scholarly journals The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Serum Creatinine in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1636
Author(s):  
Jaeyeon Chung ◽  
Min Hur ◽  
Hyeyeon Cho ◽  
Jinyoung Bae ◽  
Hyun-Kyu Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Serum Creatinine Level ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Urinary Biomarkers ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Renal function declines after partial nephrectomy due to ischemic reperfusion injury induced by surgical insult or renal artery clamping. The effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on reducing renal injury after partial nephrectomy has not been studied regarding urinary biomarkers. Eighty-one patients undergoing partial nephrectomy were randomly assigned to either RIPC or the control group. RIPC protocol consisted of four cycles of five-min inflation and deflation of a blood pressure cuff to 250 mmHg. Serum creatinine levels were compared at the following time points: preoperative baseline, immediate postoperative, on the first and third days after surgery, and two weeks after surgery. The incidence of acute kidney injury, other surgical complication rates, and urinary biomarkers, including urine creatinine, β-2 microglobulin, microalbumin, and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase were compared. Split renal functions measured by renal scan were compared up to 18 months after surgery. There was no significant difference in the serum creatinine level on the first postoperative day (median (interquartile range) 0.87 mg/dL (0.72–1.03) in the RIPC group vs. 0.92 mg/dL (0.71–1.12) in the control group, p = 0.728), nor at any other time point. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury. Secondary outcomes, including urinary biomarkers, were not significantly different between the groups. RIPC showed no significant effect on the postoperative serum creatinine level of the first postoperative day. We could not reveal any significant difference in the urinary biomarkers and clinical outcomes. However, further larger randomized trials are required, because our study was not sufficiently powered for the secondary outcomes.

scholarly journals Influence of hyperuricemia treatment on postoperative acute kidney injury among hyperuricemia patients: a single-center retrospective database analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Watanabe ◽  
Takashi Kawano ◽  
Taro Horino ◽  
Tatsuki Matsumoto ◽  
Keitaro Nagata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Database Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Retrospective Database Analysis ◽  
Retrospective Database

Abstract Objective Hyperuricemia has been reported to be associated with the development of postoperative acute kidney injury (pAKI). However, it remains underdetermined whether hyperuricemia treatment could decrease the potential risk of pAKI. Here, we investigated this hypothesis among hyperuricemia patients with previously normal renal function by performing a retrospective database analysis. Results The study screened 18,169 patients, and were examined preoperative serum creatinine, uric acid, and postoperative serum creatinine. Eight hundred thirty-six patients were finally analyzed for the study, of whom 232 were in the treatment group and 604 were in the non-treatment control group. After adjustment for multi-covariates including baseline (pre-treatment) serum uric acid (SUA) levels, the incidence of pAKI in the treatment group (9.05%; 95% CI 6.04–12.1%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (14.2%; 95% CI 11.2–17.2%). On the other hand, further adjusting for preoperative SUA levels, there was no significant difference in the expected incidence of pAKI between the groups.

scholarly journals Effect of Combined Treatment of Ketorolac and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy: Pilot Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hae Kil ◽  
Ji Kim ◽  
Young Choi ◽  
Hye Lee ◽  
Tae Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Artery ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anesthesia Induction

We evaluated postoperative renal function in patients with/without combined therapy of ketorolac and remote ischemic preconditioning during partial nephrectomy. Sixteen patients were randomly allocated to either the ketorolac combined with RIPC group (KI, n = 8) or control group (n = 8). The KI group received both remote ischemic preconditioning before surgery and intravenous ketorolac of 1 mg/kg before renal artery clamping. Renal parameters were measured before induction, after anesthesia induction, and 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after renal artery declamping. Acute kidney injury was assessed by Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. The estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased in both groups, but then increased significantly at 48 h and 72 h after declamping only in the KI group compared to 24 h (p = 0.001 and p = 0.016). Additionally, it was higher at 48 h and 72 h after declamping in the KI group compared to the control group (p = 0.025 and p = 0.044). The incidence of acute kidney injury was significantly reduced in the KI group (13%) compared to the control group (83%) (p = 0.026). FENa was markedly increased at 2 h after declamping, and recovered in both groups, but it was more significant at 12 h after declamping in the KI group (p = 0.022). Urinary N-acetyl-1-β-D-glucosoaminidase and serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin were similar (p = 0.291 and p = 0.818). There is a possibility that combined therapy of ketorolac and remote ischemic preconditioning prior to ischemia may alleviate renal dysfunction and reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

