scholarly journals Implementation of the Treat-to-Target Concept in Evaluation of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 5659
Author(s):  
Tal Gazitt ◽  
Muhanad Abu Elhija ◽  
Amir Haddad ◽  
Idit Lavi ◽  
Muna Elias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Clinical Judgement ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Clinical Impression ◽  
Composite Measure ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Treatment Changes

Background: The treat-to-target approach was recently adopted for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) management. Objective: To assess the implementation of the “treat-to-target” (T2T) concept in daily management of PsA by use of composite scores of disease activity versus clinical judgement alone. Methods: A total of 117 PsA patients from a longitudinal PsA cohort were enrolled consecutively in the study during each patient’s first clinic visit during 2016–2017. Clinic notes from the treating rheumatologist were reviewed by an independent rheumatologist, noting clinical impression of disease activity, treatment changes based on clinical judgement, and rationale. Treatment changes were then compared to the use of formal disease activity parameters in Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) composite measures. All associations were assessed using the chi-square test or the Mann–Whitney test, as appropriate. Results: The 117 PsA patient cohort consisted of 65.5% women, mean age 58.4 ± 13.6 years. Clinical judgement of treating rheumatologist concorded with MDA and DAPSA in 76 (65.5%) and 74 (64.9%) patients, respectively. Agreement between clinical judgement and composite measure criteria did not correlate with patient age, sex, alcohol/tobacco use, or treatment regimens chosen. Disagreement between physician assessment and MDA occurred in 40 (34.5%) cases: in 30 cases, the MDA status was overestimated due to disregard of patient reported outcomes (PRO), while underestimation of MDA status occurred in 25% of cases with treatment changes made in patients with a single active joint or enthesis. Underestimation of disease activity using DAPSA occurred in 22 cases and could be attributed to disregarding tender joint count, patient pain visual analogue scale and C-reactive protein level. Conclusion: In our cohort, agreement between clinical impression and formal composite measure utilization for implementation of T2T strategy occurred in 65% of patients. Discordance resulted from physicians’ overlooking PRO and emphasizing objective findings when using clinical judgement alone.

scholarly journals DAPSA and ultrasound show different perspectives of psoriatic arthritis disease activity: results from a 12-month longitudinal observational study in patients starting treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

RMD Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e000765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silva Pukšić ◽  
Pernille Bolton-King ◽  
Joseph Sexton ◽  
Brigitte Michelsen ◽  
Tore K Kvien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesDisease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) (sum score 68/66 tender/swollen joint counts (68TJC/66SJC), patient’s global assessment, pain and C-reactive protein (CRP)) is recommended for clinical assessment of disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Ultrasound (US) (grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD)) detects inflammation in joints and extra-articular structures. The present objectives were to explore the longitudinal relationships between DAPSA, clinical assessment as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with US in patients with PsA initiating biological DMARDs and the associations between DAPSA and US remission.Methods47 patients with PsA were examined at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Assessments included 68TJC/66SJC, examiner’s global assessment (EGA), PROMs, CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and US GS and PD (48 joints, 10 flexor tendons, 14 entheses, 4 bursae). Clinical composite scores and PD sum scores (0=remission) were calculated. Longitudinal associations were explored by generalised estimating equations with linear and logistic regression.ResultsDAPSA was not longitudinally associated to PD. 66SJC, ESR, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, EGA and CRP were longitudinally associated with PD (p<0.001–0.03), whereas the pain-related components of DAPSA (68TJC and pain) as well as PROMs were not associated. At 6–12 months, remission was achieved in 29%–33 % of the patients for DAPSA and 59%–70 % for PD. The association between DAPSA and PD remission was not significant (p=0.33).ConclusionsDAPSA was not associated with US inflammatory findings which indicates that DAPSA and US may assess different aspects of PsA activity.

scholarly journals Methotrexate achieves major cDAPSA response, and improvement in dactylitis and functional status in psoriatic arthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 869-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sravan Kumar Appani ◽  
Phani Kumar Devarasetti ◽  
Rajendra Vara Prasad Irlapati ◽  
Liza Rajasekhar
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Minimal Disease Activity ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Minimal Disease

