scholarly journals What Do Reviewers Want? Reflections on Editing the Journal for the Past Year

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke Liu ◽  
Samantha Stanley

The peer review process can be challenging. In this essay, the journal’s editor and editorial assistant present a summary of reviewers’ comments to authors from the past year. In presenting themes across 79 reviews, this essay arms authors with knowledge about reviewers’ expectations for manuscripts submitted to the journal. A secondary aim of this essay is to encourage reviewers to continue providing supportive and helpful feedback. As the journal heads into its third year of publishing, we are well on our way to creating the fi rst home for high-quality risk and crisis communication research from around the globe.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled Moustafa

Over the past few years, different changes have been introduced into the science publishing industry. However, important reforms are still required at both the content and form levels. First, the peer review process needs to be open, fair and transparent. Second, author-paid fees in open access journals need to either be removed or reconsidered toward more affordability. Third, the categorization of papers should include all types of scientific contributions that can be of higher interest to the scientific community than many mere quantitative and observable measures, or simply removed from publications. Forth, word counts and reference numbers in online open access journal should be nuanced or replaced by recommended ranges rather than to be a proxy of acceptance or rejection. Finally, all the coauthors of a manuscript should be considered corresponding authors and responsible for their mutual manuscript rather than only one or two.


2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry E. Graham

While scientists have routinely measured muscle glycogen in many metabolic situations for over 4 decades, there is surprisingly little known regarding its regulation. In the past decade, considerable evidence has illustrated that the carbohydrate stores in muscle are not homogeneous, and it is very likely that metabolic pools exist or that each granule has independent regulation. The fundamental aspects appear to be associated with a complex set of proteins that associate with both the granule and each other in a dynamic fashion. Some of the proteins are enzymes and others play scaffolding roles. A number of the proteins can translocate, depending on the metabolic stimulus. These various processes appear to be the mechanisms that give the glycogen granule precise yet dynamic regulation. This may also allow the stores to serve as an important metabolic regulator of other metabolic events.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-180
Author(s):  

The peer review process represents the driving force of journal development, with reviewers acting as the gatekeepers who ensure that Clocks & Sleep maintains its high-quality standard of published papers [...]


Author(s):  
Raymond E. Schneider

The nuclear industry has been aggressively pursuing risk-informed regulation for the past seven years. In this pursuit, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has established a basic framework for reviewing and granting risk-informed regulations. Focused regulatory guides have been specifically prepared in the areas of Plant Technical Specifications, In-Service Testing, In Service Inspections and Graded Quality Assurance. While these regulations have not supplanted traditional deterministic regulations, they have been used to support focused changes to the plant design basis. As the industry continues to mature the use of PSA information in day to day plant operations will grow. Today, risk insights are required by federal regulation for all plant maintenance activities. In addition, the regulator reserves the right to include consideration of risk in applications where the outcome could have a significant impact on risk. Despite, the major strides made in development and use of risk information, the industry and the regulator were operating without an agreed to PSA standard. Over the past three years the ASME has formed a committee of stakeholders, both commercial and regulatory, to develop a workable standard for the development and utilization of PSA data in the nuclear industry. The ASME PSA standard has recently been issued. The current standard has been developed to support licensing applications and is focused on the development and use of the Level 1PSA and the calculation of the Large Early Release Frequency (LERF). The ASME standard is unlike most standards in that it is tiers, and includes guidance for using results when specific items in the standard are not in complete compliance with specific standard elements. The tiers included in the standard are reflective of the level of detail in the PSA elements. The ability to use PSAs with many elements acceptable only at the lowest tier will be more limited than for more sophisticated PSAs and therefore, applications may be limited in scope and would likely involved strong deterministic support as well. As PSA tiers increase the reliance of the decision on the PSA may increase. The acceptability of the PSA elements is established via peer review process. It is the intent of this panel discussion to explore the implications of the recently released ASME PSA standard, and other focused standards under development on the nuclear industry and the role of the ASME standard in the associated regulatory process. The panelists will explore expectations of the industry, needs of the regulator and challenges of the PSA peer review process.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea D. Ellinger ◽  
Valerie Anderson ◽  
Claire Gubbins ◽  
Mary Lynn Lunn ◽  
Kim F. Nimon ◽  
...  

REGION ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Julia Koschinsky ◽  
Sierdjan Koster ◽  
Roberto Patuelli ◽  
Vicente Royuela ◽  
Vassilis Tselios

This editorial launches REGION, the new online and open-access journal of ERSA. REGION aims to be a high-quality academic journal in the field of regional science. To its contributors, it offers a solid peer-review process and immediate publication upon acceptance. Also, it will be a flexible outlet, not bound by traditional journal formats or strict page limits. To its readers, the journal offers high-standard publications on current issues in regional science that are easily accessible through its website. Both submitting to the journal and accessing the contributions are free of charge to everyone.


2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 791-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita A. Thambirajah ◽  
Juan Ausió

There has been a hotbed of activity surrounding MeCP2 research in the past number of years. Despite better characterizing the functions and nature of this protein, it has become abundantly clear that MeCP2 is involved in far more complex activities than perhaps initially anticipated. Recent publications have shown that MeCP2 is dynamically post-translationally modified, and it is possible that these marks permit MeCP2 to inhabit very diverse chromatin environments. It is also of interest to consider how nucleosome composition differs in these varying chromatin regions, and how the chromatin template itself contributes to diversifying the regulatory roles of MeCP2. These will be critical points to examine when seeking to understand how MeCP2 behaviour differentiates in tissues other than the brain. By understanding the chromatin and (or) tissue context in which MeCP2 interacts, it may be possible to discern the specific etiology of diseases linked to MeCP2 dysfunction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document