scholarly journals Lashing Force Prediction Model with Multimodal Deep Learning and AutoML for Stowage Planning Automation in Containerships

Logistics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Chaemin Lee ◽  
Mun Keong Lee ◽  
Jae Young Shin
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Explicit Calculation ◽  
Force Prediction ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Stowage Planning ◽  
Force Calculation ◽  
Very High ◽  
Stowage Plan ◽  
Classification Society

The calculation of lashing forces on containerships is one of the most important aspects in terms of cargo safety, as well as slot utilization, especially for large containerships such as more than 10,000 TEU (Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit). It is a challenge for stowage planners when large containerships are in the last port of region because mostly the ship is full and the stacks on deck are very high. However, the lashing force calculation is highly dependent on the Classification society (Class) where the ship is certified; its formula is not published and it is different per each Class (e.g., Lloyd, DNVGL, ABS, BV, and so on). Therefore, the lashing result calculation can only be verified by the Class certified by the Onboard Stability Program (OSP). To ensure that the lashing result is compiled in the stowage plan submitted, stowage planners in office must rely on the same copy of OSP. This study introduces the model to extract the features and to predict the lashing forces with machine learning without explicit calculation of lashing force. The multimodal deep learning with the ANN, CNN and RNN, and AutoML approach is proposed for the machine learning model. The trained model is able to predict the lashing force result and its result is close to the result from its Class.

Convolutional Neural Network

2022 ◽  
pp. 1559-1575
Author(s):  
Mário Pereira Véstias
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Artificial Neural Networks ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Artificial Neural

Machine learning is the study of algorithms and models for computing systems to do tasks based on pattern identification and inference. When it is difficult or infeasible to develop an algorithm to do a particular task, machine learning algorithms can provide an output based on previous training data. A well-known machine learning model is deep learning. The most recent deep learning models are based on artificial neural networks (ANN). There exist several types of artificial neural networks including the feedforward neural network, the Kohonen self-organizing neural network, the recurrent neural network, the convolutional neural network, the modular neural network, among others. This article focuses on convolutional neural networks with a description of the model, the training and inference processes and its applicability. It will also give an overview of the most used CNN models and what to expect from the next generation of CNN models.

scholarly journals Development of a Cable Damage Detection Deep Learning Method based on Acceleration Response of Cable-Stayed Bridge

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 638-647
Author(s):  
Park Gi-Hun Et.al
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Damage Detection ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Acceleration Response ◽  
Damage Location ◽  
Cable Stayed Bridge ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Cable Damage

The purpose of this thesis was to select a cable-stayed bridge to which external force may cause damage as the subject, to develop a damage detection deep learning method capable of detecting cable damage, and to test and verify the developed damage detection deep learning method. The damage detection method was developed as a system that utilizes the acceleration response of a structure measured for maintenance purposes. To extract information capable of identifying the damage locations from among the measured acceleration responses, a CNN ID was used to develop the damage detection deep learning method. The developed damage detection deep learning method was developed in a way not independently arranging 1 machine learning model per each measuring point and finally predicting the damage location based on the decision-making results collected from each machine learning model. The developed damage detection deep learning method performed the learning per each machine learning model by utilizing the acceleration response of a structure acquired based on the preliminary damage test. Finally, the damage detection deep learning method that completed the learning verified the cable damage location detection performance by utilizing the data acquired based on the cable-stayed bridge damage test. As a result, it was confirmed that the developed damage detection deep learning method predicted the damage location of a cable-stayed bridge at an average accuracy of 89%. In the current research, only the cable-stayed bridge of the Seohaegyo Bridge was studied, but in the improved study, the research will be conducted on other bridges and damage assessment will be conducted on all cables.

scholarly journals Quantitative Toxicity Prediction via Ensembling of Heterogeneous Predictors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Karim ◽  
Vahid Riahi ◽  
Avinash Mishra ◽  
Abdollah Dehzangi ◽  
M. A. Hakim Newton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Individual Performance ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Data Representation ◽  
Toxicity Prediction ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Machine Learning Approach ◽  
Benchmark Datasets

Abstract Representing molecules in the form of only one type of features and using those features to predict their activities is one of the most important approaches for machine-learning-based chemical-activity-prediction. For molecular activities like quantitative toxicity prediction, the performance depends on the type of features extracted and the machine learning approach used. For such cases, using one type of features and machine learning model restricts the prediction performance to specific representation and model used. In this paper, we study quantitative toxicity prediction and propose a machine learning model for the same. Our model uses an ensemble of heterogeneous predictors instead of typically using homogeneous predictors. The predictors that we use vary either on the type of features used or on the deep learning architecture employed. Each of these predictors presumably has its own strengths and weaknesses in terms of toxicity prediction. Our motivation is to make a combined model that utilizes different types of features and architectures to obtain better collective performance that could go beyond the performance of each individual predictor. We use six predictors in our model and test the model on four standard quantitative toxicity benchmark datasets. Experimental results show that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art toxicity prediction models in 8 out of 12 accuracy measures. Our experiments show that ensembling heterogeneous predictor improves the performance over single predictors and homogeneous ensembling of single predictors.The results show that each data representation or deep learning based predictor has its own strengths and weaknesses, thus employing a model ensembling multiple heterogeneous predictors could go beyond individual performance of each data representation or each predictor type.

