scholarly journals Valid and Reliable Barbell Velocity Estimation Using an Inertial Measurement Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 9170
Author(s):  
Steffen Held ◽  
Ludwig Rappelt ◽  
Jan-Philip Deutsch ◽  
Lars Donath
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Reliability Indicators

The accurate assessment of the mean concentric barbell velocity (MCV) and its displacement are crucial aspects of resistance training. Therefore, the validity and reliability indicators of an easy-to-use inertial measurement unit (VmaxPro®) were examined. Nineteen trained males (23.1 ± 3.2 years, 1.78 ± 0.08 m, 75.8 ± 9.8 kg; Squat 1-Repetition maximum (1RM): 114.8 ± 24.5 kg) performed squats and hip thrusts (3–5 sets, 30 repetitions total, 75% 1RM) on two separate days. The MCV and displacement were simultaneously measured using VmaxPro® and a linear position transducer (Speed4Lift®). Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (0.91 < ICC < 0.96) with a small systematic bias (p < 0.001; ηp2 < 0.50) for squats (0.01 ± 0.04 m·s−1) and hip thrusts (0.01 ± 0.05 m·s−1) and a low limit of agreement (LoA < 0.12 m·s−1) indicated an acceptable validity. The within- and between-day reliability of the MCV revealed good ICCs (0.55 < ICC < 0.91) and a low LoA (<0.16 m·s−1). Although the displacement revealed a systematic bias during squats (p < 0.001; ηp2 < 0.10; 3.4 ± 3.4 cm), no bias was detectable during hip thrusts (p = 0.784; ηp2 < 0.001; 0.3 ± 3.3 cm). The displacement showed moderate to good ICCs (0.43 to 0.95) but a high LoA (7.8 to 10.7 cm) for the validity and (within- and between-day) reliability of squats and hip thrusts. The VmaxPro® is considered to be a valid and reliable tool for the MCV assessment.

Validity and Reliability of a New Device to Measure Type of Actions in Indoor Sports

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Lago-Fuentes ◽  
Paolo Aiello ◽  
Mauro Testa ◽  
Iker Muñoz ◽  
Marcos Mecías Calvo
Keyword(s):  
Coefficient Of Variation ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
New Device ◽  
Standing Up ◽  
Indoor Sports

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to analyze the validity and the reliability of the intensity ranges, number of actions and changes of direction measured by a commercial inertial measurement unit. Eleven elite youth futsal players performed a circuit with different type of displacements as sprinting, running at low-medium intensity, standing up and changes of direction. Data recorded by the Overtraq system were compared with video-analyzer during the six trials of each player. Standard error mean, Intraclass Correlation Coeficient and Coefficient of variation, were calculated to analyze the reliability of the device, as well as the Root Mean Square Error and Confidence Interval with correlation of Pearson for its validity. The results reported good validity for three intensity ranges (R2>0.7) with high reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coeficient: 0.8–0.9), especially for high intensity actions (Intraclass Correlation Coeficient: 0.95, Coefficient of Variation: 3.06%). Furthermore, the validity for the number of different actions was almost perfect (96.3–100%), with only small differences regarding changes of activity (mean error: 2.0%). The Overtraq system can be considered as a valid and reliable technology for measuring and monitoring actions at different intensities and changes of direction in futsal, likewise common actions for other indoor sports.

scholarly journals Concurrent validity and intra-trial reliability of a bluetooth-embedded inertial measurement unit for real-time joint range of motion

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Oh ◽  
W. Lim ◽  
N. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Performance Ability

Abstract Along with advancements in science and technology, anthropometric measurements using electronic devices have become possible, and research is being actively conducted on this topic. Recently, devices using Bluetooth that are portable because of their small size have been developed to allow real-time measurements and recording. This study investigated the concurrent validity and intra-trial reliability of a recently developed Bluetooth-embedded inertial measurement unit. Thirty-seven healthy, young adult participants (age = 22.1±1.2 years, height = 166.8±1.6 cm, mass = 61.9±12.3 kg) were included in the study. The knee extension angles during active knee extension were measured for validity, using both the Bluetooth-embedded inertial measurement unit and the standard goniometer. Intra-trial reliability was tested for consistency during repeated measurements. The intra-class correlation coefficients value for the concurrent validity between the Bluetooth-embedded inertial measurement unit and standard goniometer was 0.991, and the values for the intra-trial reliability of the two devices were 0.973 and 0.963, respectively. Based on its high validity and reliability, the Bluetooth-embedded device may be useful for evaluating functional impairment and exercise performance ability by real-time measurements of joint ranges of motion in clinical rehabilitation or sports fields.

scholarly journals Tibial Accelerations During the Single-Leg Hop Test: Influence of Fixation

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Hannah W. Tucker ◽  
Emily R. Tobin ◽  
Matthew F. Moran
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Hop Test

