scholarly journals Dual Deep Sequencing Improves the Accuracy of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutation Detection in Cancer Gene Panel Testing

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3530
Author(s):  
Hiroki Ura ◽  
Sumihito Togi ◽  
Yo Niida

Cancer gene panel testing requires accurate detection of somatic mosaic mutations, as the test sample consists of a mixture of cancer cells and normal cells; each minor clone in the tumor also has different somatic mutations. Several studies have shown that the different types of software used for variant calling for next generation sequencing (NGS) can detect low-frequency somatic mutations. However, the accuracy of these somatic variant callers is unknown. We performed cancer gene panel testing in duplicate experiments using three different high-fidelity DNA polymerases in pre-capture amplification steps and analyzed by three different variant callers, Strelka2, Mutect2, and LoFreq. We selected six somatic variants that were detected in both experiments with more than two polymerases and by at least one variant caller. Among them, five single nucleotide variants were verified by CEL nuclease-mediated heteroduplex incision with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining (CHIPS) and Sanger sequencing. In silico analysis indicated that the FBXW7 and MAP3K1 missense mutations cause damage at the protein level. Comparing three somatic variant callers, we found that Strelka2 detected more variants than Mutect2 and LoFreq. We conclude that dual sequencing with Strelka2 analysis is useful for detection of accurate somatic mutations in cancer gene panel testing.

2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1250-1251
Author(s):  
C. Avgerinou ◽  
F. Fostira ◽  
P. Economopoulou ◽  
A. Psyrri

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 641-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca K. Marcus ◽  
Jennifer L. Geurts ◽  
Jessica A. Grzybowski ◽  
Kiran K. Turaga ◽  
T. Clark Gamblin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Klugman ◽  
Freya Schnabel ◽  
Ishraq Alim ◽  
Johnny Loke ◽  
Banu Arun ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Wheway ◽  
N. Simon Thomas ◽  
Mary Carroll ◽  
Janice Coles ◽  
Regan Doherty ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is estimated that 1–13% of cases of bronchiectasis in adults globally are attributable to primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) but many adult patients with bronchiectasis have not been investigated for PCD. PCD is a disorder caused by mutations in genes required for motile cilium structure or function, resulting in impaired mucociliary clearance. Symptoms appear in infancy but diagnosis is often late or missed, often due to the lack of a “gold standard” diagnostic tool and non-specific symptoms. Mutations in > 50 genes account for around 70% of cases, with additional genes, and non-coding, synonymous, missense changes or structural variants (SVs) in known genes presumed to account for the missing heritability. Methods UK patients with no identified genetic confirmation for the cause of their PCD or bronchiectasis were eligible for whole genome sequencing (WGS) in the Genomics England Ltd 100,000 Genomes Project. 21 PCD probands and 52 non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis probands were recruited in Wessex Genome Medicine Centre (GMC). We carried out analysis of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and SVs in all families recruited in Wessex GMC. Results 16/21 probands in the PCD cohort received confirmed (n = 9), probable (n = 4) or possible (n = 3) diagnosis from WGS, although 13/16 of these could have been picked up by current standard of care gene panel testing. In the other cases, SVs were identified which were missed by panel testing. We identified variants in novel PCD candidate genes (IFT140 and PLK4) in 2 probands in the PCD cohort. 3/52 probands in the non-CF bronchiectasis cohort received a confirmed (n = 2) or possible (n = 1) diagnosis of PCD. We identified variants in novel PCD candidate genes (CFAP53 and CEP164) in 2 further probands in the non-CF bronchiectasis cohort. Conclusions Genetic testing is an important component of diagnosing PCD, especially in cases of atypical disease history. WGS is effective in cases where prior gene panel testing has found no variants or only heterozygous variants. In these cases it may detect SVs and is a powerful tool for novel gene discovery.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke M. van Veen ◽  
D. Gareth Evans ◽  
Elaine F. Harkness ◽  
Helen J. Byers ◽  
Jamie M. Ellingford ◽  
...  

AbstractPurpose: Lobular breast cancer (LBC) accounts for ~ 15% of breast cancer. Here, we studied the frequency of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in an extended panel of genes in women affected with LBC. Methods: 302 women with LBC and 1567 without breast cancer were tested for BRCA1/2 PGVs. A subset of 134 LBC affected women who tested negative for BRCA1/2 PGVs underwent extended screening, including: ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51D, and TP53.Results: 35 PGVs were identified in the group with LBC, of which 22 were in BRCA1/2. Ten actionable PGVs were identified in additional genes (ATM(4), CDH1(1), CHEK2(1), PALB2(2) and TP53(2)). Overall, PGVs in three genes conferred a significant increased risk for LBC. Odds ratios (ORs) were: BRCA1: OR = 13.17 (95%CI 2.83–66.38; P = 0.0017), BRCA2: OR = 10.33 (95%CI 4.58–23.95; P < 0.0001); and ATM: OR = 8.01 (95%CI 2.52–29.92; P = 0.0053). We did not detect an increased risk of LBC for PALB2, CDH1 or CHEK2. Conclusion: The overall PGV detection rate was 11.59%, with similar rates of BRCA1/2 (7.28%) PGVs as for other actionable PGVs (7.46%), indicating a benefit for extended panel genetic testing in LBC. We also report a previously unrecognised association of pathogenic variants in ATM with LBC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. S98
Author(s):  
Guillermo Seratti ◽  
Vikram Pansare ◽  
Tiffany Yar Pang ◽  
Emanuela Izzo ◽  
William Mackenzie ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. S201
Author(s):  
Guillermo Seratti ◽  
Tiffany Pang ◽  
Vikram Pansare ◽  
Emanuela Izzo ◽  
William Mackenzie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document