scholarly journals Genome Instability Induced by Low Levels of Replicative DNA Polymerases in Yeast

Genes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dao-Qiong Zheng ◽  
Thomas Petes
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Yeast Strains ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Very High

Most cells of solid tumors have very high levels of genome instability of several different types, including deletions, duplications, translocations, and aneuploidy. Much of this instability appears induced by DNA replication stress. As a model for understanding this type of instability, we have examined genome instability in yeast strains that have low levels of two of the replicative DNA polymerases: DNA polymerase α and DNA polymerase δ (Polα and Polδ). We show that low levels of either of these DNA polymerases results in greatly elevated levels of mitotic recombination, chromosome rearrangements, and deletions/duplications. The spectrum of events in the two types of strains, however, differs in a variety of ways. For example, a reduced level of Polδ elevates single-base alterations and small deletions considerably more than a reduced level of Polα. In this review, we will summarize the methods used to monitor genome instability in yeast, and how this analysis contributes to understanding the linkage between genome instability and DNA replication stress.

scholarly journals Global analysis of genomic instability caused by DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (50) ◽  
pp. E8114-E8121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dao-Qiong Zheng ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Xue-Chang Wu ◽  
Piotr A. Mieczkowski ◽  
Thomas D. Petes
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Dna Polymerase Δ ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Low Levels

DNA replication stress (DRS)-induced genomic instability is an important factor driving cancer development. To understand the mechanisms of DRS-associated genomic instability, we measured the rates of genomic alterations throughout the genome in a yeast strain with lowered expression of the replicative DNA polymerase δ. By a genetic test, we showed that most recombinogenic DNA lesions were introduced during S or G2 phase, presumably as a consequence of broken replication forks. We observed a high rate of chromosome loss, likely reflecting a reduced capacity of the low-polymerase strains to repair double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). We also observed a high frequency of deletion events within tandemly repeated genes such as the ribosomal RNA genes. By whole-genome sequencing, we found that low levels of DNA polymerase δ elevated mutation rates, both single-base mutations and small insertions/deletions. Finally, we showed that cells with low levels of DNA polymerase δ tended to accumulate small promoter mutations that increased the expression of this polymerase. These deletions conferred a selective growth advantage to cells, demonstrating that DRS can be one factor driving phenotypic evolution.

scholarly journals Analysis of APOBEC-induced mutations in yeast strains with low levels of replicative DNA polymerases

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (17) ◽  
pp. 9440-9450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Sui ◽  
Lei Qi ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Natalie Saini ◽  
Leszek J. Klimczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Induced Mutations ◽  
Single Stranded Dna ◽  
Dna Polymerase Epsilon ◽  
Dna Polymerase Alpha ◽  
Yeast Strains ◽  
Polymerase Epsilon ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Lagging Strand

Yeast strains with low levels of the replicative DNA polymerases (alpha, delta, and epsilon) have high levels of chromosome deletions, duplications, and translocations. By examining the patterns of mutations induced in strains with low levels of DNA polymerase by the human protein APOBEC3B (a protein that deaminates cytosine in single-stranded DNA), we show dramatically elevated amounts of single-stranded DNA relative to a wild-type strain. During DNA replication, one strand (defined as the leading strand) is replicated processively by DNA polymerase epsilon and the other (the lagging strand) is replicated as short fragments initiated by DNA polymerase alpha and extended by DNA polymerase delta. In the low DNA polymerase alpha and delta strains, the APOBEC-induced mutations are concentrated on the lagging-strand template, whereas in the low DNA polymerase epsilon strain, mutations occur on the leading- and lagging-strand templates with similar frequencies. In addition, for most genes, the transcribed strand is mutagenized more frequently than the nontranscribed strand. Lastly, some of the APOBEC-induced clusters in strains with low levels of DNA polymerase alpha or delta are greater than 10 kb in length.

scholarly journals MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 activates Fanconi Anemia R-loop suppression at transcription-replication conflicts

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Yun-chia Chang ◽  
James P. Wells ◽  
Shu-Huei Tsai ◽  
Yan Coulombe ◽  
Yujia A. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Maintenance Factors ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Dna Replication Stress

