scholarly journals Association between the Use of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors and the Risk of Dementia among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 660
Author(s):  
Kuan-Chan Chen ◽  
Chi-Hsiang Chung ◽  
Chieh-Hua Lu ◽  
Nian-Sheng Tzeng ◽  
Chien-Hsing Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase ◽  
Class Effect ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors

Study Objectives: Diabetes mellitus per se and its related therapy have been frequently associated with an increased risk of developing dementia. However, studies that explored the risk of dementia from the use of the novel oral antidiabetic medication dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) have been limited, especially in Asian populations. The present study aimed to determine the effect of DPP-4i on the subsequent risk of dementia among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Taiwan. Methods: This study utilized data from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database between 2008 and 2015. We enrolled 2903 patients aged ≥50 years, who were on DPP-4i for a diagnosis of T2D and had no dementia. A total of 11,612 subjects were included and compared with a propensity score-matched control group who did not use DPP-4i (non-DPP-4i group). Survival analysis was performed to estimate and compare the risk of dementia—including Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and other dementia types—between the two groups. Results: Both groups had a mean age of 68 years, had a preponderance of women (61.8%), and were followed up for a mean duration of 7 years. The risk of all-cause dementia was significantly lower in the DPP-4i group than in the non-DPP-4i group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.798; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.681–0.883; p < 0.001), with a class effect. This trend was particularly observed for vascular dementia (HR 0.575; 95% CI 0.404–0.681; p < 0.001), but not in Alzheimer’s disease (HR 0.891; 95% CI 0.712–1.265; p = 0.297). The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the preventive effect on dementia was positively correlated with the cumulative dose of DPP-4i. Conclusions: DPP-4i decreased the risk of dementia with a class effect, especially vascular dementia, but not in Alzheimer’s disease. Our results provide important information on the drug choice when managing patients with T2D in clinical practice.

Diabetes Mellitus Is a Risk Factor for Vascular Dementia, but Not for Alzheimer's Disease: A Population-Based Study of the Oldest Old

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda B. Hassing ◽  
Boo Johansson ◽  
Sven E. Nilsson ◽  
Stig Berg ◽  
Nancy L. Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Diabetes Diagnosis ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine if Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for dementia in very old age, specifically for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD). Methods: We evaluated the risk of dementia in relation to Type 2 diabetes using a population-based sample of 702 individuals aged 80 years and older (mean age 83 years). A total of 187 persons received a dementia diagnosis. Thirty-one individuals had a diabetes diagnosis prior to onset of the dementia. Results: Cox proportional hazard analyses, adjusted for age, gender, education, smoking habits, and circulatory diseases, indicated an elevated risk to develop VaD (relative risk = 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.35–4.78) in individuals with diabetes mellitus. No association was found between diabetes and AD. Conclusion: Type 2 diabetes is selectively related to the different subtypes of dementia. There is no increased risk of AD but more than a twofold risk of VaD in persons with diabetes.

scholarly journals Type-2 diabetes and risk of dementia: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies in 1 million individuals

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Qvist Thomassen ◽  
Janne Schurmann Tolstrup ◽  
Marianne Benn ◽  
Ruth Frikke-Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Mendelian Randomisation ◽  
Nationwide Study ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Civil Status ◽  
Causal Nature

Abstract Aims In observational studies, type-2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of dementia; however, the causal nature of this association remains unanswered. In an unselected nationwide study of all Danes, we wanted to test whether type-2 diabetes is associated with dementia subtypes, and to test whether potential associations are of a causal nature. Methods In the current study of nationwide observational registry data in all Danes above the age of 65 years (n = 784 434) combined with genetic consortia data on 213 370 individuals, we investigated the associations between type-2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, unspecified dementia and all-cause dementia, and whether observational associations were of a causal nature by applying a two-sample Mendelian randomisation strategy. We addressed key biases inherent in Mendelian randomisation approaches. Results Important confounders (age, ethnicity, size of community, region, civil status and education level) were captured on all 784 434 individuals and adjusted for in the models. Multifactorial adjusted hazard ratios were 1.13 (1.06–1.21) for Alzheimer's disease, 1.98 (1.83–2.14) for vascular dementia, 1.53 (1.48–1.59) for unspecified dementia and 1.48 (1.44–1.53) for all-cause dementia in persons with type-2 diabetes v. without. Results were similar for men and women. The two-sample Mendelian randomisation estimate for the association between the genetic instrument and Alzheimer's disease was 1.04 (0.98–1.10), consistent with sensitivity estimates, addressing pleiotropy, measurement bias and weak instrument bias. Conclusions In a nationwide study of all Danes above the age of 65 years, we show that type-2 diabetes is associated with major subtypes of dementia – with particularly strong associations for vascular dementia and unspecified dementia – the two types of dementia with the most obvious vascular pathologies. Although the present two-sample Mendelian randomisation approach using genetic consortia data suggests that type-2 diabetes is not a direct cause of Alzheimer's disease, we were unable to test the causal nature of type-2 diabetes for vascular dementia and unspecified dementia, because no publicly available genetic consortia data yet exist for these dementia endpoints. The causal nature of type-2 diabetes for dementia with vascular pathologies is pivotal questions to solve for future public health recommendations and therapeutic advice.

