scholarly journals Correlation of the Subjective Hip Value with Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements for the Hip

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2179
Author(s):  
David R. Krueger ◽  
Vincent J. Leopold ◽  
Joerg H. Schroeder ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Sebastian Hardt
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Measurement Tool ◽  
Outcome Measurements ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Tool ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score

Background: The subjective hip value (SHV) was developed as a patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) that is easily and quickly performed and interpreted. The SHV is defined as a patient’s subjective hip measurement tool expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal hip joint, which would score 100%. The hypothesis is that results of the subjective hip value correlate with the results of the modified Harris hip score and the International Hip Outcome Tool in patients with hip-related diseases. Methods: 302 patients completed the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHot-33) as well as the SHV. The SHV consist of only one question: “What is the overall percent value of your hip if a completely normal hip represents 100%?”. The patients were divided into five different groups depending on the diagnosis. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the correlation between the different PROMs and linear regression analysis was used to calculate R2. Results: 302 complete datasets were available for evaluation. There was a high correlation between the SHV and the iHOT-33 (r = 0.847; r2 = 0.692, p < 0.001) and the mHHS (r = 0.832; r2 = 0.717, p < 0.001). The SHV showed a medium (r = 0.653) to high (r = 0.758) correlation with the mHHS and the iHOT-33 in all diagnosis groups. Conclusion: The SHV offers a useful adjunct to established hip outcome measurements, as it is easily and quickly performed and interpreted. The SHV reflects the view of the patient and is independent of the diagnosis. Further research with prospective studies is needed to test the psychometric properties of the score.

scholarly journals Self-reported allergies correlate with a worse patient-reported outcome after hip arthroscopy: a matched control study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica L Swartwout ◽  
Jacob D Feingold ◽  
Joshua I Wright-Chisem ◽  
John M Apostolakos ◽  
Sacha A Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Outcome Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Tool ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
Control Study

Abstract Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with and without at least one self-reported allergy undergoing hip arthroscopy were compared. Data on 1434 cases were retrospectively reviewed, and 267 patients were identified with at least one self-reported allergy and randomly matched to a control group on a 1:2 ratio. Four PROMs [Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports (HOS-Sport) and 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33)] were collected preoperatively, and at 5–11, 12–23 and 24–35 months postoperatively. Significant PROM differences were found 5–11 months postoperative on mHHS (P &lt; 0.001), HOS-ADL (P = 0.002), HOS-Sport (P &lt; 0.001) and iHOT-33 (P &lt; 0.001). At 12–23 months postoperative, the allergy cohort had significantly worse scores on mHHS (P = 0.002), HOS-ADL (P = 0.001), HOS-Sport (P &lt; 0.001) and iHOT-33 (P &lt; 0.001). They also had significantly worse measures 24–35 months postoperative on mHHS (P = 0.019), HOS-Sport (P = 0.006) and iHOT-33 (P &lt; 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed that each additional allergy reported significantly increased the risk of failing to meet the minimal clinically important difference 5–11 months after surgery on mHHS by 1.15 [OR (95% CI): 1.15 (1.03, 1.30), P = 0.014], on HOS-ADL by 1.16 [OR (95% CI): 1.16 (1.02, 1.31), P = 0.021] and on iHOT-33 by 1.20 [OR (95% CI): 1.20 (1.07, 1.36), P = 0.002]. Results suggest self-reported allergies increase the likelihood of a patient-perceived worse outcome after hip arthroscopy. An understanding of this association by the physician is essential during presurgical planning and in the management of postoperative care.

Short-Term Outcomes of Open Hip Preservation Surgery for Symptomatic Extraarticular Femoroacetabular Impingement

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 599-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin F. Ricciardi ◽  
Kara G. Fields ◽  
Catherine Wentzel ◽  
Bryan T. Kelly ◽  
Ernest L. Sink
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Open Treatment ◽  
Outcome Tool

