scholarly journals Modeling Aerial Transmission of Pathogens (Including the SARS-CoV-2 Virus) through Aerosol Emissions from E-Cigarettes

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 6355
Author(s):  
Roberto A. Sussman ◽  
Eliana Golberstein ◽  
Riccardo Polosa

We examine the plausibility of aerial transmission of pathogens (including the SARS-CoV-2 virus) through respiratory droplets that might be carried by exhaled e-cigarette aerosol (ECA). Given the lack of empiric evidence on this phenomenon, we consider available evidence on cigarette smoking and respiratory droplet emission from mouth breathing through a mouthpiece as convenient proxies to infer the capacity of vaping to transport pathogens in respiratory droplets. Since both exhaled droplets and ECA droplets are within the Stokes regime, the ECA flow acts effectively as a visual tracer of the expiratory flow. To infer quantitatively the direct exposure distance, we consider a model that approximates exhaled ECA flow as an axially symmetric intermittent steady starting jet evolving into an unstable puff, an evolution that we corroborate by comparison with photographs and videos of actual vapers. On the grounds of all this theoretical modeling, we estimate for low-intensity vaping (practiced by 80–90% of vapers) the emission of 6–210 (median 39.9, median deviation 67.3) respiratory submicron droplets per puff and a horizontal distance spread of 1–2 m, with intense vaping possibly emitting up to 1000 droplets per puff in the submicron range with a distance spread over 2 m. The optical visibility of the ECA flow has important safety implications, as bystanders become instinctively aware of the scope and distance of possible direct contagion through the vaping jet.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto A. Sussman ◽  
Eliana Golberstein ◽  
Riccardo Polosa

AbstractWe examine the plausibility, scope and risks of aerial transmission of pathogens (including the SARS-CoV-2 virus) through respiratory droplets carried by exhaled e–cigarette aerosol (ECA). Observational and laboratory data suggests considering cigarette smoking and mouth breathing through a mouthpiece as convenient proxies to infer the respiratory mechanics and droplets sizes and their rate of emission that should result from vaping. To infer distances for possible direct contagion we model exhaled ECA flow as an intermittent turbulent jet evolving into an unstable puff, estimating for low intensity vaping (practiced by 80-90% of vapers) ECA expirations the emission of 2-230 respiratory submicron droplets per puff a horizontal distance spread of 1-2 meters, with intense vaping possibly carrying hundreds and up to 1000 droplets per puff in the submicron range a distance spread over 2 meters. Bystanders exposed to low intensity expirations from an infectious vaper in indoor spaces (home and restaurant scenarios) face a 1% increase of risk of indirect contagion with respect to a “control case” scenario defined by exclusively rest breathing without vaping. This relative added risk becomes 5 – 17% for high intensity vaping, 40 – 90% and over 260% for speaking or coughing (without vaping). This risk evaluation remains practically unchanged in shared spaces with universal usage of face masks. We estimate that disinfectant properties of glycols in ECA are unlikely to act efficiently on pathogens carried by vaping expirations under realistic conditions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Aghaloo ◽  
J.J. Kim ◽  
T. Gordon ◽  
H.P. Behrsing

Traditional tobacco products have well-known systemic and local oral effects, including inflammation, vasoconstriction, delayed wound healing, and increased severity of periodontal disease. Specifically in the oral cavity and the lung, cigarette smoking produces cancer, increased infectivity, acute and chronic inflammation, changes in gene expression in epithelial lining cells, and microbiome changes. In recent years, cigarette smoking has greatly decreased in the United States, but the use of new tobacco products has gained tremendous popularity. Without significant knowledge of the oral sequelae of products such as electronic cigarettes, researchers must evaluate current in vitro and in vivo methods to study these agents, as well as develop new tools to adequately study their effects. Some in vitro testing has been performed for electronic cigarettes, including toxicologic models and assays, but these mostly study the effect on the respiratory tract. Recently, direct exposure of the aerosol to in vitro 3-dimensional tissue constructs has been performed, demonstrating changes in cell viability and inflammatory cytokines. For in vivo studies, a universal e-cigarette testing machine or standard vaping regime is needed. A standard research electronic cigarette has recently been developed by the National Institute of Drug Abuse, and other devices delivering aerosols with different nicotine concentrations are becoming available. One of the biggest challenges in this research is keeping up with the new products and the rapidly changing technologies in the industry.


