scholarly journals Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Structures Using Complex-Step Approximation with Sensitivity Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4708
Author(s):  
Junho Chun
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Structural Optimization ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Step Size ◽  
First Derivative ◽  
Step Approximation ◽  
Reliability Based Design

Structural optimization aims to achieve a structural design that provides the best performance while satisfying the given design constraints. When uncertainties in design and conditions are taken into account, reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is adopted to identify solutions with acceptable failure probabilities. This paper outlines a method for sensitivity analysis, reliability assessment, and RBDO for structures. Complex-step (CS) approximation and the first-order reliability method (FORM) are unified in the sensitivity analysis of a probabilistic constraint, which streamlines the setup of optimization problems and enhances their implementation in RBDO. Complex-step approximation utilizes an imaginary number as a step size to compute the first derivative without subtractive cancellations in the formula, which have been observed to significantly affect the accuracy of calculations in finite difference methods. Thus, the proposed method can select a very small step size for the first derivative to minimize truncation errors, while achieving accuracy within the machine precision. This approach integrates complex-step approximation into the FORM to compute sensitivity and assess reliability. The proposed method of RBDO is tested on structural optimization problems across a range of statistical variations, demonstrating that performance benefits can be achieved while satisfying precise probabilistic constraints.

scholarly journals Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Structures Using the Second-Order Reliability Method and Complex-Step Derivative Approximation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 5312
Author(s):  
Junho Chun
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Step Size ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Reliability Method ◽  
Derivative Approximation

This paper proposes a reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) approach that adopts the second-order reliability method (SORM) and complex-step (CS) derivative approximation. The failure probabilities are estimated using the SORM, with Breitung’s formula and the technique established by Hohenbichler and Rackwitz, and their sensitivities are analytically derived. The CS derivative approximation is used to perform the sensitivity analysis based on derivations. Given that an imaginary number is used as a step size to compute the first derivative in the CS derivative method, the calculation stability and accuracy are enhanced with elimination of the subtractive cancellation error, which is commonly encountered when using the traditional finite difference method. The proposed approach unifies the CS approximation and SORM to enhance the estimation of the probability and its sensitivity. The sensitivity analysis facilitates the use of gradient-based optimization algorithms in the RBDO framework. The proposed RBDO/CS–SORM method is tested on structural optimization problems with a range of statistical variations. The results demonstrate that the performance can be enhanced while satisfying precisely probabilistic constraints, thereby increasing the efficiency and efficacy of the optimal design identification. The numerical optimization results obtained using different optimization approaches are compared to validate this enhancement.

scholarly journals A decoupling algorithm with first-order asymptotic integration for reliability-based design optimization

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 168781401879333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiliang Huang ◽  
Tongguang Yang ◽  
Fangyi Li
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Asymptotic Integration ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
First Order Reliability Method ◽  
First Order ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Reliability Method

Conventional decoupling approaches usually employ first-order reliability method to deal with probabilistic constraints in a reliability-based design optimization problem. In first-order reliability method, constraint functions are transformed into a standard normal space. Extra non-linearity introduced by the non-normal-to-normal transformation may increase the error in reliability analysis and then result in the reliability-based design optimization analysis with insufficient accuracy. In this article, a decoupling approach is proposed to provide an alternative tool for the reliability-based design optimization problems. To improve accuracy, the reliability analysis is performed by first-order asymptotic integration method without any extra non-linearity transformation. To achieve high efficiency, an approximate technique of reliability analysis is given to avoid calculating time-consuming performance function. Two numerical examples and an application of practical laptop structural design are presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

A Hybrid Reliability Approach for Reliability-Based Design Optimization

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po Ting Lin ◽  
Yogesh Jaluria ◽  
Hae Chang Gea
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Accurate Solution ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Index Approach ◽  
Hybrid Reliability

Reliability-based Design Optimization problems have been solved by two well-known methods: Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and Performance Measure Approach (PMA). RIA generates first-order approximate probabilistic constraints using the measures of reliability indices. For infeasible design points, the traditional RIA method suffers from inaccurate evaluation of the reliability index. To overcome this problem, the Modified Reliability Index Approach (MRIA) has been proposed. The MRIA provides the accurate solution of the reliability index but also inherits some inefficiency characteristics from the Most Probable Failure Point (MPFP) search when nonlinear constraints are involved. In this paper, the benchmark examples have been utilized to examine the efficiency and stability of both PMA and MRIA. In our study, we found that the MRIA is capable of obtaining the correct optimal solutions regardless of the locations of design points but the PMA is much efficient in the inverse reliability analysis. To take advantages of the strengths of both methods, a Hybrid Reliability Approach (HRA) is proposed. The HRA uses a selection factor that can determine which method to use during optimization iterations. Numerical examples from the proposed method are presented and compared with the MRIA and the PMA.