Introduction The purposes of this study were to describe: (i) short-term disease-specific patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs); and (ii) factors associated with reoperation or treatment failure in patients undergoing open hip preservation surgery for symptomatic extraarticular FAI. Methods Patients undergoing open hip preservation surgery for symptomatic extraarticular FAI were identified from a prospective, single-centre hip preservation registry (n = 51 patients; median clinical follow-up 24 [range 11-49] months). Hip-specific PROMs were assessed preoperatively, 6 months, and each year subsequently. Patients undergoing reoperation or treatment failure (<10 point improvement in iHOT-33 postoperatively) over the study period were identified. Preoperative associated factors were explored on a univariate basis. Results International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) improved from 33 (standard deviation [SD] 18) to 62 (26) at most recent follow-up and 76% of patients improved by minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Harris Hip Score improved from 53 (15) to 75 (17) at most recent follow-up and 79% of patients improved by MCID. Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Sport improved from 45 (26) to 66 (28) at most recent follow-up and 60% of patients improved by MCID. Continued improvements in mean follow-up scores were seen from 1 year to 2 years. Overall, 7 patients underwent reoperation and 9 patients failed to improve by MCID. Preoperative HOS Sport was higher in patients experiencing reoperation or treatment failure (58 [SD 19] vs. 40 [SD 27] respectively; p = 0.03). No other associated demographic, physical examination, or radiographic factors were found. Conclusions Open treatment of extraarticular FAI results in short-term improvements in hip-specific PROMs in most patients. Higher HOS Sport scores were associated with reoperation or treatment failure. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to define maximum improvements in this challenging patient population.

Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Unsalvageable Labral Tear at the Time of Initial Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 2029-2037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Nakashima ◽  
Manabu Tsukamoto ◽  
Yasuo Ohnishi ◽  
Hajime Utsunomiya ◽  
Shiho Kanezaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Labral Tear ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
Reconstruction Group

Background:The acetabular labrum plays important roles in proprioception, nociception, synovial fluid seal effect, and static and dynamic joint stability and as a shock absorber. Clinical and radiographic risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are not well established.Purpose:To identify predictors of unsalvageable labral tear during initial hip arthroscopic management of FAI.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Patients were included who underwent primary hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI between March 2009 and March 2014. Patients were excluded who had <2-year follow-up, underwent bilateral surgery, or had a history of surgery, osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2 or 3), and other diagnoses, including lateral center-edge angle <25° diagnosed as developmental hip dysplasia. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their labral condition: reconstruction and refixation. Unsalvageable labral tear was defined as any irreparable labral tear, including severe degenerative tear, frayed labrum, labral ossification, flattened labrum, and failed prior repair during surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified risk factors for segmental labral reconstruction. Patient-reported outcome scores and postoperative revision rates were also assessed.Results:Twenty-five hips (18 male, 7 female) and 126 hips (65 male, 61 female) were included in the reconstruction and refixation groups, respectively. The mean ± SD ages were 52.6 ± 15.0 and 36.5 ± 16.1 years in the reconstruction and refixation groups, respectively. In the reconstruction group, the mean modified Harris Hip Score significantly improved from 67.3 ± 14.9 preoperatively to 95.0 ± 8.1 at final follow-up ( P < .001), and the mean Nonarthritic Hip Score improved from 63.0 ± 18.3 preoperatively to 89.5 ± 10.1 at final follow-up ( P < .001). In the refixation group, the mean modified Harris Hip Score significantly improved from 69.2 ± 18.6 preoperatively to 93.0 ± 11.2 at final follow-up ( P < .001), and the mean Nonarthritic Hip Score improved from 60.7 ± 18.8 preoperatively to 88.6 ± 15.0 at final follow-up ( P < .001). No significant difference was noted in patient-reported outcome scores and revision hip arthroscopy rates. The rate of conversion of total hip arthroplasty was higher in the reconstruction group than in the refixation group. Risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear were age ≥45 years (odds ratio [OR], 8.83; P < .007), body mass index ≥23.1 kg/m2(OR, 13.05; P < .001), and vertical center anterior angle ≥36° (OR, 19.03; P < .001). Furthermore, in this study, unsalvageable labral tears were present in cases with at least 2 of the 3 risk factors.Conclusion:Age ≥45 years, body mass index ≥23.1 kg/m2, and vertical center anterior angle ≥36° are risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear at initial hip arthroscopic surgery for patients with FAI.

scholarly journals Development of the HOOSglobal to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Preservation Procedures

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 940-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cale A. Jacobs ◽  
Michael R. Peabody ◽  
Stephen T. Duncan ◽  
Ryan D. Muchow ◽  
Ryan M. Nunley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Orthopaedic Community ◽  
Pro Tools ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score