Abstract Objective Despite the widespread clinical use of MTX in PsA, data from published randomized controlled studies suggest limited efficacy. The objective of the present study was to document the efficacy of MTX. Methods This was an open-label, prospective study of patients satisfying the ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis study (CASPAR) criteria for PsA who received MTX in doses of ⩾15 mg/week throughout the follow-up period of 9 months. Disease activity was assessed across various domains by tender and swollen joint count, physician and patient global assessment, DAS-28 ESR, Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA), Leeds Dactylitis Instrument basic, Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Minimal Disease Activity and HAQ (CRD Pune version) at baseline and at 3, 6 and 9 months of follow-up. Response to therapy was assessed by EULAR DAS28 ESR, Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA) response, HAQ response and PASI75. MTX dose escalation and the use of combination DMARDS were dictated by disease activity. Results A total of 73 patients were included, with mean (s.d.) age 44 (9.7) years. The mean (s.d.) dose of MTX used was 17.5 (3.8) mg/week. Seven patients received additional DMARDS (LEF/SSZ). At the end of 9 months, significant improvement (P < 0.05) was noted in the tender joint count, swollen joint count, global activity, DAS-28ESR, cDAPSA, Leeds Dactylitis Index basic, LEI, PASI and HAQ. Major cDAPSA response was achieved in 58.9% of patients. EULAR DAS28 moderate and good response was achieved in 74% and 6.8% of patients, respectively. Minimal Disease Activity was achieved in 63% of patients. A PASI75 response and HAQ response was achieved in 67.9% and 65.8% of patients, respectively. Conclusion MTX initiated at ⩾15 mg/week with targeted escalation resulted in significant improvement in the skin, joint, dactylitis, enthesitis and functional domains of PsA.

scholarly journals Ideal target for psoriatic arthritis? Comparison of remission and low disease activity states in a real-life cohort

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonieke J J van Mens ◽  
Marleen G H van de Sande ◽  
Arno W R van Kuijk ◽  
Dominique Baeten ◽  
Laura C Coates
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Skin Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Low Disease Activity

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) recommendations state that the target of treatment should be remission or low disease activity (LDA). We used a real-life dataset to compare different potential targets.Methods250 patients with PsA considered in an acceptable disease state according to their rheumatologist were included. Targets for remission were the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) remission (≤4), very low disease activity (VLDA) and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score ≤1.9. LDA targets analysed were the DAPSA ≤14, cDAPSA ≤13, minimal disease activity (MDA) and adjusted MDA targets: MDAjoints with both tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) mandated, MDAskin (psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) mandated) and MDAjoints&skin with TJC, SJC and PASI mandated.ResultsComparison of the several candidate targets demonstrates that VLDA is achieved by the lowest proportion of patients and includes patients with the lowest residual disease activity compared with the other remission targets. The modified MDA measures are the most stringent targets for LDA in terms of residual disease on joints, psoriasis and enthesitis within patients achieving the target. In both remission and LDA, the inclusion of C reactive protein did not show an added value. The exclusion of a skin domain, as in the DAPSA measures, resulted in negligence of skin disease and a negative impact on the quality of life in some patients.ConclusionsThe different remission and LDA targets show us significant overlap between measures, but these measures targeting the same definition do differ in terms of allowance of residual disease. Inclusion of laboratory markers seems unnecessary, although exclusion of a skin domain may result in psoriasis not being assessed resulting in residual impactful skin disease.

