scholarly journals Current Promising Biomarkers and Methods in the Diagnostics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 166
Author(s):  
Pavla Bradacova ◽  
Ludek Slavik ◽  
Jana Ulehlova ◽  
Adela Skoumalova ◽  
Jana Ullrychova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Annexin V ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Laboratory Diagnostics ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Domain I

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulation condition associated with the incidence of heterogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), which non-specifically affect hemostasis processes. APS is clinically manifested by recurrent arterial and venous thromboses and reproduction losses. The aPL antibodies, which may induce clinical manifestations of APS, include criteria antibodies anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, and lupus anticoagulant, but also non-criteria antibodies, for example anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-annexin V, and many others. APS occurs mostly in patients of younger and middle age, most frequently in females. Laboratory diagnostics of APS are quite difficult, as they include a wide spectrum of examining methods, which are based on various principles of detection and are performed using various laboratory techniques. The objective of the review is to describe the current state of potentially examined biomarkers and methods in APS diagnostics. The aforementioned biomarkers are lupus anticoagulant, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I IgA, anti-cardiolipin IgA, anti-annexin V and II, anti-prothrombin, anti-cardiolipin/vimentin, anti-protein S/protein C, and antibodies against phospholipid antigens for whose diagnostics we may use some of the methods established for a long time and some of the modern methods—the coagulation method for the determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), enzyme-linked imunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence analysis (CLIA), multiplex fluorescence flow immunoassay (MFFIA), fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (EliA), line immunoassay (LIA), multiline dot assay (MLDA), and thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Conclusion: Antibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, cardiolipin/vimentin complex, and annexin V are currently the most studied new markers. However, these assays have not been standardized until now, both from the laboratory and clinical point of view. In this review we summarize the evidence of the most studied aPL markers and their potential clinical significance in seronegative APS (SN-APS).

Non β2-Glycoprotein I Cofactors for Antiphospholipid Antibodies

Lupus ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Galli
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Activated Protein C ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Annexin V ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Recurrent Abortions

The Antiphospholipid Syndrome is defined by the association between peculiar clinical manifestations, namely arterial and/or venous thrombosis, recurrent abortions and thrombocytopenia, and the antiphospholipid antibodies. These antibodies are directed to plasma proteins bound to anionic phospholipids or other anionic surfaces: so far, β2-glycoprotein I is the best known and characterized antiphospholipid ‘cofactor’ ( this issue is specifically treated in other parts of this journal). In recent years, such a role has been reported also for prothrombin, activated Protein C, Protein S, Annexin V, Thrombomodulin, high- and low-molecular weight kininogens. Anti-prothrombin antibodies are detected in approximately 50% of the antiphospholipid-positive patients; conversely, limited data are available regarding the prevalence the other antibodies. ‘Cofactors' are necessary for the expression of both the immunological and the functional properties of their respective antiphospholipid antibodies. In particular, the recognition of the calcium-mediated prothrombin/lipid complex by anti-prothrombin antibodies hampers prothrombin activation, thus causing the prolongation of the phospholipid-dependent coagulation reactions. The interaction between antiphospholipid antibodies and natural inhibitors of coagulation such as activated Protein C, its non-enzymatic accessory protein Protein S or Thrombomodulin might increase the risk to develop thromboembolic events. Similarly, the presence of antibodies to surface-bound Annexin V has been hypothesized to play a role in recurrent abortions and fetal deaths. However, to clearly establish whether and which antiphospholipid antibodies represent risk factors for the thromboembolic events of the antiphospholipid syndrome, further studies of their behaviour and properties as well as the identification and characterization of (possibly) other antibodies are required.