SUMMARYEctopic R-loop accumulation causes DNA replication stress and genome instability. To avoid these outcomes, cells possess a range of anti-R-loop mechanisms, including RNaseH that degrades the RNA moiety in R-loops. To comprehensively identify anti-R-loop mechanisms, we performed a genome-wide trigenic interaction screen in yeast lacking RNH1 and RNH201. We identified >100 genes critical for fitness in the absence of RNaseH, which were enriched for DNA replication fork maintenance factors such as RAD50. We show in yeast and human cells that R-loops accumulate during RAD50 depletion. In human cancer cell models, we find that RAD50 and its partners in the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex regulate R-loop-associated DNA damage and replication stress. We show that a non-nucleolytic function of MRE11 is important for R-loop suppression via activation of PCNA-ubiquitination by RAD18 and recruiting anti-R-loop helicases in the Fanconi Anemia pathway. This work establishes a novel role for MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 in directing tolerance mechanisms of transcription-replication conflicts.

scholarly journals DNA repair factor RAD18 and DNA polymerase Polκ confer tolerance of oncogenic DNA replication stress

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (10) ◽  
pp. 3097-3115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yang ◽  
Yanzhe Gao ◽  
Liz Mutter-Rottmayer ◽  
Anastasia Zlatanou ◽  
Michael Durando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Neoplastic Cells ◽  
Oncogenic Ras ◽  
Signaling Axis ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Dna Repair Protein

The mechanisms by which neoplastic cells tolerate oncogene-induced DNA replication stress are poorly understood. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) is a major mediator of oncogenic DNA replication stress. In this study, we show that CDK2-inducing stimuli (including Cyclin E overexpression, oncogenic RAS, and WEE1 inhibition) activate the DNA repair protein RAD18. CDK2-induced RAD18 activation required initiation of DNA synthesis and was repressed by p53. RAD18 and its effector, DNA polymerase κ (Polκ), sustained ongoing DNA synthesis in cells harboring elevated CDK2 activity. RAD18-deficient cells aberrantly accumulated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) after CDK2 activation. In RAD18-depleted cells, the G2/M checkpoint was necessary to prevent mitotic entry with persistent ssDNA. Rad18−/− and Polκ−/− cells were highly sensitive to the WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775 (which simultaneously activates CDK2 and abrogates the G2/M checkpoint). Collectively, our results show that the RAD18–Polκ signaling axis allows tolerance of CDK2-mediated oncogenic stress and may allow neoplastic cells to breach tumorigenic barriers.

scholarly journals Functions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 14-3-3 Proteins in Response to DNA Damage and to DNA Replication Stress

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 165 (4) ◽  
pp. 1717-1732
Author(s):  
Francisca Lottersberger ◽  
Fabio Rubert ◽  
Veronica Baldo ◽  
Giovanna Lucchini ◽  
Maria Pia Longhese
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Replication Stress

Abstract Two members of the 14-3-3 protein family, involved in key biological processes in different eukaryotes, are encoded by the functionally redundant Saccharomyces cerevisiae BMH1 and BMH2 genes. We produced and characterized 12 independent bmh1 mutant alleles, whose presence in the cell as the sole 14-3-3 source causes hypersensitivity to genotoxic agents, indicating that Bmh proteins are required for proper response to DNA damage. In particular, the bmh1-103 and bmh1-266 mutant alleles cause defects in G1/S and G2/M DNA damage checkpoints, whereas only the G2/M checkpoint is altered by the bmh1-169 and bmh1-221 alleles. Impaired checkpoint responses correlate with the inability to maintain phosphorylated forms of Rad53 and/or Chk1, suggesting that Bmh proteins might regulate phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of these checkpoint kinases. Moreover, several bmh1 bmh2Δ mutants are defective in resuming DNA replication after transient deoxynucleotide depletion, and all display synthetic effects when also carrying mutations affecting the polα-primase and RPA DNA replication complexes, suggesting a role for Bmh proteins in DNA replication stress response. Finally, the bmh1-169 bmh2Δ and bmh1-170 bmh2Δ mutants show increased rates of spontaneous gross chromosomal rearrangements, indicating that Bmh proteins are required to suppress genome instability.

