scholarly journals Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer in a Concentric Internal Jet-Loop Airlift Bioreactor Equipped with a Deflector

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 4329
Author(s):  
Radek Šulc ◽  
Jan Dymák
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Liquid System ◽  
Gas Holdup ◽  
Gas Velocity ◽  
Liquid Phase Mass Transfer ◽  
Homogenization Time ◽  
Standard Design ◽  
Superficial Gas Velocity

The gas–liquid hydrodynamics and mass transfer were studied in a concentric tube internal jet-loop airlift reactor with a conical bottom. Comparing with a standard design, the gas separator was equipped with an adjustable deflector placed above the riser. The effect of riser superficial gas velocity uSGR on the total gas holdup εGT, homogenization time tH, and overall volumetric liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient kLa was investigated in a laboratory bioreactor, of 300 mm in inner diameter, in a two-phase air–water system and three-phase air–water–PVC–particle system with the volumetric solid fraction of 1% for various deflector clearances. The airlift was operated in the range of riser superficial gas velocity from 0.011 to 0.045 m/s. For the gas–liquid system, when reducing the deflector clearance, the total gas holdup decreased, the homogenization time increased twice compared to the highest deflector clearance tested, and the overall volumetric mass transfer coefficient slightly increased by 10–17%. The presence of a solid phase shortened the homogenization time, especially for lower uSGR and deflector clearance, and reduced the mass transfer coefficient by 15–35%. Compared to the gas–liquid system, the noticeable effect of deflector clearance was found for the kLa coefficient, which was found approx. 20–29% higher for the lowest tested deflector clearance.

Effect of Vibrating Sparger on Mass Transfer, Gas Holdup, and Bubble Size in a Bubble Column Reactor

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laleh Hadavand ◽  
Ali Fadavi
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Vibration Frequency ◽  
Bubble Size ◽  
Bubble Column ◽  
Gas Holdup ◽  
Bubble Column Reactor ◽  
Gas Velocity ◽  
Superficial Gas Velocity

Abstract Bubble size has a key role in gas holdup and mass transfer in bubble column reactors. In order to have small and uniform bubbles, a new structure was designed; the reactor operates in two modes, with vibrating sparger and conventional bubble column in which sparger is fixed. In vibrating mode, the sparger vibrates gently during gas entering. The vibrating sparger performs like a paddle, resulting in a forced recirculation of gas–liquid inside the reactor; moreover, the bubble detachment is accelerated. The superficial gas velocity was between 0.003 and 0.013 ms− 1, and the vibration frequency was changed between 0 and 10.3 Hz. The bubble size was measured at three various positions of the reactor height by photographic method and using MATLAB 7.0.1 software. The mass transfer coefficient was determined by means of the dynamic gassing-out method. The results show that the bubbles were bigger in vibrating mode than those working without vibration. The bubble size decreases with increase in height from sparger. Gas holdup increased with increase in superficial gas velocity and vibration frequency. The effect of vibration increased the gas holdup with an average of 70% for all superficial gas velocities. Volumetric mass transfer coefficient was almost stable as vibration frequency increased.

scholarly journals Gas Holdup and Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer Investigations in an Oscillatory Flow in a Baffled Column

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Taslim Taslim ◽  
Mohd Sobri Takriff
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Power Density ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Gas Holdup ◽  
Gas Velocity ◽  
Liquid Mass ◽  
Liquid Mass Transfer ◽  
Superficial Gas Velocity

Gas holdup and gas-liquid mass transfer were investigated in a vertical baffled column. Pure carbon dioxide (C02) was used as the dispersed phase and tap water was used as the continuous phase. Gas holdup and mass transfer rate of C02 were measured under semi-batch condition, while the liquid phase was measured in batch mode. Gas holdup was estimated as the volume fraction of the gas in the two-phase mixture in the column. Mass transfer was expressed in terms of the liquid-side volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa). The effects of oscillation frequency, oscillation amplitude and gas flow rate on gas holdup andmass transfer were also determined. The results showed that a significant increase in gas holdup and mass transfer could be achieved in an oscillatory baffled column compared to a bubble column. Gas holdup and mass transfer were correlated as a function of power density and superficial gas velocity. Keywords: gas holdup, mass transfer coefficient, power density, superficial gas velocity

scholarly journals Gas–liquid mass transfer using advanced optical probe in a mimicked FT slurry bubble column

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Han ◽  
Premkumar Kamalanathan ◽  
Muthanna H. Al-Dahhan
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Bubble Column ◽  
Operating Pressure ◽  
Gas Velocity ◽  
Liquid Phase Mass Transfer ◽  
Solids Loading ◽  
Superficial Gas Velocity ◽  
Reactor Models

AbstractGas-liquid volumetric liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient (kLa) was studied in a slurry bubble column at the conditions mimicking Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. To avoid the hydrodynamic disturbances due to the gas switching, oxygen enriched air dynamic absorption method was used. Influence of reactor models (CSTR, ADM and RCFD) on the volumetric mass transfer coefficient was investigated. Effect of operating pressure, superficial gas velocity and solids loading were investigated. From the reactor models investigated, it is recommended to use ADM model for kLa study. If the CSTR model is used, applicability of the model should be checked. With increase in the superficial gas velocity and operating pressure, volumetric liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient increases, while it decreases with the solids loading corroborating with the literature.