The Significance of Antibodies against Domain I of Beta-2 Glycoprotein I in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (05) ◽  
pp. 458-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walid Chayouâ ◽  
Hilde Kelchtermans ◽  
Bas Laat
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Beta 2 ◽  
Domain I

AbstractThe antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity with the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Progress is being made in understanding the pathogenesis of the syndrome, but difficulties persist in the identification of patients at risk for thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. Beta-2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI), a plasma protein consisting of five sushi domains, is thought to be the main antigenic target of aPLs. Antibodies recognizing domain I of β2GPI are predominantly present in patients with an elevated risk of thrombosis, whereas antidomain IV/V antibodies are found in nonthrombotic autoimmune diseases. Indeed, domain I antibodies proved to be pathogenic in multiple studies. Retrospective studies have provided evidence for an added clinical value of antidomain I antibodies in the risk stratification of patients with APS. Still, wide ranges of odds ratio exist between studies, probably due to differences in the study and control population, and detection methods used. Despite the proven pathogenicity of antidomain I antibodies and their correlations with clinical manifestations of APS, heterogeneity of the current studies has prohibited their acceptance in the official diagnostic criteria. Well-designed large longitudinal prospective studies with available and new, preferentially functional, assays for the risk stratification of patients with APS are required.

Laboratory Evaluation of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahla Heikal ◽  
Thomas B Martins ◽  
Sandra K White ◽  
Rohan Willis ◽  
D Ware Branch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Optimal Strategies ◽  
Laboratory Evaluation ◽  
Igm Antibodies ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Domain I ◽  
Prospective Investigation

Abstract Objectives Anti-β2 glycoprotein I domain I (anti-domain I) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies are present in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS); however, their use in evaluation remains unclear. Methods Diagnostic attributes of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-domain I IgG, anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2 glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI), and aPS/PT IgG and IgM antibodies were assessed in 216 patients evaluated for APS. Results LAC had the best odds ratio (OR, 14.2) while that for anti-domain 1 IgG was comparable to anti-β2GPI IgG (OR, 8.3 vs 9.4) but higher than all others. Significant correlations were observed for thrombosis (P = .03) and pregnancy-related morbidity (P = .001) with anti-domain IgG and for any thrombosis with aPS/PT IgG (P = .006). Use of noncriteria antiphospholipid with or without criteria markers did not significantly increase the probability to diagnose APS. Conclusions Noncriteria tests can contribute to diagnosis and stratification of APS but do not improve diagnostic yield. Optimal strategies for implementation require prospective investigation.

scholarly journals Challenges in the Diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 930-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrien Devreese ◽  
Marc F Hoylaerts
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Clinical Role ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Coagulation Tests

Abstract Background: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an important cause of acquired thromboembolic complications and pregnancy morbidity. Its diagnosis is based on clinical and laboratory criteria, defined by strict guidelines. The original clinical and laboratory criteria for the identification of APS patients were published in 1999, in the so-called Sapporo criteria. In 2006 these criteria were revised, and recently more precise guidelines for analysis of the lupus anticoagulant have been provided. However, several questions related to the diagnosis of APS remain unanswered. Content: In addition to providing a historical perspective, this review covers several challenges in the diagnosis of APS with respect to clinical and laboratory features, while highlighting pathogenic pathways of the syndrome. We discuss ongoing dilemmas in the diagnosis of this complex disease. Although antiphospholipid antibodies are found in association with various clinical manifestations, the older established clinical criteria were not substantively altered in the 2006 update. Several laboratory tests recommended in the latest criteria, including phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests for the detection of the lupus anticoagulant and ELISAs for measuring anticardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, still show methodological and diagnostic shortcomings. In addition, antiphospholipid antibodies have been described against other antigens, but their clinical role remains uncertain. Conclusions: Despite updated APS criteria, diagnosis of this syndrome remains challenging. Further research on clinically relevant antibodies and standardization of their detection are needed to improve clinical risk assessment in APS.

The clinical relevance of isolated lupus anticoagulant positivity in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-mei Yin ◽  
Philip de Groot ◽  
Marisa Ninivaggi ◽  
Katrien M.J. Devreese ◽  
Bas de Laat
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Domain I ◽  
Normal Controls ◽  
Better Than

