scholarly journals Low-Fat and High-Quality Fermented Sausages

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1025
Author(s):  
Patrizio Tremonte ◽  
Gianfranco Pannella ◽  
Silvia Jane Lombardi ◽  
Massimo Iorizzo ◽  
Franca Vergalito ◽  
...  

The present study, considering for the first time microbiological concerns due to the use of lemon albedo as a fat replacer, aimed at the selection of an anti-Listeria strain to be used as protective culture in low-fat southern Italian fermented sausages. In fact, these kinds of products require appropriate bio-protective strategies to avoid risks due to Listeria monocytogenes. Sixty-seven Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains isolated from diverse sources were screened for their antimicrobial activity and their interaction with starter strains (Latilactobacillus sakei 152 and Staphylococcus xylosus MVS9). Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Lpls100, highlighting both listericidal activity and the ability to promote Staphylococcus xylosus MVS9 growth, was used as a protective strain in low-fat fermented sausages prepared with lemon albedo as a fat replacer. The effect of the albedo and the protective strain on the fermentation process and the final quality was ascertained. Results highlighted that the use of the albedo did not affect the growth of starter strains and enhanced some quality features, such as fatty acid profiles and certain sensory attributes. However, the albedo also produced a slow decrease in water activity, compromising the microbial quality. The anti-Listeria strain, enhancing coagulase negative cocci growth and exerting antimicrobial activity, avoided the inconveniences caused by the use of the albedo. Moreover, the anti-Listeria effectiveness was assessed through a challenge test using a Listeria cocktail. The study revealed that Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Lpls100, regardless of the presence of the albedo, assures a prompt inhibition of Listeria spp. Therefore, its use could be an important contribution to the quality of low-fat fermented sausages.

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eda Demirok Soncu ◽  
Nuray Kolsarici ◽  
Neslihan Cicek ◽  
Gorsen Salman Ozturk ◽  
Ilker T. Akoglu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Cezar Bastianello Campagnol ◽  
Bibiana Alves Dos Santos ◽  
Roger Wagner ◽  
Nelcindo Nascimento Terra ◽  
Marise Aparecida Rodrigues Pollonio

2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anurag Tiwari ◽  
Harish Kumar Sharma ◽  
Navneet Kumar ◽  
Mandeep Kaur
Keyword(s):  
Low Fat ◽  

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
M GUVEN ◽  
K YASAR ◽  
O B KARACA ◽  
A A HAYALOGLU
Keyword(s):  
Low Fat ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 463-478
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Crais ◽  
Melody Harrison Savage

Purpose The shortage of doctor of philosophy (PhD)–level applicants to fill academic and research positions in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) programs calls for a detailed examination of current CSD PhD educational practices and the generation of creative solutions. The intended purposes of the article are to encourage CSD faculty to examine their own PhD program practices and consider the perspectives of recent CSD PhD graduates in determining the need for possible modifications. Method The article describes the results of a survey of 240 CSD PhD graduates and their perceptions of the challenges and facilitators to completing a PhD degree; the quality of their preparation in research, teaching, and job readiness; and ways to improve PhD education. Results Two primary themes emerged from the data highlighting the need for “matchmaking.” The first time point of needed matchmaking is prior to entry among students, mentors, and expectations as well as between aspects of the program that can lead to students' success and graduation. The second important matchmaking need is between the actual PhD preparation and the realities of the graduates' career expectations, and those placed on graduates by their employers. Conclusions Within both themes, graduate's perspectives and suggestions to help guide future doctoral preparation are highlighted. The graduates' recommendations could be used by CSD PhD program faculty to enhance the quality of their program and the likelihood of student success and completion. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11991480


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document