scholarly journals Numerical Analysis of Flow Behavior in a Rectangular Channel with Submerged Weirs

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1396
Author(s):  
Oscar Herrera-Granados
Keyword(s):  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Rectangular Channel ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Quadrant Analysis ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Proper Estimation ◽  
Good Agreement

In this contribution, different 3D numerical approaches are applied in order to simulate the behaviour of turbulent flow through a rectangular channel with broad-crested weirs. In addition, water flow velocities, using Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry (ADV) instrumentation, were recorded. Two turbulence quantities are estimated using the laboratory records and were compared with those computed with the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models. Additionally, a quadrant analysis of the laboratory records was carried out. The output of the models presents good agreement with the time-averaged parameters, but is not sufficient for the proper estimation of the turbulence quantities.

On LES Methods Applied to Seal Geometries

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Tyacke ◽  
Richard Jefferson-Loveday ◽  
Paul Tucker
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Error ◽  
Labyrinth Seal ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Final Solution ◽  
Complex Flow ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
Flow Through

Nine Large Eddy Simulation (LES) methods are used to simulate flow through two labyrinth seal geometries and are compared with a wide range of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solutions. These involve one-equation, two-equation and Reynolds Stress RANS models. Also applied are linear and nonlinear pure LES models, hybrid RANS-Numerical-LES (RANS-NLES) and Numerical-LES (NLES). RANS is found to have a maximum error and a scatter of 20%. A similar level of scatter is also found among the same turbulence model implemented in different codes. In a design context, this makes RANS unusable as a final solution. Results show that LES and RANS-NLES is capable of accurately predicting flow behaviour of two seals with a scatter of less than 5%. The complex flow physics gives rise to both laminar and turbulent zones making most LES models inappropriate. Nonetheless, this is found to have minimal tangible results impact. In accord with experimental observations, the ability of LES to find multiple solutions due to solution non-uniqueness is also observed.

scholarly journals ICCM2015: A Comparison of RANS and LES Computational Methods in Analyzing Ventilation Flow Through a Room Fitted with a Two-Sided Windcatcher

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (03) ◽  
pp. 1750021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Niktash ◽  
B. P. Huynh
Keyword(s):  
Natural Ventilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Interior Space ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Computational Fluid Dynamics Cfd ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Cfd Method ◽  
Good Agreement

A windcatcher is a structure for providing natural ventilation using wind power; it is usually fitted on the roof of a building to exhaust the inside stale air to the outside and supplies the outside fresh air into the building interior space working by pressure difference between outside and inside of the building. In this paper, the behavior of free wind flow through a three-dimensional room fitted with a centered position two-canal bottom shape windcatcher model is investigated numerically, using a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software package and LES (Large Eddy Simulation) CFD method. The results have been compared with the obtained results for the same model but using RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes) CFD method. The model with its surrounded space has been considered in both method. It is found that the achieved results for the model from LES method are in good agreement with RANS method’s results for the same model.

LES and PANS of Turbulent Flow Through a Staggered Tube Bundle

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Minelli ◽  
S. Krajnović ◽  
B. Basara
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Dominant Frequency ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Numerical Techniques ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Good Agreement

Two unsteady numerical techniques, Partially-Averaged Navier Stokes (PANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES), are used to predict the flow in a tube bundle. The results were compared with the existing experimental data. Both methods predicted the flow in a relatively good agreement with the experimental data although the PANS simulation used only fifty percent of the computational nodes compared to the LES. The results of the simulations are used to study the unsteadiness in the flow and identify a dominant frequency of the flow.