Background: Patients positive for three types of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) (triple positivity) have been identified at a high risk for thrombotic events. However, the clinical significance of isolated lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positivity is debated. Objectives: To investigate the clinical relevance of isolated LAC. Patients/Methods 456 patients were enrolled in this study; 66 antiphospholipid syndrome patients and 390 control patients. The control group existed of autoimmune patients (n=91), patients with thrombosis but without aPLs (n=127) and normal controls (n=172). The criteria LAC, anti-cardiolipin (anti-CL) and anti-beta2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) IgG and IgM and the non-criteria IgA anti-CL and anti-β2GPI, anti-domain I (anti-DI) of β2GPI IgG and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT) IgG and IgM were detected according to the ISTH guidelines for solid phase assays. Results: 70 patients were positive for LAC, of which 44 were negative for both anti-β2GPI and anti-CL. We found that isolated LAC proved to be strongly associated with vascular thrombosis (Odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 7.3 (3.3-16.1)), even better than triple positive samples (OR 4.3 (1.6-12.2)). The titers of the anti-PS/PT IgG and IgM were significantly higher in triple positivity samples compared to samples with isolated LAC positivity. The majority of single LAC positives were anti-PS/PT negative. We observed that LAC positivity was weaker in isolated LAC positive patients compared to LAC activity in triple positive patients. Conclusions: Isolated LAC was highly associated with thrombosis. The presence of anti-PS/PT could not explain LAC positivity in isolated LAC. Isolated LAC showed a weaker LAC activity compared to triple positive patients.

scholarly journals Anticardiolipin Antibodies in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Characterization in Relation to Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Ordi-Ros ◽  
Julieta Villarreal ◽  
Francesc Monegal ◽  
Silvia Sauleda ◽  
Ignacio Esteban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C Virus

ABSTRACT The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is usually defined by the association of clinical manifestations that comprise venous and/or arterial thrombosis, recurrent fetal losses, and thrombocytopenia, along with the presence of anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies and/or lupus anticoagulant. Various infectious diseases can induce aCL; however, these antibodies are not usually associated with thrombotic events, as happens with autoimmune diseases, in which these antibodies need the presence of β2-glycoprotein I. Levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM aCL antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for 243 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and 100 healthy controls. Clinical events of APS, the level of β2-glycoprotein dependence of aCL, the presence of cryoglobulins and other autoantibodies, and cross-reactivity between purified aCL and HCV were evaluated. Positive results for aCL antibodies were found more frequently (3.3%) for the patients with HCV infection than for healthy controls (0%). All positive aCL antibodies were β2-glycoprotein I independent. No significant association was found between aCL antibodies and clinical manifestations of APS, neither was one found between the presence of other autoantibodies or cryoglobulins and that of aCL. Finally, no cross-reactivity between aCL antibodies and HCV antigens was observed. As previously reported, aCL antibodies seem to be an epiphenomenon, and they do not have clinical or laboratory significance in HCV patients.

Diluted Russell viper-venom time improves identification of antiphospholipid syndrome in a lupus anticoagulant-positive patient population

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (03) ◽  
pp. 577-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Ferrard-Sasson ◽  
Sylvain Dubucquoi ◽  
Eric Hachulla ◽  
Lionel Prin ◽  
Pierre-Yves Hatron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Positive Patient ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Glycoprotein I

SummaryThe objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential ability of diluted Russell viper-venom time (dRVVT) to identify antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in a lupus anticoagulant (LA)-positive patient population, already selected by other LA clotting tests. Our cohort of positive LA patients was first identified in our outpatients population by the following sensitive LA-detecting tests: Rosner index, diluted prothrombin time (dPT) and Rosove index. Then the 227 consecutive LA-positive patients were tested for dRVVT with the same blood sample. Anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein-I (β2GPI) autoantibodies assays were also performed. APS using Sapporo clinical criteria revised at Sydney, was found in 116 of these 227 consecutive LA-positive patients. Results of the different tests were analysed statistically. Using univariate analysis, dRVVT, dPT, IgG aCL and IgG anti-β2GPI autoantibodies were significantly associated with APS. The receiver operating-characteristics (ROC) curve defined the best cut-off value for dRVVT ratio at 1.61 with a good specificity (78%) and a lower sensitivity (53%). A multivariate analysis using a binary logistic procedure, retained the dRVVT ratio (≥ 1.61) and IgG anti-β2GPI autoantibodies (> 15 USG) as being associated with APS (p = 0.018; odds ratio [OR] 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–4.7, and p = 0.0001; OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.5–6.5, respectively). To conclude, these results agree with the need for LA criteria favouring specificity over sensitivity. The use of a threshold around 1.6 for dRVVT ratio should help discriminate APS from non-APS patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document