Deep Learning Applications in Medical Imaging

2021 ◽  
pp. 178-208
Author(s):  
S. Sasikala ◽  
S. J. Subhashini ◽  
P. Alli ◽  
J. Jane Rubel Angelina
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Medical Imaging ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Driving System ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Car Driving ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Machine learning is a technique of parsing data, learning from that data, and then applying what has been learned to make informed decisions. Deep learning is actually a subset of machine learning. It technically is machine learning and functions in the same way, but it has different capabilities. The main difference between deep and machine learning is, machine learning models become well progressively, but the model still needs some guidance. If a machine learning model returns an inaccurate prediction, then the programmer needs to fix that problem explicitly, but in the case of deep learning, the model does it by itself. Automatic car driving system is a good example of deep learning. On other hand, Artificial Intelligence is a different thing from machine learning and deep learning. Deep learning and machine learning both are the subsets of AI.

scholarly journals Development of the "smart library" application using the Intel Distribution of OpenVINO toolkit

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Евгений Васильев ◽  
Evgeniy Vasil'ev ◽  
Валентина Кустикова ◽  
Valentina Kustikova ◽  
Иван Вихрев ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Computer Vision ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Face Recognition ◽  
Source Code ◽  
Face Features ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Library Users ◽  
The Face

We represent a case study of using deep learning and computer vision library - the Intel Distribution of OpenVINO toolkit. We develop the automated “smart library” using DL and computer vision methods implemented in OpenVINO toolkit. The application involves the registration of the reader (adding information and photos of the new user); updating the machine learning model that describes the face features of the library users; authorization of the reader through face recognition; receiving and returning books by comparing the cover image with the database of flat images available in the library of books. The source code of the application is free available on GitHub: https://github.com/itlab-vision/openvino-smart-library. The developed application is planned to be published as a sample of the OpenVINO toolkit.

scholarly journals Development of Machine Learning Model for Diagnostic Disease Prediction Based on Laboratory Tests

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Jin Park ◽  
Min Woo Park ◽  
Homin Lee ◽  
Young-Jin Kim ◽  
Yeongsic Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Confusion Matrix ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Disease Classification ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Tree Models ◽  
Hidden Layer ◽  
Deep Learning Model

Abstract Artificial intelligence is a concept that includes machine learning and deep learning. The deep learning model used in this study corresponds to DNN (deep neural network) by utilizing two or more hidden layers. In this study, MLP (multi-layer perceptron) and machine learning models (XGBoost, LGBM) were used. An MLP consists of at least three layers: an input layer, a hidden layer, and an output layer. In general, tree models or linear models using machine learning are widely used for classification. We analyzed our data by applying deep learning (MLP) to improve the performance, which showed good results. The deep learning and ML models showed differences in predictive power and disease classification patterns. We used a confusion matrix and analyzed feature importance using the SHAP value method. Here, we present a protocol to confirm that the use of deep learning can show good performance in disease classification using hospital numerical structured data (laboratory test).

scholarly journals Infectivity Upsurge by COVID-19 Viral Variants in Japan: Evidence from Deep Learning Modeling

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 7799
Author(s):  
Essam A. Rashed ◽  
Akimasa Hirata
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Economic Effects ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Forecasting Models ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Recent Emergence ◽  
Alpha Variant

The significant health and economic effects of COVID-19 emphasize the requirement for reliable forecasting models to avoid the sudden collapse of healthcare facilities with overloaded hospitals. Several forecasting models have been developed based on the data acquired within the early stages of the virus spread. However, with the recent emergence of new virus variants, it is unclear how the new strains could influence the efficiency of forecasting using models adopted using earlier data. In this study, we analyzed daily positive cases (DPC) data using a machine learning model to understand the effect of new viral variants on morbidity rates. A deep learning model that considers several environmental and mobility factors was used to forecast DPC in six districts of Japan. From machine learning predictions with training data since the early days of COVID-19, high-quality estimation has been achieved for data obtained earlier than March 2021. However, a significant upsurge was observed in some districts after the discovery of the new COVID-19 variant B.1.1.7 (Alpha). An average increase of 20–40% in DPC was observed after the emergence of the Alpha variant and an increase of up to 20% has been recognized in the effective reproduction number. Approximately four weeks was needed for the machine learning model to adjust the forecasting error caused by the new variants. The comparison between machine-learning predictions and reported values demonstrated that the emergence of new virus variants should be considered within COVID-19 forecasting models. This study presents an easy yet efficient way to quantify the change caused by new viral variants with potential usefulness for global data analysis.

Constructing Automatic Classification Models for Chinese-language Chief Complaint (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si Shen
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Automatic Classification ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Classification Task ◽  
Performance Difference ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Text Data ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Expansion Model

BACKGROUND Chief complaint is the initial, general, and written description of a patient’s symptoms provided during the hospital intake process. By improving the automatic classification of chief complaint text, the quality and efficiency of patients’ hospital visits can be improved. OBJECTIVE Using chief complaint data in Chinese from the Information Centre of Jiangsu Commission Health, we built models for automatically detecting the correct treating department and then conducted various tests on those models using machine learning and deep learning. METHODS The study tested and compared the performances of the traditional machine learning model of SVM with deep learning models of Bi-LSTM, Bi-LSTM-CRF, At-Bi-LSTM-CRF and Bi-GRU-CRF on the chief complaint text data mainly. It is mainly based on Chinese character expansion model train and test in all traditional machine learning and deep learning models. RESULTS We found that the Bi-LSTM performed better at the chief complaint classification task than the SVM and that the performance difference between the deep learning models constructed is not obvious. The F scores of Bi-LSTM, Bi-LSTM-CRF, At-Bi-LSTM-CRF and Bi-GRU-CRF model built for the experiment effectively reach 88.10, 87.91, 88.14 and 87.98. CONCLUSIONS We found that the Bi-LSTM performed better at the chief complaint classification task than the SVM and that the performance difference between the deep learning models constructed is not obvious. The F scores of Bi-LSTM, Bi-LSTM-CRF, At-Bi-LSTM-CRF and Bi-GRU-CRF model built for the experiment effectively reach 88.10, 87.91, 88.14 and 87.98.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document