Background: The creation of a single patient-reported outcome (PRO) platform validated across hip preservation, osteoarthritis (OA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) populations may reduce barriers and streamline the routine collection of PROs in clinical practice. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine if augmenting the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) with additional HOOS questions would result in a PRO platform that could be used across a wider spectrum of hip patient populations. Hypothesis: The HOOS, JR would demonstrate a notable ceiling effect, but by augmenting the HOOS, JR with additional HOOS questions, a responsive PRO platform could be created. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Using preoperative and postoperative HOOS responses from a sample of 304 patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), additional items were identified to augment the HOOS, JR. The psychometric properties of a newly created PRO tool (HOOSglobal) were then compared with the HOOS, JR and other PRO instruments developed for patients with hip OA and/or undergoing THA. Results: By augmenting the HOOS, JR with 2 additional questions, the HOOSglobal was more responsive than all other included PRO tools and had significantly fewer maximum postoperative scores than the HOOS, JR ( P < .0001), HOOS–Physical Function Short form ( P < .0001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ( P = .02), University of California, Los Angeles activity scale ( P = .0002), and modified Harris Hip Score ( P = .04). The postoperative HOOSglobal score threshold associated with patients achieving the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was 62.5. Conclusion: The HOOSglobal is a valid and responsive PRO tool after PAO and may potentially provide the orthopaedic community with a PRO platform to be used across hip-related subspecialties. For patients undergoing PAO, a postoperative HOOSglobal score ≥62.5 was associated with patients achieving the PASS.

Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 2636-2645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Beck ◽  
Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Kyleen Jan ◽  
Timothy C. Keating ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Hip Dysplasia ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Acetabular Coverage ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
Preoperative Predictors

Background: There is a growing trend for hip arthroscopists to treat patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) without addressing the acetabular coverage. However, the literature of outcomes and failure rates for these patients is conflicting. Purpose: (1) To identify whether patients with BHD achieved 2-year similar patient-reported outcome, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) when compared with patients without BHD and (2) to identify predictors for achieving the MCID and PASS among patients with BHD who are undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with routine capsular closure for the treatment of FAIS between January 2012 and January 2017 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with BHD (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA], 20°-25°) were matched 2:1 by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to control patients with normal acetabular coverage (LCEA, >25°-40°). Patient-reported outcome, MCID, and PASS were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified significant predictors of achieving the MCID and PASS in the BHD group. Results: The MCID in the BHD group was defined as 9.2, 13.7, 8.5, and 15.2 for the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific, modified Harris Hip Score, and iHOT-12, respectively. Threshold scores for achieving the PASS in both groups were 87.9, 76.4, 78.1, and 60.0. A total of 112 patients were identified as having BHD (LCEA, 20°-25°) and were matched to 224 controls. Both groups saw statistically significant increases in score averages over the 2-year period; however, the differences between them were not statistically significant ( P > .05 for all). There was no statistical difference in the frequency of the BHD and non-BHD cohorts achieving the MCID on at least 1 threshold score (86.6% vs 85.6%, P = .837) and the PASS (78.6% vs 79.8%, P = .79). There was, however, a statistically significant difference between the rates of patients with and without BHD achieving the PASS on the modified Harris Hip Score threshold (62.5% vs 74.5%, P = .028). The final logistic models demonstrated that lower BMI (odds ratio [OR], 0.872; P = .029), lower preoperative alpha angle (OR, 0.965; P = .014), and female sex (OR, 3.647; P = .03) are independent preoperative predictors of achieving the MCID, while lower preoperative alpha angle (OR, 0.943; P = .018) and self-reported limp (OR, 18.53; P = .007) are independent preoperative predictors of achieving the PASS. Conclusion: Outcome improvements in patients with BHD who are undergoing arthroscopic treatment with capsular closure for FAIS are not significantly different from patients with normal acetabular coverage. Lower BMI, lower alpha angle, absence of limp, and female sex are preoperative predictors of achieving meaningful clinically significant outcome improvements in patients with BHD.

scholarly journals Midterm Outcomes Following Hip Labral Augmentation

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0024
Author(s):  
Joseph Ruzbarsky ◽  
Justin Arner ◽  
Karen Briggs ◽  
Marc Philippon ◽  
Rui Soares
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Iliotibial Band ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
Suction Seal

