scholarly journals Psychosocial Pre-Transplant Screening With the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Contributes to Prediction of Survival After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Scherer ◽  
Christoph Scheid ◽  
Michael von Bergwelt ◽  
Martin Hellmich ◽  
Christian Albus ◽  
...  

There is no standard in hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) for pre-transplant screening of psychosocial risk factors, e.g., regarding immunosuppressant non-adherence. The aim of this prospective study is to explore the predictive value of the pretransplant psychosocial screening instrument Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS) for mortality in a 3-year follow-up. Between 2012 and 2017 61 patients were included and classified as low (TERS = 26.5–29) and increased-risk group (TERS = 29.5–79.5). Both groups were compared regarding mortality until 36 months after transplantation and secondary outcomes [Medication Experience Scale for Immunosuppressants (MESI); incidence/grade of GvHD]. The increased-risk group (n = 28) showed significantly worse cumulative survival in the outpatient setting (from 3 months to 3 years after HSCT) [Log Rank (Mantel Cox) P = 0.029] compared to low-risk group (n = 29) but there was no significant result for the interval immediately after HSCT until 3 years afterwards. Pre-transplant screening with TERS contributes to prediction of survival after HSCT. The reason remains unclear, since TERS did not correlate with GvHD or MESI. The negative result regarding the interval immediately after HSCT until 3 years could be caused by the intensive in-patient setting with mortality which is explained rather by biological reasons than by non-adherence.

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 209-215
Author(s):  
Cybele Lara Abad ◽  
Vania Phuoc ◽  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
Pritish K. Tosh ◽  
Irene G. Sia ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are at increased risk for infection. This study describes bone and joint infections (BJI) among HSCT recipients.Methods: We reviewed 5861 patients who underwent HSCT at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN from January 1, 2005 through January 1, 2015 for study inclusion. BJI was defined as native septic arthritis, prosthetic joint infection, osteomyelitis, and orthopedic implant infection. All adults with BJI after HSCT were included in the analysis.Results: Of 5861 patients, 33 (0.6%) developed BJI. Native joint septic arthritis was the most common BJI occurring in 15/33 (45.4%) patients. Patients were predominantly male (24/33, 72.7%), with median age of 58 (range 20-72) years. BJI was diagnosed a median of 39 (range 1-114) months after allogeneic (14/33, 42.4%) or autologous (19/33, 57.6%) HSCT. Organisms were recovered via tissue (24/27, 88.9%), synovial fluid (13/17, 76.5%), and/or blood cultures (16/25, 64%). Most underwent surgical debridement (23/33, 69.7%). Patients were followed a median of 78.3 months (range 74-119). Therapy was unsuccessful in 4/33 (12.1%), with death related to the underlying BJI in two (50%). Failure occurred a median of 3.4 (0.1-48.5) months from diagnosis. At last follow up, 7/33 (21.2%) patients were alive. Median overall survival was 13 months (0.07-70.6).Conclusion: BJI among HSCT recipients is infrequent. The most common infection is native joint septic arthritis. Pathogens appear similar to patients without HSCT. Treatment involving surgical-medical modalities is successful, with most patients surviving >1 year after BJI.


10.2196/15775 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e15775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dima Chaar ◽  
Ji Youn Shin ◽  
Amanda Mazzoli ◽  
Rebecca Vue ◽  
Jacob Kedroske ◽  
...  

Background Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), also referred to as blood and marrow transplantation (BMT), is a high-risk, but potentially curative therapy for a number of cancer and noncancer conditions. BMT Roadmap (Roadmap 1.0) is a mobile health app that was developed as a family caregiver–facing tool to provide informational needs about the health status of patients undergoing inpatient HCT. Objective This study explored the views and perceptions of family caregivers of patients undergoing HCT and their input regarding further technology development and expansion of BMT Roadmap into the outpatient setting (referred to as Roadmap 2.0). Methods Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted among 24 family caregivers. Questions were developed from existing literature coupled with prior in-depth observations and interviews in hospital-based settings to explore the study objectives. Participants were recruited during routine outpatient clinic appointments of HCT patients, and all interviews were conducted in the participants’ homes, the setting in which Roadmap 2.0 is intended for use. A thematic analysis was performed using a consistent set of codes derived from our prior research. New emerging codes were also included, and the coding structure was refined with iterative cycles of coding and data collection. Results Four major themes emerged through our qualitative analysis: (1) stress related to balancing caregiving duties; (2) learning and adapting to new routines (resilience); (3) balancing one’s own needs with the patient’s needs (insight); and (4) benefits of caregiving. When caregivers were further probed about their views on engagement with positive activity interventions (ie, pleasant activities that promote positive emotions and well-being such as expressing gratitude or engaging in activities that promote positive thoughts, emotions, and behaviors), they preferred a “menu” of positive activities to help support caregiver health and well-being. Conclusions This study involved family caregivers as participants in the development of new components for Roadmap 2.0. Our research provided a further understanding of the many priorities that hematopoietic stem cell transplant family caregivers face while maintaining balance in their lives. Their schedules can often be unpredictable, even more so once the patient is discharged from the hospital. Our findings suggest that expanding Roadmap 2.0 into the outpatient setting may provide critical caregiver support and that HCT caregivers are interested in and willing to engage in positive activities that may enhance well-being and attenuate the stress associated with caregiving. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/resprot.4918


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 135 (18) ◽  
pp. 1548-1559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Boettcher ◽  
C. Matthias Wilk ◽  
Jochen Singer ◽  
Fabian Beier ◽  
Elodie Burcklen ◽  
...  