Simulating flow separation from continuous surfaces: routes to overcoming the Reynolds number barrier

2009 ◽  
Vol 367 (1899) ◽  
pp. 2885-2903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Leschziner ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Fabrizio Tessicini
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
Wall Layer ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
High Reynolds ◽  
Near Wall

This paper provides a discussion of several aspects of the construction of approaches that combine statistical (Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes, RANS) models with large eddy simulation (LES), with the objective of making LES an economically viable method for predicting complex, high Reynolds number turbulent flows. The first part provides a review of alternative approaches, highlighting their rationale and major elements. Next, two particular methods are introduced in greater detail: one based on coupling near-wall RANS models to the outer LES domain on a single contiguous mesh, and the other involving the application of the RANS and LES procedures on separate zones, the former confined to a thin near-wall layer. Examples for their performance are included for channel flow and, in the case of the zonal strategy, for three separated flows. Finally, a discussion of prospects is given, as viewed from the writer's perspective.

Current Capabilities of DES and LES for Submarines at Straight Course

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (03) ◽  
pp. 184-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Alin ◽  
R.E. Bensow ◽  
C. Fureby ◽  
T. Huuva ◽  
U. Svennberg
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Moments ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Detached Eddy Simulation ◽  
Complex Flow ◽  
First Order ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Actuator Disc ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
Coarse Grids

The flow around an axisymmetric hull, with and without appendages, is investigated using large eddy simulation (LES), detached eddy simulation (DES), and Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models. The main objectives of the study is to investigate the effect of the different simulation methods and to demonstrate the feasibility of using DES and LES on relatively coarse grids for submarine flows, but also to discuss some generic features of submarine hydrodynamics. For this purpose the DARPA Suboff configurations AFF1 (bare hull) and AFF8 (fully appended model) are used. The AFF1 case is interesting because it is highly demanding, in particular for LES and DES, due to the long midship section on which the boundary layer is developed. The AFF8 case represents the complex flow around a fully appended submarine with sail and aft rudders. An actuator disc model is used to emulate some of the effects of the propulsor for one of the AFF8 cases studied. Results for the AFF8 model are thus presented for both "towed" and "self-propelled" conditions, where as for the bare hull, only a "towed" condition is considered. For the AFF1 and the "towed" AFF8 cases experimental data are available for comparison, and the results from both configurations show that all methods give good results for first-order statistical moments although LES gives a better representation of structures and second-order statistical moments in the complex flow in the AFF8 case.

scholarly journals A one-dimensional model of turbulent flow through “urban” canopies (MLUCM v2.0): updates based on large-eddy simulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 937-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Negin Nazarian ◽  
E. Scott Krayenhoff ◽  
Alberto Martilli
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Urban Canopy ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Turbulent Length Scale ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Urban Canopy Flow ◽  
D Model

Abstract. In mesoscale climate models, urban canopy flow is typically parameterized in terms of the horizontally averaged (1-D) flow and scalar transport, and these parameterizations can be informed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the urban climate at the microscale. Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes simulation (RANS) models have previously been employed to derive vertical profiles of turbulent length scale and drag coefficient for such parameterization. However, there is substantial evidence that RANS models fall short in accurately representing turbulent flow fields in the urban roughness sublayer. When compared with more accurate flow modeling such as large-eddy simulations (LES), we observed that vertical profiles of turbulent kinetic energy and associated turbulent length scales obtained from RANS models are substantially smaller specifically in the urban canopy. Accordingly, using LES results, we revisited the urban canopy parameterizations employed in the one-dimensional model of turbulent flow through urban areas and updated the parameterization of turbulent length scale and drag coefficient. Additionally, we included the parameterization of the dispersive stress, previously neglected in the 1-D column model. For this objective, the PArallelized Large-Eddy Simulation Model (PALM) is used and a series of simulations in an idealized urban configuration with aligned and staggered arrays are considered. The plan area density (λp) is varied from 0.0625 to 0.44 to span a wide range of urban density (from sparsely developed to compact midrise neighborhoods, respectively). In order to ensure the accuracy of the simulation results, we rigorously evaluated the PALM results by comparing the vertical profiles of turbulent kinetic energy and Reynolds stresses with wind tunnel measurements, as well as other available LES and direct numerical simulation (DNS) studies. After implementing the updated drag coefficients and turbulent length scales in the 1-D model of urban canopy flow, we evaluated the results by (a) testing the 1-D model against the original LES results and demonstrating the differences in predictions between new (derived from LES) and old (derived from RANS) versions of the 1-D model, and (b) testing the 1-D model against LES results for a test case with realistic geometries. Results suggest a more accurate prediction of vertical turbulent exchange in urban canopies, which can consequently lead to an improved prediction of urban heat and pollutant dispersion at the mesoscale.