2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maki Inoue-Choi ◽  
Patricia Hartge ◽  
Linda M. Liao ◽  
Neil Caporaso ◽  
Neal D. Freedman

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Sussman ◽  
Eliana Golberstein ◽  
Riccardo Polosa

Abstract Background. E-cigarettes are an important harm reduction tool that provides smokers an alternative for nicotine consumption that is much safer than smoking. It is important to asses its safety under preventive and containment measures undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. We develop a theoretical risk model to assess the contagion risk by aerial transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus carried by e–cigarette aerosol (ECA) in shared indoor spaces, a home and restaurant scenarios, with natural and mechanical ventilation, with and without face masks. We also provide the theoretical elements to explain the visibility of exhaled ECA, which has important safety implications. Results. In a home or restaurant scenarios bystanders exposed to ECA expirations by an infectious vaper (and not wearing face masks) face a 1% increase of risk of contagion with respect to a “control case” scenario defined by exclusively rest breathing without vaping. This relative added risk becomes 5 - 17% for high intensity vaping, 44 - 176% and over 260% for speaking for various periods or coughing (all without vaping). Mechanical ventilation significantly decrease infective emissions but keep the same proportionality in risk percentages. Face masks of common usage effectively protect wearers from respiratory droplets and droplet nuclei possibly emitted by mask-less vapers as long as they avoid direct exposure to the visible exhaled vaping jet. Conclusions. Vaping emissions in shared indoor spaces involve only a minuscule added risk of COVID-19 contagion with respect to the already existing (unavoidable) risk from continuous breathing, significantly less than speaking or coughing. Protection of bystanders from this contagion does not require extra preventive measures besides those already recommended (1.5 meters separation and wearing face masks).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto A Sussman ◽  
Eliana Golberstein ◽  
Riccardo Polosa

Background. E-cigarettes are an important harm reduction tool that provides smokers an alternative for nicotine consumption that is much safer than smoking. It is important to asses its safety under preventive and containment measures undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods. We develop a theoretical risk model to assess the contagion risk by aerial trans mission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus carried by e–cigarette aerosol (ECA) in shared indoor spaces, a home and restaurant scenarios, with natural and mechanical ventilation, with and without face masks. We also provide the theoretical elements to explain the visibility of exhaled ECA, which has important safety implications.Results. In a home or restaurant scenarios bystanders exposed to ECA expirations by an infectious vaper (and not wearing face masks) face a 1% increase of risk of contagion with respect to a “control case” scenario defined by exclusively rest breathing without vaping. This relative added risk becomes 5 - 17% for high intensity vaping, 44 - 176% and over 260% for speaking for various periods or coughing (all without vaping). Mechanical ventilation significantly decrease infective emissions but keep the same proportionality in risk percentages. Face masks of common usage effectively protect wearers from respiratory droplets and droplet nuclei possibly emitted by mask-less vapers as long as they avoid direct exposure to the visible exhaled vaping jet.Conclusions. Vaping emissions in shared indoor spaces involve only a minuscule added risk of COVID-19 contagion with respect to the already existing (unavoidable) risk from continuous breathing, significantly less than speaking or coughing. Protection of bystanders from this contagion does not require extra preventive measures besides those already recommended (1.5 meters separation and wearing face masks).


2000 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 379-380
Author(s):  
Gaetano Belvedere ◽  
Kirill Kuzanyan ◽  
Dmitry Sokoloff

Extended abstractHere we outline how asymptotic models may contribute to the investigation of mean field dynamos applied to the solar convective zone. We calculate here a spatial 2-D structure of the mean magnetic field, adopting real profiles of the solar internal rotation (the Ω-effect) and an extended prescription of the turbulent α-effect. In our model assumptions we do not prescribe any meridional flow that might seriously affect the resulting generated magnetic fields. We do not assume apriori any region or layer as a preferred site for the dynamo action (such as the overshoot zone), but the location of the α- and Ω-effects results in the propagation of dynamo waves deep in the convection zone. We consider an axially symmetric magnetic field dynamo model in a differentially rotating spherical shell. The main assumption, when using asymptotic WKB methods, is that the absolute value of the dynamo number (regeneration rate) |D| is large, i.e., the spatial scale of the solution is small. Following the general idea of an asymptotic solution for dynamo waves (e.g., Kuzanyan & Sokoloff 1995), we search for a solution in the form of a power series with respect to the small parameter |D|–1/3(short wavelength scale). This solution is of the order of magnitude of exp(i|D|1/3S), where S is a scalar function of position.


Author(s):  
J. K. Maurin

Conductor, resistor, and dielectric patterns of microelectronic device are usually defined by exposure of a photosensitive material through a mask onto the device with subsequent development of the photoresist and chemical removal of the undesired materials. Standard optical techniques are limited and electron lithography provides several important advantages, including the ability to expose features as small as 1,000 Å, and direct exposure on the wafer with no intermediate mask. This presentation is intended to report how electron lithography was used to define the permalloy patterns which are used to manipulate domains in magnetic bubble memory devices.The electron optical system used in our experiment as shown in Fig. 1 consisted of a high resolution scanning electron microscope, a computer, and a high precision motorized specimen stage. The computer is appropriately interfaced to address the electron beam, control beam exposure, and move the specimen stage.


Nanoscale ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (45) ◽  
pp. 23028-23035
Author(s):  
Artem R. Khabibullin ◽  
Alexander L. Efros ◽  
Steven C. Erwin

Theoretical modeling of wavefunction overlap in nanocrystal solids elucidates the important role played by ligands in electron transport.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document