Challenges of Increasing Childcare Center Compliance With Nutrition Guidelines: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention Providing Training, Written Menu Feedback, and Printed Resources

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan Finch ◽  
Kirsty Seward ◽  
Taya Wedesweiler ◽  
Fiona Stacey ◽  
Alice Grady ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Theoretical Domains Framework ◽  
Practice Change ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Food Groups ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Nutrition Guidelines

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of an intervention including training, provision of written menu feedback, and printed resources on increasing childcare compliance with nutrition guidelines. Design: Parallel group randomized controlled trial. Setting: Hunter New England region, New South Wales, Australia. Participants: Forty-four childcare centers that prepare and provide food on-site to children while in care. Intervention: The intervention was designed using the Theoretical Domains Framework, targeted managers, and cooks and included implementation strategies that addressed identified barriers. Measures: Outcomes included the proportion of menus providing food servings (per child) compliant with overall nutrition guideline recommendations and each individual food group assessed via menu assessments. Cook knowledge of recommendations, intervention acceptability, adverse events, and barriers were also assessed via questionnaires with cooks and managers. Analysis: Logistic regression models, adjusted for baseline values of the outcome. Results: At baseline and follow-up, zero centers in the intervention and control groups were compliant with the overall menu guidelines or for the vegetable and meat food groups. Follow-up between-group differences in compliance for discretionary (33.3 vs 5, P = .18), dairy (41.7 vs 15, P = .16), breads and cereals (8.3 vs 10 P = 1.00), and fruit (16.7 vs 10, P = .48) were all nonsignificant. Relative to the control group, intervention centers showed a significantly greater increase in percentage of cooks with correct knowledge for vegetable servings (93.3 vs 36.4, P = .008). Conclusion: Although the application of the theoretical framework produced a broader understanding of the determinants of menu compliance, due to the complexity of guidelines, limited follow-up support, lower training uptake, and low intervention dose, the intervention was not effective in supporting the practice change required.

A randomized controlled trial of support group intervention after breast cancer treatment: Results on sick leave, health care utilization and health economy

2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Granstam Björneklett ◽  
Andreas Rosenblad ◽  
Christina Lindemalm ◽  
Marja-Leena Ojutkangas ◽  
Henry Letocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Support Group ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Health Economy ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals The Use of Web-Based Support Groups Versus Usual Quit-Smoking Care for Men and Women Aged 21-59 Years: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Ann Pechmann ◽  
Douglas Calder ◽  
Connor Phillips ◽  
Kevin Delucchi ◽  
Judith J Prochaska
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Support Groups ◽  
Support Group ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Quit Smoking ◽  
Quitting Smoking

BACKGROUND Existing smoking cessation treatments are challenged by low engagement and high relapse rates, suggesting the need for more innovative, accessible, and interactive treatment strategies. Twitter is a Web-based platform that allows people to communicate with each other throughout the day using their phone. OBJECTIVE This study aims to leverage the social media platform of Twitter for fostering peer-to-peer support to decrease relapse with quitting smoking. Furthermore, the study will compare the effects of coed versus women-only groups on women’s success with quitting smoking. METHODS The study design is a Web-based, three-arm randomized controlled trial with two treatment arms (a coed or women-only Twitter support group) and a control arm. Participants are recruited online and are randomized to one of the conditions. All participants will receive 8 weeks of combination nicotine replacement therapy (patches plus their choice of gum or lozenges), serial emails with links to Smokefree.gov quit guides, and instructions to record their quit date online (and to quit smoking on that date) on a date falling within a week of initiation of the study. Participants randomized to a treatment arm are placed in a fully automated Twitter support group (coed or women-only), paired with a buddy (matched on age, gender, location, and education), and encouraged to communicate with the group and buddy via daily tweeted discussion topics and daily automated feedback texts (a positive tweet if they tweet and an encouraging tweet if they miss tweeting). Recruited online from across the continental United States, the sample consists of 215 male and 745 female current cigarette smokers wanting to quit, aged between 21 and 59 years. Self-assessed follow-up surveys are completed online at 1, 3, and 6 months after the date they selected to quit smoking, with salivary cotinine validation at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome is sustained biochemically confirmed abstinence at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS From November 2016 to September 2018, 960 participants in 36 groups were recruited for the randomized controlled trial, in addition to 20 participants in an initial pilot group. Data analysis will commence soon for the randomized controlled trial based on data from 896 of the 960 participants (93.3%), with 56 participants lost to follow-up and 8 dropouts. CONCLUSIONS This study combines the mobile platform of Twitter with a support group for quitting smoking. Findings will inform the efficacy of virtual peer-to-peer support groups for quitting smoking and potentially elucidate gender differences in quit rates found in prior research. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02823028; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02823028

scholarly journals The Use of Web-Based Support Groups Versus Usual Quit-Smoking Care for Men and Women Aged 21-59 Years: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