The 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease Questionnaire: Construct Validity, Reliability, and Interpretability in a Clinical Setting

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Di Carlo ◽  
Andrea Becciolini ◽  
Valentina Lato ◽  
Chiara Crotti ◽  
Ennio Giulio Favalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Biologic Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective.To study, in a real-life setting, the construct validity, the reliability, and the interpretability of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) questionnaire in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Methods.In 144 consecutive patients with PsA (81 men and 63 women, mean age of 51.4 ± 12.8 yrs, and 77 receiving biologic treatment), the PsAID-12 and other patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were collected, such as the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Each patient underwent articular and skin assessment.Results.Construct validity: Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor result defined as the PsAID Symptom Score and the PsAID Skin Score. In determining convergent validity, significant correlations were found between the PsAID-12 and the clinical Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA; ρ = 0.867, p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that the PsAID-12 is determined by the articular disease activity (cDAPSA, p < 0.0001), severity of psoriasis (PsO; physician’s global assessment, p < 0.0001), and the presence of a coexisting fibromyalgia (FM; p < 0.0001). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.93 for the total PsAID-12. Interpretability: Applying the cDAPSA categorization of disease activity states, the PsAID-12 cutoff values resulted in 1.4 between remission and low disease activity (LDA), 4.1 between LDA and moderate disease activity (MDA), and 6.7 between MDA and high disease activity.Conclusion.The PsAID-12 is an excellent PRO to evaluate the effect of PsA. It should be carefully handled in patients with coexisting FM.

scholarly journals Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparison of the Discriminative Capacity and Construct Validity of Six Composite Indices in a Real World

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Salaffi ◽  
Alessandro Ciapetti ◽  
Marina Carotti ◽  
Stefania Gasparini ◽  
Marwin Gutierrez
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Mental Component Summary Score ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Activity Indices

Objective. To compare, “in a real world,” the performance of the most common composite activity indices in a cohort of PsA patients.Methods. A total of 171 PsA patients were involved. The following variables were evaluated: peripheral joint assessment, patient reported of pain, physician and patient assessments of disease activity, patient general health status, dactylitis digit count, Leeds Enthesitis Index, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), physical and mental component summary score of the Medical Outcome Survey (SF-36), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). To measure the disease activity, the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP), Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA), and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) have been calculated. The criteria for minimal disease activity (MDA) and remission were applied as external criterion.Results. The ROC were similar in all the composite measures. Only the CPDAI showed less discriminative ability. There was a high degree of correlation between all the indices (P<0.0001). The highest correlations were between DAPSA and SDAI (rho = 0.996) and between DAPSA and DAS28-CRP (rho = 0.957). CPDAI, DAPSA, and PASDAS had the most stringent definitions of remission and MDA category. DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP had the highest proportions in remission and MDA.Conclusions. Although a good concurrent validity and discriminant capacity of six disease activity indices were observed, the proportions of patients classified in the disease activity levels differed. In particular, the rate of patients in remission was clearly different among the respective indices.

scholarly journals What Should Be the Primary Target of “Treat to Target” in Psoriatic Arthritis?

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Coates ◽  
Ennio Lubrano ◽  
Fabio Massimo Perrotta ◽  
Paul Emery ◽  
Philip G. Conaghan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Active Disease

Objective.Recommendations regarding “treat to target” in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have stated that the target should be remission or inactive disease. Potential definitions include very low disease activity (VLDA), PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) near remission, Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA) or clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) remission. Our aim was to investigate the proportion of patients who fulfill these definitions and how much residual active disease remained.Methods.This analysis used 2 datasets: first, trial data from the Tight Control of PsA (TICOPA) study, which included 206 patients with recent-onset (< 2 yrs) PsA receiving standard and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD); and second, an observational clinical dataset from Italy of patients receiving biological DMARD. Proportions achieving each of the 4 potential targets were calculated in each dataset and comparisons between treatment groups were performed in the TICOPA dataset. Levels of residual disease were established for key clinical domains of PsA.Results.All measures could differentiate the TICOPA trial treatment groups (p < 0.03). Lower proportions of patients fulfilled the VLDA criteria compared to DAPSA or cDAPSA remission. PASDAS results were different between the cohorts. Residual active disease was low across all definitions although higher levels were seen in DAPSA and cDAPSA compared to VLDA, particularly for psoriasis. In all measures, the proportion with elevated C-reactive protein was similar and low.Conclusion.VLDA appears the most stringent measure. It ensures that significant active arthritis, enthesitis, and psoriasis are not present, in contrast with DAPSA and PASDAS, in which composite scores can “hide” active disease in some domains.