scholarly journals DNA replication stress, genome instability and aging

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (22) ◽  
pp. 7545-7556 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. C. Burhans ◽  
M. Weinberger
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Dna Replication Stress

scholarly journals Regulation of ETAA1-mediated ATR activation couples DNA replication fidelity and genome stability

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (12) ◽  
pp. 3943-3953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Achuthankutty ◽  
Roshan Singh Thakur ◽  
Peter Haahr ◽  
Saskia Hoffmann ◽  
Alexandros P. Drainas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Regulatory Control ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Stress Dependent ◽  
Atr Kinase

The ATR kinase is a master regulator of the cellular response to DNA replication stress. Activation of ATR relies on dual pathways involving the TopBP1 and ETAA1 proteins, both of which harbor ATR-activating domains (AADs). However, the exact contribution of the recently discovered ETAA1 pathway to ATR signaling in different contexts remains poorly understood. Here, using an unbiased CRISPR-Cas9–based genome-scale screen, we show that the ATR-stimulating function of ETAA1 becomes indispensable for cell fitness and chromosome stability when the fidelity of DNA replication is compromised. We demonstrate that the ATR-activating potential of ETAA1 is controlled by cell cycle– and replication stress–dependent phosphorylation of highly conserved residues within its AAD, and that the stimulatory impact of these modifications is required for the ability of ETAA1 to prevent mitotic chromosome abnormalities following replicative stress. Our findings suggest an important role of ETAA1 in protecting against genome instability arising from incompletely duplicated DNA via regulatory control of its ATR-stimulating potential.

scholarly journals Both DNA Polymerases δ and ε Contact Active and Stalled Replication Forks differently

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanhe Yu ◽  
Haiyun Gan ◽  
Zhiguo Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Genome Duplication ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Okazaki Fragments ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

AbstractThree DNA polymerases (Pol α, Pol δ, and Pol ε) are responsible for eukaryotic genome duplication. When DNA replication stress is encountered, DNA synthesis stalls until the stress is ameliorated. However, it is not known whether there is a difference in the association of each polymerase with active and stalled replication forks. Here, we show that each DNA polymerase has distinct patterns of association with active and stalled replication forks. Pol α is enriched at extending Okazaki fragments of active and stalled forks. In contrast, although Pol δ contacts the nascent lagging strands of active and stalled forks, it binds to only the matured (and not elongating) Okazaki fragments of stalled forks. Pol ε has a greater contact with the nascent ssDNA of leading strand on active forks compared with stalled forks. We propose that the configuration of DNA polymerases at stalled forks facilitate resumption of DNA synthesis after stress removal.

PrimPol (Primase/Polymerase), replicating enzyme – A mini review

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-92
Author(s):  
Muhammad Amir ◽  
Sabeera Afzal ◽  
Alia Ishaq
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Genetic Information ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Mitochondrial Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Template ◽  
Preliminary Phase

Polymerases were revealed first in 1970s. Most important to the modest perception the enzyme responsible for nuclear DNA replication that was pol , for DNA repair pol and for mitochondrial DNA replication pol  DNA construction and renovation done by DNA polymerases, so directing both the constancy and discrepancy of genetic information. Replication of genome initiate with DNA template-dependent fusion of small primers of RNA. This preliminary phase in replication of DNA demarcated as de novo primer synthesis which is catalyzed by specified polymerases known as primases. Sixteen diverse DNA-synthesizing enzymes about human perspective are devoted to replication, reparation, mutilation lenience, and inconsistency of nuclear DNA. But in dissimilarity, merely one DNA polymerase has been called in mitochondria. It has been suggest that PrimPol is extremely acting the roles by re-priming DNA replication in mitochondria to permit an effective and appropriate way replication to be accomplished. Investigations from a numeral of test site have significantly amplified our appreciative of the role, recruitment and regulation of the enzyme during DNA replication. Though, we are simply just start to increase in value the versatile roles that play PrimPol in eukaryote.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document