Abstract Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is associated with age and an increased risk of myeloid malignancies, cardiovascular risk, and all-cause mortality. We tested for CH in a setting where hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) of the same individual are exposed to different degrees of proliferative stress and environments, ie, in long-term survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and their respective related donors (n = 42 donor-recipient pairs). With a median follow-up time since allo-HSCT of 16 years (range, 10-32 years), we found a total of 35 mutations in 23 out of 84 (27.4%) study participants. Ten out of 42 donors (23.8%) and 13 out of 42 recipients (31%) had CH. CH was associated with older donor and recipient age. We identified 5 cases of donor-engrafted CH, with 1 case progressing into myelodysplastic syndrome in both donor and recipient. Four out of 5 cases showed increased clone size in recipients compared with donors. We further characterized the hematopoietic system in individuals with CH as follows: (1) CH was consistently present in myeloid cells but varied in penetrance in B and T cells; (2) colony-forming units (CFUs) revealed clonal evolution or multiple independent clones in individuals with multiple CH mutations; and (3) telomere shortening determined in granulocytes suggested ∼20 years of added proliferative history of HSCs in recipients compared with their donors, with telomere length in CH vs non-CH CFUs showing varying patterns. This study provides insight into the long-term behavior of the same human HSCs and respective CH development under different proliferative conditions.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dânia Sofia Marques ◽  
Carlos Pinho Vaz ◽  
Rosa Branca ◽  
Fernando Campilho ◽  
Catarina Lamelas ◽  
...  

Hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing invasive fungal infections. This is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We report a case of a 17-year-old male patient diagnosed with severe idiopathic acquired aplastic anemia who developed fungal pneumonitis due toRhizomucor sp.and rhinoencephalitis due toScedosporium apiospermum6 and 8 months after undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant from an HLA-matched unrelated donor. Discussion highlights risk factors for invasive fungal infections (i.e., mucormycosis and scedosporiosis), its clinical features, and the factors that must be taken into account to successfully treat them (early diagnosis, correction of predisposing factors, aggressive surgical debridement, and antifungal and adjunctive therapies).


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2332-2332
Author(s):  
Leslie Kean ◽  
Kelly Hamby ◽  
Jennifer Perry ◽  
Christian Larsen ◽  
David Archerq

Abstract While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents the only curative therapy for sickle cell disease, sickle patients undergoing HSCT face many complications, including an increased risk of graft rejection compared to non-sickle patients. We have used the Berkeley sickle mouse model to study the potential mechanisms underlying this increased risk of rejection. Using a CD28/CD40 costimulation-blockade-based non-myeloablative HSCT regimen, we transplanted Berkeley sickle mice with fully allogeneic SJL bone marrow. While the vast majority (>85%, n=25) of control C57BL/6 animals became stably chimeric and immunologically donor-tolerant with this transplant regimen, sickle mice were much more prone to reject the transplant (~20% graft acceptance, n=25). Both CD8+ cells and NK1.1+ cells were found to contribute to this rejection, as depletion of either of these cell populations led to a marked increase in the percent of engrafted mice (>85% graft acceptance, n=15–25), while depletion of CD4+ cells led to the opposite effect, with 0% (n=25) animals engrafted in this depletion cohort. The increased propensity of HSCT rejection in the Berkeley sickle mice may, in part, be explained by the presence of increased numbers of donor-reactive T cells (5–10-fold compared to C57BL/6 controls) in naïve sickle mice, despite their lack of exposure to donor antigens, and their housing in a Specific-Pathogen-Free environment. We speculate that these increased numbers of anti-donor T cells may occur as a result of heightened inflammation in the context of active sickle cell disease, which could lead to increased expansion and persistence of a T cell repertoire containing anti-donor heterologous T cell immunity. This heterologous immunity may have a profound effect on the success of HSCT for sickle cell disease, especially when non-myeloablative regimens are employed.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 75-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn S. Speckhart ◽  
Scott R. Solomon

Abstract Although psychological and social factors are recognized as being important in the evaluation of patients for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), no standard approach to psychosocial assessment currently exists. In solid organ transplantation, psychosocial assessments have been integrated into the selection of appropriate candidates, and certain psychosocial variables, such as active substance abuse, have been shown to negatively impact outcomes in solid organ transplant patients. To determine whether similar factors impact outcomes in patients undergoing HSCT, we prospectively conducted psychosocial assessments on 221 consecutive patients (155 autologous, 66 allogeneic) undergoing HSCT. The relationship between psychosocial variables, such as those assessed on the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS), and objective outcomes, such as length of hospitalization and survival was evaluated. Based on the patient’s TERS score, each patient was stratified into one of two groups (low/moderate risk (n=187) vs. high risk (n=34)) based on their predicted psychosocial risk for problems during transplant. Although the two groups were similar in regards to known pre-transplant prognostic factors such as age, performance status, disease risk, and transplant type, there was a significant difference in the median length of hospitalization between patients who score low/moderate (10 days) and those who scored high (21.5 days) on the TERS. This difference was significant both for patients receiving autologous (9 vs. 15 days, p<.02) and allogeneic transplants (16 vs. 45 days, p<.001). Furthermore, 2-year overall survival was significantly improved in allogeneic transplant patients who score low/moderate vs. those that scored high on the TERS (72% vs. 46%; p<=.02). These findings suggest a strong correlation between pre-transplant psychosocial risk factors, resource utilization and patient outcome in HSCT. Figure 1. Overall survival following allogeneic stem cell transplantation according to TERS score Figure 1. Overall survival following allogeneic stem cell transplantation according to TERS score


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document