scholarly journals Incretin-based Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes—Comparisons Between Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors

2011 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Bailey ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Receptor Agonists ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1

Type 2 diabetes exerts a huge toll on both morbidity and mortality, despite an expanding range of antiglycemic drugs and epidemiological evidence highlighting the benefits of effective glycemic control. Incretin-based agents offer important benefits, including a meal-dependent mode of action that may protect against hypoglycemia, and weight loss—in contrast to other antihyperglycemic drugs that cause weight gain. There are now two glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and three dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors approved for the management of type 2 diabetes in the US. Clinical trials have established the efficacy of incretin-based agents in controlling fasting and post-prandial blood glucose levels as well as glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), both as monotherapy (including as first-line pharmacological treatment) and in combination with other antihyperglycemic treatments. GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors have different mechanisms of action, which may explain their inconsistent efficacy results in direct comparator trials; for example, liraglutide has better efficacy than sitagliptin. However, GLP-1 receptor agonists can cause transient nausea in some patients. There is also evidence of different effects of individual agents within the same class; for example, liraglutide has shown superior efficacy to exenatide when added to metformin and/or sulfonylurea. Linagliptin is not cleared through renal mechanisms, unlike sitagliptin and saxagliptin. Isolated cases of pancreatitis led to concerns about a putative link with incretin-based therapies. However, the data currently available do not support a mechanistic or epidemiological link, although there does appear to be an increased risk of pancreatitis in people with diabetes that is independent of incretin-based treatment. Ongoing studies aim to extend our longer-term understanding of these agents, and hence, allow us to develop an optimal approach to patient management.

scholarly journals The association of bullous pemphigoid with dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors: a ten-year prospective observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaia Lambadiari ◽  
Aikaterini Kountouri ◽  
Foteini Kousathana ◽  
Emmanouil Korakas ◽  
Georgios Kokkalis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bullous Pemphigoid ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase ◽  
Dermatology Department ◽  
Steroid Administration ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
A Prospective Study

Abstract Background Bullous pemphigoid is the most common bullous chronic autoimmune skin disease. Recent studies have suggested dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors as possible predisposing agents of bullous pemphigoid. The objective of our study was to prospectively estimate the association between gliptins and the development of bullous pemphigoid. Methods We conducted a prospective study which included all patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven bullous pemphigoid in the Dermatology Department of our hospital between April 1, 2009 and December 31,2019. The diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid was based on specific clinical, histological and immunological features. Results Overall 113 consecutive patients (age 75 ± 13 years, 62 females) with the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid were enrolled. Seventy-six patients (67.3%) suffered from type 2 Diabetes and 52 (46%) were treated with dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors. The most frequent prescribed gliptin was vildagliptin, being administered to 45 cases (39.8% of total patients enrolled, 86.5% of the patients treated with gliptins). Gliptins were withdrawn immediately after the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, which together with steroid administration led to remission of the rash. Conclusions This study revealed that treatment with dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors, especially vildagliptin, is significantly associated with an increased risk of bullous pemphigoid development.

scholarly journals Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors do not increase the risk of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes: a cohort study

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1015-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seoyoung C. Kim ◽  
Robert J. Glynn ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Brendan M. Everett ◽  
Allison B. Goldfine
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document