Context: Performance on single-leg hopping (SLH) assessments is commonly included within return-to-sport criteria for rehabilitating athletes. Triaxial accelerometers have been used to quantify impact loading in a variety of movements, including hopping; however, they have never been attached to the tibia during SLH, and their method of fixation has not been investigated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify triaxial accelerations and evaluate the influence of the fixation method of a lightweight inertial measurement unit (Blue Trident) mounted to the tibia during SLH performance. Design: Single cohort, repeated-measures experimental design. Participants: Sixteen healthy participants (10 females and 6 males; 20 [0.9] y; 1.67 [0.08] m; 66.0 [8.5] kg) met the inclusion criteria, volunteered, and completed this study. Interventions: Participants performed 2 sets of 3 SLH trials with an inertial measurement unit (1500 Hz) fixated to the tibia, each set with 1 of 2 attachment methods (double-sided tape [DST] with athletic tape and silicon strap [SS] with Velcro adhesion). Main Outcome Measures: Hop distance, peak tibial acceleration (PTA), time to PTA, and the acceleration slope were assessed during each hop landing. Results: Repeated-measures analysis of variance determined no significant effect of the attachment method on hop metrics (P = .252). Across 3 trials, both fixation methods (DST and SS) had excellent reliability values (intraclass correlation coefficient: .868–.941) for PTA and acceleration slope but not for time to PTA (intraclass correlation coefficient: .397–.768). The PTA for DST (27.22 [7.94] g) and SS (26.21 [10.48] g) was comparable and had a moderate, positive relationship (DST: r = .72, P < .01; SS: r = .77, P < .01) to SLH distance. Conclusions: Tibial inertial measurement units with triaxial accelerometers can reliably assess PTA during performance of the SLH, and SS is a viable alternative tibial attachment to DST.

scholarly journals Validity and sensitivity of an inertial measurement unit-driven biomechanical model of motor variability for gait

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Bailey ◽  
Thomas Uchida ◽  
Julie Nantel ◽  
Ryan Graham
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Biomechanical Model ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Local Dynamic ◽  
Joint Angles ◽  
Motor Variability ◽  
Arm Swing ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Local Dynamic Stability

Motor variability in gait is frequently linked to fall risk, yet field-based biomechanical joint evaluations are scarce. We evaluated the validity and sensitivity of an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-driven biomechanical model of joint angle variability for gait. Fourteen healthy young adults completed seven-minute trials of treadmill gait at several speeds and arm swing amplitudes. Joint kinematics were estimated by IMU- and optoelectronic-based models using OpenSim. We calculated range of motion (ROM), magnitude of variability (meanSD), local dynamic stability (λmax), persistence of ROM fluctuations (DFAα), and regularity (SaEn) of each angle over 200 continuous strides, and evaluated model accuracy (e.g., RMSD: root mean square difference), consistency (ICC2,1: intraclass correlation), biases, limits of agreement, and sensitivity to within-participant gait responses (effects of Speed and Swing). RMSDs of joint angles were 1.7–7.5° (pooled mean of 4.8°), excluding ankle inversion. ICCs were mostly good–excellent in the primary plane of motion for ROM and in all planes for meanSD and λmax, but were poor–moderate for DFAα and SaEn. Modeled Speed and Swing responses for ROM, meanSD, and λmax were similar. Results suggest that the IMU-driven model is valid and sensitive for field-based assessments of joint angles and several motor variability features.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Gait Analysis Systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 872-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Shin Cho ◽  
Seong-Ho Jang ◽  
Jae-Sung Cho ◽  
Mi-Jung Kim ◽  
Hyeok Dong Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Inertial Measurement

scholarly journals Design, Validity, and Reliability of a New Test, Based on an Inertial Measurement Unit System, for Measuring Cervical Posture and Motor Control in Children with Cerebral Palsy

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 661
Author(s):  
Cristina Carmona-Pérez ◽  
Alberto Pérez-Ruiz ◽  
Juan L. Garrido-Castro ◽  
Francisco Torres Vidal ◽  
Sandra Alcaraz-Clariana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Motor Control ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Functional Measures ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Children With Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Cervical Posture

Objective: The aim of this study was to design and propose a new test based on inertial measurement unit (IMU) technology, for measuring cervical posture and motor control in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and to evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods: Twenty-four individuals with CP (4–14 years) and 24 gender- and age-matched controls were evaluated with a new test based on IMU technology to identify and measure any movement in the three spatial planes while the individual is seated watching a two-minute video. An ellipse was obtained encompassing 95% of the flexion/extension and rotation movements in the sagittal and transversal planes. The protocol was repeated on two occasions separated by 3 to 5 days. Construct and concurrent validity were assessed by determining the discriminant capacity of the new test and by identifying associations between functional measures and the new test outcomes. Relative reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test–retest data. Absolute reliability was obtained by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the Minimum Detectable Change at a 90% confidence level (MDC90). Results: The discriminant capacity of the area and both dimensions of the new test was high (Area Under the Curve ≈ 0.8), and consistent multiple regression models were identified to explain functional measures with new test results and sociodemographic data. A consistent trend of ICCs higher than 0.8 was identified for CP individuals. Finally, the SEM can be considered low in both groups, although the high variability among individuals determined some high MDC90 values, mainly in the CP group. Conclusions: The new test, based on IMU data, is valid and reliable for evaluating posture and motor control in children with CP.

