scholarly journals Eribulin Efficacy on Brain Metastases in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1272
Author(s):  
Renaud Sabatier ◽  
Johan Martin ◽  
Cécile Vicier ◽  
Mathilde Guérin ◽  
Audrey Monneur ◽  
...  

The onset of brain metastases (BM) is a major turning point during advanced breast cancer (ABC) evolution, with only few treatment options when local therapies have failed. The therapeutic effect of eribulin, a wildly used drug in the treatment of ABC, remains unclear in this setting. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study to assess eribulin efficacy in patients with ABC who displayed BM at time of eribulin initiation. We collected data from the medical files of all ABC patients who received eribulin at our institution from 2012 until 2020. Our main endpoint was the central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival. (CNS-PFS). Other evaluation criteria were extra-cranial progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty patients with BM monitoring data available were selected out of the 549 who received eribulin during the inclusion period. Fifteen patients (75%) had BM progressive as the best response, three patients (15%) had disease stabilization for more than 6 months and only one patient had a partial response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Median CNS-PFS was 3.39 months (95CI (3.02–3.76)). Cox univariate analysis identified molecular subtype as the only prognostic parameter in our cohort, with patients with hormone-receptor positive tumors less likely to experience CNS progression than those with triple-negative MBC (HR = 0.23 (95CI = 0.07–0.80), p = 0.021). Median extra-cranial PFS was 2.67 months (95CI (2.33–3.01)). Median OS was 7.68 months (95CI (0–17.41)). Conclusion: Eribulin seems to have only a limited impact on BM evolution. Hormone receptors expression may identify a subset of patients with better BM control.

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117955491878247 ◽  
Author(s):  
BJ Srinivasa ◽  
Bhanu Prakash Lalkota ◽  
Girish Badarke ◽  
Diganta Hazarika ◽  
Nasiruddin Mohammad ◽  
...  

Background: Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane microtubule inhibitor which can be used after anthracycline and taxane treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of eribulin monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with MBC. Methods: In this study, a total of 45 eligible patients with MBC who received eribulin in HCG Cancer Speciality Center from November 2014 to March 2016 were prospectively analyzed. Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon) survival analysis was carried out for progression-free survival and for overall survival. Patients were excluded if they had not taken treatment for 3 cycles and defaulted/expired during the treatment. Results: In this study, median age of patients was 52 years. A total of 27 (60%) patients had estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (PR) positive primary tumors, whereas HER2 was overexpressed or amplified in 7 (15.6%); a triple negative subtype was recorded in 13 patients (28.9%). Regarding toxicity, 30 patients (66.67%) tolerated treatment well and 3 patients (6.67%) got anemia, 6 patients (13.3%) experienced neutropenia, and 7 (15.62%) patients had neurological toxicity. About 14 (31.1%) patients showed PR, 12 (26.7%) patients had stable disease (SD), whereas 19 (42.25%) patients showed progression disease (PD). Response evaluation at 6 cycles was possible in 18 patients and revealed that 4 (22.5%) patients showed PR, 10 (55.5%) patients had SD, whereas 4 (22.2%) patients had PD. Progression-free survival of the overall study population was 3.95 months. Conclusions: Eribulin mesylate is efficacious and tolerable chemotherapy as second- and third-line treatment options for MBC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052199101
Author(s):  
Zheling Chen ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Xiao Li ◽  
Yucheng Zhou ◽  
Ke Chen

Objective Nearly 5% of patients with breast cancer carry germline BRCA mutations, which are more common in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous clinical trials demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) against BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. The current study conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficiency and safety of PARPis, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, in patients with TNBC. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PARPi therapy with chemotherapy, and comparisons of chemotherapy plus PARPis with chemotherapy alone were included. The study endpoints included the clinical response, progression-free survival, and adverse event rates. Results PARPi therapy was revealed to improve progression-free survival in patients with advanced breast cancer, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis illustrated that patients with mutant BRCA1 and mutant BRCA2 and those who had not been treated with platinum-based agents could specifically benefit from PARPis. Conclusion PARPi monotherapy can significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer, especially those with TNBC, those who had not previously received platinum therapy, and those with mutant BRCA1/2. PARPis combined with chemotherapy represent new treatment options for patients with advanced cancer.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 41-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Berghoff ◽  
Z. Bago-Horvath ◽  
P. C. Dubsky ◽  
M. Rudas ◽  
U. Pluschnig ◽  
...  