10.2196/16417 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e16417
Author(s):  
Cornelia Ann Pechmann ◽  
Douglas Calder ◽  
Connor Phillips ◽  
Kevin Delucchi ◽  
Judith J Prochaska
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Support Groups ◽  
Support Group ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Quit Smoking ◽  
Quitting Smoking

Background Existing smoking cessation treatments are challenged by low engagement and high relapse rates, suggesting the need for more innovative, accessible, and interactive treatment strategies. Twitter is a Web-based platform that allows people to communicate with each other throughout the day using their phone. Objective This study aims to leverage the social media platform of Twitter for fostering peer-to-peer support to decrease relapse with quitting smoking. Furthermore, the study will compare the effects of coed versus women-only groups on women’s success with quitting smoking. Methods The study design is a Web-based, three-arm randomized controlled trial with two treatment arms (a coed or women-only Twitter support group) and a control arm. Participants are recruited online and are randomized to one of the conditions. All participants will receive 8 weeks of combination nicotine replacement therapy (patches plus their choice of gum or lozenges), serial emails with links to Smokefree.gov quit guides, and instructions to record their quit date online (and to quit smoking on that date) on a date falling within a week of initiation of the study. Participants randomized to a treatment arm are placed in a fully automated Twitter support group (coed or women-only), paired with a buddy (matched on age, gender, location, and education), and encouraged to communicate with the group and buddy via daily tweeted discussion topics and daily automated feedback texts (a positive tweet if they tweet and an encouraging tweet if they miss tweeting). Recruited online from across the continental United States, the sample consists of 215 male and 745 female current cigarette smokers wanting to quit, aged between 21 and 59 years. Self-assessed follow-up surveys are completed online at 1, 3, and 6 months after the date they selected to quit smoking, with salivary cotinine validation at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome is sustained biochemically confirmed abstinence at the 6-month follow-up. Results From November 2016 to September 2018, 960 participants in 36 groups were recruited for the randomized controlled trial, in addition to 20 participants in an initial pilot group. Data analysis will commence soon for the randomized controlled trial based on data from 896 of the 960 participants (93.3%), with 56 participants lost to follow-up and 8 dropouts. Conclusions This study combines the mobile platform of Twitter with a support group for quitting smoking. Findings will inform the efficacy of virtual peer-to-peer support groups for quitting smoking and potentially elucidate gender differences in quit rates found in prior research. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02823028; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02823028 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/16417

scholarly journals Mentalization-based treatment for psychotic disorder: a rater-blinded, multi-center, randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
J. Weijers ◽  
C. Ten Kate ◽  
W. Viechtbauer ◽  
L. J. A. Rampaart ◽  
E. H. M. Eurelings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Psychotic Disorder ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Mental States ◽  
Mediation Effect ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background Impaired mentalizing ability – an impaired ability to understand one's own and other people's behavior in terms of mental states – is associated with social dysfunction in non-affective psychotic disorder (NAPD). We tested whether adding mentalization-based treatment for psychotic disorder (MBTp) to treatment as usual (TAU) results in greater improvement in social functioning. Methods Multicenter, rater-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Eighty-four patients with NAPD were assigned to TAU or MBTp plus TAU. Patients in the MBTp group received 18 months of MBTp, consisting of weekly group sessions and one individual session per 2 weeks. Social functioning was measured using the Social Functioning Scale. We conducted ANCOVAs to examine the difference between treatment conditions directly after treatment and at 6-month follow-up and performed moderation and mediation analyses. Results Intention-to-treat analyses showed no significant differences between groups post-treatment (p = 0.31) but revealed the MBTp group to be superior to TAU at follow-up (p = 0.03). Patients in the MBTp group also seemed to perform better on measures of mentalizing ability, although evidence of a mediation effect was limited (p = 0.06). Lastly, MBTp treatment was less effective in chronic patients than in recent-onset patients (p = 0.049) and overall symptoms at baseline were mild, which may have reduced the overall effectiveness of the intervention. Conclusion The results suggest that MBTp plus TAU may lead to more robust improvements in social functioning compared to TAU, especially for patients with a recent onset of psychosis.

scholarly journals One-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial Piloting a Mindfulness-Based Group Intervention for Adolescent Insulin Resistance

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren B. Shomaker ◽  
Bernadette Pivarunas ◽  
Shelly K. Annameier ◽  
Lauren Gulley ◽  
Jordan Quaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
One Year
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document