A New Study on Reliability-Based Design Optimization

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tu ◽  
K. K. Choi ◽  
Y. H. Park
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Probabilistic Constraint ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Index Approach ◽  
Special Cases

This paper presents a general approach for probabilistic constraint evaluation in the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Different perspectives of the general approach are consistent in prescribing the probabilistic constraint, where the conventional reliability index approach (RIA) and the proposed performance measure approach (PMA) are identified as two special cases. PMA is shown to be inherently robust and more efficient in evaluating inactive probabilistic constraints, while RIA is more efficient for violated probabilistic constraints. Moreover, RBDO often yields a higher rate of convergence by using PMA, while RIA yields singularity in some cases.

An Efficient Approach for Reliability-Based Design Optimization Combined Sequential Optimization with Approximate Models

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 1850018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao Quoc Doan ◽  
Guiping Liu ◽  
Can Xu ◽  
Minh Quang Chau
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Assessment ◽  
Latin Hypercube Sampling ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Sequential Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Efficient Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Approximate Models

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) involves evaluation of probabilistic constraints which can be time-consuming in engineering structural design problems. In this paper, an efficient approach combined sequential optimization with approximate models is suggested for RBDO. The radial basis functions and Latin hypercube sampling are used to construct approximate models of the probabilistic constraints. Then, a sequential optimization with approximate models is carried out by the sequential optimization and reliability assessment method which includes a serial of cycles of deterministic optimization and reliability assessment. Three numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach.

Reliability-based design optimization for vertical vibrations of a modified electric vehicle using fourth-moment polynomial standard transformation method

2020 ◽  
Vol 234 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 2649-2664
Author(s):  
Sheng Wang ◽  
Lin Hua ◽  
Xinghui Han ◽  
Zhuoyu Su
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Electric Vehicle ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Computing Time ◽  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Transformation Method ◽  
Vertical Vibration ◽  
Fourth Moment ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design

This article presents a new reliability-based design optimization procedure for the vertical vibration issues raised by a modified electric vehicle using fourth-moment polynomial standard transformation method. First, the fourth-moment polynomial standard transformation method with polynomial chaos expansion is used to obtain the reliability index of uncertain constraints in the reliability-based design optimization which is highly precise and saves computing time compared with other common methods. Next, the half-car model with nonlinear suspension parameters for the modified electric vehicle is investigated, and the response surface methodology is adopted to approximate the complex and time-consuming vertical vibration calculation to the polynomial expressions, and the approximation is validated for reliability-based design optimization results within permissible error level. Then, reliability-based design optimization results under both deterministic and uncertain load parameters are shown and analyzed. Unlike the traditional vertical vibration optimization that only considers one or several sets of load parameters, which lacks versatility, this article presents the reliability-based design optimization with uncertain load parameters which is more suitable for engineering. The results show that the proposed reliability-based design optimization procedure is an effective and efficient way to solve vertical vibration optimization problems for the modified electric vehicle, and the optimization statistics, including the maximum probability interval, can provide references for other suspension dynamical optimization.

Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization

2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeng D. Youn ◽  
Kyung K. Choi ◽  
Young H. Park
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Equality Constraint ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Probabilistic Constraint ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Function ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Advanced Mean Value

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) involves evaluation of probabilistic constraints, which can be done in two different ways, the reliability index approach (RIA) and the performance measure approach (PMA). It has been reported in the literature that RIA yields instability for some problems but PMA is robust and efficient in identifying a probabilistic failure mode in the optimization process. However, several examples of numerical tests of PMA have also shown instability and inefficiency in the RBDO process if the advanced mean value (AMV) method, which is a numerical tool for probabilistic constraint evaluation in PMA, is used, since it behaves poorly for a concave performance function, even though it is effective for a convex performance function. To overcome difficulties of the AMV method, the conjugate mean value (CMV) method is proposed in this paper for the concave performance function in PMA. However, since the CMV method exhibits the slow rate of convergence for the convex function, it is selectively used for concave-type constraints. That is, once the type of the performance function is identified, either the AMV method or the CMV method can be adaptively used for PMA during the RBDO iteration to evaluate probabilistic constraints effectively. This is referred to as the hybrid mean value (HMV) method. The enhanced PMA with the HMV method is compared to RIA for effective evaluation of probabilistic constraints in the RBDO process. It is shown that PMA with a spherical equality constraint is easier to solve than RIA with a complicated equality constraint in estimating the probabilistic constraint in the RBDO process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document