scholarly journals Real-world validation of the minimal disease activity index in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis from a prospective, observational, biological treatment registry

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e016619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Proton Rahman ◽  
Michel Zummer ◽  
Louis Bessette ◽  
Philip Baer ◽  
Boulos Haraoui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Minimal Disease Activity ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Minimal Disease

ObjectiveTo describe the minimal disease activity (MDA) rate over time in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving antitumour necrosis factor agents, evaluate prognostic factors of MDA achievement and identify the most common unmet criteria among MDA achievers.DesignBiologic Treatment Registry Across Canada (BioTRAC): ongoing, prospective registry of patients initiating treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or PsA with infliximab (IFX), golimumab (GLM) or ustekinumab.Setting46 primary-care Canadian rheumatology practices.Participants223 patients with PsA receiving IFX (enrolled since 2005) and GLM (enrolled since 2010) with available MDA information at baseline, 6 months and/or 12 months.Primary and secondary outcome measuresMDA was defined as ≥5 of the following criteria: 28-item tender joint count (TJC28) ≤1, 28-item swollen joint count (SJC28) ≤1, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤1 or body surface area≤3, Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≤15 mm, patient’s global assessment (PtGA) (VAS) ≤20 mm, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ≤0.5, tender entheseal points ≤1. Independent prognostic factors of MDA achievement were assessed with multivariate logistic regression.ResultsMDA was achieved by 11.7% of patients at baseline, 43.5% at 6 months, 44.8% at 12 months and 48.8% at either 6 or 12 months. Among MDA achievers at 6 months, 75.7% had sustained MDA at 12 months. Lower baseline HAQ (OR=0.210; 95% CI: 0.099 to 0.447) and lower TJC28 (OR=0.880; 95% CI: 0.804 to 0.964), were significant prognostic factors of MDA achievement over 12 months of treatment. The most commonly unmet MDA criteria among MDA achievers was patient reported pain (25%), PtGA (15%) and PASI (12%).ConclusionsAlmost 50% of patients treated with IFX or GLM in routine clinical care achieved MDA within the first year of treatment. Lower baseline HAQ and lower TJC28, were identified as significant prognostic factors of MDA achievement. The most commonly unmet criteria in patients who achieved MDA were pain, PtGA and PASI.Trial registration numberBioTRAC (NCT00741793).

The relationship between patient acceptable symptom state and disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanie Z Fei ◽  
Anthony V Perruccio ◽  
Justine Y Ye ◽  
Dafna D Gladman ◽  
Vinod Chandran
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
High Disease Activity ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Abstract Objectives The Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) are composite PsA disease activity measures. We sought to identify the PASDAS and DAPSA cut-off points consistent with patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), the threshold of symptoms beyond which patients consider themselves well, and examine PASS across published PASDAS and DAPSA thresholds for low, moderate and high disease activity. Methods We used a standard protocol including physician assessment and patient-reported outcomes to prospectively record measures required to calculate PASDAS and DAPSA. We identified PASS thresholds for the PASDAS and DAPSA using receiver operating characteristics curve analyses. We assessed the frequency of reporting acceptable symptom state across disease activity thresholds for PASDAS and DAPSA scores. Results A total of 229 patients (58.5% male, mean age 55.5 years, mean disease duration 17.1 years) were recruited. The PASS threshold for the PASDAS was 3.79 [area under the curve (AUC) 0.86, sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.82] and for the DAPSA was 11.10 (AUC 0.91, sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.82). With the PASDAS, 90% of patients defined as having low disease activity considered their symptom state acceptable, compared with 55% and 17% among those with moderate and high disease activity, respectively. With the DAPSA, 98% of patients in disease remission considered their symptom state acceptable compared with 85, 22 and 18% among those with low, moderate and high disease activity, respectively. Conclusion We have defined PASS thresholds for PASDAS and DAPSA. The PASDAS target for low disease activity and DAPSA targets of low disease activity or remission align well with PASS.

