scholarly journals Inorganic Arsenic in Drinking Water and Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis for Dose-Response Assessment

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huei-An Chu ◽  
Douglas Crawford-Brown
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inorganic Arsenic ◽  
Response Assessment

scholarly journals Association between lung cancer risk and inorganic arsenic concentration in drinking water: a dose–response meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1257-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanwei Yuan ◽  
Hongbo zhang ◽  
Bin Chen ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Shasha Tao
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Arsenic Concentration ◽  
Inorganic Arsenic ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cancer Risks ◽  
Dose Response Relationship

High dose arsenic in drinking water (≥100 μg L−1) is known to induce lung cancer, but lung cancer risks at low to moderate arsenic levels and its dose–response relationship remains inconclusive.

scholarly journals Low-Level Exposure to Arsenic in Drinking Water and Risk of Lung and Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose–Response Meta-Analysis

Dose-Response ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 155932581986363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Boffetta ◽  
Claire Borron
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Arsenic Level ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Low Levels

Background: Exposure to high levels of arsenic in drinking water has been associated with an increased risk of lung and bladder cancer, but the presence of an increased risk at low levels is questionable. Methods: A systematic review and a dose–response meta-analysis were conducted on risk estimates of lung and bladder cancer for exposure to arsenic in drinking water up to 150 µg/L, using a 2-stage approach based on a random-effects model. Results: Five studies of lung cancer were identified; the meta-relative risk (RR) for an increase of 10 µg/L arsenic level was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99-1.06; P heterogeneity = .05). The meta-analysis of bladder cancer included 8 studies; the meta-RR for an increase of 10 µg/L arsenic level was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.97-1.07, P heterogeneity = .01). Sensitivity analyses, including a 1-stage meta-regression, confirmed the main findings. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis provided evidence of a lack of an increased risk of lung and bladder cancer for exposure to arsenic in drinking water up to 150 µg/L, the highest concentration studied.

scholarly journals Dose-response meta-analysis of arsenic exposure in drinking water and hypertension

Heliyon ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e06409
Author(s):  
Afsaneh Amiri ◽  
Yaser Mokhayeri ◽  
Rasool Mohammadi ◽  
Mohammad Amin Karami ◽  
Mansour Ghaderpoori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Arsenic Exposure

scholarly journals Association of vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E and risk of bladder cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuqiang Chen ◽  
Qingshu Li ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Wenrong Yang ◽  
Fei Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Vitamin E ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Dose-response for assessing the cancer risk of inorganic arsenic in drinking water: the scientific basis for use of a threshold approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce S. Tsuji ◽  
Ellen T. Chang ◽  
P. Robinan Gentry ◽  
Harvey J. Clewell ◽  
Paolo Boffetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Inorganic Arsenic ◽  
Scientific Basis ◽  
Threshold Approach
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document