Heat Transfer Evaluation for a Two-Pass Smooth Wall Channel: Stationary and Rotating Cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandana S. Saravani ◽  
Nicholas J. DiPasquale ◽  
Ahmad I. Abbas ◽  
Ryoichi S. Amano
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Rotational Speed ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract This study presents findings on combined effects of Reynolds number and rotational effect for a two-pass channel with a 180-deg turn, numerically and experimentally. To have a better understanding of the flow behavior and to create a baseline for future studies, a smooth wall channel with the square cross section is used in this study. The Reynolds number varies between 6000 and 35,000. Furthermore, by changing the rotational speed, the maximum rotation number of 1.5 is achieved. For the numerical investigation, large eddy simulation (LES) is utilized. Results from the numerical study show a good agreement with the experimental data. From the results, it can be concluded that increasing both Reynolds number and rotational speed is in favor of the heat transfer coefficient enhancement, especially in the turn region.

Wind-Driven Natural Ventilation in an Areaway-Attached Basement with a Single-Sided Opening for Residential Purposes

2011 ◽  
Vol 383-390 ◽  
pp. 5344-5349
Author(s):  
Zhen Bu
Keyword(s):  
Natural Ventilation ◽  
Ventilation Rate ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Effective Ventilation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ventilation Rates ◽  
Les Model ◽  
Good Agreement

This paper discusses the sustainability of the areaway-attached basement concept with the attentions focused on wind-driven single-sided natural ventilation. First, numerical simulations were performed on an areaway-attached basement with a single-sided opening. Two CFD approaches: Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) were used and compared with the previous experimental results of effective ventilation rate. A good agreement between the measurement and LES model was found and RANS model tends to underestimate the ventilation rates. Furthermore, Based on LES with the inflow turbulent fluctuations, the mean airflow patterns within and around the areaway-attached basement was investigated for different wind incidence angles to examine the influences of wind direction on ventilation performances.

Comparison of Partially Averaged Navier–Stokes and Large-Eddy Simulations of the Flow Around a Cuboid Influenced by Crosswind

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siniša Krajnović ◽  
Per Ringqvist ◽  
Branislav Basara
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Good Agreement ◽  
Near Wall

The paper presents a partially averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) simulation of the flow around a cuboid influenced by crosswind. The results of the PANS prediction are validated against experimental data and results of a large-eddy simulation (LES) made using the same numerical conditions as PANS. The PANS shows good agreement with the experimental data. The prediction of PANS was found to be better than that of the LES in flow regions where simulations suffered from poor near-wall resolution.

Prediction of Profile Losses by Means of Large-Eddy Simulation Including Turbulence Modeling Assessment

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karsten Hasselmann ◽  
Stefan aus der Wiesche
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulence Modeling ◽  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Unsteady Separation ◽  
Power Spectral ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Experimental Values

In this contribution, a Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) analysis was carried out, to get detailed information about the unsteady flow behavior and loss generation in a turbine cascade at moderate Reynolds numbers. A comprehensive comparison study with experimental data was conducted to validate the LES results. Compared to Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) results, the LES shows a much better agreement with the measured values of the profile loss coefficient, downstream velocity profile, and blade pressure distribution. The unsteady separation and reattachment process was covered well by the LES approach. The power spectral density (PSD) profiles at several positions of the downstream wake were compared and analyzed. Although the results of the LES show mainly a good agreement with the experimental values, there are still some deviations at high frequency. In summery the present case study indicates the high potential of LES especially in case of moderate Reynolds numbers with flow separation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document