scholarly journals Acknowledgment to Reviewers of Clocks & Sleep in 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-180
Author(s):  

The peer review process represents the driving force of journal development, with reviewers acting as the gatekeepers who ensure that Clocks & Sleep maintains its high-quality standard of published papers [...]

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke Liu ◽  
Samantha Stanley

The peer review process can be challenging. In this essay, the journal’s editor and editorial assistant present a summary of reviewers’ comments to authors from the past year. In presenting themes across 79 reviews, this essay arms authors with knowledge about reviewers’ expectations for manuscripts submitted to the journal. A secondary aim of this essay is to encourage reviewers to continue providing supportive and helpful feedback. As the journal heads into its third year of publishing, we are well on our way to creating the fi rst home for high-quality risk and crisis communication research from around the globe.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea D. Ellinger ◽  
Valerie Anderson ◽  
Claire Gubbins ◽  
Mary Lynn Lunn ◽  
Kim F. Nimon ◽  
...  

REGION ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Julia Koschinsky ◽  
Sierdjan Koster ◽  
Roberto Patuelli ◽  
Vicente Royuela ◽  
Vassilis Tselios

This editorial launches REGION, the new online and open-access journal of ERSA. REGION aims to be a high-quality academic journal in the field of regional science. To its contributors, it offers a solid peer-review process and immediate publication upon acceptance. Also, it will be a flexible outlet, not bound by traditional journal formats or strict page limits. To its readers, the journal offers high-standard publications on current issues in regional science that are easily accessible through its website. Both submitting to the journal and accessing the contributions are free of charge to everyone.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenya Malcolm ◽  
Allison Groenendyk ◽  
Mary Cwik ◽  
Alisa Beyer

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody Fullerton

For years, the gold-standard in academic publishing has been the peer-review process, and for the most part, peer-review remains a safeguard to authors publishing intentionally biased, misleading, and inaccurate information. Its purpose is to hold researchers accountable to the publishing standards of that field, including proper methodology, accurate literature reviews, etc. This presentation will establish the core tenants of peer-review, discuss if certain types of publications should be able to qualify as such, offer possible solutions, and discuss how this affects a librarian's reference interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document