Assessment of the diagnostic ability of RIFLE and SOFA scoring systems in comparison with protein biomarkers in acute kidney injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siavash Abedi ◽  
Atieh Makhlough ◽  
Alireza Rafie ◽  
Ali Sharifpour ◽  
Masoud Aliyali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Serum Creatinine Level ◽  
Creatinine Level ◽  
Urine Output ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diagnostic Ability

AbstractBackgroundWe aimed to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage (RIFLE) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring systems regarding the serum creatinine level in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study also aims to compare the sensitivity of these scoring systems with that of mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 (MPC-1), interleukin-10 (IL-10) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as biomarkers.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study. Thirty patients with increased creatinine level and decreased urine output were recognized as AKI patients, and 30 patients were selected as the control group. The serum levels of each of the proteins of interest were measured at the initial state (moment of entrance) and final state (14th day in the ICU). Statistical analysis was performed with respect to t-test, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The diagnostic ability of biomarkers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsThe majority of patients were recognized in the risk level of RIFLE, and level 1 of SOFA scoring system. There was no correlation between RIFLE and SOFA (p = 0.123). The expression of MPC-1, IL-10 and NGAL was more remarkable compared with the serum creatinine level. The ROC area change for MPC-1 and IL-10 was higher compared with that for NGAL. As a result, MPC-1 and IL-10 are more reliable biomarkers than NGAL to predict the incidence of AKI in the earlier stage.ConclusionsThere was no significant correlation between SOFA and RIFLE classification, and also the sensitivity of these scoring systems was identified at the risk level for AKI patients. Instead, the level of biomarkers alters earlier, and in higher concentration, than creatinine and urine output changes; therefore, they are more reliable than RIFLE and SOFA scoring systems for prognosis purposes.

The Effect of a Short Course of Tocolytic Indomethacin on Urinary Biomarkers in Premature Infants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad El Samra ◽  
Ayesa Mian ◽  
Marc Lande ◽  
Hongyue Wang ◽  
Ronnie Guillet
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Urinary Biomarkers ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Medication Exposure ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Neutrophil Gelatinase

Objective The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a 2-day prenatal course of indomethacin on the premature kidney as reflected by serum creatinine and urinary biomarkers. Study Design Urine of infants ≤ 32 weeks was collected for the first 14 days and analyzed for cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, osteopontin, β2 microglobulin, epidermal growth factor, uromodulin, and microalbumin. Bivariate analysis compared serum creatinine and biomarkers of exposed (INDO) and unexposed (CONT) subjects. Results Fifty-seven infants (35 CONT and 22 INDO) were studied. The cohorts were similar in gestational age, birthweight, race, gender, nephrotoxic medication exposure, and Apgar scores. CONT had more dopamine exposure and included more pre-eclamptic mothers (p = 0.005). No difference in creatinine-based acute kidney injury or the log transformed mean, maximum, and minimum values of urinary biomarkers was detected. Conclusion Our findings suggest that a short course of tocolytic indomethacin does not result in neonatal acute kidney injury. Key Points

scholarly journals Impact of goal-directed hemodynamic management on the incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: a pilot randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong-Fang Wu ◽  
Hao Kong ◽  
Zhen-Zhen Xu ◽  
Huai-Jin Li ◽  
Dong-Liang Mu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hemodynamic Management ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Renal Hilum ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) remains high after partial nephrectomy. Ischemia-reperfusion injury produced by renal hilum clamping during surgery might have contributed to the development of AKI. In this study we tested the hypothesis that goal-directed fluid and blood pressure management may reduce AKI in patients following partial nephrectomy. Methods This was a pilot randomized controlled trial. Adult patients who were scheduled to undergo partial nephrectomy were randomized into two groups. In the intervention group, goal-directed hemodynamic management was performed from renal hilum clamping until end of surgery; the target was to maintain stroke volume variation < 6%, cardiac index 3.0–4.0 L/min/m2 and mean arterial pressure > 95 mmHg with crystalloid fluids and infusion of dobutamine and/or norepinephrine. In the control group, hemodynamic management was performed according to routine practice. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI within the first 3 postoperative days. Results From June 2016 to January 2017, 144 patients were enrolled and randomized (intervention group, n = 72; control group, n = 72). AKI developed in 12.5% of patients in the intervention group and in 20.8% of patients in the control group; the relative reduction of AKI was 39.9% in the intervention group but the difference was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–1.28; P = 0.180). No significant differences were found regarding AKI classification, change of estimated glomerular filtration rate over time, incidence of postoperative 30-day complications, postoperative length of hospital stay, as well as 30-day and 6-month mortality between the two groups. Conclusion For patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, goal-directed circulatory management during surgery reduced postoperative AKI by about 40%, although not significantly so. The trial was underpowered. Large sample size randomized trials are needed to confirm our results. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02803372. Date of registration: June 6, 2016.

Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin, an early biomarker for diagnosis of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nakhshab Choudhry ◽  
Amna Ihsan ◽  
Sadia Mahmood ◽  
Fahim Ul Haq ◽  
Aamir Jamal Gondal
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarker ◽  
Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

AbstractObjectives:This study was designed to find the reliability of serum NGAL as an early and better diagnostic biomarker than that of serum creatinine for acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention in Pakistani population.Materials and methods:One hundred and fifty-one patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention were included and demographic data were recorded. Blood was drawn by venipuncture in clot activator vacutainers and serum was separated and stored at 4°C. Sample was drawn before the percutaneous procedure and subsequently sampling was done serially for 5 days.Results:The mean±SD serum NGAL pre-PCI (39.92± 10.35 μg/L) and 4 h post-PCI (100.42±26.07 μg/L) showed highly significant difference (p<0.001). The mean±SD serum creatinine pre-PCI (70.1±11.8 μmol/L) and post-PCI (71.2±11.6 μmol/L) showed significant difference (p=0.005) on day 2 onwards but mean microalbumin showed insignificant results (p=0.533). The serum NGAL predicted CI-AKI with sensitivity of 95.8% and specificity of 97.6% for a cut off value of 118 μg/L.Conclusion:Our results suggest that NGAL is an excellent early diagnostic biomarker for acute kidney injury in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

scholarly journals Is there a protective effect with remote ischemic preconditioning on contrast-induced acute renal injury after coronary angiography in low-risk patients?

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
Sanaz Soleymani ◽  
Hamid Reza Samimagham ◽  
Mohammad Tamaddondar ◽  
Hossein Farshidi ◽  
Mahmood Khayatian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Protective Effect ◽  
Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Renal Biomarkers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients

Introduction: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIN-AKI) is a serious complication of coronary angiography. Given the weaknesses in the common protective methods used to prevent CIN-AKI, a safe and effective strategy is needed. RIPC has been shown to have a nephroprotective effect. Objectives: We aimed to determine the protective effect of RIPC on CIN-AKI after angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in low-risk patients. Patients and Methods: In our study, 140 low-risk patients who needed angiography or PCI, were assigned to either RIPC or control group. In each group, serum creatinine and urinary neutrophil gelatinaseassociated lipocalin (uNGAL) were measured before the procedure. Serum creatinine was measured daily for 2 days and uNGAL was measured 6 and 24 hours after the procedure. Diagnosis of AKI was, according to the Kidney Disease; Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria (2012). Results: The mean age in the remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) group was 56.8 ± 11.4 years and 56.3 ± 11.8 years in the control group. We observed no significant difference regarding patient’s characteristic and renal biomarkers at baseline. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI (P = 0.116). The uNGAL increased by 36.2% 6-hour after the procedure in patients with AKI, while at the same time, this biomarker increased only by 4.3% in patients without AKI. Conclusion: We concluded that RIPC, with 3 cycles of 5-minute ischemia and 5-minute reperfusion, did not decrease CIN-AKI or altering renal biomarkers course in low-risk patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI. Additionally, uNGAL, seems to be an appropriate biomarker for early diagnosis of CIN-AKI, 6 hours after contrast media exposure.

scholarly journals Management of Presumed Acute Kidney Injury during Hypertensive Therapy: Stay Calm and Carry on?