41 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are diagnosed in up to 40% of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Since the introduction of trastuzumab in 1999, a rising incidence of BM was reported. We aimed to identify factors that prolong BM free survival (BMFS) in all HER2-positive patients (pts) treated for MBC at the Medical University of Vienna from 1999-2009. Methods: BMFS was defined as primary study endpoint and measured as the interval from diagnosis of metastatic disease until diagnosis of brain metastases. 201 pts with HER2-positive MBC were identified from a breast cancer database. 82 pts (40.8%) were diagnosed with BM; 13 pts were excluded from this analysis as brain was the first site of disease progression. Complete data sets of 69 pts with pathologically verified HER2-positive MBC were available. HER2 status was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and reanalyzed by FISH if a score of 2= was gained. BMFS was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method; factors significantly associated with BMFS in the univariate analysis were included into a Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Median BMFS was 25 months (m; 95%CI 13.37-36.63 m). Trastuzumab-based treatment significantly prolonged median BMFS (29 vs. 11 m; p<0.01); BMFS was further improved by trastuzumab treatment in multiple lines (30 vs. 17 m; p=0.045). Co-positivity for estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 predicted for longer BMFS (30 vs. 15 m; p<0.05). Further variables such as prior exposure to capecitabine, presence of visceral metastasis, presence of lung metastasis, stage IV disease at primary diagnosis, as well as disease free interval from adjuvant therapy were not significantly associated with BMFS. In the Cox regression model, positive ER status (HR 2.03; 95%CI 1.22-3.36; p<0.05) and trastuzumab-based treatment (HR 2.72; 95%CI 1.20-6.17; p=0.017) remained independent predictors for longer BMFS. Conclusions: Trastuzumab-based therapy significantly prolongs BMFS in HER2-positive pts with MBC, probably due to improved systemic disease control. In line with known better survival outcome, ER/HER2 co-positive disease appears to be a less aggressive subtype of HER2-positive breast cancer associated with longer BMFS.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (33) ◽  
pp. 5210-5217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva S. Thomas ◽  
Henry L. Gomez ◽  
Rubi K. Li ◽  
Hyun-Cheol Chung ◽  
Luis E. Fein ◽  
...  

PurposeEffective treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. Ixabepilone has single-agent activity in these patients and has demonstrated synergy with capecitabine in this setting. This study was designed to compare ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in anthracycline-pretreated or -resistant and taxane-resistant locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.Patients and MethodsSeven hundred fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to ixabepilone 40 mg/m2intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2orally on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle, or capecitabine alone 2,500 mg/m2on the same schedule, in this international phase III study. The primary end point was progression-free survival evaluated by blinded independent review.ResultsIxabepilone plus capecitabine prolonged progression-free survival relative to capecitabine (median, 5.8 v 4.2 months), with a 25% reduction in the estimated risk of disease progression (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; P = .0003). Objective response rate was also increased (35% v 14%; P < .0001). Grade 3/4 treatment-related sensory neuropathy (21% v 0%), fatigue (9% v 3%), and neutropenia (68% v 11%) were more frequent with combination therapy, as was the rate of death as a result of toxicity (3% v 1%, with patients with liver dysfunction [≥ grade 2 liver function tests] at greater risk). Capecitabine-related toxicities were similar for both treatment groups.ConclusionIxabepilone plus capecitabine demonstrates superior efficacy to capecitabine alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated or resistant to anthracyclines and resistant to taxanes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document