scholarly journals Influence of Axial Involvement on Clinical Characteristics of Psoriatic Arthritis: Analysis from the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1389-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Mease ◽  
Jacqueline B. Palmer ◽  
Mei Liu ◽  
Arthur Kavanaugh ◽  
Renganayaki Pandurengan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Severe Psoriasis ◽  
Spinal Involvement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Axial Involvement

Objective.We analyzed the characteristics of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with and without axial involvement in the US-based Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry.Methods.All patients were included who had PsA and data on axial involvement, defined as physician-reported presence of spinal involvement at enrollment, and/or radiograph or magnetic resonance imaging showing sacroiliitis. Demographics, clinical measures, patient-reported outcomes, and treatment characteristics were assessed at enrollment.Results.Of 1530 patients with PsA, 192 (12.5%) had axial involvement and 1338 (87.5%) did not. Subgroups were similar in sex, race, body mass index, disease duration, presence of dactylitis, and prevalence of most comorbidities. However, patients with axial involvement were younger and more likely to have enthesitis, a history of depression, and more frequently used biologics at enrollment. They were also more likely to have moderate/severe psoriasis (body surface area ≥ 3%, 42.5% vs 31.5%) and significantly worse disease as measured by a lower prevalence of minimal disease activity (30.1% vs 46.2%) and higher nail psoriasis scores [visual analog scale (VAS) 11.4 vs 6.5], enthesitis counts (5.1 vs 3.4), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (4.7 vs 3.5) scores, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (3.8 vs 2.5) scores, C-reactive protein levels (4.1 vs 2.4 mg/l), and scores for physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire, 0.9 vs 0.6), pain (VAS, 47.7 vs 36.2), and fatigue (VAS, 50.2 vs 38.6).Conclusion.Presence of axial involvement was associated with a higher likelihood of moderate/severe psoriasis, with higher disease activity and greater effect on quality of life. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring patients with PsA for signs of axial symptoms or spinal involvement.

scholarly journals Residual Disease Activity and Associated Factors in Psoriatic Arthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1490-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ennio Lubrano ◽  
Silvia Scriffignano ◽  
Fabio Massimo Perrotta
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Composite Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Psoriasis Area Severity Index ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectiveRemission or low disease activity should be the treatment target of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, residual disease activity (RDA) in some domains could persist. The aim of this study was to assess RDA and its associated factors in a group of patients with PsA.MethodsPatients with PsA were enrolled if they satisfied ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria with > 6 months’ followup and achieved a status of low disease activity (LDA), minimal disease activity (MDA), or remission [Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA) remission or very low disease activity (VLDA)]. RDA was assessed by the percentage of patients who had, although in LDA or remission, tender and/or swollen joints > 1, Leeds Enthesitis Index > 1, Health Assessment Questionnaire > 0.5, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) > 1, patient’s global assessment > 20, physician visual analog scale (VAS) > 20, and VAS pain > 15. Associated factors of RDA were also assessed.ResultsOf 113 enrolled patients, 78 (69%) were in MDA. Moreover, DAPSA remission was observed in 46 (40.7%) while VLDA only in 32 (28.3%) of patients with PsA. VLDA seems to be the most stringent criterion, with a minimal RDA only in the VAS physician in 1 patient (3.1%) and none in the different domains, while patients in MDA had RDA in tender joints (14.1%), VAS pain (29.4%) and PASI > 1 or body surface area (BSA) > 3% (17.9%). Of note, although patients in DAPSA remission show a very low rate of RDA in almost all domains, 12 (26%) of them show a PASI > 1 or BSA > 3%. Finally, LDA shows RDA in higher percentages, mainly in patient-reported outcomes, tender joints, and skin domain.ConclusionRDA can be recognized in patients with PsA. VLDA seems to be the most stringent composite index to identify patients in the absence of RDA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document