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115
Author(s):  
Teresa K. Chen ◽  
Chirag R. Parikh
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Blood Pressure Control ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Intensive Treatment ◽  
Urinary Biomarkers ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Intensive Blood Pressure

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that intensive blood pressure control is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Acute kidney injury (AKI), however, was more common in the intensive treatment group prompting concern in the nephrology community. Summary: Clinical trials on hypertension control have traditionally defined AKI by changes in serum creatinine. However, serum creatinine has several inherent limitations as a marker of kidney injury, with various factors influencing its production, secretion, and elimination. Urinary biomarkers of kidney injury and repair have the potential to provide insight on the presence and phenotype of kidney injury. In both the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study, urinary biomarkers have suggested that the increased risk of AKI associated with intensive treatment was due to hemodynamic changes rather than structural kidney injury. As such, clinicians who encounter rises in serum creatinine during intensification of hypertension therapy should “stay calm and carry on.” Alternative explanations for serum creatinine elevation should be considered and addressed if appropriate. When the rise in serum creatinine is limited, particularly if albuminuria is stable or improving, intensive blood pressure control should be continued for its potential long-term benefits. Key Messages: Increases in serum creatinine during intensification of blood pressure control may not necessarily reflect kidney injury. Clinicians should evaluate for other contributing factors before stopping therapy. Urinary biomarkers may address limitations of serum creatinine as a marker of kidney injury.

Risk of acute kidney injury associated with neuroimaging obtained during triage and treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke symptoms

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1231-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelby L Hall ◽  
Stephan A Munich ◽  
Marshall C Cress ◽  
Leonardo Rangel-Castilla ◽  
Elad I Levy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Serum Creatinine Level ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Creatinine Level ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Vascular Pathology ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Iodinated Contrast

BackgroundCombining non-contrast CT (NCCT), CT angiography (CTA), and CT perfusion (CTP) imaging (referred to as a CT stroke study, CTSS) provides a rapid evaluation of the cerebrovascular axis during acute ischemic stroke. Iodinated contrast-enhanced CT imaging is not without risk, which includes renal injury. If a patient's CTSS identifies vascular pathology, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is often performed within 24–48 h. Such patients may receive multiple administrations of iodinated contrast material over a short time period.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients who underwent a CTSS and DSA for evaluation of acute ischemic symptoms or for stroke intervention within a 48 h period between August 2012 and December 2014.MethodsWe identified 84 patients for inclusion in the analysis. Patients fell into one of two cohorts: AKI, defined as a rise in the serum creatinine level of ≥0.5 mg/dL from baseline, or non-AKI. Clinical parameters included pre- and post-imaging serum creatinine level, time between CTSS and DSA, and type of angiographic procedure (diagnostic vs intervention) performed.ResultsFour patients (4.7%) experienced AKI, one of whom had baseline renal dysfunction (defined as baseline serum creatinine level ≥1.5 mg/dL). The mean difference between baseline and peak creatinine values was found to be significantly greater in patients with AKI than in non-AKI patients (1.65 vs −0.09, respectively; p=0.0008).ConclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence of the safety and feasibility of obtaining CTSS with additional DSA imaging, whether for diagnosis or intervention, to identify possible acute ischemic stroke.

scholarly journals The efficiency of remote ischemic preconditioning on serum cystatin C-based acute kidney injury in patients undergoing coronary angiography; a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e09-e09
Author(s):  
Azadeh Moradkhani ◽  
Hamid Reza Samimagham ◽  
Mohammad Tamaddondar ◽  
Hossein Farshidi ◽  
Mahmood Khayatian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Cystatin C ◽  
Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Serum Cystatin C ◽  
Serum Cystatin ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a known complication of cardiac interventions. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a non-pharmacological method which has a nephroprotective effect. Serum cystatin C (CysC) is a suitable biomarker for the early diagnosis of AKI. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of CI-AKI after RIPC in patients undergoing coronary angiography, through assessment of CysC. Patients and Methods: Around 140 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing angiography were randomly allocated to two groups of RIPC and control groups. In each group, the following biomarkers were assessed: serum creatinine (Cr) and CysC at baseline, 24-hour and 48-hour serum Cr and 24-hour CysC. The endpoint was the development of AKI based on either the KDIGO criteria or a 15% increase in serum CysC. Results: No significant difference was observed between two groups regarding the incidence of AKI according to either KIDIGO criteria or by the increase of serum CysC (P =0.116 and P =0.392, respectively). Moreover, a 46.99% increase in CysC level was observed among patients with AKI during the first 24 hours after the procedure, while at the same interval, it increased only 16.01% in patients without AKI. Conclusion: RIPC with three cycles of 5-minute ischemia and 5-minute reperfusion, did not decrease serum CysC based CI-AKI or alter renal biomarkers course in patients with low risk, who underwent coronary angiography.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document