scholarly journals The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol® under Various Walking and Running Conditions

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Renner ◽  
DS Williams ◽  
Robin Queen
Keyword(s):  
Reliable Method ◽  
Loading Rate ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Single Sensor ◽  
Force Data

The assessment of loading during walking and running has historically been limited to data collection in laboratory settings or with devices that require a computer connection. This study aims to determine if the loadsol®—a single sensor wireless insole—is a valid and reliable method of assessing force. Thirty (17 male and 13 female) recreationally active individuals were recruited for a two visit study where they walked (1.3 m/s) and ran (3.0 and 3.5 m/s) at a 0%, 10% incline, and 10% decline, with the visits approximately one week apart. Ground reaction force data was collected on an instrumented treadmill (1440 Hz) and with the loadsol® (100 Hz). Ten individuals completed the day 1 protocol with a newer 200 Hz loadsol®. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,k) were used to assess validity and reliability and Bland–Altman plots were generated to better understand loadsol® validity. Across conditions, the peak force ICCs ranged from 0.78 to 0.97, which increased to 0.84–0.99 with the 200 Hz insoles. Similarly, the loading rate ICCs improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.80–0.96 and impulse improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.90–0.97. The 200 Hz insoles may be needed for loading rate and impulse in running. For both walking and running, the loadsol® has excellent between-day reliability (>0.76).

Validity of inertial measurement unit–based knee flexion strength-power test

2019 ◽  
Vol 233 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-449
Author(s):  
Ryu Nagahara ◽  
Mai Kameda ◽  
Jonathon Neville
Keyword(s):  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Mean Power ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Power Test ◽  
Angular Impulse ◽  
Flexion Strength ◽  
Positive Work

This study aimed to examine the concurrent validity of inertial measurement unit–based knee flexion strength-power test variables. Ten physically active males performed a knee flexion strength-power test, consisting of serial right knee flexion-extension motions. Two trials were performed, each at 50%, 75% and 100% effort. Lower-extremity motion during the trial was recorded using a motion capture system and an inertial measurement unit. For inertial measurement unit data, the measured length of each lower-extremity segment was used to estimate segment endpoint coordinates. Knee flexion kinetic variables were then computed using inverse dynamics analysis for both systems. The inertial measurement unit provided comparable values with the motion capture system for angular impulse, mean moment, positive work and mean power (−0.8%, 1.0%, −0.9%, and 1.5%, respectively). Moreover, intraclass correlation coefficients and correlation coefficients for angular impulse, mean moment, positive work and mean power of knee flexion were acceptably high (ICC or r = 0.903–0.970). For positive mean power, however, a Bland–Altman plot showed heteroscedasticity. For knee flexion negative work and mean power, the inertial measurement unit clearly showed an overestimation of the values (32.5% and 23.5%, respectively). Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficients and correlation coefficients were not acceptably high for knee flexion negative work and mean power (ICC or r = 0.541–0.899). These results indicate that the angular impulse, mean moment and positive work can be measured accurately and validly using an inertial measurement unit for knee flexion strength-power test variables. Given its simplicity, the suggested inertial measurement unit–based knee flexion strength-power test would improve on-the-field physical fitness evaluation.

Relative validity and reliability of a novel diet quality assessment tool for athletes: the Athlete Diet Index

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Louise Capling ◽  
Janelle A. Gifford ◽  
Kathryn L. Beck ◽  
Victoria M. Flood ◽  
Fiona Halar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diet Quality ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Rank Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Food Record ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Relative Validity

Abstract Diet quality indices are a practical, cost-effective method to evaluate dietary patterns, yet few have investigated diet quality in athletes. This study describes the relative validity and reliability of the recently developed Athlete Diet Index (ADI). Participants completed the electronic ADI on two occasions, 2 weeks apart, followed by a 4-d estimated food record (4-dFR). Relative validity was evaluated by directly comparing mean scores of the two administrations (mAdm) against scores derived from 4-dFR using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman (B–A) plots. Construct validity was investigated by comparing mAdm scores and 4-dFR-derived nutrient intakes using Spearman’s coefficient and independent t test. Test–retest reliability was assessed using paired t test, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and B–A plots. Sixty-eight elite athletes (18·8 (sd 4·2) years) from an Australian sporting institute completed the ADI on both occasions. Mean score was 84·1 (sd 15·2; range 42·5–114·0). The ADI had good reliability (ICC = 0·80, 95 % CI 0·69, 0·87; P < 0·001), and B–A plots (mean 1·9; level of agreement −17·8, 21·7) showed no indication of systematic bias (y = 4·57–0·03 × x) (95 % CI −0·2, 0·1; P = 0·70). Relative validity was evaluated in fifty athletes who completed all study phases. Comparison of mAdm scores with 4-dFR-derived scores was moderate (rs 0·69; P < 0·001) with no systematic bias between methods of measurement (y = 6·90–0·04 × x) (95 % CI −0·3, 0·2; P = 0·73). Higher scores were associated with higher absolute nutrient intake consistent with a healthy dietary pattern. The ADI is a reliable tool with moderate validity, demonstrating its potential for application to investigate the diet quality of athletes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document