Objectives: Arthroscopic hip labral preservation techniques have evolved over the last decade. Arthroscopic hip labral augmentation with iliotibial band (ITB) autograft placed into a labral defect with viable circumferential fibers is a novel treatment option to restore the hip suction seal and improve functionality. The purpose of this study is to determine midterm (3-5 year follow up) outcomes of arthroscopic hip labral augmentation procedure. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral augmentation from August 2011 to March 2017 were prospectively evaluated. Pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome scores were compared and included SF12 PCS, SF12 MCS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS) (Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport). Post-operative Tegner Activity Scale and patient satisfaction (1 – 10) were also evaluated. Results: One hundred and six patients underwent arthroscopic hip labral augmentation with minimum 3-year follow-up. Mean follow-up was 5-year follow-up (range, 3 to 9.2 years). All patient reported outcomes improved after labral augmentation (SF12 PCS 39±8 vs. 50±10, p>0.01; mHHS 59±15 vs. 79±21, p<0.01; WOMAC 31±16 vs. 16±17, p<0.01; HOS ADL 64±17 vs. 84±21, p<0.01; HOS Sport 41±22 vs. 71±29, p<0.01). Median post-operative Tegner score was 4. Median post-operative patient satisfaction was 9 out of 10 (range, 1-10). In terms of survivorship, 12 patients (11%) required revision surgery and 6 (5.7%) converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Conclusions: Arthroscopic hip labral augmentation is a successful treatment option for patients that have viable circumferential fibers present at the time of arthroscopy. This technique continues to show improved patient reported outcomes and is another hip labral preservation technique that may help reestablish the intra-articular fluid suction seal.

Acetabular microfracture in hip arthroscopy: clinical outcomes with minimum 5-year follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G Domb ◽  
Danil Rybalko ◽  
Brian Mu ◽  
Jody Litrenta ◽  
Austin W Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Significant Deterioration ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Tool ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
Mid Term Results

Introduction: There is a paucity in the literature regarding mid-term results of microfracture in hip arthroscopy. We aim to assess 5-year outcomes of patients who underwent acetabular microfracture for full-thickness chondral lesions as a part of hip arthroscopy. Methods: Between August 2008 and September 2011, data were prospectively gathered for patients undergoing acetabular microfracture during hip arthroscopy with minimum 5-year follow-up. All patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively, with modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score – Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS). International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) and satisfaction were collected postoperatively. Exclusion criteria included previous hip conditions, or preoperative Tönnis grade ≥2. Results: Fifty three hips were eligible for this study. Of these, 43 (81.1%) hips in 42 patients had follow-up. The study group had a male majority (65.1%) and an average age of 44.4 ± 9.5 years. There was statistically significant improvement in all patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and VAS at follow-up. Patient satisfaction was 7.6 ± 2.6. A comparison of 2-year to minimum 5-year follow-up results identified no statistically significant deterioration in PROs, VAS, and patient satisfaction. Survivorship was 72.1% with 12 patients converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA). 4 patients (10.8%) underwent secondary arthroscopy. Conclusions: In the mid-term, microfracture as a part of hip arthroscopy demonstrated favourable outcomes and 72% survivorship. Careful patient selection is warranted to limit the risk of conversion to THA.

Modified Harris Hip Score as patient-reported outcome measure in osteoarthritic patients: psychometric properties of the Greek version

2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002090168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Stasi ◽  
George Papathanasiou ◽  
Afroditi Diochnou ◽  
Basiliki Polikreti ◽  
Antonios Chalimourdas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Minimal Important Change ◽  
Greek Version ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Introduction: This study explored the psychometric properties of the modified Harris Hip Score-Greek version (mHHS-Gr) as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in osteoarthritic hip patients. Methods: Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and reproducibility were evaluated in 90 patients aged >55 years. Construct validity was tested against Greek versions of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-Greek) and WOMAC Index (WOMAC-Gr), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and 9-stairs-ascend/descend (9S-A/D) tests. Known-groups validity was examined using TUG score (cut-off 13.5 s) as an estimate variable. Responsiveness was examined before and 4 weeks after direct anterior minimal invasive surgery. Results: Reliability: Internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach’s a = 0.614, p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.881, 95% CI, 0.824–0.920). Reproducibility: Floor and ceiling effects were both 1.1%; measurement error was 3.54 ( p < 0.05); minimal important change was lower than minimal detectable change. Validity: mHHS-Gr correlated strongly with both LEFS-Greek and WOMAC-Gr (Pearson’s r 0.801 and −0.783, respectively; p < 0.001). The questionnaire’s correlations with TUG and 9S-A/D were also significant but moderate (Spearman’s ρ: −0.547 and −0.575, respectively; p < 0.001). Known-groups validity showed that mHHS-Gr scores were significantly higher in participants with TUG < 13.5 seconds than in those with TUG > 13.5 seconds ( p < 0.001). In ROC analysis, the cut-off point of 52.5 yielded sensitivity 81% and specificity 71%. Responsiveness: Standardised response mean and Guyatt’s responsiveness statistic were greater than 0.8. Discussion: mHHS-Gr showed significant moderate to excellent reliability, significant moderate to strong validity properties and excellent responsiveness. Overall, mHHS-Gr could be a reliable and valid PRO measure for assessing patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document