Experimental and Computational Studies of Aerated Stirred Tank with Dual Impeller

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivanand M. Teli ◽  
Viraj S. Pawar ◽  
Channamallikarjun Mathpati
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Gas Velocity ◽  
Stirred Tanks ◽  
Mixing Performance ◽  
Liquid Systems ◽  
Superficial Gas Velocity

AbstractStirred tanks are commonly used in chemical and allied industries for reaction and separation. In order to improve the mixing performance, large scale reactors are often equipped with multiple impellers. In the case of gas-liquid systems, the gas hold-up, mass transfer coefficient, and interfacial area strongly depend on the size and type of impellers, clearance between impellers and superficial gas velocity. In the present work, the effect of the impeller speed, superficial gas velocity, and top impeller position has been investigated on gas hold-up, interfacial area, and mass transfer coefficient. Computational fluid dynamics have been carried out for the multiphase multi-impeller system and the model predictions have been compared with the experimental data.

Study of the Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer Coefficient in a 2D Mimicked FT Slurry Bubble Columns for Alternative Clean Energy and Chemical Production

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 975-990
Author(s):  
Hiba A. Abdulkareem ◽  
Saba A. Gheni ◽  
Rafi’ J. Yacoup
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Perforated Plate ◽  
Silica Particles ◽  
Gas Holdup ◽  
Diameter Ratio ◽  
Bubble Columns ◽  
Solid Loading ◽  
Gas Velocity

Abstract Bubble columns are widely used for contacting gas–liquid and gas–liquid–solid mass transfer/chemical reactions. Gas distributor is the most important accessory because it decides the bubble size/rise velocity and gas distribution. In this study, the effect of distributor design on hydrodynamics and mass transfer coefficient are studied at different operating conditions of height to diameter ratio, solid loading, and superficial gas velocity The overall gas holdup, is studied experimentally using a rectangular slurry bubble column operating at ambient temperature and pressure, using liquid paraffin (C9–C11), three heights to diameter ratios (6, 7.5 and 10) and silica as a solid phase (0 %, 9 % and 25 %) with oxygen as gas phase. Two types of distributor were used, perforated plate and ring type. The results showed that the overall gas holdup increased by increasing gas velocity and decreased by increasing height to diameter ratio and solid loading. Also, it is found that the perforated plate distributor gave a higher gas hold up than ring distributor at gas velocity higher than 0.03 m/sec. The following correlations are obtained: Plate distributor at presence of silica particles: $$\eqalign{{{\rm{\varepsilon}}_{\rm{g}}} =& {\left({1.343{\rm{U}}_{\rm{g}}^{0.0612} - 0.00891{\rm{\varepsilon}}_{\rm{s}}^{- 0.374} - 0.702{{\left({{{\rm{L}} \over {\rm{D}}}} \right)}^{0.041}}} \right)^{4.904}}\cr& - 0.0251}$$ Ring distributor at presence and absence of silica particles: $$\eqalign{{{\rm{\varepsilon}}_{\rm{g}}} = &{\left({0.216{\rm{U}}_{\rm{g}}^{0.297} - 0.354{\rm{\varepsilon}}_{\rm{s}}^{1.4671} - 0.127{{\left({{{\rm{L}} \over {\rm{D}}}} \right)}^{0.147}}} \right)^{1.1206}} \cr&+ 0.058}$$ There is a good agreement between experimental and predicted values with a percent of error less than 2 %. It has been found that the mass transfer coefficient is higher for ring distributor than the perforated plate and growing higher for heterogeneous flow regime and higher solid loading.

scholarly journals LIQUID-PHASE MASS TRANSFER COEFFICIENT AND GAS HOLDUP IN A PACKED-BED COCURRENT UP-FLOW COLUMN

1976 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
SATOSHI OHSHIMA ◽  
TOSHIICHI TAKEMATSU ◽  
YASUNORI KURIKI ◽  
KAZUO SHIMADA ◽  
MORIO SUZUKI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Packed Bed ◽  
Gas Holdup ◽  
Liquid Phase Mass Transfer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document