scholarly journals A Framework for Multivariate Analysis of Land Surface Dynamics and Driving Variables—A Case Study for Indo-Gangetic River Basins

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Soner Uereyen ◽  
Felix Bachofer ◽  
Claudia Kuenzer

The analysis of the Earth system and interactions among its spheres is increasingly important to improve the understanding of global environmental change. In this regard, Earth observation (EO) is a valuable tool for monitoring of long term changes over the land surface and its features. Although investigations commonly study environmental change by means of a single EO-based land surface variable, a joint exploitation of multivariate land surface variables covering several spheres is still rarely performed. In this regard, we present a novel methodological framework for both, the automated processing of multisource time series to generate a unified multivariate feature space, as well as the application of statistical time series analysis techniques to quantify land surface change and driving variables. In particular, we unify multivariate time series over the last two decades including vegetation greenness, surface water area, snow cover area, and climatic, as well as hydrological variables. Furthermore, the statistical time series analyses include quantification of trends, changes in seasonality, and evaluation of drivers using the recently proposed causal discovery algorithm Peter and Clark Momentary Conditional Independence (PCMCI). We demonstrate the functionality of our methodological framework using Indo-Gangetic river basins in South Asia as a case study. The time series analyses reveal increasing trends in vegetation greenness being largely dependent on water availability, decreasing trends in snow cover area being mostly negatively coupled to temperature, and trends of surface water area to be spatially heterogeneous and linked to various driving variables. Overall, the obtained results highlight the value and suitability of this methodological framework with respect to global climate change research, enabling multivariate time series preparation, derivation of detailed information on significant trends and seasonality, as well as detection of causal links with minimal user intervention. This study is the first to use multivariate time series including several EO-based variables to analyze land surface dynamics over the last two decades using the causal discovery algorithm PCMCI.

2006 ◽  
Vol 152 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 190-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Müller ◽  
Hannes Osterhage ◽  
Robert Sowa ◽  
Ralph G. Andrzejak ◽  
Florian Mormann ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 2311-2322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Liu ◽  
Zhongqi Li ◽  
Ye Ji ◽  
Leonardo Martinez ◽  
Zia Ul Haq ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 4126
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Ziti Jiao ◽  
Kaiguang Zhao ◽  
Yadong Dong ◽  
Yuyu Zhou ◽  
...  

Vegetation indices are widely used to derive land surface phenology (LSP). However, due to inconsistent illumination geometries, reflectance varies with solar zenith angles (SZA), which in turn affects the vegetation indices, and thus the derived LSP. To examine the SZA effect on LSP, the MODIS bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) product and a BRDF model were employed to derive LSPs under several constant SZAs (i.e., 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°) in the Harvard Forest, Massachusetts, USA. The LSPs derived under varying SZAs from the MODIS nadir BRDF-adjusted reflectance (NBAR) and MODIS vegetation index products were used as baselines. The results show that with increasing SZA, NDVI increases but EVI decreases. The magnitude of SZA-induced NDVI/EVI changes suggests that EVI is more sensitive to varying SZAs than NDVI. NDVI and EVI are comparable in deriving the start of season (SOS), but EVI is more accurate when deriving the end of season (EOS). Specifically, NDVI/EVI-derived SOSs are relatively close to those derived from ground measurements, with an absolute mean difference of 8.01 days for NDVI-derived SOSs and 9.07 days for EVI-derived SOSs over ten years. However, a considerable lag exists for EOSs derived from vegetation indices, especially from the NDVI time series, with an absolute mean difference of 14.67 days relative to that derived from ground measurements. The SOSs derived from NDVI time series are generally earlier, while those from EVI time series are delayed. In contrast, the EOSs derived from NDVI time series are delayed; those derived from the simulated EVI time series under a fixed illumination geometry are also delayed, but those derived from the products with varying illumination geometries (i.e., MODIS NBAR product and MODIS vegetation index product) are advanced. LSPs derived from varying illumination geometries could lead to a difference spanning from a few days to a month in this case study, which highlights the importance of normalizing the illumination geometry when deriving LSP from NDVI/EVI time series.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document